251
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Construct and diagnostic validities of the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test in the Alzheimer’s disease spectrum

, , &
Pages 913-924 | Received 18 Jun 2015, Accepted 05 Apr 2016, Published online: 17 May 2016
 

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT) is a memory test that controls attention and acquisition, by providing category cues in the learning process. Because it enables an assessment of memory not confounded by normal age-related changes in cognition and a high accuracy on Alzheimer’s disease (AD) evaluation, it has been suggested by the International Working Group on AD. Our aim was to assess the construct related validity of the FCSRT in the AD spectrum disorders. Method: Patients were classified in two groups according to standard criteria: amnestic mild cognitive impairment (n = 100) and AD (n = 70). A matched control group (n = 101) of cognitively healthy subjects was included. The factorial structure of two models and respective construct and diagnostic validities were analyzed. Results: Both models revealed adequate fit values. The appropriated convergent validity and the lack of discriminant validity support the two factors as measuring the same construct (memory ability). The recalls of the FCSRT enabled high classification accuracy and diagnostic validity for both pathological groups. Conclusions: This study represents a novel contribution regarding the adequacy of the FCSRT in terms of construct and diagnostic validities and shows the interest of including both immediate (learning) and delayed (retention) recalls. It gives also new possibilities regarding the use of the FCSRT in the memory assessment of AD spectrum disorders.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the International Neuropsychological Society’s Research Editing and Consulting Program, in the persons of Alexandra Pentaraki and Michael A. Sugarman, for assistance in coordinating English language editing and statistical consulting, respectively.

Disclosure statement

All authors of this study declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT)–Portugal [grant number SFRH/BD/74070/2010], [grant number PIC/IC/83206/2007].

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 627.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.