280
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Characterization of inhibitory failure in Multiple Sclerosis: Evidence of impaired conflict resolution

ORCID Icon, , , &
Pages 320-329 | Received 12 Jul 2018, Accepted 21 Nov 2018, Published online: 10 Dec 2018
 

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Inhibitory control deficits are frequently reported in Multiple Sclerosis (MS), although it is unclear whether these deficits represent a global or process-specific failure. Notably, most models of inhibitory control recognize at least two dissociable processes, the most consistent being: (a) the inhibition of a dominant response: response suppression, and (b) the inhibition of a dominant response and initiation of a nondominant response: executive control. This study aimed to ascertain the processes underlying inhibitory failure in MS.

Method: Twenty-three MS patients and 25 healthy controls completed a battery of commonly used inhibitory tasks, with measures from each task entered into a principal components analysis with orthogonal (varimax) rotation.

Results: As anticipated, two components emerged, with tasks evaluating response suppression (stop signal, go/no go) loading on a common component, and tasks evaluating executive control (Stroop, antisaccade, endogenously-cued saccade) loading on a separate common component. Composite scores were generated for each component and compared between groups. Unlike response suppression scores, executive control scores were significantly poorer for MS patients.

Conclusions: Inhibitory control deficits in MS may reflect poor resolution in the context of competing processes, rather than difficulty in preventing the execution of an inappropriate response.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all participants who gave up their time to contribute to this study.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author [AT].

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 627.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.