1,084
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Thinking with new materialism about ‘safe-un-safe’ campus space for LGBTTIQA+ students

Pensando con el Nuevo Materialismo sobre espacios de campus ‘seguros-no-seguros’ para estudiantes LGBTTIQA +

Pensando con el Nuevo Materialismo sobre espacios de campus ‘seguros-no-seguros’ para estudiantes LGBTTIQA +

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 757-773 | Received 02 Dec 2019, Accepted 26 Jun 2020, Published online: 18 Aug 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Some LGBTTIQA+ students maintain campus is a safe space despite also detailing significant discriminatory practices they have witnessed or experienced there. This article explores this paradox drawing insights from new materialism and geographical research. Predominantly theoretical in orientation, it takes the notion of ‘dwelling with’ from Noora Pyyry’s posthuman work in geography and thinks with it, in relation to participants’ experiences of being LGBTTIQA+ on campus. These moments offer openings for undertaking a reconceptualization of campus space as neither inherently safe, nor unsafe. Thinking with new materialism enables an understanding of campus space as relational, ongoing and actively engaged in how students experience it. From this perspective, campus safety is not simply secured by the actions of individuals and presence of institutional equity policy. We argue shifting constellations of bodies, objects, and their entanglements create campus space as paradoxically safe-un-safe, potentially engendering a new politics of campus safety. This new politics recognises the issue of campus safety as more expansive than a problem of individuals or structural discrimination. Encompassing a new materialist understanding of space, campus safety is reconceptualised as contingent upon intra-active human-non-human entanglements.

RESUMEN

Algunos estudiantes LGBTTIQA + sostienen que el campus es un espacio seguro a pesar de detallar también prácticas discriminatorias significativas que han presenciado o experimentado allí. Este artículo explora esta paradoja extrayendo ideas del nuevo materialismo y la investigación geográfica. Predominantemente teórico en orientación, toma la noción de ‘vivir con’ del trabajo posthumano de Noora Pyyry en geografía y piensa con él, en relación con las experiencias de los participantes de ser LGBTTIQA + en el campus. Estos momentos ofrecen oportunidades para emprender una reconceptualización del espacio del campus como inherentemente seguro o inseguro. Pensar con el nuevo materialismo permite comprender el espacio del campus como relacional, continuo y activamente involucrado en cómo los estudiantes lo experimentan. Desde esta perspectiva, la seguridad del campus no está garantizada simplemente por las acciones de los individuos y la presencia de una política de equidad institucional. Argumentamos que las constelaciones cambiantes de cuerpos, objetos y sus enredos crean el espacio del campus como paradójicamente seguro y no seguro, lo que engendra potencialmente una nueva política de seguridad del campus. Esta nueva política reconoce a la seguridad del campus como un asunto que desborda los problemas de los individuos o la discriminación estructural. Al abarcar una nueva comprensión materialista del espacio, la seguridad del campus se reconceptualiza como contingente de enredos humanos-no-humanos intra-activos.

RÉSUMÉ

Certains étudiants LGBTTIQA+ maintiennent que les campus sont des espaces sans danger tout en décrivant aussi des actes de discrimination notables qui y ont pris place et dont ils ont été témoins ou victimes. Cet article explore ce paradoxe en faisant appel à des perspectives provenant du néo-matérialisme et de la recherche géographique. Avec une orientation essentiellement théorique, il adopte la notion de « demeurer avec » introduite par Noora Pyvry dans sa recherche posthume en géographie et l’utilise pour une réflexion sur les expériences des participants en tant que LGBTTIQA+ sur les campus. Ces moments offrent des occasions de reconceptualiser les campus comme des lieux fondamentalement ni dangereux, ni sans danger. La réflexion sous l’angle néo-matérialiste permet une compréhension des campus en tant qu’espaces relationnels, continus et activement engagés avec l’expérience qu’en ont les étudiants. De ce point de vue, la sécurité sur les campus n’est pas simplement obtenue par les actes des personnes individuelles et la présence de chartes institutionnelles d’égalité. Nous soutenons que les constellations changeantes des corps, objets et leurs intrications créent des campus qui sont paradoxalement avec et sans danger, ce qui engendre potentiellement de nouvelles chartes pour la sécurité sur les campus. Ces dernières acceptent que l’enjeu de la sécurité sur les campus soit plus que juste un problème concernant les personnes ou une discrimination structurelle. Englobant une compréhension néo-matérialiste des lieux, la sécurité sur les campus est reconceptualisée comme étant dépendante d’enchevêtrements intra-actifs humains et non-humains.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Notes

1. Throughout this article, we use LGBTTIQA+ to denote lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, Takatāpui, intersex, queer and asexual identities. The plus sign acknowledges and encompasses other sexual and gender identities not captured by these designations. This acronym is unique to Aotearoa-New Zealand the geographical location of the current research, in its acknowledgement of Takatāpui identities. Takatāpui is a traditional Māori concept meaning ‘intimate companion of the same sex’ and ‘embrace[s] all Māori who identify with diverse sexes, genders and sexualities such as whakawāhine (trans women), tangata ira tāne (trans men), lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, intersex and queer’ (Kerekere, Citation2017 p. 2). When we refer to the work of other researchers, we employ the acronym they specify to accurately reflect participants’ identities in other local contexts. Our use of multiple acronyms is characteristic of other queer work, which covets fluidity, inconsistencies and specificities (Jagose, Citation1996).

2. See note 1 for definition of Takatāpui.

3. The term MVPFAFF was coined by Phylesha Acton-Brown and encapsulates diverse Pasifika sexual and gender identities including Mahu, Vakasalewa, Palopa, Fa’afāfine, Akava’ine, Fakaleiti, Fakafifine.

4. Māori word for woman.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by a Faculty of Education and Social Work, Equity Committee Grant, from the University of Auckland.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 333.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.