ABSTRACT
This paper analyzes the transmission of China’s Ecological Migration Policy from the central government down to Tibetan villages and townships for implementation. It examines the specific ways through which the policy is translated from Chinese to Tibetan and communicated through various local dialects to concerned pastoralists. In order to achieve the Ecological Migration Policy’s purported objectives of environmental conservation, livelihood improvement, and urbanization, township government officials at the grassroots level mistranslate and miscommunicate policy meanings to villagers to render an otherwise unfeasible, impractical policy implementable on the ground. Tibetan pastoralists actively engage with this resettlement project to fulfill their desires and aspirations for accessing healthcare and educational services in urban areas. However, this pursuit of legibility is induced by the state’s negligence of rural pastoralist life and elimination of alternative educational facilities in rural communities. Both negligence and elimination of educational facilities in rural areas concentrate and increase investments in education and healthcare in urban settlements. These conjunctures ultimately drive Tibetan pastoralists to “choose” their only available option, to resettle in urban townships.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Dr Emily Yeh at the University of Colorado Boulder, Dr Charlene Makley at Reed College, Critical Asian Studies editors, and one anonymous reviewer for their insightful comments and editorial support on earlier drafts of this article. I also would like to extend my gratitude to Dr Peter D. Little at Emory University. This article was originally materialized in one of his graduate anthropology courses I took in 2017. This effort would not have come into full fruition without his support and insights in the first place. Research for this article was carried out as an independent study when I worked as a program coordinator at Shanshui Conservation, a Chinese environmental NGO headquartered in Beijing.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.
Notes on contributor
Tsering Bum is currently a doctoral student of environmental anthropology at Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, USA. From 2012 to 2016, he worked with Tibetan pastoralist communities in China’s Qinghai Province to build community-based resource management organizations to conduct biodiversity monitoring, waste management, and human-wildlife conflict resolution. His current doctoral research interests broadly cover political ecology of environmental conservation, development, and natural resource management in Tibetan areas of Qinghai Province. For his dissertation research, he is interested in exploring the conjunctures of grassroots environmental initiatives and their interplay with state development and environmental policies.
Notes
1 Even though resettled pastoralists do not have the legal right to graze animals on what officially is public land, they still retain use rights to harvest caterpillar fungus, an endemic fungus on the Tibetan Plateau highly valuable in Tibetan and Chinese medical practices.
12 Kham is a region in Southwest China historically located between Tibet and Sichuan. It is currently divided between the Tibetan Autonmous Region and the Chinese provinces of Yunnan, Sichuan, and Qinghai. A majority of residents are Khampa people.
31 Others argue the flooding was likely aggravated by China’s urbanization process, rather than by rangeland degradation upstream. See Fischer Citation2008b.
39 A similar phenomenon has been described by Yusuke Bessho for in the Golok Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture of Qinghai, where Tibetan pastoralists decided to become ecological migrants to access medical benefits and schooling opportunities in urban settings. Yuseke Bessho Citation2015.
46 This survey work was conducted only among resettled pastoralists with the main objective of understanding the reasons and rationales for resettlement; therefore, I do not attempt to make generalizable interpretations about other communities using this set of survey data. The primary respondents to the surveys are the heads of households. Tibetan heads of households make major family decisions regarding resettlement and other socioeconomic issues. In the case of this survey, the heads of households were mostly older males, with the exception of a few adult males and three older females.
48 This was particularly the case prior to villages being exempt from agricultural taxes in 2006. See Chen Citation2014.
52 The name of the anonymous county at the center of Hillman’s book. See Hillman Citation2104, 6.
Shore, Cris, and Susan Wright. 2011. “Conceptualizing Policy: Technologies of Policy and the Politics of Visibility.” In Policy World: Anthropology and the Analysis of Contemporary Power, edited by Cris Shore, Susan Wright, and Davide Pero, 1–25. New York: Berghahn Books. Scott, James. 1999. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Homewood, Katherine. 2004. Maasailand Ecology: Pastoralist Development and Wildlife Conservation in Ngorongoro, Tanzania. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Little, Peter D. 2014. Economic and Political Reform in Africa: Anthropological Perspectives. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Scott, James. 1999. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Li, Tania M. 2007. The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics. Durham: Duke University Press. Buckley, Michael. 2014. Meltdown in Tibet: China’s Reckless Destruction of Ecosystems From Highlands of Tibet to the Deltas of Asia. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Tsing, Anna. 1997. “Transitions as Translations.” In Transitions, Environments, Translations: Feminism in International Politics, edited by Joan W. Scott, Cora Kaplan, and Debra Keates, 253–272. New York: Routledge. Asad, Talal. 1984. “The Concept of Cultural Translation in British Social Anthropology.” In Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, edited by James Clifford and George E. Marcus, 141–164. Berkeley: University of California Press. Mosse, David, and David Lewis. 2006. “Theoretical Approaches to Brokerage and Translation in Development.” In Development Brokers and Translators: The Ethnography of Aid and Agencies, edited by David Lewis and David Mosse, 1–26. Champaign: Kumarian Press. West, Paige. 2005. “Translation, Value, and Space: Theorizing an Ethnographic and Engaged Environmental Anthropology.” American Anthropologist 107 (4): 632–642. doi: 10.1525/aa.2005.107.4.632 Tsering, Shakya. 1994. “Politicization and the Tibetan Language.” In Resistance and Reform in Tibet, edited by Robert Barnett and Shirin Akiner, 157–165. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Yarchak, Alexei. 2005. Everything Was Forever, Until It Was No More: The Last Soviet Generation. Princeton: NJ: Princeton University Press. Hardin, Garrett. 1968. “The Tragedy of the Commons.” Science 162 (3859): 1243–1248. doi: 10.1126/science.162.3859.1243 Foggin, J. Marc. 2008. “Depopulating the Tibetan Grasslands: National Policies and Perspectives for the Future of Tibetan Herders in Qinghai Province, China.” Mountain Research and Development 28 (1): 26–31. doi: 10.1659/mrd.0972 Banks, Tony, Camille Richard, Li Ping, and Yan Zhaoli. 2003. “Community-Based Grassland Management in Western China Rationale, Pilot Project Experience, and Policy Implications.” Mountain Research and Development 23 (2): 132–140. doi: 10.1659/0276-4741(2003)023[0132:CGMIWC]2.0.CO;2 Nyima, Yonten. 2017. “Rangeland Use Rights Privatization Based on the Tragedy of the Commons: A Case Study From Tibet.” Conservation and Society 2017 (15): 270–279. Li, Li, Fabian E. Fassnacht, Ilse Storch, and Matthias Burgi. 2017. “Land-use Regime Shift Triggered the Recent Degradation of Alpine Pastures in Nyanpo Yutse of the Eastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.” Landscape Ecology 32 (11): 2187–2203. doi: 10.1007/s10980-017-0510-2 Stevens, Stan. 1993. Claiming the High Ground: Sherpas, Subsistence, and Environmental Change in the Highest Himalaya. Berkeley: University of California Press. Stevens, Stan. 1997. Conservation Through Cultural Survival: Indigenous Peoples and Protected Areas. Washington, DC: Island Press. Wang, Xiaoqiang, and Bai Nanfeng. 1991. The Poverty of Plenty (Furao de Pinkun). Translated by Angela Knox. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Little, Peter D. 2014. Economic and Political Reform in Africa: Anthropological Perspectives. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Scott, James. 1999. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Cencetti, Elisa. 2011. “Tibetan Plateau Grassland Protection: Tibetan Herders’ Ecological Conception Versus State Policies.” Himalaya: The Journal of the Association for Nepal and Himalayan Studies XXX (1–2): 39–50. Bauer, Kenneth. 2015. “New Homes, New Lives – the Social and Economic Effects of Resettlement on Tibetan Nomads (Yushu Prefecture, Qinghai Province, PRC).” Nomadic Peoples 19 (2): 209–220. doi: 10.3197/np.2015.190204 Homewood, Katherine. 2004. Maasailand Ecology: Pastoralist Development and Wildlife Conservation in Ngorongoro, Tanzania. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Little, Peter D. 2014. Economic and Political Reform in Africa: Anthropological Perspectives. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Gyal, Huatse. 2015. “The Politics of Standardising and Subordinating Subjects: the Nomadic Settlement Project in Tibetan Areas of Amdo.” Nomadic Peoples 19 (2): 241–260. doi: 10.3197/np.2015.190206 (Kabzung), Gaerrang. 2015. “Housing Projects in the Nomadic Areas of China’s Eastern Tibetan Plateau: Representation, Market Logic, and Governmentality.” Nomadic Peoples 19 (2): 261–280. doi: 10.3197/np.2015.190207 Cencetti, Elisa. 2013. “New Settlements on the Tibetan Plateau of Amdo-Qinghai: Spatialized Power Devices.” In On the Fringes of the Harmonious Society: Tibetans and Uyghurs in Socialist China, edited by Trine Brox and Ildiko Beller-Hann, 159–182. Copenhagen: NIAS Press. Zukosky, MichaelL. 2007. “Making Pastoral Resettlement Visible in China.” Nomadic Peoples 11 (2): 107–133. doi: 10.3167/np.2007.110206 Fischer, Andrew M. 2008a. “‘Population Invasion’ Versus Urban Exclusion in the Tibetan Areas of Western China.” Population and Development Review 34 (4): 631–662. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2008.00244.x Rohlf, Gregory. 2016. Building New China, Colonizing Kokonor: Resettlement to Qinghai in the 1950s. New York: Lexington Books. Fischer, Andrew M. 2008a. “‘Population Invasion’ Versus Urban Exclusion in the Tibetan Areas of Western China.” Population and Development Review 34 (4): 631–662. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2008.00244.x Gruschke, Andreas. 2008. “Nomads Without Pastures? Globalization, Regionalization, and Livelihood Security of Nomads and Former Nomads in Northern Khams.” Journal of the International Association of Tibetan Studies 4: 1–40. Foggin, J. Marc. 2008. “Depopulating the Tibetan Grasslands: National Policies and Perspectives for the Future of Tibetan Herders in Qinghai Province, China.” Mountain Research and Development 28 (1): 26–31. doi: 10.1659/mrd.0972 Bauer, Kenneth, and Yonten Nyima. 2010. “Laws and Regulations Impacting the Enclosure Movement on the Tibetan Plateau of China.” Himalaya: The Journal of the Association for Nepal and Himalayan Studies XXX (1–2): 23–37. Yeh, Emily T. 2005. “Green Governmentality and Pastoralism in Western China: Converting Pastures to Grassland.” Nomadic Peoples 9 (1&2): 9–30. doi: 10.3167/082279405781826164 Fischer, Andrew M. 2008b. “Subsistence and Rural Livelihood Strategies in Tibet Under Rapid Economic and Social Transition.” The Journal of the International Association of Tibetan Studies 4: 1–49. Foggin, J. Marc. 2008. “Depopulating the Tibetan Grasslands: National Policies and Perspectives for the Future of Tibetan Herders in Qinghai Province, China.” Mountain Research and Development 28 (1): 26–31. doi: 10.1659/mrd.0972 Bum, Tsering. 2016. Guardians of Nature: Tibetan Pastoralists and the Natural World. Asian Highlands Perspectives 42. Bauer, Kenneth. 2015. “New Homes, New Lives – the Social and Economic Effects of Resettlement on Tibetan Nomads (Yushu Prefecture, Qinghai Province, PRC).” Nomadic Peoples 19 (2): 209–220. doi: 10.3197/np.2015.190204 Wang, Zongming, Kaishan Song, and Liangjun Hu. 2010. “China’s Largest Scale Ecological Migration in the Three-River Headwater Region.” AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 39 (5–6): 443–446. doi: 10.1007/s13280-010-0054-z Du, Fachun. 2012. “Ecological Resettlement of Tibetan Herders in the Sanjiangyuan: A Case Study in Modoi County of Qinghai.” Nomadic Peoples 16 (1):16–133. Makley, Charlene. 2018. The Battle for Fortune: State-Led Development, Personhood, and Power among Tibetans in China. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Harwood, Russell. 2014. China’s New Socialist Countryside: Modernity Arrives in the Nu River Valley. Seattle: University of Washington Press. Smith, Graeme. 2009. “Political Machinations in a Rural County.” The China Journal 62: 29–59. doi: 10.1086/tcj.62.20648113 Gupta, Akhil. 2012. Red Tape: Bureaucracy, Structural Violence and Poverty in India. Durham: Duke University Press. Tenzin, Jinba. 2014. “A Grassroots Association on the Sino-Tibetan Border: The Role, Agendas and Beyond.” The China Quarterly 217: 99–120. doi: 10.1017/S0305741013001148 Bessho, Yusuke. 2015. “Migration for Ecological Preservation? Tibetan Herders’ Decision-Making Process in the Eco-Migration Policy of Golok Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture (Qinghai Province, PRC).” Nomadic Peoples 19 (2): 189–208. doi: 10.3197/np.2015.190203 Makley, Charlene. 2018. The Battle for Fortune: State-Led Development, Personhood, and Power among Tibetans in China. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Rogers, Lisa. 2004. “‘The Heavens are High and the Emperor is Far Away’: Cultural Heritage Law and Management in China.” Historic Environment 17 (3): 38–43. Yeh, Emily T., Yonten Nyima, Kelly A. Hopping, and Julia A. Klein. 2014. “Tibetan Pastoralists’ Vulnerability to Climate Change: A Political Ecology Analysis of Snowstorm Coping Capacity.” Human Ecology 42: 61–74. doi: 10.1007/s10745-013-9625-5 Winkler, Daniel. 2009. “Caterpillar Fungus (Ophiocordyceps sinensis) Production and Sustainability on the Tibetan Plateau and in the Himalayas.” Asian Medicine 5: 291–316. doi: 10.1163/157342109X568829 Winkler, Daniel. 2008. “Yartsa Gunbu (Cordyceps sinensis) and the Fungal Commodification of Tibet’s Rural Economy.” Economic Botany 62 (3): 291–305. doi: 10.1007/s12231-008-9038-3 Gruschke, Andreas. 2011. “Nomads and Their Market Relations in Eastern Tibet’s Yushu Region: The Impact of Caterpillar Fungus.” In Economic Spaces of Pastoral Production and Commodity Systems: Markets and Livelihoods, edited by Jorg Gertel and Richard Le. Heron, 211–230. Farnham: Ashgate. Yeh, Emily T., and Kunga T. Lama. 2013. “Following the Caterpillar Fungus: Nature, Commodity Chains, and the Place of Tibet in China’s Uneven Geographies.” Social and Cultural Geography 14 (3): 318–340. doi: 10.1080/14649365.2013.765025 Chen, An. 2014. The Transformation of Governance in Rural China: Market, Finance, and Political Authority. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lipsky, Michael. 1979. Street-level Bureaucracy. New York: Russell Sage. Mueggler, Erik. 2001. The Age of Wild Ghosts: Memory, Violence, and Place in Southwest China. Berkeley: University of California Press. Makley, Charlene. 2007. The Violence of Liberation: Gender and Tibetan Buddhist Revival in Post-Mao China. Berkeley: University of California Press. Makley, Charlene. 2018. The Battle for Fortune: State-Led Development, Personhood, and Power among Tibetans in China. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Hillman, Ben. 2014. Patronage and Power: Local State Networks and Party-State Resilience in Rural China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Hillman, Ben. 2014. Patronage and Power: Local State Networks and Party-State Resilience in Rural China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Kennedy, John J. 2007. “From the Tax-for-Fee Reform to the Abolition of Agricultural Taxes: The Impact on Township Governments in North-West China.” The China Quarterly 189: 43–59. doi: 10.1017/S0305741006000798 Smith, Graeme. 2010. “The Hollow State: Rural Governance in China.” The China Quarterly 203: 601–618. doi: 10.1017/S0305741010000615 Fischer, Andrew M. 2014. The Disempowered Development of Tibet in China: A Study in the Economics of Marginalization. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. Fischer, Andrew M. 2015. “Subsidizing Tibet: An Interprovincial Comparison of Western China up to the End of the Hu-Wen Administration.” The China Quarterly 221 (1): 73–99. doi: 10.1017/S0305741014001581 Nyima, Yonten. 2012. “From ‘Retire Livestock, Restore Rangeland’ to the Compensation for Ecological Services: State interventions into Rangeland Ecosystems and Pastoralism in Tibet.” Geography Graduate Theses & Dissertations. Accessed February 11, 2018: https://scholar.colorado.edu/geog_gradetds/30. Makley, Charlene. 2018. The Battle for Fortune: State-Led Development, Personhood, and Power among Tibetans in China. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Ortner, Sherry B. 2006. Anthropology and Social Theory: Culture, Power, and the Acting Subject. Durham: Duke University Press.