393
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Becoming an ‘authorised’ postgraduate research writerFootnote1

Pages 41-50 | Published online: 31 Jan 2012
 

Abstract

Within the context of postgraduate research education and training in the higher education sector, drafting might be understood as ‘not quite the final product’ produced by the student who is ‘not yet the final product’ of the university. In this paper, I turn this assumption ‘off centre’ to argue instead that writing and subjectivity are mutually constitutive. The execution of competent writing is, I will suggest, the effect of the repeated performance of a particular academic subjectivity, instantiated in text, over time. The interconnected concepts of the social subject and the relational subject are central to the work of this paper and I draw on Judith Butler’s work on peformativity to rethink the relationship between writing and academic subjectivity. Butler’s subject is an unstable subject rather than a fixed identity category, formed in and through discourse and language. Extrapolating from her work to the context of higher education research writing pedagogy, my task in this paper is to exemplify some of what I will call the intersecting vectors; i.e., the limitations, exclusions, foreclosures and improvisations that work together in complex often unpredictable ways in the production of what and who is recognisable as an intelligible text and a competent research writer.

Acknowledgement

I would like to acknowledge the helpful comments made by the two anonymous reviewers in preparing this paper for publication.

Notes

1. A version of this paper was first presented at the Academic Identities for the twenty-first Century Conference at the University of Strathclyde in June 2010 and subsequently published in the refereed conference proceedings.

2. The phrase the subject who writes implies a subject in-excess and in-process. This is contrasted with the writing subject, implying more defined and stable understandings of subjectivity or identity. I owe this distinction to David McInnes (McInnes & James, Citation2003).

3. Transcript conventions – B: indicates Bernadette and I: indicates interviewer turn.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 294.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.