From mobilization to improvisation: the lessons from Taiwan’s 2014 sunflower movement^§

Abstract

The recent global eruption of large protests calls for a rethinking of the question of movement participation. The conventional model of movement as organized mobilization led by pre-existing organizations and top–down leadership clearly fails as an adequate portrait. As an alternative, horizontality with its emphasis on direct democracy, decentralized decision-making, and prefigurative politics (the rejection of instrumental view of participation) emerges in the global justice movement. This article explores an intermediate pattern of movement participation between these two extremes. Analyzing the protest occupation of Taiwan’s national legislature in 2014, the so-called Sunflower Movement, I theorize the mechanism of improvisation, defined as ‘strategic responses without prior planning,’ as a vital process that facilitates coordination in a large-scale protest. Improvisation involves decentralized decision-making, but it proceeds as a means to a clearly defined and consensual movement goal. The creative collaboration by dispersed, but experienced activists plays a critical yet often neglected role during contentious confrontations against the government. Improvisation is capable of orchestrating large-scale protests because movement leadership is oft constrained by the lack of real-time information and their command is more effective when it provides room for improvisation from below.

Keywords:

• Improvisation
• mobilization
• horizontality
• activists
• leadership

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to thank the participants in that event as well as anonymous reviewers of this journal. The assistance of Huang Chun-hao also made this research possible.

Notes

^§ An earlier version of this article was presented at Taiwan’s Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica, on May 29–30, 2015