From mobilization to improvisation: the lessons from Taiwan’s 2014 sunflower movement^§

References

• Beissinger, M. R. (2013). The semblance of democratic revolution: Coalitions in Ukraine’s orange revolution. American Political Science Review, 107, 574–592.10.1017/S0003055413000294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosi, L., & Davis, D. (2017). What is to be done? agency and the causation of transformative events in Ireland’s 1916 rising and 1969 long march. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 22, 223–243.10.17813/1086-671X-22-2-223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burstein, P. (1998). Social movement and public policy. In M. Giugni, D. McAdam, & C. Tilly (Eds.), How social movements matter (pp. 3–21). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, Y. (2017). The occupy movement in Hong Kong: Sustaining decentralized protest. London: Routeldge.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, E. W., & Chan, W. (2017). Explaining spontaneous occupation: Antecedents, contingencies and spaces in the Umbrella Movement. Social Movement Studies, 16, 222–239.10.1080/14742837.2016.1252667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, J. M. (2014). Was Taiwan’s Sunflower Movement Successful? Retrieved September 16, 2014, from https://goo.gl/dHZFhM
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D., & Mosca, L. (2005). Global-net for Global Movements? A Network of Networks for a Movement of Movements. Journal of Public Policy, 25, 165–190.10.1017/S0143814X05000255
   Google Scholar
• Fell, D. (Ed.). (2017). Taiwan’s social movements under Ma Ying-jeou. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fominaya, C. F. (2015). Debunking spontaneity: Spain’s 15-M/indignados as autonomous movement. Social Movement Studies, 14, 142–163.10.1080/14742837.2014.945075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, J. (1975). The politics of women’s liberation. New York, NY: David McKay.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction Ritual. New York, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstone, J. (2004). More social movements or fewer? Beyond political opportunity structures to relational fields. Theory and Society, 33, 333–365.10.1023/B:RYSO.0000038611.01350.30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graeber, D. (2002). The new anarchists. New Left Review, 13, 61–73.
   Google Scholar
• Graeber, D. (2009). Direct action: An ethnography. Oakland, CA: AK Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graeber, D. (2013). The democracy Project: A history, a crisis, a movement. New York, NY: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Gunning, J., & Baron, I. Z. (2014). Why occupy a square: People, protests and movements in the Egyptian revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199394982.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Ho, M. (2015). Occupy congress in Taiwan: Political opportunity, threat and the sunflower movement. Journal of East Asian Studies, 15, 69–97.10.1017/S1598240800004173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobsbawm, E. J. (1973). Revolutionaries: Contemporary essays. New York, NY: Meridian Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jasper, J. M. (1997). The art of moral protest. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226394961.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Jasper, J. M. (2004). A strategic approach to collective action: Looking for agency in social-movement choices. Mobilization, 9(1), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Jasper, J. M. (2014). Protest: A cultural introduction to social movements. Oxford: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Juris, J. S., & Pleyers, G. H. (2009). Alter-activism: Emerging cultures of participation among young global justice activists. Journal of Youth Studies, 12, 57–75.10.1080/13676260802345765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsiaficas, G. N. (1997). The subversion of politics: European autonomous social movements and the decolonization of everyday life. New York, NY: Humanities Press International.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. (2014). The networked public, multitentacled participation and collaborative expertise. East Asian Science, Technology and Society, 8, 223–252.
   Google Scholar
• Krastev, I. (2014). Democracy disrupted: The politics of global protest. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.10.9783/9780812290745
   Google Scholar
• Lee, F. L. F., & Chan, J. M. (2016). Digital media activities and mode of participation in a protest campaign: A study of the Umbrella Movement. Information, Communication & Society, 19, 4–22.10.1080/1369118X.2015.1093530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeckelbergh, M. (2011). Doing is believing: Prefiguration as strategic practice in the alterglobalization movement. Social Movement Studies, 10(1), 1–20.10.1080/14742837.2011.545223
   Google Scholar
• Maeckelbergh, M. (2012). Horizontal democracy now: From alterglobalization to occupation. Interface, 4, 207–234.
   Google Scholar
• Maeckelbergh, M. (2013). Learning from conflict: Innovative approaches to democratic decision making in the alterglobalization movement. Transforming Anthropology, 21, 27–40.10.1111/traa.2013.21.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Mason, P. (2012). Why It’s kicking off everywhere: The new global revolutions. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (Eds.). (1996). Comparative perspectives on social movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1987). Social movement in an organizational society. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mcdonald, K. (2002). From solidarity to fluidarity: Social movements beyond ‘collective identity’. Social Movement Studies, 1, 109–128.10.1080/1474283022000010637
   Google Scholar
• McPhail, C. (1991). The myth of the madding crowd. New York, NY: A. de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. S., & Tarrow, S. (Eds.). (1998). The social movement society: Contentious politics for a new century. New York, NY: Rowman-Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Noueihed, L., & Warren, A. (2012). The battle for the Arab spring. New Have, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nowhere. (2003). We are everywhere: The irresistible rise of global anticapitalism. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• One More Story Citizens’ Voice Team. (2014). Nashi wozai: Gongmin shengyin [I was there: Voices of citizens]. Taipei: Xuxianchuban.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D., & Moss, D. M. (2014). Protest on the fly: Toward a theory of spontaneity in the dynamics of protest and social movements. American Sociological Review, 79, 1122–1143.10.1177/0003122414554081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staggenborg, S. (1989). The consequences of professionalization and formalization in the pro-choice movement. American Sociological Review, 53, 585–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S. (1994). Power in movement: Social movements, collective action and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tejerina, B., Perugorría, I., Benski, T., & Langman, L. (2013). From indignation to occupation: A new wave of global mobilization. Current Sociology, 61, 377–392.10.1177/0011392113479738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (1978). From mobilization to revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C., & Tarrow, S. (2006). Contentious politics. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
   Google Scholar
• Tominaga, K. (2012). A study of movement identity on protest events: The case of the protest against the 2008 Hokkaido Toyako G8 summit. Paper presented at From Social to Political. New Forms of Mobilization and Democratization, Bilbao.
   Google Scholar
• Way, L. (2011). Comparing the Arab revolts: The lessons of 1989. Journal of Democracy, 22, 13–23.10.1353/jod.2011.0068
   Google Scholar
• Yuen, S., & Cheng, E. W. (2017). Neither repression nor concession? A regime’s attrition against massive protests. Political Studies, 65(1), 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Zamponi, L., & Joseba, F. G. (2017). Dissenting youth: How student and youth struggles helped shape anti-austerity mobilisations in Southern Europe. Social Movement Studies, 16, 64–81.10.1080/14742837.2016.1239194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar