Fetus delivery time in extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal cesarean section: a randomized trial

Abstract

Objective: We compared the extraperitoneal cesarean section to transperitoneal cesarean on fetal delivery time.

Material and methods: This randomized study included 210 pregnant women undergoing cesarean section for elective reasons, repeat cesarean (< four), or dystocia. Patients who required an urgent cesarean section, who were at high risk for obstetric or maternal bleeding, who had a uterine or adnexal mass, or who requested tubal ligation were excluded from the study. The primary outcome of the study was the skin incision-to-delivery time. The sample size was set to detect of 1-minute difference in fetal delivery time between groups (two-tailed hypothesis, α = 0.05, β = 0.10). Secondary outcome measures were total operation time, intraoperative nausea, gag reflex, vomiting, pain and anxiety for those receiving regional anesthesia, postoperative pain, change in hemoglobin, postoperative analgesic requirements, nausea, vomiting and shoulder pain, urogenital distress, time until gas passage, and neonatal outcome.

Results: No significant difference occurred between the two groups for skin incision-to- delivery time (extraperitoneal cesarean 3.9 minutes [2.1–7.3] versus transperitoneal cesarean 4.2 minutes [1.9–8.2], p = .065). Significant differences regarding intraoperative pain, total operation time, postoperative pain at the surgical site and shoulder pain, analgesic requirements, time until gas passage, and oral tolerability favored the extraperitoneal group. No significant differences between groups occurred regarding other seconder outcome parameters.

Conclusions: There is no clinically significant difference between extraperitoneal cesarean section and transperitoneal cesarean on fetal delivery time. Extraperitoneal cesarean reduces postoperative pain, analgesic requirements, and improves oral tolerability.

Keywords:

• Cesarean section
• delivery time
• extraperitoneal cesarean section
• postoperative pain
• surgical morbidity

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.