Advanced search
Publication Cover
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine Volume 33, 2020 - Issue 4
Submit an article Journal homepage
431
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Fetus delivery time in extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal cesarean section: a randomized trial

Omer E. YapcaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Atatürk University Faculty of Medicine, Erzurum, TurkeyCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5578-0126
ORCID Icon,
Yunus E. TopdagiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Atatürk University Faculty of Medicine, Erzurum, TurkeyORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0003-0656-0765
ORCID Icon &
Ragip A. AlDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Atatürk University Faculty of Medicine, Erzurum, TurkeyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2921-1891
ORCID Icon
Pages 657-663 | Received 11 Nov 2017, Accepted 09 Jul 2018, Published online: 13 Aug 2018

References

  • Hibbard LT. Extraperitoneal cesarean section. Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1985;28:711–721.
  • Norton JF. A paravesical extraperitoneal cesarean section technique; with an analysis of 160 paravesical extraperitoneal cesarean sections. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1946;51:519–526.
  • Cacciarelli RA. Extraperitoneal cesarean section; a new paravesical approach. Am J Surg. 1949;78:371–373.
  • Perkins RP. Role of extraperitoneal cesarean section. Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1980;23:583–599.
  • Waters EG. Supravesical extraperitoneal cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1940;39:423–434.
  • Ricci JV. Simplification of the Physick–Frank–Sellheim principle of extraperitoneal cesarean section. Am J Surg. 1940;47:33–40.
  • Bourgeois GA, Phaneuf LE. The surgical anatomy of extraperitoneal cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1949;57:237–250.
  • Atherton HE, Williamson PJ. A clinical comparison of extraperitoneal cesarean section and low cervical cesarean section for the potentially or frankly infected parturient. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1954;68:1091–1097.
  • Haesslein HC, Goodlin RC. Extraperitoneal cesarean section revisited. Obstet Gynecol. 1980;55:181–183.
  • Wallace RL, Eglinton GS, Yonekura ML, et al. Extraperitoneal cesarean section: a surgical form of infection prophylaxis? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;148:172–177.
  • Creanga AA, Bateman BT, Butwick AJ, et al. Morbidity associated with cesarean delivery in the United States: is placenta accreta an increasingly important contributor? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213:384.e1–384.11.
  • Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB, et al. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990–2014. Plos One. 2016;11:e0148343.
  • Gurol-Urganci I, Bou-Antoun S, Lim CP, et al. Impact of caesarean section on subsequent fertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:1943–1952.
  • Weibel S, Neubert K, Jelting Y, et al. Incidence and severity of chronic pain after caesarean section: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016;33:853–865.
  • Tulandi T, Agdi M, Zarei A, et al. Adhesion development and morbidity after repeat cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;201:56.e1–56.e6.
  • Andolf E, Thorsell M, Källén K. Cesarean delivery and risk for postoperative adhesions and intestinal obstruction: a nested case-control study of the Swedish Medical Birth Registry. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:406.e1–406.e6.
  • Walfisch A, Beloosesky R, Shrim A, et al. Adhesion prevention after cesarean delivery: evidence, and lack of it. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211:446–452.
  • Tappauf C, Schest E, Reif P, et al. Extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal cesarean section: a prospective randomized comparison of surgical morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209:338.e1–338.e8.
  • Hanson HB. Current use of the extraperitoneal cesarean section: a decade of experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;149:31–34.
  • Paternite CJ, Bachand MS. Extraperitoneal cesarean sections; analysis of 93 consecutive operations. Obstet Gynecol. 1954;3:283–286..
  • Durfee RB. Elective extraperitoneal cesarean section. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1960;110:173–181.
  • Marr JP, Nathanson BN. Extraperitoneal cesarean section. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1958;107:377–382.
  • Cam C, Sakalli M, Ay P, et al. Validation of the short forms of the incontinence impact questionnaire (IIQ-7) and the urogenital distress inventory (UDI-6) in a Turkish population. Neurourol Urodyn. 2007;26:129–133.
  • Hodges JL, Lehmann EL. The efficiency of some nonparametric competitors of the t-test. Ann Math Statist. 1956;27:324–335.
  • Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, et al. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39:175–191.
  • Hanson H. Revival of the extraperitoneal cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1978;130:102–103.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.