Evaluating parental perceptions of written handbooks provided during shared decision making with parents anticipating extremely preterm birth

Abstract

Objective

To explore parental perceptions of written handbooks provided to them during antenatal counseling for anticipated extremely preterm birth.

Study design

This study involved a prospective convenience sample of parents anticipating delivery between 22 weeks + 0 days and 25 weeks + 6 days gestation. The antenatal counseling involved a shared decision-making process. In-person interviews were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide to gather feedback about new parent handbooks developed to support decision making. The questions during the semi-structured interview targeted seven main themes: overall impression, timing, graphs/tables, formatting, imagery, ease of use and understanding, and content. The interviews followed an antenatal consultation and provision of the appropriate handbook(s) by a neonatologist. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematic analysis of the data was completed.

Results

Eleven parents were interviewed. All parents described the provision of the handbook(s) following the consultation with a neonatologist as the ideal time. All parents considered a visual representation of the data to be invaluable. Parents considered the handbooks easy to understand and straightforward. Some parents were satisfied with simple information, which helped them feel less overwhelmed; others felt the depth of information was insufficient. Parents preferred a paper copy to electronic. Reactions to the photo of an infant receiving intensive care varied; some parents felt frightened, others felt comforted.

Conclusion

Overall, parents positively evaluated the handbooks, supporting their utility for parents anticipating extremely preterm birth. Concrete suggestions for improvement were made; the handbooks will be modified accordingly. Parents at other perinatal centers may benefit from receiving such handbooks.

Keywords:

• Neonatology
• prematurity
• decision aid
• comparative analysis
• qualitative

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

Financial support for this study included a Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute Resident Research Grant ($2500) and a University of Ottawa Medical School Student Summership Grant ($5000).