Advanced search
Publication Cover
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine Volume 35, 2022 - Issue 14
Submit an article Journal homepage
280
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Evaluating parental perceptions of written handbooks provided during shared decision making with parents anticipating extremely preterm birth

Emily Mardiana Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, CanadaView further author information
,
Shannon Buckingb Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, CanadaView further author information
,
Sandra Dunnd Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, CanadaView further author information
,
Brigitte Lemyrea Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada;b Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Canada;c Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada;d Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, CanadaView further author information
,
Thierry Dabovala Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada;b Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Canada;c Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada;d Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, CanadaView further author information
&
Gregory P. Moorea Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada;b Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Canada;c Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada;d Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, CanadaCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
Pages 2723-2730 | Received 21 May 2020, Accepted 15 Jul 2020, Published online: 29 Jul 2020

References

  • Obeidat HM, Bond EA, Callister LC. The parental experience of having an infant in the newborn intensive care unit. J Perinat Educ. 2009;18(3):23–29.
  • Lemyre B, Moore G. Canadian Paediatric Society Fetal and Newborn Committee: counselling and management for anticipated extremely preterm birth. Paediatr Child Health. 2017;22(6):334–341.
  • Haward MF, Gaucher N, Payot A, et al. Personalized decision making: practical recommendations for antenatal counseling for fragile neonates. Clin Perinatol. 2017;44(2):429–445.
  • Cummings J. Antenatal antenatal counseling regarding resuscitation and intensive care before 25 weeks of gestation. Pediatrics. 2015;136(3):588–595.
  • Jaworski M, Janvier A, Lefebvre F, et al. Parental perspectives regarding outcomes of very preterm infants: toward a balanced approach. J Pediatr. 2018;200:58–63.
  • Geurtzen R, Van Heijst A, Hermens R, et al. Preferred prenatal counselling at the limits of viability: a survey among Dutch perinatal professionals. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):7
  • Geurtzen R, Draaisma J, Hermens R, et al. Various experiences and preferences of Dutch parents in prenatal counseling in extreme prematurity. Patient Educ Couns. 2018;101(12):2179–2185.
  • Kharrat A, Moore GP, Beckett S, et al. Antenatal consultations at extreme prematurity: a systematic review of parent communication needs. J Pediatr. 2018;196:109–115.e7.
  • Geurtzen R, Van Heijst A, Draaisma J, et al. Prenatal counseling in extreme prematurity – insight into preferences from experienced parents. Patient Educ Couns. 2019;102(8):1541–1549.
  • Muthusamy AD, Leuthner S, Gaebler-Uhing C, et al. Supplemental written information improves prenatal counseling: a randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2012;129(5):e1269–e1274.
  • Mancini J, Noguès C, Adenis C, et al. Impact of an information booklet on satisfaction and decision-making about BRCA genetic testing. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42(7):871–881.
  • Geurtzen R, Van Heijst A, Draaisma J, et al. Professionals' preferences in prenatal counseling at the limits of viability: a nationwide qualitative Dutch study. Eur J Pediatr. 2017;176(8):1107–1119.
  • Lemyre B, Dunn S, Daboval T, et al. Shared decision making for infants born at the threshold of viability: a prognosis-based guideline. J Perinatol. 2016;36(7):503–509.
  • Barker C, Dunn S, Moore GP, et al. Shared decision making during antenatal counselling for anticipated extremely preterm birth. Paediatr Child Health. 2019;24(4):240–249.
  • Moore GP, Reszel J, Daboval T, et al. Qualitative evaluation of a guideline supporting shared decision making for extreme preterm birth. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(6):973–981.
  • Moore GP, Lemyre B, Daboval T, et al. Field testing of decision coaching with decision aid for parents facing extreme prematurity. J Perinatol. 2017;37(6):728–734.
  • Moore GP, Lemyre B, Barrowman N, et al. Neurodevelopmental Outcomes at 4 to 8 Years of Children Born at 22 to 25 weeks' gestational age: a meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167(10):967–974.
  • Tyson JE, Parikh NA, Langer J, et al. Intensive care for extreme prematurity-moving beyond gestational age. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(16):1672–1681.
  • Grobman WA, Kavanaugh K, Moro T, et al. Providing advice to parents for women at acutely high risk of periviable delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(5):904–909.
  • Guillén Ú, Suh S, Munson D, et al. Development and pretesting of a decision-aid to use when counseling parents facing imminent extreme premature delivery. J Pediatr. 2012;160(3):382–387.
  • Paul DA, Epps S, Leef KH, et al. Prenatal consultation with a neonatologist prior to preterm delivery. J Perinatol. 2001;21(7):431–437.
  • Boss RD, Hutton N, Sulpar LJ, et al. Values parents apply to decision-making regarding delivery room resuscitation for high-risk newborns. Pediatrics. 2008;122(3):583–589.
  • Srinivas SK. Periviable births: communication and counseling before delivery. Semin Perinatol. 2013;37(6):426–430.
  • Tomlinson MW, Kaempf JW, Ferguson LA, et al. Caring for the pregnant woman presenting at periviable gestation: acknowledging the ambiguity and uncertainty. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(6):529.e1–e6.
  • Kenny T, Wilson RG, Purves IN, et al. A PIL for every ill? Patient information leaflets (PILs): a review of past, present and future use. Fam Pract. 1998;15(5):471–479.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.