440
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Impact of maternal height on birthweight classification in singleton births at term: a cohort study in The Netherlands

ORCID Icon, , , , &
Pages 3167-3174 | Received 21 Feb 2020, Accepted 20 Aug 2020, Published online: 03 Sep 2020
 

Abstract

Objective

To assess the association between maternal height and birthweight in a healthy population and to study the effect of maternal height on the classification of birthweight as small for gestational age (SGA) and large for gestational age (LGA).

Methods

A descriptive, observational retrospective study was conducted in a low risk population in the Netherlands. The study included term singleton healthy nonsmoking pregnant women with normal body mass index (n = 9291). We calculated the impact of maternal height on birthweight using multiple linear regression analyses with adjustment for gestational age, gender, and parity. We calculated the number of newborns classified as SGA and LGA using the cutoff point of the Dutch Birthweight chart, which does not customize for maternal height. Subsequently, we calculated the changes in classification from SGA and LGA to appropriate for gestational age (AGA) in case of customization for maternal height.

Results

A significant association was found between maternal height and birthweight; 15.0 g higher birthweight per extra cm maternal height (95% confidence interval 13.8–16.1; p<.001; R2 model = 0.28). The incidence of SGA was 7.1% (range 17.4–2.0% form shortest to tallest maternal height category) and of LGA 8.4% (range 1.9–21.5% from shortest to tallest maternal height category). We calculated a shift in classification: 114 newborns (17.3%) in shorter (<167 cm) women previously SGA and 165 newborns (21.1%) in taller (>173 cm) women previously LGA were classified as AGA when controlling for maternal height.

Conclusions

Maternal height is significantly associated with birthweight. Birthweight charts customized for maternal height change classification in one out of six SGA or LGA newborns at term.

Acknowledgements

Many thanks to the midwives and pregnant women participating in the VeCaS-project for their contribution in collecting the data.

Ethical approval

The Medical Research Ethics Committee Maastricht (no. 09-4-061, date: 20 July 2012) approved VeCaS.

Disclosure statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 65.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.