Impact of maternal height on birthweight classification in singleton births at term: a cohort study in The Netherlands

References

• Chauhan SP, Rice MM, Grobman WA, et al. Neonatal morbidity of small- and large-for-gestational-age neonates born at term in uncomplicated pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(3):511–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowdall D, Flatley C, Kumar S. Birth weight centiles, risk of intrapartum compromise, and adverse perinatal outcomes in term infants. J Matern Fetal Neonat Med. 2017;30(17):2126–2132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriksen T. The macrosomic fetus: a challenge in current obstetrics. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(2):134–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilliod RA, Cheng YW, Snowden JM, et al. The risk of intrauterine fetal death in the small-for-gestational-age fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(4):318.e1–318.e6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntire DD, Bloom SL, Casey BM, et al. Birth weight in relation to morbidity and mortality among newborn infants. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(16):1234–1238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray E, Fernandes M, Fazel M, et al. Differential effect of intrauterine growth restriction on childhood neurodevelopment: a systematic review. BJOG. 2015;122(8):1062–1072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malin GL, Morris RK, Riley RD, et al. When is birthweight at term (>/=37 weeks' gestation) abnormally low? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prognostic and predictive ability of current birthweight standards for childhood and adult outcomes. BJOG. 2015;122(5):634–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo S, Bollani L, Decembrino L, et al. Short-term and long-term sequelae in intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR). J Matern Fetal Neonat Med. 2013;26(3):222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gluckman PD, Hanson MA, Cooper C, et al. Effect of in utero and early-life conditions on adult health and disease. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(1):61–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ay L, Kruithof CJ, Bakker R, et al. Maternal anthropometrics are associated with fetal size in different periods of pregnancy and at birth. The Generation R Study. BJOG. 2009;116(7):953–963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trojner Bregar A, Blickstein I, Steblovnik L, et al. Do tall women beget larger babies? J Matern Fetal Neonat Med. 2016;29(8):1311–1313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCowan L, Horgan RP. Risk factors for small for gestational age infants. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;23(6):779–793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolly MC, Sebire NJ, Harris JP, et al. Risk factors for macrosomia and its clinical consequences: a study of 350,311 pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003;111(1):9–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villar J, Cheikh Ismail L, Victora CG, et al. International standards for newborn weight, length, and head circumference by gestational age and sex: the Newborn Cross-Sectional Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. Lancet. 2014;384(9946):857–868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grantz KL, Hediger ML, Liu D, et al. Fetal growth standards: the NICHD fetal growth study approach in context with INTERGROWTH-21st and the World Health Organization Multicentre Growth Reference Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(2S):S641–6S55.e28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoftiezer L, Hof MHP, Dijs-Elsinga J, et al. From population reference to national standard: new and improved birthweight charts. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;220(4):383.e1–383.e17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voigt M, Rochow N, Jahrig K, et al. Dependence of neonatal small and large for gestational age rates on maternal height and weight – an analysis of the German Perinatal Survey. J Perinat Med. 2010;38(4):425–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olbertz DM, Knie A, Straube S, et al. Somatic development at birth as influenced by maternal characteristics – an analysis of the German Perinatal Survey. J Perinat Med. 2018;46(8):889–892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polzlberger E, Hartmann B, Hafner E, et al. Maternal height and pre-pregnancy weight status are associated with fetal growth patterns and newborn size. J Biosoc Sci. 2017;49(3):392–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikolajczyk RT, Zhang J, Betran AP, et al. A global reference for fetal-weight and birthweight percentiles. Lancet. 2011;377(9780):1855–1861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochow N, AlSamnan M, So HY, et al. Maternal body height is a stronger predictor of birth weight than ethnicity: analysis of birth weight percentile charts. J Perinat Med. 2018;47(1):22–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amelink-Verburg MP, Buitendijk SE. Pregnancy and labour in the Dutch maternity care system: what is normal? The role division between midwives and obstetricians. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2010;55(3):216–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeegers B, Wijnen H, Nieuwenhuijze MJ, editors. VeCaS: a Dutch project to obtain valid data from electronic patient records for midwifery research. Maastricht: European Congress of Epidemiology; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Pouwels A, Offerhaus P, Merkx A, et al. Detailed registration of care in midwifery practices in the Netherlands: an opportunity for research within a healthy pregnant population. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaans I, Wijnen H. Consensushandleiding voor invoer van data in digitaal cliëntdossier van. Orfeus/Vrumun.: Research Centre for Midwifery Science Maastricht; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Geneva: WHO; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Voigt M, Rochow N, Guthmann F, et al. Birth weight percentile values for girls and boys under consideration of maternal height. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2012;216(5):212–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal P, Rajadurai VS, Yap F, et al. Comparison of customized and cohort-based birthweight standards in identification of growth-restricted infants in GUSTO cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonat Med. 2015;29(15):1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson NH, Sadler LC, Stewart AW, et al. Maternal and pathological pregnancy characteristics in customised birthweight centiles and identification of at-risk small-for-gestational-age infants: a retrospective cohort study. BJOG. 2012;119(7):848–856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clausson B, Gardosi J, Francis A, et al. Perinatal outcome in SGA births defined by customised versus population-based birthweight standards. BJOG. 2001;108(8):830–834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardosi J, Francis A, Turner S, et al. Customized growth charts: rationale, validation and clinical benefits. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(2S):S609–S618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sovio U, Smith GCS. The effect of customization and use of a fetal growth standard on the association between birthweight percentile and adverse perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(2):S738–S744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths LJ, Dezateux C, Cole TJ. Differential parental weight and height contributions to offspring birthweight and weight gain in infancy. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36(1):104–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomeroy E, Wells JC, Cole TJ, et al. Relationships of maternal and paternal anthropometry with neonatal body size, proportions and adiposity in an Australian cohort. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2015;156(4):625–636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieira MC, Relph S, Persson M, et al. Determination of birth-weight centile thresholds associated with adverse perinatal outcomes using population, customised, and intergrowth charts: a Swedish population-based cohort study. PLoS Med. 2019;16(9):e1002902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar