Erratum for “Individual and collaborative implementation intentions and the promotion of breast self-examination”, 20(6), pp. 743–760.

The publishers wish to point out several typographical errors in the statistics of this paper:

In Study 1 (participants section) the statistical information showing no difference in past BSE behaviour between implementation intention and control conditions should read: [F(1,449) = 0.002, p > 0.05].

The footnote for d = 0.40 on page 747 should refer to note 1 rather than note 2.

The final statistical information in footnote four should read [F(1,116) = 1.23, p > 0.05], rather than [F(1,116) = 1.23, p = 0.05].

Table I in the original published version contained several innaccurate values. The correct table is printed below.

Table I. The BSE behaviour at baseline, one-month and six-month time points (Study 1).

	Time 1 (baseline)			Time 2 (one month)		Time 3 (six months)
Condition	Intention	Past behaviour	Likelihood	Likelihood	Mean BSE	Likelihood	Mean BSE
Implementation	4.62	0.01	19.5% (47/241)	44.7% (46/103)	0.81	69.6% (48/69)	2.55
Intention (overall)	(1.65)	(1.83)			(0.98)		(3.76)
Control (overall)	4.68	−0.02	15.9% (34/214)	25.8% (23/89)	0.38	56.9% (29/51)	1.57
	(1.52)	(1.75)			(0.57)		(1.96)
Total	4.65	0.00	17.8% (81/455)	35.9% (69/192)	0.62	64.2% (77/120)	2.13
	(1.59)	(1.79)			(0.85)		(3.15)