187
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Karyotype asymmetry shapes diversity within the physaloids (Physalidinae, Physalideae, Solanaceae)

, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 168-185 | Published online: 01 Dec 2020
 

Abstract

Within the cosmopolitan family Solanaceae, Physalideae is the tribe with the highest generic diversity (30 genera and more than 200 species). This tribe embraces subtribe Physalidinae, in which phylogenetic relationships of some genera are not entirely resolved. Chromosomes may help on resolution, by providing information on the processes underlying speciation. Thus, cytogenetic analyses were carried out in the subtribe in order to establish its chromosome number and morphology. Physalidinae is characterized by x = 12 and most species shows a karyotype more asymmetric than those of sister clade Iochrominae. These karyotype traits were mapped onto a molecular phylogeny to test the congruence between karyotype evolution and clade differentiation. A diploid ancestor was reconstructed for the subtribe, and five to six polyploidy independent events were estimated, plus one aneuploidy event (X = 11 in the monotypic genus Quincula). Comparative phylogenetic methods showed that asymmetry indices and mean arm ratio (r) have a high phylogenetic signal, whereas a single gain of subtelocentric/telocentric chromosomes was found in the common ancestor of Physalis, Quincula, and Chamaesaracha. Karyotype asymmetry allows us to differentiate genera within subtribe Physalidinae. Overall, our study suggests that diversification in this group has been accompanied by karyotype changes, which can also be applied to delimit genera.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the National Council for Scientific Research and Techniques (CONICET), National Agency for Scientific Promotion and Technological (FONCyT, grant # PICT JI 2017-2370 and 2016-1525), SECyT (National University of Córdoba, Argentina, grant # 203/14), and National Science Foundation (grant # DEB 1557871) for financial support, equipment and facilities. We thank Chelsea Pretz, Tiina Särkinen, Sandra Knapp from http://solanaceaesource.org/, and G. Chaniot from https://www.inaturalist.org/ for their contribution of photographic material and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable contributions.

Disclosure statement

None of the authors has received or will receive any benefit, financial or otherwise, arising from the direct application of this research.

Supplemental data

Supplementary data for this article can be accessed here: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10.1080/14772000.2020.1832156.

Associate Editor: Steven Dodsworth

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the National Council for Scientific Research and Techniques (CONICET), National Agency for Scientific Promotion and Technological (FONCyT, grant # PICT 2017-2370 and 2016-1525), SECyT (National University of Córdoba, Argentina, grant # 203/14) and National Science Foundation (grant # DEB 1557871).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 129.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.