Karyotype asymmetry shapes diversity within the physaloids (Physalidinae, Physalideae, Solanaceae)

References

• Acosta, M. C., Bernardello, G., Guerra, M., & Moscone, E. A. (2005). Karyotype analysis in several South American species of Solanum and Lycianthes rantonnei (Solanaceae). TAXON, 54(3), 713–723. https://doi.org/10.2307/25065428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716–723. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Averett, J. E. (1973). Biosystematic study of Chamaesaracha (Solanaceae). Rhodora, 75(803), 325–365.
   Google Scholar
• Badr, A., Khalifa, S. F., Aboel Atta, A. I., & Abou el Enain, M. M. (1997). Chromosomal criteria and taxonomic relationships in the Solanaceae. CYTOLOGIA, 62(2), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1508/cytologia.62.103
   Google Scholar
• Baltisberger, M., & Hörandl, E. (2016). Karyotype evolution supports the molecular phylogeny in the genus Ranunculus (Ranunculaceae). Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 16, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, P. (1984). A new diploid chromosome number for tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)? Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology, 26(5), 636–639. https://doi.org/10.1139/g84-099
   Google Scholar
• Barboza, G. E. (2000). Rehabilitación del género Quincula (Solanaceae: Solaneae). Kurtziana, 28(1), 69–79.
   Google Scholar
• Barboza, G. E., Chiarini, F. E., & Stehmann, J. R. (2010). Real identity of Witheringia sellowiana (Solanaceae), typification, and chromosome number. Systematic Botany, 35(2), 420–424. https://doi.org/10.1600/036364410791638397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barboza, G. E., Hunziker, A. T., Bernardello, G., Cocucci, A. A., Carrizo García, C., Fuentes, V., Dillon, M., Bittrich, V., Cosa, M. T., Subils, R., Romanutti, A., Arroyo, S., & Anton, A. (2016). Solanaceae. In K. Kubitzki (Ed.). The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants., 14, 295–357.
   Google Scholar
• Bachman, S., Moat, J., Hill, A. W., De Torre, J., & Scott, B. (2011). Supporting Red List threat assessments with GeoCAT: geospatial conservation assessment tool. ZooKeys, 150, 117–126. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.150.2109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blöch, C., Weiss-Schneeweiss, H., Schneeweiss, G. M., Barfuss, M. H., Rebernig, C. A., Villaseñor, J. L., & Stuessy, T. F. (2009). Molecular phylogenetic analyses of nuclear and plastid DNA sequences support dysploid and polyploid chromosome number changes and reticulate evolution in the diversification of Melampodium (Millerieae, Asteraceae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 53(1), 220–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2009.02.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomberg, S. P., Garland, T., Jr., & Ives, A. R. (2003). Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution, 57(4), 717–745. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00285.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohs, L. (2005). Major clades in Solanum based on ndhF sequence data. In V. Hollowell, R. Keating, W. Lewis & T. Croat (Eds.). A Festschrift for William D’Arcy. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden. (vol. 104, pp. 24–49). Missouri Botanical Garden Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brako, L., Zarucchi, J. (1993). Catalogue of the flowering plants and Gymnosperms of Peru. Catálogo de las Angiospermas y Gimnospermas del Perú. Monographs in systematic botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden, 45, 1–1286.
   Google Scholar
• Brandham, P. E., & Doherty, M. J. (1998). Genome size variation in the Aloaceae, an angiosperm family displaying karyotypic orthoselection. Annals of Botany, 82, 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1998.0742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. H. (1984). On the relationship between distribution and abundance. The American Naturalist, 124(2), 255–279. https://doi.org/10.1086/284267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiarini, F. E., & Barboza, G. E. (2008). Karyological studies in Jaborosa (solanaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 156(3), 467–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2007.00734.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiarini, F. E., Moreno, N., Barboza, G. E., & Bernardello, G. (2010). Karyotype characterization of Andean Solanoideae (Solanaceae). Caryologia, 63(3), 278–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.2010.589738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiarini, F. E., Lipari, D., Barboza, G. E., & Knapp, S. (2017). Solanaceae. In: Marhold, K. & J. Kučera (Eds.). IAPT/IOPB chromosome data 25. Taxon., 66(5), 1246–1252.
   Google Scholar
• Chiarini, F. E., Sazatornil, F., & Bernardello, G. (2018). Data reassessment in a phylogenetic context gives insight into chromosome evolution in the giant genus Solanum (Solanaceae). Systematic and Biodiversity, 16(4), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deanna, R., Barboza, G. E., & Scaldaferro, M. A. (2014). First karyological report in Larnax and Deprea (Solanaceae). Australian Journal of Botany, 62(3), 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1071/BT14041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deanna, R., Smith, S. D., Särkinen, T., & Chiarini, F. E. (2018). Patterns of chromosomal evolution in the florally diverse Andean clade Iochrominae (Solanaceae). Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 35, 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2018.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deanna, R., Larter, M. D., Barboza, G. E., & Smith, S. D. (2019). Repeated evolution of a morphological novelty: a phylogenetic analysis of the inflated fruiting calyx in the Physalideae tribe (Solanaceae). American Journal of Botany, 106(2), 270–279. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deanna, R., Wilf, P., & Gandolfo, M. A. (2020). New physaloid fruit-fossil species from early Eocene South America. American Journal of Botany, 107(12).
   Google Scholar
• Doganlar, S., Frary, A., Daunay, M. C., Lester, R. N., & Tanksley, S. D. (2002). A comparative genetic linkage map of eggplant (Solanum melongena) and its implications for genome evolution in the Solanaceae. Genetics, 161(4), 1697–1711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. H., Hong, T. D., & Roberts, E. H. (1985). Compendium of specific germination, information and test recommendations. Handbook for Genebanks 3. International Board for Plant Genetic Resources.
   Google Scholar
• FitzJohn, R. G. (2012). Diversitree: comparative phylogenetic analyses of diversification in R. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 3(6), 1084–1092. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00234.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Futuyma, D. J. (2005). Evolution. (3rd ed.). Sinauer Associates, Inc. Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• GBIF.org. (2020). 30 Aug GBIF Occurrence Data.
   Google Scholar
• Glick, L., & Mayrose, I. (2014). ChromEvol: assessing the pattern of chromosome number evolution and the inference of polyploidy along a phylogeny. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 31(7), 1914–1922. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldblatt, P., Johnson, D. E. (1979). onwards). Index to plant chromosome numbers. St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden. http://www.tropicos.org/Project/IPCN (Accessed 17 August 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Guerra, M. (2012). Cytotaxonomy: The end of childhood. Plant Biosystems, 146(3), 703–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegarty, M. J., & Hiscock, S. J. (2008). Genomic clues to the evolutionary success of review polyploid plants. Current Biology : Cb, 18(10), R435–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.03.043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hijmans, R. J., Gavrilenko, T., Stephenson, S., Bamberg, J., Salas, A., & Spooner, D. M. (2007). Geographical and environmental range expansion through polyploidy in wild potatoes (Solanum section Petota). Global Ecology and Biogeography, 16(4), 485–495. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00308.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huelsenbeck, J. P., Nielsen, R., & Bollback, J. P. (2003). Stochastic mapping of morphological characters. Systematic Biology, 52(2), 131–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150390192780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IUCN. (2017). Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. http://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/RedListGuidelines.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K. (1974). Chromosome evolution by Robertsonian translocation in Gibasis (Commelinaceae). Chromosoma, 45(4), 353–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00283382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kembel, S. W., Cowan, P. D., Helmus, M. R., Cornwell, W. K., Morlon, H., Ackerly, D. D., Blomberg, S. P., & Webb, C. O. (2010). Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)), 26(11), 1463–1464. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levan, A., Fredga, L., & Sandberg, A. (2009). Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes. Hereditas, 52(2), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.1964.tb01953.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, D. A. (2003). The ecological transition in speciation. New Phytologist, 161(1), 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00921.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, D. A., & Funderburg, S. W. (1979). Genome size in angiosperms: temperate versus tropical species. The American Naturalist, 114(6), 784–795. https://doi.org/10.1086/283528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H. Q., Gui, P., Xiong, S. Z., & Averett, J. E. (2013). The generic position of two species of tribe Physaleae (Solanaceae) inferred from three DNA sequences: a case study on Physaliastrum and Archiphysalis. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 50, 82–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bse.2013.03.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madlung, A. (2013). Polyploidy and its effect on evolutionary success: old questions revisited with new tools. Heredity, 110(2), 99–104. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2012.79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandáková, T., & Lysak, M. A. (2008). Chromosomal phylogeny and karyotype evolution in x= 7 crucifer species (Brassicaceae). The Plant Cell, 20(10), 2559–2570. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.108.062166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxime, V. (2008). The physiology of triploid fish: Current knowledge and comparisons with diploid fish. Fish and Fisheries, 9(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2007.00269.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayrose, I., Barker, M. S., & Otto, S. P. (2010). Probabilistic models of chromosome number evolution and the inference of polyploidy. Systematic Biology, 59(2), 132–144. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syp083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menzel, M. Y. (1950). Cytotaxonomic observations on some genera of the Solanae: Margaranthus, Saracha, and Quincula. American Journal of Botany, 37(1), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1950.tb08157.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menzel, M. Y. (1951). The cytotaxonomy and genetics of Physalis. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 95(2), 132–183.
   Google Scholar
• Moscone, E. A. (1992). Estudios de cromosomas meióticos en Solanaceae de Argentina. Darwiniana, 31, 261–297.
   Google Scholar
• Moscone, E. A., Baranyi, M., Ebert, I., Greilhuber, J., Ehrendorfer, F., & Hunziker, A. T. (2003). Analysis of nuclear DNA content in Capsicum (Solanaceae) by flow cytometry and Feulgen densitometry. Annals of Botany, 92(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcg105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscone, E. A., Scaldaferro, M. A., Grabiele, M., Cecchini, N. M., Sánchez García, Y., Jarret, R., & Ehrendorfer, F. (2006 The evolution of chili peppers (Capsicum-Solanaceae): a cytogenetic perspective [Paper presentation]. VI International Solanaceae Conference: Genomics Meets Biodiversity. Acta Horticulturae, In 745, 137–170.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, R. (2001). Mutations as missing data: inferences on the ages and distributions of non-synonymous and synonymous mutations. Genetics, 159(1), 401–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olmstead, R. G., & Bohs, L. (2006 A summary of molecular systematic research in Solanaceae: 1982-2006 < SE-END> [Paper presentation].</SE-END>VI International Solanaceae Conference: Genomics Meets Biodiversity. Acta Horticulturae, In 745, 255–268.
   Google Scholar
• Olmstead, R. G., Bohs, L., Migid, H. A., Santiago Valentin, E., Garcia, V. F., & Collier, S. M. (2008). A molecular phylogeny of the Solanaceae. TAXON, 57(4), 1159–1181. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.574010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto, S. P., & Whitton, J. (2000). Polyploid incidence and evolution. Annual Review of Genetics, 34, 401–437. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.34.1.401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagel, M. (1999). Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature, 401(6756), 877–884. https://doi.org/10.1038/44766
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paradis, E., Claude, J., & Strimmer, K. (2004). APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics, 20(2), 289–290. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paszko, B. (2006). A critical review and a new proposal of karyotype asymmetry indices. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 258(1-2), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-005-0389-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peruzzi, L., & Eroğlu, H. E. (2013). Karyotype asymmetry: again, how to measure and what to measure? Comparative Cytogenetics, 7(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3897/CompCytogen.v7i1.4431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poggio, L. (1996). Algunos aportes a la citogenética y especiación vegetal < SE-END> [Paper presentation].</SE-END>Anales de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 48, 79–92.
   Google Scholar
• Poggio, L., Realini, M. F., Fourastié, M. F., García, A. M., & González, G. E. (2014). Genome downsizing and karyotype constancy in diploid and polyploid congeners: a model of genome size variation. AoB Plants, 6, plu029. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plu029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pound, G. E., Cox, S. J., & Doncaster, C. P. (2004). The accumulation of deleterious mutations within the frozen niche variation hypothesis. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 17(3), 651–662. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2003.00690.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretz, C., & Deanna, R. (2020). Typifications and nomenclatural notes in Physalis (Solanaceae) from the United States. TAXON, 69(1), 170–192. early view. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2017). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2016). Retrieved from: https://www.R-project.org (Accessed August 01, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Ranney, T. G. (2006). Polyploidy: From evolution to new plant development. Combined Proceedings International Plant Propagators’ Society, 56, 137–142.
   Google Scholar
• Revell, L. J. (2012). Phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 3(2), 217–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00169.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, A., Glick, L., Abadi, S., Einhorn, M., Kopelman, N. M., Salman-Minkov, A., Mayzel, J., Chay, O., & Mayrose, I. (2015). The Chromosome Counts Database (CCDB) – a community resource of plant chromosome numbers. New Phytologist, 206(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, N. C., & Bueno, M. L. (2006). Estudio de la diversidad citogenética de Physalis peruviana L. (Solanaceae). Acta Biológica Colombiana, 11(2), 75–85.
   Google Scholar
• Romero Zarco, C. (1986). A new method for estimating karyotype asymmetry. TAXON, 35(3), 526–530. https://doi.org/10.2307/1221906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Särkinen, T., Bohs, L., Olmstead, R. G., & Knapp, S. (2013). A phylogenetic framework for evolutionary study of the nightshades (Solanaceae): a dated 1000-tip tree. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 13(1), 214 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-13-214
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sattler, M. C., Carvalho, C. R., & Clarindo, W. R. (2016). The polyploidy and its key role in plant breeding. Planta, 243(2), 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-015-2450-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S., & Eliceiri, K. W. (2012). NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature Methods, 9(7), 671–675. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schönswetter, P., Lachmayer, M., Lettner, C., Prehsler, D., Rechnitzer, S., Reich, D. S., Sonnleitner, M., Wagner, I., Hülber, K., Schneeweiss, G. M., Trávnícek, P., & Suda, J. (2007). Sympatric diploid and hexaploid cytotypes of Senecio carniolicus (Asteraceae) in the Eastern Alps are separated along an altitudinal gradient. Journal of Plant Research, 120(6), 721–725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-007-0108-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheehan, D., & Hrapchak, B. (1980). Theory and practice of Histotechnology. (2nd ed.). The CV Mosby Company.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. D., & Baum, D. A. (2006). Phylogenetics of the florally diverse Andean clade Iochrominae (Solanaceae). American Journal of Botany, 93(8), 1140–1153. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.93.8.1140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soltis, D. E., Soltis, P. S., Pires, J. C., Kovarik, A., Tate, J. A., & Mavrodiev, E. (2004). Recent and recurrent polyploidy in Tragopogon (Asteraceae): cytogenetic, genomic and genetic comparisons. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 82(4), 485–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00335.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa Peña, M. (2001). Systematics and reproductive biology of the genus Whiteringia L’ Hér. (Solanaceae). Unpublished D Phil. Thesis, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.
   Google Scholar
• Stace, C. A. (2000). Cytology and cytogenetics as a fundamental taxonomic resource for the 20th and 21st centuries. TAXON, 49(3), 451–477. https://doi.org/10.2307/1224344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stebbins, G. L. (1971). Chromosomal Evolution in Higher Plants. E. Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Stebbins, G. L. (1985). Polyploidy, hybridization, and the invasion of new habitats. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 72(4), 824–832. https://doi.org/10.2307/2399224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiefkens, L., & Bernardello, G. (2000). Karyotypes and DNA content in diploid and polyploid Lycium (Solanaceae). Boletín de la Sociedad Argentina de Botánica, 35, 237–244.
   Google Scholar
• Szinay, D., Wijnker, E., van den Berg, R., Visser, R. G., de Jong, H., & Bai, Y. (2012). Chromosome evolution in Solanum traced by cross-species BAC-FISH . The New Phytologist, 195(3), 688–698. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04195.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorpe, P. H., González Barrera, S., & Rothstein, R. (2007). More is not always better: the genetic constraints of polyploidy. Trends in Genetics, 23(6), 263–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2007.03.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toledo, J. M., & Barboza, G. E. (2013). Physalis L. In F. O. Zuloaga, M. Belgrano & A. M. Anton (Eds.). Flora Argentina: Solanaceae. (vol. 13, pp. 141–148). IBODA-IMBIV, CONICET.
   Google Scholar
• Udall, J. A., & Wendel, J. F. (2006). Polyploidy and crop improvement. Crop Science, 46(Supplement 1), S-3–3. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2006.07.0489tpg
   Google Scholar
• Venkateswarlu, J., & Raja Rao, K. G. (1977). Morphology of the pachytene chromosomes of Physalis philadelphica Lam. Caryologia, 30(4), 435–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.1977.10796718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkateswarlu, J., & Raja Rao, K. G. (1979a). Morphology of the pachytene chromosomes of Physalis pubescens L. CYTOLOGIA, 44(1), 161–166. https://doi.org/10.1508/cytologia.44.161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkateswarlu, J., & Raja Rao, K. G. (1979b). Morphology of the pachytene chromosomes of Physalis angulata L. CYTOLOGIA, 44(3), 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1508/cytologia.44.557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss Schneeweiss, H., & Schneeweiss, G. M. (2013). Karyotype diversity and evolutionary trends in angiosperms. In I. J. Leitch (Ed.). Plant Genome Diversity., 2, 209–230.
   Google Scholar
• Winchester, A. M. (1981). Genética. (3rd ed.). México: Compañía Editorial Continental.
   Google Scholar
• Whitson, M., & Manos, P. S. (2005). Untangling Physalis (Solanaceae) from the Physaloids: A Two-Gene Phylogeny of the Physalinae. Systematic Botany, 30(1), 216–230. https://doi.org/10.1600/0363644053661841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittemore, A. T., & Olsen, R. T. (2011). Ulmus americana (Ulmaceae) is a polyploid complex. American Journal of Botany, 98(4), 754–760. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1000372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, F., & Tanksley, S. D. (2010). Chromosomal evolution in the plant family Solanaceae. BMC Genomics, 11(1), 182 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-182
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yamazaki, T. (1993). Solanaceae. In K. Iwatsuki, T. Yamazaki, D. E. Boufford, H. Ohba (Eds.). Flora of Japan. (pp. 183–194). Kodansha Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, Y., Harris, A. J., Blair, C., & He, X. (2015). RASP (Reconstruct Ancestral State in Phylogenies): a tool for historical biogeography. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 87, 46–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2015.03.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamora Tavares, M. P., Martínez, M., Magallón, S., Guzmán Dávalos, L., & Vargas Ponce, O. (2016). Physalis and physaloids: A recent and complex evolutionary history. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 100, 41–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z. Y., Lu, A. M., & D’Arcy, W. G. (1994). Solanaceae. In Z.Y. Wu & P.H. Raven (Eds.). Flora of China. (vol. 17, pp. 300–332). Missouri Botanical Garden Press.
   Google Scholar