Abstract
We investigate the relationship between internal performance evaluation and the ability of external market participants to assess the effectiveness of management’s quality strategy for a sample of 156 Australian manufacturing firms that link executive compensation to non-financial performance measures (NFPM). We find that for firms where management compensation is tied to non-financial performance measures, organisational financial performance, as measured by return on investment, has no significant direct association with the extent of disclosure of non-financial performance measures in the financial statements by Australian manufacturing firms. However, we find that the origination of a firm’s non-financial performance measures indirectly and significantly affects the financial performance of an organisation through the implementation of quality based strategy. Further, we find that manufacturing firms that place greater emphasis on quality strategy disclose more information regarding non-financial performance measures in their annual reports, and that only for firms following a quality strategy, the disclosure of non-financial performance measures positively impacts operating financial performance.
Acknowledgements
The authors are very thankful to all the associated personnel in any reference that contributed in/for the purpose of this research. We also acknowledge the constructive comments provided by discussant and participants at the 4th Biennial International Conference of the Global Accounting and Organizational Change (GAOC) held in November 17–20, 2014, AUS, Sharjah, UAE.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Notes
1 In addition, the study explores whether the results are different if ‘size’ (measured in revenue dollars) is included in the model as a control variable. However, the results (not tabulated) reveal no significant difference between the two models.