483
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

‘Sorry, but they don’t want Chinese Americans to participate’: a case study of tracking in an Ivy League Chinese language programme

ORCID Icon
Pages 437-462 | Received 15 Dec 2015, Accepted 31 Dec 2016, Published online: 19 Jan 2017
 

ABSTRACT

This study examines a Chinese language programme in an Ivy League institution through the lens of Tracking to re-conceptualise the achievement gap between Chinese heritage language learners (CHLLs) and non-heritage language learners. Like most prestigious universities in the U.S., Chinese language learners in this case study are put on one of two tracks: Chinese heritage or non-heritage. This study reveals that CHLLs obtain a lower level of Chinese language proficiency despite their cultural background and language advantages. Scholars have tended to analyse CHLLs’ academic performance through linguistic or cultural perspectives. Drawing on research studies of tracking systems, this study compares the dual-track system in a Chinese language programme with the tracking system in place at American K-12 schools. This comparison allows for a deeper understanding of how CHLLs’ status as a minority in American language classrooms makes it more difficult for CHLLs to learn Chinese. This study examines the cultural processes and structural forces that shape the learning environment of CHLLs. It focuses on factors that contribute to CHLLs’ academic struggles, including school culture, institutional structures, and individual’s agency, to offer foreign language teachers and scholars new ways of thinking about improving the language proficiencies of heritage language learners.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Notes

1. This assessment, designed by the American Council for the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL), provides a standardized and substantive measurement of students' improvement in spoken ability over the course of the summer. See http://www.actfl.org/professional-development/certified-proficiency-testing-program#opic for a description.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 310.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.