Article title: Practice efficiency and total cost of care with bispecifics and CAR-T in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: an institutional perspective
Authors: Lei, M., Li, Q., O'Day, K., Meyer, K., & Jun, M.
Journal: Future Oncology
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14796694.2024.2354157
In an additional footnote has been inserted relating to the heading ‘Epcoritamab’ the added footnote reads ‘Grade 3/4 CRS was rounded to 3.0% and Grade 3+ ICANS was rounded to 1.0% in model calculations’.
The Grade 3/4 value for Epcoritamab within the ‘CRS’ section of the table has been updated to ‘2.5%’ from ‘3%’ to accurately reflect the rate in the product prescribing information.
Furthermore the ‘Grade 3/4’ subcategory within the ‘ICANS’ section has been changed to ‘Grade 3+’ based on the fact that the only non-Grade 1/2 ICANS event was Grade 5 according to the product prescribing information.
The ‘Epcoritamab’ value for this subcategory (Grade 3+, see previous point) has been changed to ‘0.6%’ from ‘1%’ to accurately reflect the rate in the product prescribing information.
The figure captions for Figures 2 and 3 were mistakenly switched, the caption for Figure 2 related to Figure 3 and vice versa. This has now been rectified.
Corrections
Table 1. Model inputs and sources.
Figure 2. Total cost breakdown over each time horizon.
a Note: When examining costs over median duration of treatment, total costs were lower for glofitamab, while monthly costs were lower for epcoritamab.
Figure 3. Per-patient personnel and chair time of comparators vs epcoritamab. (A) 1-year time horizon. (B) 6-month time horizon. (C) Median cycles time horizon.