697
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Sustainability policy paradox: coping with changing environmental priorities in municipal waste management

Pages 785-796 | Received 16 Feb 2019, Accepted 14 Aug 2019, Published online: 03 Oct 2019
 

ABSTRACT

The impacts of climate change are apparent, but the US federal government continues to deny climate science, deregulate, and obstruct international environmental consensus. Municipal governments are thus, with increasing urgency, modifying infrastructure to achieve a broad range of environmental goals. Much of this action occurs within a sustainability framework. Commonly framed as a balance of economic, environmental, and social interests that ensures the viability of future generations, sustainability is conflictual in practice. As cities attempt bold environmental action, understanding how these conflicts play out is crucial. This study uses Deborah Stone's theory of policy paradox combined with insights from sustainability policy and discards studies literatures to analyze how policy makers respond to competing interests and values in the case of waste management in Washington DC. Though DC policy actors agree about the need for sustainability, stakeholders have clashed repeatedly over the city's reliance on waste-to-energy (WTE) incineration for disposal. I argue that WTE in DC can best be understood as a ‘sustainability policy paradox’: a policy paradox that results not only from predictable tensions between environmental and economic interests, but conflicts between environmental objectives that surface in the contemporary context of technocratic uncertainty, the neoliberal state, and climate change.

Acknowledgements

Funding for this research was provided in part by the Environmental Solutions Initiative (ESI) at MIT. The author thanks research assistants Amy Plovnick and Fernando Madrazo Vega, and gratefully acknowledges the contributions of Judith Layzer and Eran Ben-Joseph.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.

Notes on contributor

Lily Baum Pollans is Assistant Professor of Urban Policy and Planning at Hunter College in New York City. As an urban planner and scholar, her interests lie in sustainability, infrastructure, and environmental justice. As a practitioner, she has worked in both municipal and institutional settings on public transportation, public space design, environmental justice, brownfield redevelopment, and zero waste. In her current research, Pollans looks at institutional and infrastructural transformation of solid waste systems in U.S. cities, and the considers the ability of municipalities to influence consumption. She has a Master's and PhD in city planning from MIT.

Notes

1. Please seeBen-Joseph et al. (Citation2016) and Pollans et al. (Citation2017) for a description of the larger project as well as additional findings.

Additional information

Funding

Funding for this research was provided in part by the Environmental Solutions Initiative (ESI) at MIT.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 217.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.