403
Views
42
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Estimating Lifetime Risk from Spot Biomarker Data and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC)

&
Pages 747-766 | Received 14 Apr 2013, Accepted 21 May 2013, Published online: 27 Aug 2013
 

Abstract

Human biomarker measurements in tissues including blood, breath, and urine can serve as efficient surrogates for environmental monitoring because a single biological sample integrates personal exposure across all environmental media and uptake pathways. However, biomarkers represent a “snapshot” in time, and risk assessment is generally based on long-term averages. In this study, a statistical approach is proposed for estimating long-term average exposures from distributions of spot biomarker measurements using intraclass correlations based upon measurement variance components from the literature. This methodology was developed and demonstrated using a log-normally distributed data set of urinary OH-pyrene taken from our own studies. The calculations are generalized for any biomarker data set of spot measures such as those from the National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Studies (NHANES) requiring only spreadsheet calculations. A three-tiered approach depending on the availability of metadata was developed for converting any collection of spot biomarkers into an estimated distribution of individual means that can then be compared to a biologically relevant risk level. Examples from a Microsoft Excel-based spreadsheet for calculating estimates of the proportion of the population exceeding a given biomonitoring equivalent level are provided as an appendix.

Acknowledgments

This article is not subject to U.S. copyright.

The authors thank Stephen Edwards, Peter Egeghy, Martin Phillips, Myriam Medina-Vera, Krista Christensen, Timothy Buckley, Lynn Flowers, and Linda Sheldon from the U.S. EPA, Matthew Stiegel from the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, and Stephen Rappaport from the University of California, Berkeley, for valuable insights and discussions. This work was reviewed by the U.S. EPA and approved for publication, but does not necessarily reflect official agency policy. The authors declare they have no competing financial interests.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 482.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.