308
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Impact of genotype, seed composition, agronomic trait, and environment on soybean test weight

, , , , & ORCID Icon
Pages 711-729 | Received 08 Jul 2019, Accepted 20 Aug 2019, Published online: 05 Sep 2019
 

ABSTRACT

Test weight (TW) is a primary indicator of soybean grain quality and measure of bulk density (mass/volume). The objectives of this research were to evaluate the effects of genotype, environment and planting date on TW, and determine the relationship of TW with agronomic and seed composition traits. Six experiments (Exp) were conducted using diverse sets of cultivars/experimental lines. Significant negative linear correlations between TW and seed moisture in each of five genotypes were observed (P < 0.0001). A linear regression model using both measured TW and moisture were developed to normalize TW on a 13% moisture basis for comparison across genotypes and environments. Significant genetic variations (P < 0.01) of TW among genotypes were observed, ranging from 70.0 to 75.3; 70.3 to 74.3; and 66.4 to 74.3 kg hL−1 in Exp-1, 2, and 3, respectively. Locations and G x E interactions also had significant effects on TW (P < 0.01) in these EXPs. Soybean yield was significantly negatively correlated with TW in Exp-1 and 3 (P < 0.01). Seed protein and sucrose contents, and maturity days were significantly, positively correlated with TW, while seed oil content and seed size were significantly, negatively correlated with TW in most or all experiments (P < 0.05). Effects of planting dates on TW were inconsistent for both Exp-4 and 5 between 2 years. There was no correlation between TW of the cultivars and their releasing years in MG VII. To our knowledge, this is the first report on test weight in soybean and the results could be used to guide future genetic improvement of TW.

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to Dale Wood, Brice Wilson, Earl Baxter, Greg Gokalp, and Tatyana Nienow for their technical assistance in this project and thanks Xuelin Luo for her technical assistance in data analysis.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the University of Georgia Research Foundation .

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 503.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.