1,217
Views
54
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Systematic review and meta-analyses

Quantifying the strength of the associations of prototype perceptions with behaviour, behavioural willingness and intentions: a meta-analysis

, , &
Pages 25-43 | Received 23 Oct 2013, Accepted 02 Jul 2014, Published online: 28 Aug 2014
 

Abstract

Prototypes (i.e., social images representing perceptions of typical persons engaging in or refraining from certain behaviour) have been shown to explain health-related behaviours. The present meta-analysis quantified the strength of the associations of prototype perceptions with health motivation and behaviour. Specifically, the analysis addressed (i) the relationship of prototype favourability (i.e., degree of likability) and similarity (i.e., perceived resemblance to the self) with behaviour, willingness and intentions; (ii) the effect of the interaction between favourability and similarity; and (iii) the extent to which health-risk and health-protective prototypes differed in their association with these outcomes. A total of 80 independent studies were identified based on 69 articles. The results indicated that prototype favourability and similarity were related to behaviour, intentions and willingness with small-to-medium effect sizes (r+ = 0.12–0.43). Direct measures of prototype perceptions generally produced larger effects than indirect measures. The interaction between favourability and similarity produced small-to-large effect sizes (r+ = .22–.54). The results suggest that both health-risk and health-protective prototypes might be useful targets for interventions (r+ = .22–.54). In order to increase health-protective behaviours, intentions and behaviour could be targeted by increasing similarity to health-protective prototypes. Health-risk behaviour might be decreased by targeting willingness by modifying health-risk prototype favourability and similarity.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Rick Gibbons and Meg Gerrard for their feedback on construct definitions. The authors thank the following individuals for providing further details regarding their studies: Judy Andrews, Maureen Barckley, Hart Blanton, Maria Comello, Yifu Chen, Elliot Coups, Paul Etcheverry, Meg Gerrard, Rick Gibbons, David Lane, Barbara Maglica, Heike Mahler, Ingrid Myklestad, Judith Ouellette, Melissa Peterson, Bettina Piko, Wendy Rogers, Bridie Scott-Parker, Paschal Sheeran, Hanneke Teunissen, Jemma Todd and John de Wit.

Funding

The study was supported by a research grant [Project No. 121020020] from ZonMW, Organisation for Health Research and Development, the Netherlands. Collaboration was supported by a travel grant from the Erasmus Trust Fund.

Supplemental material

Supplemental material for this article can be accessed here: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2014.941997

Additional information

Funding

Funding: The study was supported by a research grant [Project No. 121020020] from ZonMW, Organisation for Health Research and Development, the Netherlands. Collaboration was supported by a travel grant from the Erasmus Trust Fund.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 216.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.