Publication Cover
The Journal of Positive Psychology
Dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice
Volume 11, 2016 - Issue 6
2,228
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A differentiated approach to the link between positive emotion, motivation, and eudaimonic well-being

, &
Pages 595-608 | Received 20 Feb 2015, Accepted 05 Jan 2016, Published online: 11 Mar 2016
 

Abstract

Many studies have highlighted the role that positive emotions play in promoting eudaimonic well-being, yet often fail to differentiate between discrete positive emotions (e.g. gratitude, compassion, pride, and contentment). As such, potential functional differences among positive emotions in contributing to eudaimonic well-being may have been overlooked. The present study (N = 273) differentiated communion from agency motivation as well as other-focused from self-focused eudaimonic well-being. In line with a hypothesized model, pride contributed positively to self-focused eudaimonic well-being indirectly via agency motivation, and contentment was directly linked positively to self-focused eudaimonic well-being. Compassion contributed positively to other-focused eudaimonic well-being indirectly via communion motivation and gratitude was directly linked positively to other-focused eudaimonic well-being. While several other links were observed, hypothesized links were generally stronger. These findings highlight the potential utility of adopting approaches that differentiate among positive emotions in applied and theoretical work in the field of positive psychology.

Notes

1. Within these factor analytic studies, autonomy – a sixth component of eudaimonic well-being – did not show a consistent pattern. For example, some studies report autonomy as its own separate factor (Abbott et al., Citation2006; Burns & Machin, Citation2009, Citation2012), whereas others have found that it loads onto the self-focused factor (Gallaghe r et al., Citation2009) or the other-focused factor (Kafka & Kozma, Citation2002). Given this inconsistency, autonomy was not modeled in the current study.

2. Participants also completed a number of other measures not related to the primary aim of the present study, which was to test the proposed model. Details on these measures and resulting data can be requested from the corresponding author.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 351.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.