Publication Cover
Global Public Health
An International Journal for Research, Policy and Practice
Volume 15, 2020 - Issue 9
403
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

‘PrEP should be for men only’: Young heterosexual men’s views on PrEP in rural South Africa

ORCID Icon, , , & ORCID Icon
Pages 1337-1348 | Received 21 Nov 2019, Accepted 02 Mar 2020, Published online: 24 Mar 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Background: Gaps persist in HIV testing, treatment, and prevention services for men, leading to higher attributable mortality compared to women. We sought to characterise HIV prevention knowledge, risk behaviours, and interest in pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among young men in rural South Africa. Methods: We conducted interviews with HIV-negative heterosexual men which were thematically analysed to identify key themes. Results: Among 31 participants, median age was 26 (IQR23–31), 77% were unemployed, 52% reported previous STI, 84% reported casual sexual partners. Men acknowledged inconsistent condom use with multiple partners, reporting high-risk sexual behaviour despite recognised risk. Mistrust between partners was common. Respondents reported willingness to take PrEP to protect themselves and their partner, though anticipated stigma and structural barriers. Men worried that if their female partner had PrEP, she would become sexually active with others. Conclusions: In rural South Africa, young heterosexual men acknowledged high HIV-risk behaviour, expressed concern about acquiring HIV, and recognised the value of PrEP. Men were often not supportive of their female partners taking PrEP. Implementing HIV prevention services needs to incorporate young men’s perspectives and may require gender-specific interventions, including addressing stigma, differentiated service delivery models such as community-based services or adapting facility services to target men.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the staff at Church of Scotland Hospital and Philanjalo NGO for their dedication to the Msinga community.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

The study was funded by Doris Duke Charitable Foundation (AH, JL #2016178; SS #2015216), Irene Diamond Foundation (#2006078).

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access
  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart
* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.