38
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Keratoconus: advances in anterior lamellar keratoplasty techniques

, , &
Pages 59-66 | Received 20 Nov 2019, Accepted 08 Feb 2020, Published online: 19 Feb 2020
 

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) is nowadays considered the gold standard for the surgical treatment of keratoconus thanks to the lower rate of complications compared to conventional penetrating keratoplasty (PK). However, the learning curve and the suboptimal quality of donor-recipient interface still remain debated issues.

Areas covered: To date, big-bubble DALK (BB-DALK) is the most widely performed technique. However, the introduction of femtosecond laser has given new impulse to the standardization of DALK, but also new drawbacks to deal with. Furthermore, the recent redefinition of corneal anatomy understanding along with the introduction of novel techniques have provided further advantages in terms of success rate and postoperative visual outcomes.

Expert commentary: Although DALK is still dependent on single surgeon experience and skills, techniques and tools employed are quickly evolving thus improving surgical outcomes. However, to date, there is no universal consensus about alternative options in case of BB-DALK failure as well as management of intra-operative complications.

Article highlights

  • DALK provides several advantages over PK for the treatment of keratoconus

  • The most popular techniques to perform DALK is BB-DALK

  • Current limitations of DALK learning curve and interface quality

  • New technologies such as femtosecond laser could open new scenario for DALK.

Declaration of interest

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Reviewer Disclosures

Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no relevant financial relationships or otherwise to disclose.

Additional information

Funding

This paper is not funded.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 99.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 608.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.