93
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Eye injuries sustained during protests due to non-lethal weaponry: a systematic review

, , &
Pages 297-304 | Received 23 Dec 2020, Accepted 13 May 2021, Published online: 28 May 2021
 

ABSTRACT

Introduction

Ocular injuries may be produced by non-lethal weaponry. With the upsurge of protests in the United States earlier in 2020, the consequences posed by non-lethal weaponry represent an emerging public health concern. This review summarizes the types of ocular injuries sustained, reports on secondary injuries when applicable and outlines the visual outcomes and necessary methods of treatments.

Areas covered

This paper reviews the current literature pertaining to ocular injuries sustained during protests. The literature was searched through three databases (Medline, Ovid, CINAHL). Grey literature was searched through Clinical Trials.gov and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Conferences held through American Academy of Ophthalmology, Canadian Society of Ophthalmology, and Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology were searched. Primary studies that adhered to the inclusion and exclusion criteria were included.

Expert opinion

Numerous forms of non-lethal weaponry are capable of producing ocular injuries. Open and closed globe injuries are observed in addition to countless secondary injuries. The presenting visual acuity is an indication to the severity of the ocular injuries. Surgical intervention is the frequent primary method of treatment. In the interest of public health, the necessary regulations must be implemented to control the usage of non-lethal weaponry during protests.

Declaration of interest

The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.

Reviewer disclosures

A peer reviewer has disclosed being an employee of Essilor International. Peer reviewers on this manuscript have no other relevant financial relationships or otherwise to disclose.

Additional information

Funding

This paper was not funded.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 99.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 608.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.