Working memory capacity predicts conflict-task performance

Abstract

The relationship between the ability to maintain task goals and working memory capacity (WMC) is firmly established, but evidence for WMC-related differences in conflict processing is mixed. We investigated whether WMC (measured using two complex-span tasks) mediates differences in adjustments of cognitive control in response to conflict. Participants performed a Simon task in which congruent and incongruent trials were equiprobable, but in which the proportion of congruency repetitions (congruent trials followed by congruent trials or incongruent trials followed by incongruent trials) and thus the need for trial-by-trial adjustments in cognitive control varied by block. The overall Simon effect did not depend on WMC capacity. However, for the low-WMC participants the Simon effect decreased as the proportion of congruency repetitions decreased, whereas for the high- and average-WMC participants it was relatively constant across conditions. Distribution analysis of the Simon effect showed more evidence for the inhibition of stimulus location in the low- than in the high-WMC participants, especially when the proportion of congruency repetitions was low. We hypothesize that low-WMC individuals exhibit more interference from task-irrelevant information due to weaker preparatory control prior to stimulus presentation and, thus, stronger reliance on reactive recruitment of cognitive control.

Keywords:

• Working memory
• Executive control
• Conflict processing
• Simon task
• Individual differences

Notes

¹ A delta-plot analysis conducted after error trial removal yielded comparable results to those reported with error trials included. The main effect of condition was significant: F(2, 354) = 3.74, MSE = 0.12, p = .025, η²_p = .02. The main effect of WMC group [F(1, 177) = 1.87, MSE = 0.08, p = .137, = .03] and Condition × WMC (F < 1) were not significant.