Working memory capacity predicts conflict-task performance

REFERENCES

• Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436. doi: 10.1163/156856897X00357
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braver, T. S. (2012). The variable nature of cognitive control: A dual mechanisms framework. Trends in Cognitive Science, 16, 106–113. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braver, T. S., Gray, J. R., & Burgess, G. C. (2007). Explaining the many varieties of working memory variation: Dual mechanisms of cognitive control Variation in working memory (pp. 76–106).
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, G. C., & Braver, T. S. (2010). Neural mechanisms of interference control in working memory: Effects of interference expectancy and fluid intelligence. PLoS One, 5(9), e12861. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burle, B., Possamaï, C. -A., Vidal, F., Bonnet, M., & Hasbroucq, T. (2002). Executive control in the Simon effect: An electromyo- graphic and distributional analysis. Psychological Research, 66, 324–339. doi: 10.1007/s00426-002-0105-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, A. R., Cowan, N., Bunting, M. F., Therriault, D., & Minkoff, S. (2002). A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 30, 163–183. doi: 10.1016/S0160-2896(01)00096-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user's guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 769–786. doi: 10.3758/BF03196772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, R., Liang, C. C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731–750. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egner, T. (2007). Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control. Cognitive, Affectitve, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 380–390. doi: 10.3758/CABN.7.4.380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egner, T., Ely, S., & Grinband, J. (2010). Going, going, gone: Characterizing the time-course of congruency sequence effects. Frontiers in Psychology, 1(154), 1–8. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00154
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Engle, R. W. (2010). Role of working-memory capacity in cognitive control. Current Anthropology, 51, S17–S26. doi: 10.1086/650572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle, R. W., & Kane, M. J. (2003). Executive attention, working memory capacity, and a two-factor Theory of Cognitive Control. In B. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 44) (pp. 145–199). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavioral Research Methods, 39, 175–191. doi: 10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forstmann, B. U., Jahfari, S., Scholte, H. S., Wolfensteller, U., van den Wildenberg, W. P., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2008). Function and structure of the right inferior frontal cortex predict individual differences in response inhibition: A model-based approach. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 9790–9796. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1465-08.2008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forstmann, B. U., van den Wildenberg, W. P., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2008). Neural mechanisms, temporal dynamics, and individual differences in interference control. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1854–1865. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuda, K., & Vogel, E. K. (2011). Individual differences in recovery time from attentional capture. Psychological Science, 22, 361–368. doi: 10.1177/0956797611398493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gratton, G., Coles, M. G., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 480–506. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heitz, R. P., & Engle, R. W. (2007). Focusing the spotlight: Individual differences in visual attention control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 217–240. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.2.217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K. P. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 68, 1–17. doi: 10.1007/s00426-003-0132-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimenez, L., & Mendez, A. (2013). It is not what you expect: Dissociating conflict adaptation from expectancies in a Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 271–284. doi:10.1037/a0027734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, M. J., Conway, A. R. A., Hambrick, D. Z., & Engle, R. W. (2007). Variation in working memory capacity as variation in executive attention and control Variation in working memory (pp. 21–48). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 47–70. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.1.47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S. W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W., & Engle, R. W. (2004). The generality of working memory capacity: A latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 189–217. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A. W.III, Cho, R. Y., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science, 303, 1023–1026. doi: 10.1126/science.1089910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keye, D., Wilhelm, O., Oberauer, K., & van Ravenzwaaij, D. (2009). Individual differences in conflict-monitoring: Testing means and covariance hypothesis about the Simon and the Eriksen Flanker task. Psychological Research, 73, 762–776. doi: 10.1007/s00426-008-0188-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.97.2.253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, D. L., & Prat, C. S. (2002). Working memory and stroop interference: An individual differences investigation. Memory and Cognition, 30, 294–301. doi: 10.3758/BF03195290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, C. M. (1991). Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 163–203. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, M. E., & Kane, M. J. (2012). Working memory capacity and Stroop interference: Global versus local indices of executive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 748–759. doi:10.1037/a0029200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey, C. C., Elliott, E. M., Wiggers, J., Eaves, S. D., Shelton, J. T., & Mall, J. T. (2012). Goal-neglect links Stroop interference with working memory capacity. Acta Psychologica, 141, 250–260. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.05.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Notebaert, W., Gevers, W., Verbruggen, F., & Liefooghe, B. (2006). Top-down and bottom-up sequential modulations of congruency effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 112–117. doi: 10.3758/BF03193821
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor, R. W., Miles, J. D., & Baroni, G. (2011). Reaction time distribution analysis of spatial correspondence effects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 18, 242–266. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0053-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redick, T. S., Broadway, J. M., Meier, M. E., Kuriakose, P. S., Unsworth, N., Kane, M. J. (2012). Measuring working memory capacity with automated complex span tasks. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28, 164–171. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2002). Micro- and macro-adjustments of task set: Activation and suppression in conflict tasks. Psychological Research, 66, 312–323. doi: 10.1007/s00426-002-0104-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, J. R. (1969). Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 174–176. doi: 10.1037/h0027448
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spape, M. M., Band, G. P., & Hommel, B. (2011). Compatibility-sequence effects in the Simon task reflect episodic retrieval but not conflict adaptation: Evidence from LRP and N2. Biological Psychology, 88, 116–123. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schroter, H., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1345–1363. doi:10.1037//0096-1523.28.6.1345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullsperger, M., & King, J. A. (2010). Proactive and reactive recruitment of cognitive control: Comment on Hikosaka and Isoda. Trends in Cognitive Science, 14, 191–192. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2010.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsworth, N., Heitz, R. P., Schrock, J. C., & Engle, R. W. (2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behavioral Research Methods, 37, 498–505. doi: 10.3758/BF03192720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsworth, N., Redick, T. S., Spillers, G. J., & Brewer, G. A. (2011). Variation in working memory capacity and cognitive control: Goal maintenance and microadjustments of control. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 326–355. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.597865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unsworth, N., Schrock, J. C., & Engle, R. W. (2004). Working memory capacity and the antisaccade task: Individual differences in voluntary saccade control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 30, 1302–1321. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.6.1302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weldon, R. B., Mushlin, H., Kim, B., & Sohn, M. H. (2013). The effect of working memory capacity on conflict monitoring. Acta Psychologica, 142, 6–14. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhelm, O., Hildebrandt, A., & Oberauer, K. (2013). What is working memory capacity, and how can we measure it? Frontiers in Psychology, 4(433), 1–22. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00433
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winkel, J., Wijnen, J. G., Danielmeier, C., Groen, II, Derrfuss, J., & Ridderinkhof, K. R. (2011). Observed and self-experienced conflict induce similar behavioral and neural adaptation. Social Neuroscience, 7, 385–397. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2011.628760
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wylie, S. A., Ridderinkhof, K. R., Bashore, T. R., & van den Wildenberg, W. P. (2010). The effect of Parkinson's disease on the dynamics of on-line and proactive cognitive control during action selection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 2058–2073. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar