ABSTRACT
Workplace bullying is often a traumatic communication experience. Using face-negotiation theory, this study compared strategic coping behaviors of employees from individualistic and collectivistic cultures. Findings from surveys of U.S. Americans and Singaporeans (N = 648) revealed that face concerns predict use of coping strategies modestly. In both cultures, self-face positively relates to neglect and acquiescence, and other-face negatively associates with retribution. Further, culture does not moderate relationships between face concerns and enactment of strategic coping behaviors, suggesting that people in both cultures cope with bullying in a similar manner.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Additional information
Funding
Notes on contributors
Jaesub Lee
Jaesub Lee is Professor at the Valenti School of Communication, University of Houston, Texas. His research interests include managerial relationships, leadership communication, and risk and crisis communication.
Jingpei J. C. Lim
Jingpei J. C. Lim is currently a communication specialist working for an international firm in Houston, Texas.
Robert L. Heath
Robert L. Heath is Professor-Emeritus at the University of Houston, Texas. His research interests include risk, crisis, safety, and strategic management communication.