Ethical dilemmas in community interpreting: interpreters’ experiences and guidance from the code of ethics

ABSTRACT

Community interpreters (or public service interpreters) work in a variety of contexts, including health, legal, and governmental service provision. Although the field is characterised by diversity, community interpreters may be unified by the relevant professional code of ethics. Previous studies have shown that case deliberation in educational settings can be valuable to practitioners in developing the skills to resolve ethical dilemmas in practice. This study explored ethical dilemmas experienced by community interpreters working in policing and other contexts. Transcripts of interviews with 20 Australian community interpreters were analysed to document the types of ethical dilemmas discussed and the salience of ethical principles in resolving them. Participants referred to all ethical principles from the Australian Code of Ethics. Four themes were identified in the types of dilemmas that participants reported: wanting to help one of the parties, not wanting to say what the parties said, pressure to take on another professional’s role, and disagreeing with another interpreter’s choices. Participants’ resolutions of ethical dilemmas mostly aligned with principles from the Code. The study highlights the significance of professional ethics to community interpreters and provides examples from practice that may be valuable in community interpreter education, training and professional development contexts.

KEYWORDS:

• Interpreters
• community interpreting
• public service interpreting
• ethical dilemmas
• professional ethics

Acknowledgments

I thank TIS National for advertising the research to their interpreter panel. Thank you to the participants for sharing their insights and experiences. Thank you to Kesherie Gurung for research assistance, and Leanne Wisbey for interview transcription.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the University of Tasmania’s Research Enhancement Grant Scheme (REGS).