ABSTRACT
To encourage residents to sort their waste, governments can use incentives such as cash rewards or social reinforcement. The effect of such incentives remains unclear, and residents often are deterred by the complexity of procedures to obtain their rewards. Based on positive reinforcement theory and using a survey experiment, we study the effect of types and procedures of incentives on waste sorting behavioural intentions in a large Chinese city. We find that cash incentives have a stronger effect on waste sorting behavioural intentions than incentives based on social reinforcement such as a certificate of merit. Cash-based incentives also have a stronger effect on perceived probability to obtain the incentive and on perceptions of procedure difficulty. More simple procedures to obtain the incentive does not seem to have an effect on waste sorting behavioural intentions, neither direct nor in an interaction. However, the simplification of the procedure through which an incentive can be obtained is positively correlated with perceived probability to obtain the incentive.
Acknowledgement
The authors thank the 2023 ASPA Annual Conference and the NIG course. The authors also thank Robin Cuypers, reviewers, and editors for the help.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Additional information
Funding
Notes on contributors
Yang Zhao
Yang Zhao is a PhD candidate in public administration at the Public Governance Institute, KU Leuven, Belgium.
Steven Van de Walle
Steven Van de Walle is a professor of public management at the Public Governance Institute, KU Leuven, Belgium.