994
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

The representation of Indigenous Australians in sport for development policy: what’s the problem?

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 587-603 | Received 22 Nov 2020, Accepted 17 Jun 2021, Published online: 27 Jul 2021
 

ABSTRACT

This research critically examines Sport for Development (SFD) policies targeting Indigenous Australians. While previous studies have sought to compare the impact of SFD policies on First Nations people in Canada and Australia, no research to date has provided a detailed investigation of the specific policy approaches underpinning SFD programmes, that target Indigenous Australians. Utilising thematic discourse analysis and Bacchi’s (2009) What’s the problem represented to be? (WPR) theoretical framework, this study seeks to expose the dominant representations within the policy approaches underpinning the use of SFD to achieve Closing the Gap (CTG) outcomes. Furthermore, this research seeks to question the policy ‘problems’ upon which these representations are based. Drawing on policy documents produced by the Australian Government between 2013 and 2019, the findings highlight a range of policy ‘problems’ associated with the use of sport to achieve CTG outcomes. Utilising a WPR approach, this study considers the impacts of these dominant representations and presents an argument for how these ‘problems’ may be considered differently. In doing so, this analysis reveals a policy approach underpinned by the ‘power of sport’ narrative, which draws its roots from the colonial era. Additionally, this research questions how sport may be understood for Indigenous Australians, and whether policy ‘problems’ such as the lack of participation in formalised sport by Indigenous Australians represents a new form of resistance. Finally, this paper calls for more Indigenous-led research to continue to disrupt potentially destructive narratives surrounding SFD for Indigenous Australians.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Notes

1. The authors have utilised the term ‘Indigenous Australians’ to refer to both Aboriginal (First Nations peoples who resided on the continent pre-colonisation) and Torres Strait Islander peoples (First Nations people whose traditional lands were off shore) throughout the manuscript, unless when remaining consistent with cited texts. For a full discussion on naming, refer to Carlson, B., Berglund, J., Harris, M., & Poata-Smith, E. (Citation2014). Four Scholars Speak to Navigating the Complexities of Naming in Indigenous Studies. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 43(1), 58–72. doi:10.1017/jie.2014.8

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 265.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.