https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3818-9377
ABSTRACT
Background: Psychological therapies are the recommended first-line treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Previous systematic reviews have grouped theoretically similar interventions to determine differences between broadly distinct approaches. Consequently, we know little regarding the relative efficacy of the specific manualized therapies commonly applied to the treatment of PTSD.
Objective: To determine the effect sizes of manualized therapies for PTSD.
Methods: We undertook a systematic review following Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. A pre-determined definition of clinical importance was applied to the results and the quality of evidence was appraised using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) approach.
Results: 114 randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) of 8171 participants were included. There was robust evidence that the therapies broadly defined as CBT with a trauma focus (CBT-T), as well as Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR), had a clinically important effect. The manualized CBT-Ts with the strongest evidence of effect were Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT); Cognitive Therapy (CT); and Prolonged Exposure (PE). There was also some evidence supporting CBT without a trauma focus; group CBT with a trauma focus; guided internet-based CBT; and Present Centred Therapy (PCT). There was emerging evidence for a number of other therapies.
Conclusions: A recent increase in RCTs of psychological therapies for PTSD, results in a more confident recommendation of CBT-T and EMDR as the first-line treatments. Among the CBT-Ts considered by the review CPT, CT and PE should be the treatments of choice. The findings should guide evidence informed shared decision-making between patient and clinician.
Objetivo: determinar los tamaños del efecto de las terapias manualizadas para el TEPT.
Métodos: Realizamos una revisión sistemática siguiendo las guías de la Colaboración Cochrane. Se aplicó una definición predeterminada de importancia clínica a los resultados y se evaluó la calidad de la evidencia utilizando el enfoque de calificación de recomendaciones, evaluación, desarrollo y evaluaciones (GRADE).
Resultados: se incluyeron 114 ensayos controlados aleatorizados (ECA) de 8.171 participantes. Hubo evidencia robusta de que las terapias ampliamente definidas como TCC con un enfoque de trauma (TCC-T), así como la desensibilización y reprocesamiento POR movimientos oculares (EMDR), tuvieron un efecto clínicamente importante. Las CBT-Ts manualizados con la mayor evidencia de efecto fueron la terapia de procesamiento cognitivo (CPT); Terapia cognitiva (CT); y exposición prolongada (PE). También hubo alguna evidencia que apoya la TCC sin un enfoque traumático; TCC grupal con enfoque en trauma; TCC basada en Internet guiada; y terapia centrada en el presente (PCT). Hubo evidencia emergente para una serie de otras terapias.
Conclusiones: Un aumento reciente en ECA de terapias psicológicas para el TEPT, da como resultado una recomendación más confiable de CBT-T y EMDR como los tratamientos de primera línea. Entre los CBT-Ts considerados por la revisión CPT, CT y PE deberían ser los tratamientos de elección. Los hallazgos deben guiar la toma de decisiones compartida informada por la evidencia entre el paciente y el médico.
目的: 确定创伤后应激障碍的规范疗法的效应量大小。
方法: 我们按照Cochrane协作指南进行了系统综述。临床重要性的预定义用于结果中, 并使用‘建议, 评估, 发展和评估等级’ (GRADE) 方法评估证据的质量。
结果: 纳入了8171名参与者的114项随机对照试验 (RCT) 。有力的证据表明, 广泛定义为创伤中心CBT (CBT-T) 以及眼动脱敏再加工 (EMDR) 疗法具有重要的临床效果。效果最强的CBT-T是认知加工疗法 (CPT), 认知疗法 (CT), 和延长暴露 (PE) 。也有一些证据支持非创伤中心的CBT, 以创伤中心的团体CBT, 有指导的基于互联网的CBT, 现实中心疗法 (PCT) 。越来越多的证据表明存在其他许多疗法。
结论: 创伤后应激障碍心理治疗的RCT最近增加, 结果更加支持CBT-T和EMDR作为一线治疗方法。在本综述考虑的CBT-T中, CPT, CT和PE应该是首选的治疗方法。研究结果应指导患者和临床医生之间循证知情的共同决策。
PALABRAS CLAVES:
1. Introduction
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a common mental disorder that can develop as a consequence of exposure to a serious traumatic event (American Psychiatric Association, Citation2013; World Health Organisation, Citation2018). Diagnostic criteria for PTSD specify the presence of symptoms including re-experiencing the traumatic event; avoiding reminders of the trauma; alterations in arousal and reactivity; and changes in cognition and mood (American Psychiatric Association, Citation2013). PTSD is a debilitating disorder, which is commonly comorbid with other conditions such as depression, substance use and anxiety disorders (Kessler, Citation2000; Kessler, Sonnega, Bromet, Hughes, & Nelson, Citation1995).
Previous systematic reviews have converged on the general finding that psychological therapies are effective for the treatment of PTSD (Bisson, Roberts, Andrew, Cooper, & Lewis, Citation2013; Bradley, Greene, Russ, Dutra, & Westen, Citation2005, Cusack, Grubaugh, Knapp, & Frueh, Citation2006; Jonas et al., Citation2013, Watts et al., Citation2013). Reviews to date have grouped psychological therapies together based on similar theoretical underpinnings and overlapping techniques. A broad distinction has been made between therapies that focus on the traumatic event and those that aim to reduce traumatic stress symptoms without directly targeting the trauma memory or related thoughts, with the strongest evidence for the effect of those with a trauma-focus (Bisson et al., Citation2013; Bradley et al., Citation2005; Cusack et al., Citation2006; Jonas et al., Citation2013). A further distinction has been made based on the theoretical model from which a therapy stems, for example, grouping those based on cognitive behavioural principles. Despite the benefits to the methodology in terms of detecting differences between broadly different therapeutic approaches, categorizing interventions for meta-analysis has hindered the reporting of effect sizes for specific manualized therapies.
A recent proliferation of randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) has resulted in adequate data to move beyond grouping therapies for meta-analysis, allowing the estimation of effect sizes for specific manualized therapies. In addition to the benefits of being able to inform more detailed and precise treatment recommendations, this approach may indicate the procedures shared by the most effective interventions to inform an understanding of the crucial components when developing and modifying therapies. An in-depth understanding is also required to aid patients and clinicians in the co-production of treatment plans. These should take patient characteristics and preferences into account, alongside the evidence-base for the many psychological therapies currently available for the treatment of PTSD in adults.
We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analyses of RCTs of all psychological therapies for PTSD. The aim was to determine effect sizes for specific manualized therapies for PTSD and to apply a pre-determined definition of clinically important effect in order to inform a detailed understanding of the relative efficacy of the specific psychological therapies commonly applied to the treatment of PTSD. The review informed the 2018 update of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies (ISTSS) treatment guidelines (ISTSS, Citation2018).
2. Method
2.1. Selection criteria
The review included RCTs of any defined psychological therapy aimed at the reduction of PTSD-symptoms in comparison with a control group (e.g., usual care/waiting list); other psychological therapy; or psychosocial intervention (e.g., psychoeducation/relaxation training). At least 70% of study participants were required to be diagnosed with PTSD with a duration of 3 months or more, according to DSM or ICD criteria determined by clinician diagnosis or an established diagnostic interview. This review considered studies of adults aged 18 or over, only. There were no restrictions based on symptom-severity or trauma-type. The diagnosis of PTSD was required to be primary, but there were no other exclusions based on co-morbidity. Studies that conducted secondary analyses of data already included in the meta-analyses were excluded. Studies were also excluded if a continuous measure of PTSD severity post-treatment was not available.
2.2. Search strategy
This systematic review was undertaken alongside a number of reviews for an update of the ISTSS Treatment Guidelines (ISTSS, Citation2018). A search was conducted by the Cochrane Collaboration, which updated a previously published Cochrane review with the same inclusion criteria, which was published in 2013 (Bisson et al., Citation2013). The updated search aimed to identify all RCTs related to the prevention and treatment of PTSD, published from January 2008 to the 31 May 2018, using the search terms PTSD or posttrauma* or post-trauma* or ‘post trauma*’ or ‘combat disorder*’ or ‘stress disorder*’. The searches included results from PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase and the Cochrane database of randomized trials. This produced a group of papers related to the psychological treatment of PTSD in adults. We checked reference lists of the included studies. We searched the World Health Organization’s, and the U.S. National Institutes of Health’s trials portals to identify additional unpublished or ongoing studies. We contacted experts in the field with the aim of identifying unpublished studies and studies that were in submission. A complementary search of the Published International Literature on Traumatic Stress (PILOTS) was also conducted.
2.3. Data extraction
Study characteristics and outcome data were extracted by two reviewers using a form that had been piloted on five of the included studies. In order to categorize therapies, information on the protocol used was sought from the methods sections of the included studies and authors were contacted if there was uncertainty regarding the type of therapy delivered. The outcome measure for the review was reduction in the severity of PTSD symptoms post-treatment using a standardized measure. When available, clinician-rated measures were included in meta-analyses (e.g., the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS); Blake et al., Citation1995). If no clinician-rated measure was used or reported, self-report measures were included (e.g., the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5); Weathers et al., Citation2013). Study authors were contacted to obtain missing data. Therapy classifications were agreed with the ISTSS treatment guidelines committee.
2.4. Risk of bias assessment
All included studies were assessed for risk of bias using Cochrane criteria (Higgins et al., Citation2011). This included: (1) sequence allocation for randomization (the methods used for randomly assigning participants to the treatment arms and the extent to which this was truly random); (2) allocation concealment (whether or not participants or personnel were able to foresee allocation to a specific group); (3) assessor blinding (whether the assessor was aware of group allocation); (4) incomplete outcome data (whether missing outcome data was handled appropriately); (5) selective outcome reporting (whether reported outcomes matched with those that were pre-specified); and (6) any other notable threats to validity (for example, baseline imbalances between groups, small sample size, or premature termination of the study). Two researchers independently assessed each study and any conflicts were discussed with a third researcher with the aim of reaching a unanimous decision.
2.5. Quality of evidence assessment
The quality of evidence for each comparison was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system (GRADE, Citation2018). Evidence was categorized as high quality (indicating that further research is very unlikely to change confidence in the estimate of effect); moderate quality (indicating that further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate); low quality (indicating that further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate) or very low quality (indicating that we are very uncertain about the estimate).
2.6. Data synthesis
Meta-analyses were conducted using the Cochrane’s Review Manager 5 (RevMan) software (RevMan, Citation2014). Continuous measures of post-treatment PTSD severity were analysed as standardized mean differences (SMDs). All outcomes were presented using 95% confidence intervals. Clinical heterogeneity was assessed in terms of variability in the experimental and control interventions; participants; settings; and outcomes. Heterogeneity was assessed further using both the I2 statistic and the chi-squared test of heterogeneity, as well as visual inspection of the forest plots. Data were pooled using fixed-effect meta-analyses, except where heterogeneity was present, when random-effect models were used. Since combining waitlist and usual care in a single comparison was a potential limitation of the review, sensitivity analyses looked at the influence of removing studies that adopted a usual care control group from meta-analyses making this comparison. To determine the impact of risk of bias within the included studies on outcome, sensitivity analyses were conducted by removing studies with high risk of bias in three or more domains. Sensitivity analyses were only conducted for meta-analyses including 10 or more studies, since it was unlikely that meaningful differences would be determined among a smaller number of studies. A funnel plot was constructed for the meta-analysis containing the largest number of studies and visually inspected, with signs of asymmetry taken to indicate publication bias.
2.7. Clinical importance
A definition of clinical importance, which was developed by the ISTSS treatment guidelines committee, after consultation with the ISTSS membership, and approved by the ISTSS Board, was applied to the meta-analytic results (ISTSS, Citation2018). To be rated as clinically important, an intervention had to demonstrate an effect size of >0.80 for wait list control comparisons; >0.5 for attention control comparisons; >0.4 for placebo control comparisons; and >0.2 for active treatment control comparisons. If there was only one RCT, an intervention was not rated as clinically important unless it included over 300 participants. Non-inferiority RCT evidence alone was not enough to rate an intervention as clinically important.
3. Results
The original Cochrane review included 70 RCTs. The update search identified 5500 potentially eligible studies published since 2008. Abstracts were reviewed and full-text copies obtained for 203 potentially relevant studies. Forty-four new RCTs met inclusion criteria for the review. This resulted in a total of 114 RCTs of 8171 participants. presents a flow diagram for study selection.
Figure 1. Study flow diagram
3.1. Study characteristics
Study characteristics are summarized in . Twenty-nine defined psychological therapies were evaluated. Eight of these were broadly categorized as CBT-T delivered on an individual basis: Brief Eclectic Psychotherapy (BEP); Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT); Cognitive Therapy (CT); Narrative Exposure Therapy (NET): Prolonged Exposure (PE); Single Session CBT; Reconsolidation of Traumatic Memories (RTM); Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy (VRE). Twelve other therapies delivered to individuals were evaluated: EMDR; CBT without a Trauma Focus; Present Centred Therapy (PCT); Supportive Counselling; Written Exposure Therapy; Observed and Experiential Integration (OEI); Interpersonal Psychotherapy; Psychodynamic Psychotherapy; Relaxation Training; REM Desensitization; Emotional Freedom Technique (EFT); Dialogical Exposure Therapy (DET); Relaxation Training; Psychoeducation; Guided Internet-based CBT with a Trauma Focus. There were five different types of group therapy: Group CBT-T; Group and Individual CBT-T; Group Interpersonal Therapy; Group Stabilizing Treatment; Group Supportive Counselling. Couples CBT with a Trauma Focus was also evaluated. It was decided a priori that therapies delivered in a group format would be grouped, due to the small number of studies.
Table 1. Study characteristics
The number of randomized participants ranged from 10 to 366. Studies were conducted in Australia (9), Canada (2), China (2), Denmark (1), Germany (5), Iran (2), Israel (1), Italy (2), Japan (1), the Netherlands (4), Norway (1), Portugal (1), Romania (1), Rwanda (1), Spain (1), Sweden (3), Switzerland (1), Syria (1), Thailand (1), Turkey (3), Uganda (2), UK (11), USA (61). Participants were traumatized by military combat (27 studies), sexual assault or rape (11 studies), war/persecution (8 studies), road traffic accidents (6 studies), earthquakes (4 studies), childhood sexual abuse (7 studies), political detainment (1 study), terrorism (2 studies), physical assault (2 studies), domestic violence (4 studies), trauma from a medical diagnosis/emergency (4 studies) and crime/organized violence (4 studies). The remainder (41 studies) included individuals traumatized by a variety of different traumatic events. There were 27 studies of females only and 9 of only males; the percentage of females in the remaining studies ranged from 1.75% to 96%. The percentage with a University education ranged from 4% to 90%. Exclusion criteria varied across studies, with the most common being: current or lifetime psychosis (69 studies); bipolar disorder (18 studies) or severe depression (12 studies); substance use (63 studies); suicidal ideation (55 studies). Participants were recruited from health or social care settings (71 studies); from the general public via advertisements (21); or through a combination of the two approaches (7 studies).
3.2. Risk of bias
Risk of bias assessments for the included studies is summarized in . Fifty-three studies reported a method of sequence allocation judged to pose a ‘low’ risk of bias; four reported a method with a ‘high’ risk of bias; the remainder reported insufficient details and were, therefore, rated as ‘unclear’. Forty-one studies reported methods of allocation concealment representing a ‘low’ risk of bias; one a method with a ‘high’ risk of bias; with the remainder rated as ‘unclear’. The outcome assessor was aware of the participant’s allocation in 12 of the included studies; it was unclear whether the outcome assessor was aware of group allocation in 18 studies; with the remainder using blind-raters or self-report questionnaires delivered in a way that could not be influenced by members of the research team. Twenty-three studies were judged as posing a ‘high’ risk of bias in terms of incomplete outcome data; 80 studies were felt to have dealt with dropouts appropriately (‘low’ risk of bias); it was unclear in the remaining studies. The majority of studies failed to reference a published protocol, resulting in an ‘unclear’ risk of selective reporting for 78 studies; risk of bias was judged as ‘high’ in five studies and low in the remainder. Seventy of the included studies presented a ‘high’ risk of bias in other areas, for example, in relation to sample size, baseline imbalances between groups, or other methodological shortfalls. We could not rule out potential researcher allegiance, since treatment originators were involved in the evaluation of their own intervention in many of the included studies.
Table 2. Risk assessment
3.3. Efficacy
Results of the meta-analyses are summarized in and . The strongest evidence of effect was for the studies broadly categorized as CBT-T, and EMDR. Meta-analyses of specific manualized CBT-Ts found that CPT; CT; and PE had the strongest evidence of effect. There was also some evidence supporting the effect of NET (a variant of CBT-T); CBT without a trauma focus; PCT; Group CBT-T and guided internet-based CBT. There was emerging evidence to support the effect of single-session CBT; RTM; VRE (all variants of CBT-T); as well as Written Exposure Therapy; combined group and individual CBT-T; and couples CBT-T. There was insufficient evidence to support the efficacy of BEP (a variant of CBT-T); Supportive Counselling; Group Interpersonal Therapy; Group Stabilizing Treatment; Group Supportive Counselling; Group Interpersonal Therapy; OEI; Psychodynamic Therapy; Relaxation Training; or Psychoeducation.
Table 3. Meta-analytic results
Table 4. Meta-analytic results
3.4. Sensitivity analyses
Four of the meta-analyses included 10 or more studies (CBT-T versus waitlist/usual care/minimal attention; PE versus waitlist/usual care/minimal attention; EMDR versus waitlist/usual care/minimal attention; and EMDR versus CBT-T). Sensitivity analyses that removed studies with high risk of bias in three or more domains gave similar SMDs and confidence intervals. Sensitivity analyses that removed studies with a usual care control group found that SMDs and confidence intervals in the analyses of CBT-T and PE, but evidence of improved effect in the case of EMDR.
3.5. Heterogeneity
There was evidence of substantial clinical heterogeneity across studies in terms of the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the studies; the populations from which the samples were drawn; the nature and duration of therapy; the qualifications and experience of therapists; the predominant trauma type; the mean age of participants; and the proportion of female versus male participants. Considerable statistical heterogeneity was also evident in many of the pooled comparisons. This resulted in regular use of a random-effects model.
3.6. Publication bias
All of the included studies were published. There was evidence of some publication bias, demonstrated by a funnel plot using data from the comparison of CBT-T versus waitlist/usual care/minimal attention.
4. Discussion
4.1. Main findings
In agreement with previous reviews and in continued support of existing treatment guidelines (American Psychological Association, Citation2017; Australian Centre for Posttraumatic Mental Health, Citation2007; National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, Citation2005; US Department of Veterans Affairs, Citation2017), there was robust evidence for the clinically important effect of the therapies broadly defined as CBT-T, as well as EMDR. A substantial increase in the number of RCTs published in recent years resulted in a greater level of confidence in these findings. This review went further, and we conducted meta-analyses of specific manualized therapies. By applying pre-determined definitions of clinically important effect, we found that the CBT-Ts with the strongest evidence were PE, CPT and CT. There was also some evidence in support of NET; and emerging evidence in support of other CBT-Ts, namely, single-session CBT-T; RTM; VRE; and WRT. There was insufficient evidence to support the efficacy of BEP. Although CBT-Ts and EMDR demonstrated the strongest evidence of effect, there was also evidence supporting the effect of CBT without a trauma focus; PCT; Group CBT-T; and guided internet-based CBT, as well as emerging evidence in support of combined group and individual CBT with a trauma focus; couples CBT with a trauma focus. There was insufficient evidence to support Group therapies without a trauma focus; OEI; Psychodynamic Therapy; Relaxation Training; or psychoeducation.
The comparison of effect sizes across meta-analyses was not straightforward. Although we can draw conclusions in relation to the treatments most strongly supported by the evidence-base, this does not equate to evidence that other interventions were ineffective. Some comparisons may have lacked sufficient statistical power to demonstrate clinically important effect. On occasion, therapies were delivered to act as an active control and may not have been optimally effective. As an example, supportive counselling often barred discussion of the trauma, which diverges from standard practice. There were many more RCTs of CBT-T and EMDR than those without a trauma-focus, and a greater number of studies of therapies delivered on an individual basis than those delivered to couples or groups. Although it is unlikely new studies will substantially alter the estimated pooled-effect of CBT-T or EMDR, it is probable that further research will modify the evidence base for therapies currently represented by fewer studies. Although not as strong as the evidence for CBT-T and EMDR, emerging evidence for interventions such as guided internet-based CBT and PCT advances the field by providing a greater choice of evidence-based therapies.
4.2. Strengths and limitations
The review followed Cochrane guidelines for the identification of relevant studies; data extraction and synthesis; risk of bias assessment; and interpretation of findings (Higgins & Green, Citation2011). The review moves the field forward, by estimating the effect of specific manualized therapies when available data allowed, rather than grouping similar approaches. Despite the many strengths of the review, there were inevitable limitations. The small number of studies evaluating interventions delivered to a group or to couples precluded analyses of these therapies, as was previously the case for therapies delivered on an individual basis. All included studies were published, resulting in the possibility of publication bias. A funnel plot constructed from the meta-analysis of CBT-T versus waitlist or usual care found some evidence of publication bias, indicating that the currently available evidence may overestimate the effect of CBT-T. Several studies reported incomplete data and although authors were contacted, it was not always possible to obtain missing information, resulting in the exclusion of otherwise eligible studies. The majority of studies included in the review excluded individuals with comorbidities of substance dependence, psychosis, and severe depression; we are not, therefore, able to draw any conclusions beyond the efficacy of psychological therapies for relatively simple presentations of PTSD. Waitlist and treatment as usual were included as a single comparison group in meta-analyses, giving a more conservative estimate of effect than reviews that have separated the two. It is acknowledged that usual care, especially in more recent studies, may have included evidence-based therapies. This said, sensitivity analyses, which excluded studies with a usual care control group from comparisons with more than ten studies, revealed little difference in the outcome in two of three eligible analyses. The methodological quality of included studies varied considerably, and risk of bias was high/unclear in several domains of many studies. However, sensitivity analyses removing studies with high risk of bias in at least three or more domains revealed little influence. Most of the trials to date have been conducted on DSM-IV PTSD. We are not therefore able to draw conclusions regarding the performance of therapies on the additional cluster of symptoms (alterations in mood and cognitions) that was introduced by DSM-5. Data on the competence of the therapists and the number of therapy sessions was not extracted from the included studies and we cannot therefore comment on these as factor that may have impacted efficacy. Sample sizes were often small; however, the pooled comparisons included data from 8171 participants.
4.3. Clinical implications
The psychological therapies with the strongest evidence of effect should be those prioritized for clinical use when available and acceptable to the patient. It is, however, unlikely that any given therapy is universally appropriate for all individuals with PTSD. There is a need to consider predictors of outcome that may indicate the suitability of particular therapies for specific subgroups of patients. We should also consider the skills and therapeutic style of the therapist, given the likelihood that some are better at delivering certain types of therapy than others. Since there is evidence for the effect of numerous psychological therapies, the evidence-base should be used to guide shared decision-making between patient and clinician. There is a need for detailed assessment; followed by discussion surrounding the evidence; resulting in the co-production of treatment plans that consider patient-preference (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence [NICE], Citation2018). Although the strongest evidence of effect was for CBT-T and EMDR, there was also evidence in support of CBT without a trauma focus and PCT. This indicates a role for these therapies as alternatives to trauma-focused intervention, if the latter are not available; if patient preference dictates; or if exposure work is contraindicated, for example, if an individual is unable to tolerate the treatment.
Despite the current review giving a good indication of the therapies most strongly supported by the current evidence-base, these are not always widely available or accessible. There is growing evidence in support of group and internet-based therapies, which are potential avenues for widening access to low-cost treatment and disseminating evidence-based therapies more efficiently. At least a proportion of individuals are likely to respond to these minimally intensive treatments and require no further intervention, which fits well with the principles of prudent healthcare. It is hoped that future work will identify the characteristics of those unlikely to respond to less intensive interventions, allowing a more stratified or personalized approach to treatment. Work is needed to develop optimal clinical pathways that deliver appropriate evidence-based therapies in the most efficient way possible, whilst ensuring the acceptability of the approach to patients. There are additional factors to take into account when considering clinical implications, including rates of attrition from treatment; adverse events; the acceptability of treatment approaches; and cost-effectiveness. Considering these factors was beyond the scope of this review, but they should inform clinical practice.
4.4. Research implications
Although we report effect sizes across a range of therapies, further high-quality head-to-head RCTs of the most effective interventions are necessary to determine comparative efficacy among participants drawn from the same population. We know little about the predictors of outcome and acceptability of psychological therapies, and a greater understanding would enable targeted recommendation of particular treatments to specific sub-groups of patients. PTSD is a highly heterogeneous condition (DiMauro, Carter, Folk, & Kashdan, Citation2014, Murphy, Ross, Busuttil, Greenberg, & Armour, Citation2019) and work is needed to develop more personalized approaches. We do not have a sufficient understanding of the efficacy of current therapies for those with a diagnosis of ICD-11 complex PTSD (Dorrepaal et al., Citation2013, Citation2014; Karatzias et al., Citation2019). Further research is needed to evaluate existing therapies among those with complex PTSD, and to modify or develop new therapies, as appropriate. Work is also needed to determine the efficacy of therapies in addressing the DSM-5 symptom-cluster related to mood and cognition. Therapies delivered in a group format and to couples have shown promise, but there are currently an insufficient number of studies to conduct meta-analyses beyond those grouping interventions into broad categories. There is a need for established standards for the reporting of psychological therapy trials to ensure that methods are transparent and any risk of bias clear. This would also ensure a clearer definition of control groups. In many studies, it was unclear what constituted usual care and what intervention, if any, was permitted in wait-list control groups. We know very little about the acceptability of psychological therapies for PTSD and more work should focus on patient preference.
Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge the input and support of the Cochrane Collaboration and the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies (ISTSS).
Disclosure statement
CL, JB and NR are the authors of one of the included RCTs.
Additional information
Funding
References
- Acarturk, C., Konuk, E., Cetinkaya, M., Senay, I., Sijbrandij, M., Gulen, B., & Cuijpers, P. (2016). The efficacy of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing for post-traumatic stress disorder and depression among Syrian refugees: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Psychological Medicine, 46(12), 2583–21.
- Adenauer, H., Catani, C., Gola, H., Keil, J., Ruf, M., Schauer, M., & Neuner, F. (2011). Narrative exposure therapy for PTSD increases top-down processing of aversive stimuli – evidence from a randomized controlled treatment trial. BMC Neuroscience, 12(1), 1–13.
- Ahmadi, K., Hazrati, M., Ahmadizadeh, M., & Noohi, S. (2015). REM desensitization as a new therapeutic method for post-traumatic stress disorder: A randomized controlled trial. Acta Medica Indonesiana, 47(2), 111–119.
- Akbarian, F., Bajoghli, H., Haghighi, M., Kalak, N., Holsboer-Trachsler, E., & Brand, S. (2015). The effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy with respect to psychological symptoms and recovering autobiographical memory in patients suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 11, 395–404.
- American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th edition). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
- American Psychological Association. (2017). Clinical practice guideline for the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in adults. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
- Asukai, N., Saito, A., Tsuruta, N., Kishimoto, J., & Nishikawa, T. (2010). Efficacy of exposure therapy for Japanese patients with posttraumatic stress disorder due to mixed traumatic events: A randomized controlled study. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 23(6), 744–750.
- Australian Centre for Posttraumatic Mental Health. (2007). Australian guidelines for the treatment of adults with acute stress disorder and posttraumatic stress disorder. Melbourne, Victoria: ACPMH.
- Basoglu, M., Salcioglu, E., & Livanou, M. (2007). A randomized controlled study of single-session behavioural treatment of earthquake-related post-traumatic stress disorder using an earthquake simulator. Psychological Medicine, 37, 203–213.
- Basoglu, M., Şalcıoğlu, E., Livanou, M., Kalender, D., & Acar, G. (2005). Single session behavioural treatment of earthquake related posttraumatic stress disorder: A randomised waiting list controlled trial. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 18(1), 1–11.
- Beck, J., Coffey, S. F., Foy, D. W., Keane, T. M., & Blanchard, E. B. (2009). Group cognitive behavior therapy for chronic posttraumatic stress disorder: An initial randomized pilot study. Behavior Therapy, 40, 82–92.
- Bichescu, D., Neuner, F., Schauer, M., & Elbert, T. (2007). Narrative exposure therapy for political imprisonment related chronic posttraumatic stress disorder and depression. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 2212–2220.
- Bisson, J. I., Roberts, N. P., Andrew, M., Cooper, R., & Lewis, C. (2013). Psychological therapies for chronic post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in adults (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 12(CD003388).
- Blake, D. D., Weathers, F. W., Nagy, L. M., Kaloupek, D. G., Gusman, F. D., Charney, D. S., & Keane, T. M. (1995). The development of a clinician-administered PTSD scale. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 8, 75–90.
- Blanchard, E., Hickling, E. J., Devineni, T., Veazey, C. H., Galovski, T. E., Mundy, E., & Buckley, T. C. (2003). A controlled evaluation of cognitive behavioral therapy for posttraumatic stress in motor vehicle accident survivors. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41(1), 79–96.
- Bradley, R., Greene, J., Russ, E., Dutra, L., & Westen, D. (2005). A multidimensional meta-analysis of psychotherapy for PTSD. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162(2), 214–227.
- Bradshaw, R. A., McDonald, M. J., Grace, R., Detwiler, L., & Austin, K. (2014). A randomized clinical trial of Observed and Experiential Integration (OEI): A simple, innovative intervention for affect regulation in clients with PTSD. Traumatology Traumatology: An International Journal, 20, 161–171.
- Brom, D., Kleber, R., & Defares, P. (1989). Brief psychotherapy for posttraumatic stress disorders. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 57(5), 607–612.
- Bryant, R., Moulds, M. L., Guthrie, R. M., Dang, S. T., & Nixon, R. D. V. (2003). Imaginal exposure alone and imaginal exposure with cognitive restructuring in treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 706–712.
- Bryant, R. A., Ekasawin, S., Chakrabhand, S., Suwanmitri, S., Duangchun, O., & Chantaluckwong, T. (2011). A randomized controlled effectiveness trial of cognitive behavior therapy for post‐traumatic stress disorder in terrorist‐affected people in Thailand. World Psychiatry, 10(3), 205–209.
- Buhmann, C., Nordentoft, M., Ekstroem, M., Carlsson, J., & Mortensen, E. L. (2016). The effect of flexible cognitive-behavioural therapy and medical treatment, including antidepressants on post-traumatic stress disorder and depression in traumatised refugees: Pragmatic randomised controlled clinical trial. The British Journal of Psychiatry : The Journal of Mental Science, 208, 252–259.
- Butollo, W., Karl, R., König, J., & Rosner, R. (2016). A randomized controlled clinical trial of dialogical exposure therapy versus cognitive processing therapy for adult outpatients suffering from PTSD after type I trauma in adulthood. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 85(1), 16–26.
- Capezzani, L., Ostacoli, L., Cavallo, M., Carletto, S., Fernandez, I., Solomon, R., … Cantelmi, T. (2013). EMDR and CBT for cancer patients: Comparative study of effects on PTSD, anxiety, and depression. Journal of EMDR Practice and Research, 7, 134–143.
- Carletto, S., Borghi, M., Bertino, G., Oliva, F., Cavallo, M., Hofmann, A., … Ostacoli, L. (2016). Treating post-traumatic stress disorder in patients with multiple sclerosis: A randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing and relaxation therapy. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 526.
- Carlson, J., Chemtob, C. M., Rusnak, K., Hedlund, N. L., & Muraoka, M. Y. (1998). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EDMR) treatment for combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 11(1), 3–32.
- Castillo, D. T., Chee, C. L., Nason, E., Keller, J., C’de Baca, J., Qualls, C., & Keane, T. M. (2016). Group-delivered cognitive/exposure therapy for PTSD in women veterans: A randomized controlled trial. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice and Policy, 8, 404–412.
- Chard, K. M. (2005). An evaluation of cognitive processing therapy for the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder related to childhood sexual abuse. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(5), 965.
- Cloitre, M., Koenen, K. C., Cohen, L. R., & Han, H. (2002). Skills training in affective and interpersonal regulation followed by exposure: A phase-based treatment for PTSD related to childhood abuse. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 1067–1074.
- Cloitre, M., Stovall-McClough, K. C., Nooner, K., Zorbas, P., Cherry, S., Jackson, C. L., … Petkova, E. (2010). Treatment for PTSD related to childhood abuse: A randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 915–924.
- Cusack, K. J., Grubaugh, A. L., Knapp, R. G., & Frueh, B. C. (2006). Unrecognized trauma and PTSD among public mental health consumers with chronic and severe mental illness. Community Mental Health Journal, 42(5), 487–500.
- Devilly, G., Spence, S., & Rapee, R. (1998). Statistical and reliable change with eye movement desensitization and reprocessing: Treating trauma within a veteran population. Behavior Therapy, 29, 435–455.
- Devilly, G. J., & Spence, S. H. (1999). The relative efficacy and treatment distress of EMDR and a cognitive-behavior trauma treatment protocol in the amelioration of posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 13(1–2), 131–157.
- DiMauro, J., Carter, S., Folk, J. B., & Kashdan, T. B. (2014). A historical review of trauma-related diagnoses to reconsider the heterogeneity of PTSD. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 28(8), 774–786.
- Dorrepaal, E., Thomaes, K., Hoogendoorn, A. W., Veltman, D. J., Draijer, N., & van Balkom, A. J. L. M. (2014). Evidence-based treatment for adult women with child abuse-related complex PTSD: A quantitative review. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 5(1), 23613.
- Dorrepaal, E., Thomaes, K., Smit, J. H., van Balkom, A. J. L. M., Veltman, D. J., Hoogendoorn, A. W., & Draijer, N. (2012). Stabilizing group treatment for complex posttraumatic stress disorder related to child abuse based on psychoeducation and cognitive behavioural therapy: A multisite randomized controlled trial. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 81, 217–225.
- Dorrepaal, E., Thomaes, K., Smit, J. H., Veltman, D. J., Hoogendoorn, A. W., van Balkom, A. J. L. M., & Draijer, N. (2013). Treatment compliance and effectiveness in complex PTSD patients with co-morbid personality disorder undergoing stabilizing cognitive behavioral group treatment: A preliminary study. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 4(1), 21171.
- Duffy, M., Gillespie, K., & Clark, D. (2007). Post-traumatic stress disorder in the context of terrorism and other civil conflict in Northern Ireland: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ, 334, 1147–1150.
- Dunne, R. L., Kenardy, J., & Sterling, M. (2012). A randomized controlled trial of cognitive-behavioral therapy for the treatment of PTSD in the context of chronic whiplash. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 28(9), 755–765.
- Echeburua, E., De Corral, P., Zubizarreta, I., & Sarasua, B. (1997). Psychological treatment of chronic posttraumatic stress disorder in victims of sexual aggression. Behavior Modification, 21, 433–456.
- Ehlers, A., Clark, D. M., Hackmann, A., McManus, F., & Fennell, M. (2005). Cognitive therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder: Development and evaluation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 413–431.
- Ehlers, A., Hackmann, A., Grey, N., Wild, J., Liness, S., Albert, I., … Clark, D. M. (2014). A randomized controlled trial of 7-day intensive and standard weekly cognitive therapy for PTSD and emotion-focused supportive therapy. American Journal of Psychiatry, 171, 294–304.
- Ehlers, A., Clark, D. M., Hackmann, A., McManus, F., Fennell, M., Herbert, C., & Mayou, R. (2003). A randomized controlled trial of cognitive therapy, a self-help booklet, and repeated assessments as early interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60(10), 1024–1032.
- Falsetti, S., Resnick, H., & Davis, J. (2008). Multiple channel exposure therapy for women with PTSD and comorbid panic attacks. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 37, 117–130.
- Fecteau, G., & Nicki, R. (1999). Cognitive behavioural treatment of post traumatic stress disorder after motor vehicle accident. Behavioural & Cognitive Psychotherapy, 27(3), 201–214.
- Feske, U. (2008). Treating low-income and minority women with posttraumatic stress disorder a pilot study comparing prolonged exposure and treatment as usual conducted by community therapists. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(8), 1027–1040.
- Foa, E., Dancu, C. V., Hembree, E. A., Jaycox, L. H., Meadows, E. A., & Street, G. P. (1999). A comparison of exposure therapy, stress inoculation training, and their combination for reducing posttraumatic stress disorder in female assault victims. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(2), 194–200.
- Foa, E., Hembree, E. A., Cahill, S. P., Rauch, S. A. M., Riggs, D. S., Feeny, N. C., & Yadin, E. (2005). Randomized trial of prolonged exposure for posttraumatic stress disorder with and without cognitive restructuring: Outcome at academic and community clinics. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 953–964.
- Foa, E., Rothbaum, B. O., Riggs, D. S., & Murdock, T. B. (1991). Treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder in rape victims: A comparison between cognitive-behavioral procedures and counseling. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(5), 715–723.
- Foa, E. B., McLean, C. P., Zang, Y., Rosenfield, D., Yadin, E., Yarvis, J. S., … Fina, B. A. (2018). Effect of prolonged exposure therapy delivered over 2 weeks vs 8 weeks vs present-centered therapy on PTSD symptom severity in military personnel: A randomized clinical trial. Jama, 319, 354–364
- Fonzo, G., Goodkind, M. S., Oathes, D. J., Zaiko, Y. V., Harvey, M., Peng, K. K., … Etkin, A. (2017). PTSD psychotherapy outcome predicted by brain activation during emotional reactivity and regulation. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 174, 1163–1174.
- Forbes, D., Lloyd, D., Nixon, R. D. V., Elliott, P., Varker, T., Perry, D., … Creamer, M. (2012). A multisite randomized controlled effectiveness trial of cognitive processing therapy for military-related posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 26(3), 442–452.
- Ford, J. D., Chang, R., Levine, J., & Zhang, W. (2013). Randomized clinical trial comparing affect regulation and supportive group therapies for victimization-related PTSD with incarcerated women. Behavior Therapy, 44(2), 262–276.
- Ford, J. D., Steinberg, K. L., & Zhang, W. (2011). A randomized clinical trial comparing affect regulation and social problem-solving psychotherapies for mothers with victimization-related PTSD. Behavior Therapy, 42(4), 560–578.
- Galovski, T. E., Blain, L. M., Mott, J. M., Elwood, L., & Houle, T. (2012). Manualized therapy for PTSD: Flexing the structure of cognitive processing therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 80(6), 968.
- Gamito, P., Oliveira, J., Rosa, P., Morais, D., Duarte, N., Oliveira, S., & Saraiva, T. (2010). PTSD elderly war veterans: A clinical controlled pilot study. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 13(1), 43–48.
- Gersons, B. P., Carlier, I. V., Lamberts, R. D., & Van der Kolk, B. A. (2000). Randomized clinical trial of brief eclectic psychotherapy for police officers with posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 13(2), 333–347.
- GRADE. (2018). Retrieved from http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org
- Gray, R., Budden-Potts, D., & Bourke, F. (2017). Reconsolidation of traumatic memories for PTSD: A randomized controlled trial of 74 male veterans. Psychotherapy Research, 29(5), 1–19.
- Hensel-Dittmann, D., Schauer, M., Ruf, M., Catani, C., Odenwald, M., Elbert, T., & Neuner, F. (2011). Treatment of traumatized victims of war and torture: A randomized controlled comparison of narrative exposure therapy and stress inoculation training. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 80(6), 345–352.
- Higgins, J., & Green, S. (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration. Retrieved from www.cochrane-handbook.org
- Higgins, J. P., Altman, D. G., Gotzsche, P. C., Juni, P., Moher, D., Oxman, A. D., … Sterne, J. A. C. (2011). The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ, 343, d5928.
- Hinton, D., Chhean, D., Pich, V., Safren, S. A., Hofmann, S. G., & Pollack, M. H. (2005). A randomised controlled trial of cognitive behaviour therapy for Cambodian refugees with treatment resistant PTSD and panic attacks: A cross over design. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 18, 617–629.
- Hinton, D. E., Hofmann, S. G., Rivera, E., Otto, M. W., & Pollack, M. H. (2011). Culturally adapted CBT (CA-CBT) for Latino women with treatment-resistant PTSD: A pilot study comparing CA-CBT to applied muscle relaxation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 49(4), 275–280.
- Hogberg, G., Pagani, M., Sundin, O., Soares, J., Aberg-Wistedt, A., Tarnell, B., & Hallstrom, T. (2007). On treatment with eye movement desensitization and reprocessing of chronic post-traumatic stress disorder in public transportation workers – A randomized controlled trial. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 61(1), 54–60.
- Hollifield, M., Sinclair-Lian, N., Warner, T. D., & Hammerschlag, R. (2007). Acupuncture for posttraumatic stress disorder. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 195(6), 504–513.
- International Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ISTSS). (2018). New ISTSS prevention and treatment guidelines [ Online]. Retrieved from http://www.istss.org/treating-trauma/new-istss-guidelines.aspx
- Ironson, G., Freund, B., Strauss, J. L., & Williams, J. (2002). Comparison of two treatments for traumatic stress: A community based study of EMDR and prolonged exposure. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 113–128.
- Ivarsson, D., Blom, M., Hesser, H., Carlbring, P., Enderby, P., Nordberg, R., & Andersson, G. (2014). Guided internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder: A randomized controlled trial. Internet Interventions, 1, 33–40.
- Jacob, N., Neuner, F., Maedl, A., Schaal, S., & Elbert, T. (2014). Dissemination of psychotherapy for trauma spectrum disorders in postconflict settings: A randomized controlled trial in Rwanda. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 83, 354–363.
- Jensen, J. (1994). An investigation of eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing as a treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms of vietnam combat veterans. Behavior Therapy, 25, 311–325.
- Johnson, D., Johnson, N. L., Perez, S. K., Palmieri, P. A., & Zlotnick, C. (2016). Comparison of adding treatment of PTSD during and after shelter stay to standard care in residents of battered women’s shelters: Results of a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 29, 365–373.
- Johnson, D. M., Zlotnick, C., & Perez, S. (2011). Cognitive behavioral treatment of PTSD in residents of battered women’s shelters: Results of a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79(4), 542.
- Jonas, D., Cusack, K., Forneris, C. A., Wilkins, T. M., Sonis, J., Middleton, J. C., … Olmsted, K. R. (2013). Psychological and pharmacological treatments for adults with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) ( Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 92). US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
- Karatzias, T., Murphy, P., Cloitre, M., Bisson, J., Roberts, N., Shevlin, M., & Mason-Roberts, S. (2019). Psychological interventions for ICD-11 complex PTSD symptoms: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine, 49(11), 1761–1775.
- Karatzias, T., Power, K., Brown, K., McGoldrick, T., Begum, M., Young, J., … Adams, S. (2011). A controlled comparison of the effectiveness and efficiency of two psychological therapies for posttraumatic stress disorder: Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing vs. emotional freedom techniques. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 199, 372–378.
- Keane, T., Fairbank, J. A., Caddell, J. M., & Zimering, R. T. (1989). Implosive (flooding) therapy reduces symptoms of PTSD in Vietnam combat veterans. Behavior Therapy, 20(2), 245–260.
- Kessler, R. C. (2000). Posttraumatic stress disorder: The burden to the individual and to society. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 61(5), 4–14.
- Kessler, R. C., Sonnega, A., Bromet, E., Hughes, M., & Nelson, C. B. (1995). Posttraumatic stress disorder in the national comorbidity survey. Archives of General Psychiatry, 52(12), 1048–1060.
- Krupnick, J. L., Green, B. L., Stockton, P., Miranda, J., Krause, E., & Mete, M. (2008). Group interpersonal psychotherapy for low-income women with posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychotherapy Research, 18(5), 497–507.
- Kubany, E., Hill, E., Owens, J., Iannce-Spencer, C., McCaig, M. A., Tremayne, K. J., & Williams, P. L. (2004). Cognitive trauma therapy for battered women with PTSD (CTT-BW). Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(1), 3–18.
- Kubany, E., Hill, E. E., & Owens, J. A. (2003). Cognitive trauma therapy for battered women with PTSD: Preliminary findings. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 16, 81–91.
- Laugharne, J., Kullack, C., Lee, C. W., McGuire, T., Brockman, S., Drummond, P. D., & Starkstein, S. (2016). Amygdala volumetric change following psychotherapy for posttraumatic stress disorder. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 28, 312–318.
- Lee, C., Gavriel, H., Drummond, P., Richards, J., & Greenwald, R. (2002). Treatment of PTSD: Stress inoculation training with prolonged exposure compared to EMDR. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 1071–1089.
- Lewis, C. E., Farewell, D., Groves, V., Kitchiner, N. J., Roberts, N. P., Vick, T., & Bisson, J. I. (2017). Internet‐based guided self‐help for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD): Randomized controlled trial. Depression and Anxiety, 34(6), 555–565.
- Littleton, H., Grills, A. E., Kline, K. D., Schoemann, A. M., & Dodd, J. C. (2016). The from survivor to thriver program: RCT of an online therapist-facilitated program for rape-related PTSD. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 43, 41–51.
- Litz, B. T., Engel, C. C., Bryant, R. A., & Papa, A. (2007). A randomized, controlled proof-of-concept trial of an Internet-based, therapist-assisted self-management treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164, 1676–1683.
- Marcus, S., Marquis, P., & Sakai, C. (1997). Controlled study of treatment of PTSD using EMDR in an HMO setting. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 34, 307–315.
- Markowitz, J., Petkova, E., Neria, Y., Van Meter, P. E., Zhao, Y., Hembree, E., & Marshall, R. D. (2015). Is exposure necessary? A randomized clinical trial of interpersonal psychotherapy for PTSD. American Journal of Psychiatry, 172, 430–440.
- Marks, I., Lovell, K., Noshirvani, H., Livanou, M., & Thrasher, S. (1998). Treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder by exposure and/or cognitive restructuring: A controlled study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 55(4), 317–325.
- McDonagh, A., Friedman, M., McHugo, G., Ford, J., Sengupta, A., Mueser, K., … Descamps, M. (2005). Randomized controlled trial of cognitive-behavioural therapy for chronic posttraumatic stress disorder in adult female survivors of childhood sexual abuse. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 515–524.
- McLay, R., Baird, A., Webb-Murphy, J., Deal, W., Tran, L., Anson, H., … Johnston, S. (2017). A randomized, head-to-head study of virtual reality exposure therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 20, 218–224.
- McLay, R., Wood, D. P., Webb-Murphy, J. A., Spira, J. L., Wiederhold, M. D., Pyne, J. M., & Wiederhold, B. K. (2011). A randomized, controlled trial of virtual reality-graded exposure therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder in active duty service members with combat-related post-traumatic stress disorder. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 14, 223–229.
- Monson, C., Fredman, S. J., Macdonald, A., Pukay-Martin, N. D., Resick, P. A., & Schnurr, P. P. (2012, August 15). Effect of cognitive-behavioral couple therapy for PTSD: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 308(7), 714–716.
- Monson, C., Schnurr, P. P., Resick, P. A., Friedman, M. J., Young-Xu, Y., & Stevens, S. P. (2006). Cognitive processing therapy for veterans with military related posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74, 898–907.
- Morath, J., Moreno-Villanueva, M., Hamuni, G., Kolassa, S., Ruf-Leuschner, M., Schauer, M., & Kolassa, I.-T. (2014). Effects of psychotherapy on DNA strand break accumulation originating from traumatic stress. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 83, 289–297.
- Mueser, K. T., Rosenberg, S. D., Xie, H., Jankowski, M. K., Bolton, E. E., Lu, W., … Wolfe, R. (2008). A randomized controlled trial of cognitive-behavioral treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder in severe mental illness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76(2), 259–271.
- Murphy, D., Ross, J., Busuttil, W., Greenberg, N., & Armour, C. (2019). A latent profile analysis of PTSD symptoms among UK treatment seeking veterans. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 10(1), 1558706.
- Nacasch, N., Foa, E. B., Huppert, J. D., Tzur, D., Fostick, L., Dinstein, Y., … Zohar, J. (2011). Prolonged exposure therapy for combat- and terror-related posttraumatic stress disorder: A randomized control comparison with treatment as usual NCT00229372. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 72, 1174–1180.
- National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health. (2005). Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD): The management of PTSD in adults and children in primary and secondary care – National cost impact report. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence.
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). (2018). Post-traumatic stress disorder (NICE guideline NG116). Retrieved from https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng116.
- Neuner, F., Kurreck, S., Ruf, M., Odenwald, M., Elbert, T., & Schauer, M. (2010). A randomized controlled pilot study can asylum seekers with posttraumatic stress disorder be successfully treated? Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 39(2), 81–91.
- Neuner, F., Onyut, P. L., Ertl, V., Odenwald, M., Schauer, E., & Elbert, T. (2008). Treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder by trained lay counselors in an African refugee settlement: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76(4), 686.
- Neuner, F., Schauer, M., Klaschik, C., Karunakara, U., & Elbert, T. (2004). A comparison of narrative exposure therapy, supportive counselling, and psychoeducation for treating posttraumatic stress disorder in an African refugee settlement. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(4), 579–587.
- Nijdam, M. J., Gersons, B. P. R., Reitsma, J. B., de Jongh, A., & Olff, M. (2012). Brief eclectic psychotherapy v. eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder: Randomised controlled trial. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 200(3), 224–231.
- Pacella, M. L., Armelie, A., Boarts, J., Wagner, G., Jones, T., Feeny, N., & Delahanty, D. L. (2012). The impact of prolonged exposure on PTSD symptoms and associated psychopathology in people living with HIV: A randomized test of concept. AIDS and Behavior, 16(5), 1327–1340.
- Paunovic, N. (2011). Exposure inhibition therapy as a treatment for chronic posttraumatic stress disorder: A controlled pilot study. Psychology, 2(6), 605.
- Peniston, E. G., & Kulkosky, P. J. (1991). Alpha-theta brainwave neurofeedback for Vietnam veterans with combat-related post-traumatic stress disorder. Medical Psychotherapy, 4(1), 47–60.
- Power, K., McGoldrick, T., Brown, K., Buchanan, R., Sharp, D., Swanson, V., & Karatzias, A. (2002). A controlled comparison of eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing versus exposure plus cognitive restructuring versus waiting list in the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 9, 229–318.
- Rauch, S., King, A. P., Abelson, J., Tuerk, P. W., Smith, E., Rothbaum, B. O., … Liberzon, I. (2015). Biological and symptom changes in posttraumatic stress disorder treatment: A randomized clinical trial. Depression and Anxiety, 32, 204–212.
- Ready, D. J., Gerardi, R. J., Backscheider, A. G., Mascaro, N., & Rothbaum, B. O. (2010). Comparing virtual reality exposure therapy to present centred therapy with 11 US Vietnam veterans with PTSD cyberpsychology. Behavior and Social Networking, 13(1), 49–54.
- Reger, G., Koenen-Woods, P., Zetocha, K., Smolenski, D. J., Holloway, K. M., Rothbaum, B. O., & Gahm, G. A. (2016). Randomized controlled trial of prolonged exposure using imaginal exposure vs. virtual reality exposure in active duty soldiers with deployment-related posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 84, 946–959.
- Resick, P., Nishith, P., Weaver, T. L., Astin, M. C., & Feuer, C. A. (2002). A comparison of cognitive-processing therapy with prolonged exposure and a waiting condition for the treatment of chronic posttraumatic stress disorder in female rape victims. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70(4), 867–879.
- Resick, P. A., Wachen, J. S., Dondanville, K. A., Pruiksma, K. E., Yarvis, J. S., Peterson, A. L., … Young-McCaughan, S. (2017). Effect of group vs individual cognitive processing therapy in active-duty military seeking treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry, 74(1), 28–36.
- Resick, P. A., Wachen, J. S., Mintz, J., Young-McCaughan, S., Roache, J. D., Borah, A. M., & Peterson, A. L. (2015). A randomized clinical trial of group cognitive processing therapy compared with group present-centered therapy for PTSD among active duty military personnel. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83, 1058–1068. Epub ahead of print.
- RevMan. (2014). Review manager 5 (RevMan 5) [ Computer Program]. Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration.
- Rothbaum, B. (1997). A controlled study of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disordered sexual assault victims. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 61(3), 317–334.
- Rothbaum, B., Astin, M. C., & Marsteller, F. (2005). Prolonged exposure versus eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR) for PTSD rape victims. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 18, 607–616.
- Sautter, F. J., Glynn, S. M., Cretu, J. B., Senturk, D., & Vaught, A. S. (2015). Efficacy of structured approach therapy in reducing PTSD in returning veterans: A randomized clinical trial. Psychological Services, 12(3), 199–212.
- Scheck, M., Schaeffer, J. A., & Gillette, C. (1998). Brief psychological intervention with traumatized young women: The efficacy of eye movement desensitisation and reprocessing. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 11, 25–44.
- Schnurr, P., Friedman, M. J., Engel, C. C., Foa, E. B., Shea, M. T., Chow, B. K., … Bernardy, N. (2007). Cognitive behavioural therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder in women. JAMA, 297, 820–830.
- Schnurr, P., Friedman, M. J., Foy, D. W., Shea, M. T., Hsieh, F. Y., Lavori, P. W., & Bernardy, N. C. (2003). Randomized trial of trauma-focused group therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60, 481–489.
- Schnyder, U., Müller, J., Maercker, A., & Wittmann, L. (2011). Brief eclectic psychotherapy for PTSD: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 72, 564–566.
- Sloan, D., Marx, B. P., Bovin, M. J., Feinstein, B. A., & Gallagher, M. W. (2012). Written exposure as an intervention for PTSD: A randomized clinical trial with motor vehicle accident survivors. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 50(10), 627–635.
- Sloan, D., Marx, B. P., Lee, D. J., & Resick, P. A. (2018). A brief exposure-based treatment vs cognitive processing therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder: A randomized noninferiority clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry, 75, 233.
- Spence, J., Titov, N., Dear, B. F., Johnston, L., Solley, K., Lorian, C., … Schwenke, G. (2011). Randomised controlled trial of internet delivered cognitive behavioural therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder. Depression and Anxiety, 28, 541–550.
- Stenmark, H., Catani, C., Neuner, F., Elbert, T., & Holen, A. (2013). Treating PTSD in refugees and asylum seekers within the general health care system. A randomized controlled multicenter study. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 51, 641–647.
- Suris, A., Link-Malcolm, J., Chard, K., Ahn, C., & North, C. (2013). A randomized clinical trial of cognitive processing therapy for veterans with PTSD related to military sexual trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 26, 28–37.
- Taylor, S., Thordarson, D. S., Maxfield, L., Fedoroff, I. C., Lovell, K., & Ogrodniczuk, J. (2003). Comparative efficacy, speed, and adverse effects of three PTSD treatments: Exposure therapy, EMDR, and relaxation training. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 330–338.
- Tylee, D. S., Gray, R., Glatt, S. J., & Bourke, F. (2017). Evaluation of the reconsolidation of traumatic memories protocol for the treatment of PTSD: A randomized, wait-list-controlled trial. Journal of Military, Veteran and Family Health, 3(1), 21–33.
- US Department of Veterans Affairs. (2017, June). VA/DOD clinical practice guideline for the management of posttraumatic stress disorder and acute stress disorder. Retrieved from https://www.healthquality.va.gov/guidelines/MH/ptsd/VADoDPTSDCPGClinicianSummaryFinal.pdf
- Vaughan, K., Armstrong, M. S., Gold, R., O’Connor, N., Jenneke, W., & Tarrier, N. (1994). A trial of eye movement desensitization compared to image habituation training and applied muscle relaxation in post-traumatic stress disorder. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25, 283–291.
- Watts, B. V., Schnurr, P. P., Mayo, L., Young-Xu, Y., Weeks, W. B., & Friedman, M. J. (2013). Meta-analysis of the efficacy of treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 74(6), e541–e550.
- Weathers, F. W., Litz, B. T., Keane, T. M., Palmieri, P. A., Marx, B. P., & Schnurr, P. P. (2013). The PTSD checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). The National Center for PTSD.
- Wells, A., & Sembi, S. (2004). Metacognitive therapy for PTSD: A preliminary investigation of a new brief treatment. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 35(4), 307–318.
- Wells, A., Walton, D., Lovell, K., & Proctor, D. (2015). Metacognitive therapy versus prolonged exposure in adults with chronic post-traumatic stress disorder: A parallel randomized controlled trial. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 39, 70–80.
- World Health Organisation. (2018). ICD-11 for mortality and morbidity statistics. Retrieved from https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en
- Yehuda, R., Pratchett, L. C., Elmes, M. W., Lehrner, A., Daskalakis, N. P., Koch, E., & Bierer, L. M. (2014). Glucocorticoid-related predictors and correlates of post-traumatic stress disorder treatment response in combat veterans. Interface Focus, 4(5), 20140048.
- Zang, Y., Hunt, N., & Cox, T. (2013). A randomised controlled pilot study: The effectiveness of narrative exposure therapy with adult survivors of the Sichuan earthquake. BMC Psychiatry, 13(1), 1.
- Zang, Y., Hunt, N., & Cox, T. (2014). Adapting narrative exposure therapy for Chinese earthquake survivors: A pilot randomised controlled feasibility study. BMC Psychiatry, 14, 262.
- Zlotnick, C., Shea, T. M., Rosen, K., Simpson, E., Mulrenin, K., Begin, A., & Pearlstein, T. (1997). An affect‐management group for women with posttraumatic stress disorder and histories of childhood sexual abuse. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 10(3), 425–436.