1,327
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial - Commissioned

Galleria mellonella: A model of infection to discern novel mechanisms of pathogenesis of non-toxigenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains

&
Pages 22-24 | Received 29 Sep 2017, Accepted 29 Sep 2017, Published online: 30 Nov 2017

ABSTRACT

Vibrio parahaemolyticus is a leading cause of raw seafood-associated bacterial gastroenteritis in the world. Its pathogenesis is likely to be multifactorial, although the most characteristic virulence-associated factors are the toxins TDH and TRH, in addition to the Type-III Secretion System-2, which codes for diverse effectors involved in cytotoxicity and enterotoxicity. However, diarrhea cases produced by clinical strains lacking all of these main virulence factors (non-toxigenic strains) have been reported in many countries and they can represent up to 9-10% of the clinical isolations. So far, although there have been significant advances in the description of the virulence factors of V. parahaemolyticus, the ability of non-toxigenic strains to cause illness is still not completely understood. To elucidate this question it is necessary to have adequate infection models. The susceptibility of G. mellonella to the infection with non-toxigenic strains seems to be the response to identifying new virulence factors and consequently providing new insights into mechanisms of the virulence of non-toxigenic strains. This new model means an invaluable contribution to public health, since the understanding of virulence in strains lacking the traditional major toxins is essential to detect these strains present in waters and marine products and avoid possible food-borne infection.

This article refers to:
Galleria mellonella as an infection model to investigate virulence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus

Vibrio parahaemolyticus is a Gram-negative, halophilic bacterium which naturally inhabits estuaries and marine environments, where it is able to persist and proliferate.Citation1 This microorganism was reported for the first time as the etiological agent responsible for a gastroenteritis outbreak in Osaka, JapanCitation2 during the fall of 1950. Today, V. parahaemolyticus is a leading cause of raw seafood-associated bacterial gastroenteritis in the worldCitation3 although most of the environmental strains are non-virulent and only few strains have the ability to cause infection in humans.Citation4 Estuaries and marine environments represent a broad reservoir of virulence-associated genes of the genus Vibrio.Citation5 These genes may be combined by horizontal gene transfer in high frequency, and produce pathogenic species if they are incorporated in an appropriate background.Citation6 As a consequence, bacterial pathogens continue to cause problems because of the emergence of new pathogens and the evolution of existing others. This is especially important because the diarrhea produced by V. parahaemolyticus is transmitted by mollusks and other seafood contaminated with environmental bacteria, thus human pathogenesis evolved by coincidental selection of traits beneficial for bacteria in the ocean that also conferred virulence in humans.Citation7 Notably, bacterial evolution has led to the emergence of pandemic or pathogenic clones with expanded ecological persistence and dispersion, as occurred in 1996 with the emergence of V. parahaemolyticus pandemic strain serotype O3:K6, which caused thousands of clinical cases worldwide.Citation5

The pathogenesis of V. parahaemolyticus is likely to be multifactorial,Citation8 although the most characteristic virulence-associated factors are two toxins, the thermostable direct hemolysin (TDH) and the tdh-related hemolysin (TRH),Citation9 in addition to the Type-III Secretion System present in chromosome II (T3SS2) which codes for diverse effectors involved in cytotoxicity and enterotoxicity.Citation10 However, Jones and other researchers reported clinical isolates negative for the two hemolysins and T3SS2, indicating that the tdh, trh and T3SS2 genes are not necessarily predictive of pathogenic potential.Citation11,12 Diarrhea cases produced by clinical strains lacking tdh, trh and T3SS2, called non-toxigenic strains because they lack the main toxins, have been reported in many countries;Citation13,14,15 they can represent up to 9–10% of the clinical isolations.Citation15 So far, although there have been significant advances in the description of the virulence factors of V. parahaemolyticus, the ability of non-toxigenic strains to cause illness is still not completely understood. Several theories have been proposed to explain why these strains are isolated from sick patients, including coinfection with pathogenic strains (ingested mussels contain a mixed population of bacteria including toxigenic and non-toxigenic strains), loss of virulence genes during or before the infection and the presence of virulence factors not yet discovered.Citation16

To elucidate if the non-toxigenic strains have novel virulence factors involved in mechanisms of infection unidentified, it is necessary to have adequate infection models. However, the limited understanding of the pathogenesis of the diarrhea induced by V. parahaemolyticus to date could be explained in part because there are few analyses of human intestinal samples obtained from infected patients and because of the absence of animal models that mimic the human disease.Citation17 Nonetheless, some models like orogastric and peritoneal mice, orogastric infection of infant rabbits and rabbit ileal-loop models have been previously used and the results obtained have provided information about intestinal colonization and pathogenesis.Citation18 Zebrafish have been also used as an infection model for V. parahaemolyticus, providing a method to screen strains with varying virulence potential.Citation8 However, the selection of experimental animal models for research is subject to bioethical aspects and the 3R (Replacement, Reduction and Refinement) criteria of Russell and BurchCitation19 must be considered for this purpose. The use of a non-mammalian model to study V. parahaemolyticus allows high throughput screening of a large number of strains at low cost and reduces the dependence on animal models.

Caenorhabditis elegans, a free-living transparent nematode, has been used as a model of V. parahaemolyticus infection. This microorganism is able to persist in the intestine of C. elegans, leading to distention of the intestinal lumen. However, although the bacterium induces a strong inflammatory response in the host intestine, the detailed mechanism of pathogenesis is still unclear.Citation20 Fortunately, Wagley and coworkers recently reported for the first time that Galleria mellonella is susceptible to infection with V. parahaemolyticus. G. mellonella, the larva of the great wax moth, has been investigated as an infection model, showing susceptibility to a wide range of fungi and bacteriaCitation21 including human pathogensCitation22 such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Yersinia pseudotuberculosis and Campylobacter jejuni.

Interestingly, G. mellonella seems to be susceptible not only to a lethal infection with toxigenic clinical strains, but also to non-toxigenic clinical strains. Also, the moth does not develop the disease when treated with environmental isolates,Citation22 suggesting that this is an excellent model to distinguish pathogenic from non-pathogenic strains. Some important differences can be observed in the pathogenesis of disease induced by toxigenic and non-toxigenic strains, suggesting that TDH and/or TRH are involved in detrimental effects on the infected larvae.Citation22 So additionally this model may also be adequate to differentiate between toxigenic and non-toxigenic strains.

The susceptibility of G. mellonella to the infection with non-toxigenic strains would allow screening different genes through the use of bacterial mutants, with the purpose of identifying new virulence factors and consequently providing new insights into mechanisms of the virulence of non-toxigenic strains. As a matter of fact, this model in combination with whole genome sequencing data of diverse V. parahaemolyticus strains allowed Wagley and coworkers to observe that mutT (nudix hydrolase) mutant strains were unable to kill G. mellonella, suggesting a role of this gene in virulence processes.Citation22 In light of the results of Wagley et al.,Citation22 the model of G. mellonella to study the infection of V. parahaemolyticus would mean an invaluable contribution to public health, since the understanding of virulence in strains lacking the traditional major toxins is essential to detect these strains present in waters and marine products and avoid possible food-borne infection.

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

Additional information

Funding

K. García acknowledge to FONDECYT Iniciación 11140257, CONICYT, Chile.

References

  • Letchumanan V, Chan KG, Lee, LH. Vibrio parahaemolyticus: a review on the pathogenesis, prevalence, and advance molecular identification techniques. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2014;5:705; doi:10.3389/fmicb.2014.00705. PMID:25566219.
  • Boyd EF, Cohen A LV, Naughton LM, Ussery DW, Binnewies TT, Stine OC, Parent MA. Molecular analysis of the emergence of pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus. BMC Microbiology. 2008;8:110; doi:10.1186/1471-2180-8-110. PMID:18590559.
  • Raghunath P. Roles of thermostable direct hemolysin (TDH) and TDH-related hemolysin (TRH) in Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2014;5:80; doi:10.3389/fmicb.2014.00805. PMID:24624126.
  • Shinoda S. Sixty Years from the Discovery of Vibrio parahaemolyticus and Some Recollections. Biocontrol Sci. 2011;16:129–37; doi:10.4265/bio.16.129. PMID:22190435.
  • Ceccarelli D, Hasan NA, Huq A, Colwell RR. Distribution and dynamics of epidemic and pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus virulence factors. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 2013;3:97; doi:10.3389/fcimb.2013.00097. PMID:24377090.
  • Nishibuchi M, Kaper JB. Thermostable direct hemolysin gene of Vibrio parahaemolyticus: a virulence gene acquired by a marine bacterium. Infection and Immunity 1995;63:2093–2099; PMID:7768586.
  • Espejo RT, García K, Plaza N. Insight into the origin and evolution of the Vibrio parahaemolyticus pandemic strain. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2017;8:1397; doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.01397. PMID:28790994.
  • Paranjpye R, Myers M, Yount E, Thompson L. Zebrafish as a model for Vibrio parahaemolyticus virulence. Microbiology. 2013;159: 2605–2615; doi:10.1099/mic.0.067637-0. PMID:24056807.
  • Nishibuchi M, Fasano A, Russell RG, Kaper B. Enterotoxigenicity of Vibrio parahaemolyticus with and without genes encoding thermostable direct hemolysin. Infect lmmun 1992;60: 3539–3545; PMID:1500161.
  • Zhang L, Orth K. Virulence determinant for Vibrio parahaemolyticus infection. Current Opinion in Microbiology. 2013;16:70–77; doi:10.1016/j.mib.2013.02.002. PMID:23433802.
  • Wootipoom N, Bhoopong P, Pomwised R, Nishibuchi M, Ishibashi M, Vuddhakul V. A decrease in the proportion of infections by pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Hat Yai Hospital, southern Thailand. J Med Microbiol. 2007;56:1630–8; doi:10.1099/jmm.0.47439-0. PMID:18033832.
  • Jones J, Lüdeke C, Bowers J, Garrett N, Fischer M, Parsons M, Bopp C, DePaola A. Biochemical, serological and virulence characterization of clinical and oyster Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(7): 2343–2352; doi:10.1128/JCM.00196-12. PMID:22535979.
  • García K, Torres R, Uribe P, Hernández C, Rioseco ML, Romero J, Espejo RT. Dynamics of clinical and environmental Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains during seafood-related summer diarrhea outbreaks in southern Chile. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75(23):7482–7487; doi:10.1128/AEM.01662-09. PMID:19801458.
  • Ottaviani D, Leoni F, Serra R, Serracca L, Decastelli L, Rocchegiani E, Masini L, Canonico C, Talevi G, Carraturo A. Nontoxigenic Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains causing acute gastroenteritis. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50 (12): 4141–4143. doi:10.1128/JCM.01993-12. PMID:23052317.
  • Bhoopong P, Palittapongarnpim P, Pomwised R, Kiatkittipong A, Kamruzzaman M, Nakaguchi Y, Nishibuchi M, Ishibashi M, Vuddhakul V. Variability of properties of Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains isolated from individual patients. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:1544–1550; doi:10.1128/JCM.02371-06. PMID:17344357.
  • Ronholm J, Petronella N, Chew Leung C, Pightling AW, Banerjee SK. Genomic Features of Environmental and Clinical Vibrio parahaemolyticus Isolates Lacking Recognized Virulence Factors Are Dissimilar. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2016;82:1102–1113; doi:10.1128/AEM.03465-15.
  • Ritchie JM, Rui H, Zhou X, Iida T, Kodoma T, Ito S, Davis BM, Bronson RT, Waldor MK. Inflammation and Disintegration of Intestinal Villi in an Experimental Model for Vibrio parahaemolyticus-Induced Diarrhea. Valdivia RH, ed. PLoS Pathogens. 2012;8:e1002593; doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1002593. PMID:22438811.
  • Livny J, Zhou X, Mandlik A, Hubbard T, Davis BM, Waldor MK. Comparative RNA-Seq based dissection of the regulatory networks and environmental stimuli underlying Vibrio parahaemolyticus gene expression during infection. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:12212–23; doi:10.1093/nar/gku891. PMID:25262354.
  • Russell WMS, Burch RL. The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique. London (UK): Universities Federation for Animal Welfare; 1959.
  • Durai S, Karutha Pandian S, Balamurugan K. Changes in Caenorhabditis elegans exposed to Vibrio parahaemolyticus. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;21:1026–35; doi:10.4014/jmb.1102.02006. PMID:22031026.
  • Tsai CJ-Y, Loh JMS, Proft T. Galleria mellonella infection models for the study of bacterial diseases and for antimicrobial drug testing. Virulence. 2016;7(3):214–29. doi:10.1080/21505594.2015.1135289.
  • Wagley S, Borne R, Harrison J, Baker-Austin C, Ottaviani D, Leoni F, Vuddhakul V, Titball R. Galleria mellonella as an infection model to investigate virulence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Virulence. 2017. PMID:28960137.