3,381
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Sepsis, parenteral vaccination and skin disinfection

Pages 2546-2559 | Received 21 Mar 2016, Accepted 12 May 2016, Published online: 26 Jul 2016

ASBSTRACT

Disinfection should be required for all skin penetrative procedures including parenteral administration of vaccines. This review analyses medically attended infectious events following parenteral vaccination in terms of their microbiological aetiology and pathogenesis. Like ‘clean’ surgical site infections, the major pathogens responsible for these events were Staphylococcal species, implicating endogenous con-tamination as a significant source of infection. As 70% isopropyl alcohol swabbing has been shown to effectively disinfect the skin, it would be medico-legally difficult to defend a case of sepsis with the omission of skin disinfection unless the very low risk of this event was adequately explained to the patient and documented prior to vaccination. There was a significant cost-benefit for skin disinfection and cellulitis. Skin disinfection in the context of parenteral vaccination represents a new paradigm of medical practice; the use of a low cost intervention to prevent an event of very low prevalence but of significant cost.

Introduction

Skin disinfectionCitation1 has been shown to significantly reduce surgical wound infection,Citation2 infection associated with vascular catheters,Citation3 blood culturesCitation4 collection of blood componentsCitation5 and yet is not routinely recommended prior to parenteral administration of vaccines and other therapeutic agents.

This procedure is not addressed in the National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups (NITAGs) guidelines from Argentina,Citation6 Canada,Citation7 Dubai,Citation8 India,Citation9 Sri lankaCitation10 and USACitation11; is considered unnecessary in AustraliaCitation12 and the UKCitation13; if used in IrelandCitation14 and New Zealand,Citation15 the skin site should be allowed to dry for 30 seconds and 2 minutes after alcohol swabbing respectively, while in BrazilCitation16 the skin should be cleaned for 30 seconds and allowed to dry for 30 seconds.

Table 1. VAERS database Cellulitis (Level 1a of certainty) and microbiology.

There is very limited evidence for the omission of skin disinfection prior to parenteral injection. Hutin et alCitation17 provides data from 6 small studies with insulin (n  =  176) in 2 retrospective and 4 retrospective studies, 16/21 case reports where exogenous sources of infection were implicated and an experimental studyCitation18 involving introduction of coagulase positive Staphylococcus aureus into the skin of 26 young healthy adults. Del Mar et alCitation19 reported 3 very small randomized trials, 2 venous access studies (Sutton et al,Citation20 n = 194 and Grabe et al,Citation21 n = 187) and one small insulin site comparative study (Koivisto & Felig,Citation22 n = 13). It is noteworthy that Del Mar et alCitation19 made recommendation about skin disinfection prior to intramuscular injection yet none of their collated studies involved this route of administration. Clearly, accepting these limited data is supporting the null hypothesis that there is no difference between skin disinfection and no skin disinfection in terms of sepsis post parenteral injection is likely to be a type II error.Citation23

70% isopropyl alcohol swabbing has been shown to effectively disinfect the skin. Sherman et alCitation24 reported it decreased the proportion of contaminants (odds ratio 21, 95% CI 3.1–142.2), with 20 of 26 patients who were initially culture positive being culture negative after disinfection. One patient remained culture positive despite disinfection.

Reichel et alCitation25 observed that disinfection depended on skin site (lumbar area 81–90%, abdomen 57–82%, upper back 55–60% and forehead 32–34%) but was not time dependent with 3 and 4 minutes not being significantly better than 2 minutes.

Khawaja et alCitation26 concluded that skin disinfection was unnecessary to prevent skin sepsis in a small study (n = 51) where a 47% reduction in colony forming units was found with cultures taken prior to the skin being swabbed for 30 seconds with a drying time of 30 seconds and post injection at the prepared site.

Medically attended infectious eventsCitation27 following parenteral vaccination range from any condition for which medical attention is sought to more serious adverse events resulting in hospitalisation, persistent or significant disability and death. Due to their more significant nature, they are likely to be brought to the attention of healthcare workers who report them as case reports and/or to vaccine surveillance programs. However due to their method of reportingCitation28 there is likely to be a bias toward under-reporting of less severe events like cellulitis, often treated on an outpatient basis without probable report.

In this review, medically attended infectious events data following parenteral vaccination were collated with a view to assessing the role of skin contamination in the microbiological aetiology and pathogenesis of sepsis following vaccination.

Results

Medically attended infectious events following parenteral vaccination can be subdivided into 2 groups:

  1. Localized Clinical Syndromes (cellulitis, infectious abscess, necrotizing fasciitis, pyomyositis, osteomyelitis and septic arthritis).

  2. Systemic Syndromes (bacteraemia and sepsis, septic [toxic] shock syndrome) often complicating local syndromes.

Clinical syndrome reports were collated only for healthy patients with case reports with overlapping syndromes entered only once as the most significant syndrome.

Localized clinical syndromes

Cellulitis

Cellulitis is the most common infectious event following parenteral administration of vaccines. It has been definedCitation29 by the Brighton Collaborative Local Reaction Working Group as “an acute, infectious and expanding inflammatory condition of the skin.”

Level 1a of diagnostic certainty – includes at least 3 of the following signs/symptoms: localized pain or tenderness (pain to touch) erythema, induration or swelling and warmth AND reaction at the injection site and laboratory confirmation by culture.

Level 2 of diagnostic certainty – at least 3 of the signs/symptoms for level 1a and reaction at the injection site and diagnosed by a qualified healthcare provider. Exclusion criteria – spontaneous, rapid resolution and fluctuance.

Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting Scheme (VAERS) database

Search of the VAERS database for cellulitis codes listed in the methods section, retrieved 5 cases of cellulitis satisfying the Level 1a of diagnostic certainty, 4 due to staphylococcal species (1 MRSA) and 1 due to mixed streptococcal/staphylococcal infection ().

576 entries from the VAERS database satisfied the Level 2 of diagnostic certainty (major vaccines; combination 179, pneumococcal 166, varicella 90, DTPa 64 and influenza vaccine 41).

The rate of hospitalization for cellulitis in these VAERS patients was 16.2% which is much greater than rates observed n other studiesCitation30,31 and presumably reflects a bias to reporting more severe reactions in passive surveillance systems like the VAERS. Goettsch et al.,Citation30 using data from the National Morbidity Registration in the Netherlands, estimated that 7% of all patients with bacterial cellulitis and erysipelas of the leg required hospitalization while McCall et alCitation31 noted a 4% admission rate for cellulitis in Medicare + Choice (M + C) enrolees in the USA.

Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) program

Review of studies drawn from data collected through the Vaccine Safety Datalink program,Citation32 an active collaboration between a number of health maintenance organisations and the National Immunization Program of the Center for Diseases Control, also gave reports of vaccine related cellulitis. Improved diagnostic certainty of these data was made by chart review and only studies with this level of analysis were included in this review. In 5 studies, 288 cases of cellulitis were reported ().

Table 2. Vaccine Safety Datalink studies and cellulitis.

Other vaccine surveillance programs

Two reports of injection site cellulitis have been reported for influenza vaccines by the National Vaccine Injury Compensation ProgramCitation38 and the Korean National Adverse Events Following Immunization Surveillance System.Citation37

Choe et al.Citation38 reported cellulitis in 7/45 vaccine recipients with serious adverse events following administration of trivalent, inactivated influenza vaccine over the period 2003–2010, with 2 satisfying the level 1 and 5, the level 2 of diagnostic certainty. Kim et alCitation39 reported an 8 y old male who developed cellulitis following injection of a novel influenza A (H1N1) vaccine.

In the Italian region of Veneto, 13 patients were reportedCitation40 as having cellulitis as a serious event following vaccination during the period 1992–2008.

In the Canadian Province of Ontario, 19 cases of cellulitis were reportedCitation41 in recipients of DTaP-IPV over the period 2009–2013.

Post-marketing vaccine safety studies

Schmidt et alCitation42 reported 36 cases of cellulitis in a retrospective study in Kaiser Permanente Northwest (KPNW) clinics, 7/13,210 patients who received 2 doses of an inactivated, trivalent influenza vaccine within 28 days and 29/59,905 patients who received a single dose of this vaccine.

Burwen et alCitation43 reported 42 cases of cellulitis/abscess (ICD-9-CM code 682.3) requiring hospital admission in a retrospective study of Medicare vaccination data.

Case reports of cellulitis

Twenty-three reports of vaccine related cellulitis have been made in 6 studies ().

Table 3. Vaccine studies and cellulitis.

Table 4. Infectious abscess post vaccination.

In two VSD studies, with zoster vaccine in adultsCitation51 and trivalent inactivated influenza in children aged 24–59 months,Citation52 relative risks of 1.30 (95%CI 1.18–1.44) and 3.27 (95% CI 0.36 – 29.70) were reported for cellulitis and infection and cellulitis and skin reaction respectively.

Also in a studyCitation53 of emergency department visits and hospital admission following quadrivalent human papilloma vaccines, vaccination odds ratio for skin infection days 1 to 14 post vaccination was 1.8 (95% CI 1.3–24). However in those 3 studies the number of patients satisfying the case definitions for cellulitis are unknown.

Infectious abscess

The Brighton Collaboration Local Reaction Working Group level 1 of diagnostic certainty for abscess of infectious aetiology requiresCitation54 “spontaneous or surgical drainage of material from the mass” and “laboratory confirmation (Gram stain, culture or either test) of microbiological organisms with or without polymorphonuclear leukocytes in material drained or aspirated from the mass.”

VAERS database infectious abscess (Level 1 of certainty and microbiology)

Fifty three cases of infectious abscess with level 1 of certainty were retrieved from the VAERS database, 30 Staphylococcus aureus (including 5 MRSA, 5 coagulase negative strains), 6 group A (GAS) Streptococcus, 4 mixed growth (Staphylococcus/Streptococcus), 3 Serratia Marcescens, 2 acid fast bacillus and 1 each of Streptococcus viridans, Haemophilus influenzae type b, Haemophilus influenzae (not specified), Haemophilus parainfluenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Enterobacter faecalis, Enterobacter agglomerans, and mixed skin flora. The vaccines involved were Combination 18, DTP 10, influenza 7, Hepatitis B 5, TD/TT 5, pneumococcal 3, DTaP 2, Hepatitis A 2 and DaTP – IPV/Hib/Hepatitis B 1.

Published reports of infectious abscess formation

Mycobacteral infection (254/307) accounted for the majority of infectious abscess formation. Mycobacterium tuberculosis (167 cases), Mycobacterium chelonae (47 cases) and Mycobacterium fortuitum (40 cases) (). Oka and SatoCitation55 and Tamura et alCitation56 reported 62 and 102 cases of cutaneous Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection following vaccination with pertussis and typhoid vaccines respectively. Although the role of infected vaccinators is uncertain, the potential for needle contamination as the source of these infections is supportedCitation57 by a recent outbreak of Mycobacterium tuberculosis following acupuncture in which failure to disinfect needles was implicated.

In three other cases Citation58,59,60 of primary cutaneous tuberculosis (PCTB) caused by M. tuberculosisc ontamination of the needle could not be excluded.

M. fortuitum and M. chelonae are rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM) with contaminated tap water considered to be major reservoir of these pathogens.Citation61 This source is more likely to explain the 47 cases reported by Borghans & Stanford,Citation62 than the contamination of a number of vials with the same mycobacterial strain over a 6 month period. Similarly, this source could explain the 40 cases of M. fortuitum reported by Owen et al.Citation63

Exogenous source of infection also accounted for infectious abscess formation in another 43 cases (7 contaminated vaccinator, 4 Group A Streptococcus [GAS]Citation64 and 3 MRSA encoding the Panton-Valentine-Leukocidin toxinCitation65) and contaminated multi-dose vials (9 children Colorado,Citation66 12 children Georgia and 7 children OklahomaCitation67 and 7 children IndianaCitation68). In 10 cases, (8 Singapore,Citation69 1 TurkeyCitation70 and 1 USACitation71) the source of infection was not identified.

Abscesses following vaccination have been reported in clinical trials, number in parenthesis, from NigerCitation72 (5), Burkina FasoCitation73,74 (16, 1), KenyaCitation75 (17), India76(16) and EthiopiaCitation77 (10) and also in the review by Klar et al.Citation41 However as microbiological data were not provided in these reports it is uncertain whether these were infectious or “sterile” abscesses.

Necrotizing fasciitis

Necrotizing fasciitis is an infection of the subcutaneous tissue (between the skin and the underlying muscle) which often overlaps with myconecrosis and is complicated by sepsis.Citation78 It has been classifiedCitation78 in 4 groups; Type 1 (polymicrobial), Type 2 (Group A Streptococcus), Clostridium fasciitis and Clostridium myonecrosis.

Seven case reports of this condition have been reported post vaccination with an additional 5 cases being retrieved from the VAERS database (). Definitive treatment of this condition involves early debridement of all necrotic tissue.

Table 5. Necrotozing fasciitis post vaccination.

Pyomyositis

Pyomyositis is a very uncommon primary infection of skeletal muscle mainly caused by Staphylococcus aureus.Citation85

Bae et al.Citation86 reported this condition in a 17 month old female patient due to Mycobacterium tuberculosis following Hepatitis A (Havrix®) vaccination. The case was considered to have incidentally occurred at the vaccination site “rather than being a syringe-transmitted infection or that it was associated with BCG vaccination..”

Two cases of pyomyositis were retrieved from the VAERS database;

A 17 y old female vaccinated with HPV (Gardasil®) vaccine developed an oval, tender, swollen and erythematous reaction with fever. Blood culture and aspiration culture negative, WCC 13.7×109, (80% neutrophils), CT scan showed subcutaneous infiltration, no abscess formation and MRI positive for inflammation.

A 4 y old female vaccinated with 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine (Pneumovax®) developed severe leg pain, fever and difficulty walking. MRI and Ultrasound revealed diffuse fasciitis with abscess formation and patient was diagnosed with cellulitis and myositis.

Osteomyelitis

Osteomyelitis is a not uncommon diseaseCitation87 of bone which can be divided into 3 categories in terms of its source of infection; haematogenous, contiguous spread with or without vascular insufficiency.

Search of the VAERS database retrieved 10 cases of osteomyelitis, 9 due to contiguous spread and one due to haematogenous spread ().

Table 6. Osteomyelitis cases and VAERS database.

Septic arthritis

Septic arthritis, infection of the joint, can occur via 3 routesCitation88; haematogenous, direct contamination into the joint and indirect contamination – spread from nearby structures.

Search of the VAERS database revealed 7 cases of septic arthritis, 4 due to haematogenous spread, 2 due to direct contamination and 1 due to indirect contamination ().

Systemic syndromes

Bacteraemia

A consensus conference between the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) and the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) defined bacteraemiaCitation90 as the presence of viable bacteria in the blood. This condition can be divided into complicated and uncomplicated bacteraemia with the criteria for the latterCitation91 being:

  1. Exclusion of endocarditis

  2. No implanted prosthesis

  3. Negative results of follow-up blood cultures drawn 2–4 d after the initial set

  4. Defervescence within 72 hours after the initiation of effective antibiotic therapy and

  5. No evidence of metastatic infection

Uncomplicated bacteraemia

A case of uncomplicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia was drawn from the VAERS database. A 64 y old male given influenza (H1N1) [Sanofi®] vaccine had induration, swelling and pain at the injection site with blood culture positive for coagulase negative S. aureus. Using the 5 predictors of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) validated by Elzi et alCitation92 to differentiate between blood culture contamination and blood stream infection due to coagulase-negative S. aureus, the probability of blood stream infection in this case was 42.4%, as the while cell count was greater than 12 × 109/l.

Complicated bacteraemia

Complicated bacteraemia has been reportedCitation93 to include a wide range of metastatic infectious syndromes (infective endocarditis, septic arthritis, deep tissue abscess, vertebral osteomyelitis, epidural abscess, septic thrombophlebitis, psoas abscess, meningitis and embolic stroke).

Chae et al.Citation94 reported a case of multiple subcutaneous abscesses complicating Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in a 42 day old female vaccinated with BCG.

One case of haematogenous osteomyelitis () was drawn from the VAERS database, a 73 y old female vaccinated with influenza vaccine developed L3/4 vertebral osteomyelitis.

Four cases of septic arthritis () were drawn from the VAERS database

Table 7. Septic arthritis.

(M/age not given, MSSA; M/16, MRSA; M/72, GAS; F/1.1, Alcaligenes faecalis. A case of arterial stroke was also drawn from the VAERS database, a 1.1 y old male presented with febrile seizure and left arm weakness the morning after vaccination with a combination of hepatitis A (Vaqta®), 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (Prevnar7®) and varicella (Varivax®) vaccines. MRI showed thrombosis of the right middle cerebral artery and blood cultures were positive for S. aureas. Fullerton et alCitation95 have concluded that “infection may act as a trigger for childhood arterial ischaemic stroke, while routine vaccinations appear protective.”

Two other cases of complicated bacteraemia were obtained from the VAERS database. A 72 y old male vaccinated with influenza H1N1 (Novartis®) developed sudden onset of pain and swelling in right wrist and arm and left ankle had GAS cultured from the right wrist. A 0.6 y old female vaccinated with a combination of Hib and Hep B (Comvax®), DTaP (Tripedia®), 7 valent pneumococcal vaccine (Prevnar®) and polio inactivated (IPOL®) developed Streptococcus pneumoniae bacteraemia with bacterial meningitis.

Sepsis/severe sepsis/septic (toxic) shock syndrome

Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), is characterizedCitation96 by more than one of the following clinical findings: body temperature higher than 38°c, heart rate higher than 90/minute, hyperventilation evidenced by respiratory rate higher than 20/min or PaCO2 lower than 32 mm Hg or white cell count higher than 12×109/l or lower than 4×109/l. SepsisCitation96 is defined as SIRS in the presence of infection with severe sepsis being associated with organ dysfunction, hypoperfusion or hypotension and septic shock being sepsis-induced hypotension despite adequate fluid resuscitation.

Septic/Toxic shock is rarely seen following vaccination and then likely to be due to contamination of needles/syringes or vaccines or transfer of infectious agents from the vaccinator to the vaccine recipient ().

Table 8. Septic/toxic shock.

In total 1534 reports of sepsis following parenteral vaccination were retrieved from databases and published reports in this review with this number being dominated by cellulitis, 1011 (65.9%).

Discussion

“Clean” surgical site infections (an uninfected operative wound in which no inflammation is encountered and the respiratory, alimentary, genital or uninfected urinary tract is not entered) have been suggestedCitation101 to be due to endogenous Staphylococcal species at the site of incision. This contention has been supportedCitation102 by a study using Technetium-99 m pertechnetate labeled albumin microspheres to differentiate between surgeon and patient derived infection.

Staphylococcal species infection prevalence at “clean” surgical sites varies from 54.8% (orthopaedic surgery),Citation103 67.3% (superficial site, open heart surgery)Citation104 to 87.9% (post arthroscopy)Citation105 with the latter authors concluding that “their predominance supports the need for careful skin preparation and sterile technique when performing arthroscopy.”

Similarly in this review, Staphylococcal species were identified in 59/92 (64.1%) cases, when suspected/proven cases due to exogenous infection were excluded; cellulitis 5/5, infectious abscess 43/63, necrotising fasciitis 1/4, osteomyelitis 4/6, septic arthritis 3/5, bacteraemia 3/5, sepsis 0/4. This implicates endogenous contamination as a significant source of infection during parenteral vaccination, a thesis supported by the probable/proven exogenous contamination in only 421 of the 1534 (27.4%) of the medically attended infectious events collated in this review.

Consequently it would be difficult to defendCitation106 a case of sepsis if skin preparation was omitted unless the risk of this very low prevalence event was adequately explained to the patient and documented prior to vaccine administration.

Cellulitis, a syndrome of uncertain microbiological etiology,Citation107 was the major event post parenteral vaccination in this review, 1011/1534 (65.9%). In a reviewCitation108 of prospective and retrospective laboratory studies of the 16% of patients with positive needle aspirate and/or punch biopsy cultures from intact skin, the ratio of Staphylococcus aureus to group A streptococcus was almost 2:1 (51% : 27%).

This trend was reversed when microbiological diagnosis was made with blood cultureCitation109 and serology,Citation110 (anti-streptolysin O (ASOT) and anti-DNase B) (beta haemolytic streptococcus 57–75% and 70% respectively).

A Kaiser Permanente of Northern California studyCitation111 of the microbiology of skin and soft tissue infections (2006–2009) held beta haemolytic streptococci accounted for 9% of cultured cellulitis and abscess.

In the presented review, GAS accounted for 13.5% of cultured cellulitis and abscesses when mixed growth culture with Staphylococcus aureus were combined.

Cutaneous tuberculosis can be classifiedCitation112 as, inoculation tuberculosis from an exogenous source, tuberculosis from an endogenous source and haematogenous tuberculosis.

In this review Mycobacterial infection was dominant in the infectious abscess post vaccination group, 254/307 (82.7%), 167 cases due to Mycobacterium tuberulosis and 87 cases due to rapid growing mycobacteria (Mycobactyerium chelonae 47 and Mycobacterium fortuitum 40). These infections are “inoculation” tuberculosis due to inadequately sterilised needlesCitation112 in the M tuberculosis group and probable use of contaminated tapwater,Citation61 the major reservoir of rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM) in the cluster of cases of Mycobacterium chelonae and Mycobacterium fortuitum.

A cost benefit analysis for skin disinfection with 70% isopropyl alcohol swabs can be made for cellulitis from the data collated in this review.

The prevalence of cellulitis in the 6 randomized, controlled trials collatedCitation45-50 in this review ranged from 1/143 to 1/22,070 injections with the mean being 1/5290 injections. If the 2 extreme outliers are excluded then mean prevalence of cellulitis is 1/2383 injections. The cost per swab is 2.2 c USACitation113 and 2.9c Australian,Citation115

As decontamination rates after swabbing with isopropyl alcohol have varied from 47% to 77%, with the former measurement made after injection, a mean effectiveness of swabbing of 66% would seem to be acceptable with this presumably translating into a similar rate of reduction of injection site cellulitis.

The cost of swabbing 2383 patients is $52.5 USA and $69.1 Australia.

The cost of managing a case of cellulitis includes outpatient and inpatient components. The outpatient component is $37.05 standard consultation (concession card holders) and $68 (private billing) jwith $6.10 to $10 respectively for a course of Cephalexin in Australia. In the USA the consultation charge would be $10–50 for insured patients and $50–200 for uninsured patients respectively with $7 for a course of Cephalexin.

An inpatient component is added to the cost of managing cellulitis as 4–7% of these patients require hospital admission.Citation30,31 In the USA this is costed at between $6,000 to $25,000 while in Australia (2011–2012) this was costedCitation116 at an average of $3800 with a range of $1900 to $4000 for major metropolitan hospitals and at an average of $4000 (range 2700 to 5300) for major regional hospitals. If this is averaged at $4000 per admission in 2016 and the mean rate of admission for cellulitis is also averaged at 5.5% then the increment of cost added to the care of all cases of cellulitis is $220.

The total cost per patient for the management of cellulitis in Australia is thus $263.15 and $298 for concession card holders and privately billed patients respectively and as 66% of patients are protected against cellulitis by swabbing the cost saved per patient is $173.6 and $196.7 for these groups.

The cost-benefit for skin disinfection prevention of cellulitis is the cost saved per case ($173.6 and $196.7) minus the cost of swabbing to prevent 1 case of cellulitis (2.9 c × 2383 = $69.1), $104.5 and $127.6. This significant cost-benefit takes no account of indirect costs such as loss of income.

Evidence based medicine has been championedCitation117 as a paradigm which results in improved medical practice. However, it is evident from the body of data collated in this review that very large randomized trials would be needed to adequately address the issue of skin disinfection prior to vaccine administration and the prevention of sepsis.

Consequently, a new paradigmCitation118 might be evoked to cover this clinical issue, namely the use of a very low cost intervention (disposable skin swab) to prevent a very low prevalence event (sepsis related to parenteral vaccination) of high cost (medical attention including hospitalisation with morbidity/ mortality).

Methods

Data for this review were sought from the following databases: Medline via Ovid (1996 to present), Embase via Ovid (1980 to present, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) via EBSCO (1982 to present), using search terms and their word variants; “cellulitis,” “infected abscess formation,” “necrotizing fasciitis,” “pyomyositis,” “osteomyelitis,” “septic arthritis,” “bacteraemia,” “sepsis” and “toxic shock syndrome” and “vaccine administration,” “vaccine studies,” “vaccine trials” and “post marketing vaccine safety.”

Additional data were obtained by hand searching journals for “safety data” and “vaccine studies/trials.” The following journals were searched for these data from the date in parentheses to December 2015; Acta Paediatrica (1998), Acta Tropica (1989), American Journal of Medicine (1946), American Journal of Public Health (1971), American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (1998), Annals of Internal Medicine (1960), Archives of Diseases of Child Health (1926), Bio Drugs (1998), Biologicals (1990), British Medical Journal (1991), Canadian Medical Association Journal (1911), Clinical Infectious Diseases (1999), Clinical Therapeutics (1995), Clinical and Vaccine Immunology (2006), European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (1997), European Journal of Pediatrics (1997), Infection and Immunity (1970), Infection (1997), International Journal of Infectious Diseases (1996), Journal of American Medical Association (1983), Journal of Hygiene (1903), Journal of Infectious Disease (1999), Journal of Medical Microbiology (1996), Journal of Pediatrics and Childhood (1998), Journal of Pediatrics (1999), Journal of Travel Medicine (1997), Journal of Tropical Pediatrics (1996), Lancet (1990), Medical Journal of Australia (2004), New England Journal of Medicine (1993), Pediatrics (1966), Pediatric Infectious Diseases Journal (1995), Public Health (1995), Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Disease (1997), Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (1920) and Vaccine (1983). Bibliographies of all relevant publications obtained by these searches were then searched for additional data.

The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) database November 2015 was searched manually by the author for code 10075095 (administration site cellulitis), code 10007882 (cellulitis), code 10007921 (cellulitis staphylococcal), code 10007922 ( cellulitis streptococcal) and code 10050057 (injection site cellulitis); code 10022044 (injection site abscess), code 10041917 (staphylococcal abscess), 10042343 (subcutaneous abscess), code 10069556 (vaccination site abscess), code 10028885 (necrotising fasciitis), code 10028887 (necrotizing fasciitis staphylococcal), code 10021918 (infective myositis), code 10028653 (myositis), code 10037652 (pyomyositis), code 10031252 (osteomyelitis), code 10031253 (osteomyelitis acute), code 10031256 (osteomyelitis chronic), code 10064250 (staphylococcal osteomyelitis), code 10053555 (arthritis bacterial), code 10060968 (arthritis infective), code 10064111 (injection site inflammation), code 10040059 (septic arthritis haemophilus), code 10067323 (septic arthritis streptococcal); code 10003997 (bacteraemia), code 10058922 (haemophilus bacteraemia), code 10058859 (pneumococcal bacteraemia), 10051017 (staphylococcal bacteraemia), code 10051018 (streptococcal bacteraemia), code 10014665 (endocarditis), code 1001466 (endocarditis bacterial), code 10014684 (endocarditis staphylococcal); code 10058875 (haemophilus sepsis), code 10054047 (pneumococcal sepsis), code 10056430 (staphylococcal sepsis), code 10048960 (streptococcal sepsis); code 10044248 (toxic shock syndrome), code 10044250 (toxic shock syndrome staphylococcal), code 10044251 (toxic shock syndrome streptococcal) AND all vaccine products. Data were included from these search domains if adverse events were reported or reviewed by a healthcare professional and if the vaccine name was provided.

Abbreviations

NITAGs=

National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups

VAERS=

Vaccine Adverse Effect Reporting System

VSD=

Vaccine Safety Datalink

KPNW=

Kaiser Permanente North West

PCTB=

Primary Cutaneous Tuberculosis

RGM=

Rapid Growing Mycobacteria

MRSA=

Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus

SIRS=

Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome

GAS=

Group A Streptococcus

Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest

No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

References

  • McDonnell G. Sterilization and disinfection. Encyclopaedia of Microbiology (3rd edition) 2009; 529-48.
  • Darouiche RO, Wall MJ, Itani KMF, Otterson MF, Webb AL, Carrick MM, Miller HJ, Awad SS, Crosby CT, Mosier MC, et al. Chlorhexidine – Alcohol versus Povidine - Iodine for surgical-site antisepsis. N Engl J Med 2010; 362:18-26; PMID:20054046; http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0810988
  • Chaiyakunapruk N, Veenstra DL, Lipsky B, Saint S. Chlorhexidine compared with povidine-iodine solution for vascular catheter-site care. A meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2002; 136:792-801; PMID:12044127; http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-136-11-200206040-00007
  • Hall KK, Lyman JA. Updated review of blood culture contamination. Clin Micro Rev 2006; 19:788-802; PMID:17041144; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00062-05
  • Lee CK, Ho PL, Chan NK, Mak A, Hong J, Lin CK. Impact of donor arm skin disinfection on the bacterial contamination rate of platelet concentrates. Vox Sang 2002; 83:204-8; PMID:12366760; http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1423-0410.2002.00219.x
  • Recommendaciones nacionales de Vacunacion, Ministerio de Salud, Argentina 2012.
  • Canadian Immunization Guide Part 1. Public Health Agency of Canada 2013.
  • Immunization Guidelines, Dubai Health Authority, Department of Public Health & Safety. Health Policy and Strategy Sector
  • IAP Committee on Immunization. Indian Academy of Pediatrics Mumbai, India 2012.
  • Immunisation Handbook. Epidemiology Unit, Ministry of Health, Sri Lanka 2012.
  • Centers For Disease Control and Prevention. General recommendations on Immunization: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) MMWR 2011; 60(RR02):1-60.
  • The Australian Immunization Handbook. National Health and Medical Research Council 2014.
  • Immunisation against Infectious Disease (The Green Book), Department of Health, London, UK 2013.
  • Immunisation Guidelines, HSE National Immunisation Office, Dublin, Ireland 2014.
  • New Zealand Immunisation Handbook. Ministry of Health, Wellington, New Zealand 2014.
  • Manual de Normas e Procedimentos para Vacinação, Ministerio da Saude, Brazil. 2014
  • Hutin Y, Hauri A, Chiarello L, Catlin M, Stilwell B, Ghebrehiwet T, Garner J; Injection Safety Best Practices Development Group. Best infection control practices for intradermal, subcutaneous and intramuscular needle injections. Bull WHO 2003; 81:491-500; PMID:12973641
  • Elek SD, Conen PE. The virulence of Staphylococcus pyogenes for man. A study of the problems of wound infection. Brit J Exp Path 1957; 38:573-86; PMID:13499821
  • Del Mar CB, Glasziou PP, Spinks AB, Sanders SL. Is Isopropyl alcohol swabbing before injection really necessary? Med J Aust 2001; 174:306; PMID:11297122
  • Sutton CD, White SA, Edwards R, Lewis MH. A prospective controlled trial of the efficacy of isopropyl alcohol wipes before venesection in surgical patients. Ann R Coll Surg England 1999; 81:183-6.
  • Grabe N, Jakoben C-JB, Damm MD. Skin disinfection before intravenous cannulation – intraluminal contamination after disinfection with 70% isopropyl alcohol. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1985; 29:764-6; PMID:4082876; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.1985.tb02297.x.
  • Koivisto VA, Felig P. Is skin preparation necessary before insulin injection. Lancet 1978; 1072-3; PMID:77369; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(78)90916-9.
  • Sakpal TV. Sample size estimation in clinical trial. Perspect Clin Res 2010; 1:67-9; PMID:21829786.
  • Sherman T, Ferguson J, Davis W, Russo M, Argintar E. Does the use of ultrasound affect contamination of musculoskeletal injection sites. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015; 473:351-7; PMID:25163689; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3903-4.
  • Reichel M, Heisig P, Kohlmann T, Kampf G. Alcohols for skin antisepsis at clinically relevant skin sites. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53:4778-82; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00582-09.
  • Khawaja RA, Sikander R, Qureshi R, Jareno RJM. Routine skin preparation with 70% isopropyl alcohol swabs: Is it necessary before injection? Quasi study. JLUMHS 2013; 12:109-14.
  • Candela S, Pergolizzi S, Ragni P, Cavuto S, Nobilio L, Di Mario S, Dragosevic V, Groth N, Magrini N; SaFoH1N1 working group. An early (3–6 weeks) active surveillance study to assess the safety of pandemic influenza vaccine, Focetria, in a province of Emilia – Romagna region, Italy – part one. Vaccine 2013; 31:1431-7; PMID:22766247; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.06.030.
  • Hatz C, Beck B, Steffen R, Genton B, d'Acremont V, Louton L, Hartmann K, Herzog C. Real-life versus package insert: a post-marketing study on adverse-event rates of the virosomal hepatitis A vaccine Epaxal® in healthy travellers. Vaccine 2011; 29:5000-6; PMID:21569813; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.04.099.
  • Halperin S, Kohl KS, Gidudu J, Ball L, Hammer SJ, Heath P, Hennig R, Labadie J, Rothstein E, Schuind A, et al. Cellulitis at injection site: Case definition and guidelines for collection, analysis and presentation of immunization safety data. Vaccine 2007; 25:5803-20; PMID:17548135; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.04.059.
  • Goettsch WG, Bouwes Bavinck JN, Harings RMC. Burden of illness of bacterial cellulitis and erysipelas of the leg in the Netherlands. JEADV 2006; 20:834-9; PMID:16898907.
  • McCall N, Harlow J, Dayhoff D. Rates of hospitalization for ambulating care sensitive conditions in the Medicare + Choice population. Health Care Financ Rev 2001; 22:127-45; PMID:25372877.
  • Baggs J, Gee J, Lewis E, Fowler G, Benson P, Lieu T, Naleway A, Klein NP, Baxter R, Belongia E, et al. The Vaccine Safety Datalink: a model for monitoring immunization safety. Pediatrics 2011; 127:S45-53; PMID:21502240; http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-1722H.
  • Jackson LA, Yu O, Nelson JC, Dominguez C, Peterson D, Baxter R, Hambidge SJ, Naleway AL, Belongia EA, Nordin JD, et al. Injection site and risk of medically attended local reactions to acellular pertussis vaccine. Pediatrics 2011; 127:e581-7; PMID:21300679; http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-1886.
  • Jackson LA, Yu O, Nelson J, Belongia EA, Hambidge SJ, Baxter R, Naleway A, Nordin J, Baggs J, Iskander J. Risk of medically attended local reactions following diphtheria toxoid containing vaccines in adolescents and young adults: A Vaccine Safety Datalink study. Vaccine 2009; 27:4912-6; PMID:19567245; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.06.038.
  • Jackson LA, Yu O, Belongia EA, Hambidge SJ, Nelson J, Baxter R, Naleway A, Gay C, Nordin J, Baggs J, et al. Frequency of medically attended adverse events following tetanus and diphtheria toxoid vaccine in adolescents and young adults: a Vaccine Safety Database study. BMC Infect Dis 2009; 9:165-71; PMID:19804643; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-9-165.
  • Jackson LA, Nelson JC, Whitney CG, Neuzil KM, Benson P, Malais D, Baggs J, Mullooly J, Black S, Shay DK. Assessment of the safety of a third dose of pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in the Vaccine Safety Datalink population. Vaccine 2006; 24:151-6; PMID:16122845; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.07.066.
  • Hambidge SJ, Glanz JM, France JM, McClure D, Xu S, Yamasaki K, Jackson L, Mullooly JP, Zangwill KM, Marcy SM, et al. Safety of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in children 6 to 23 months old. JAMA 2006; 296:1990-7; PMID:17062862; http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.16.1990.
  • Choe YJ, Cho H, Kim SN, Bae G-R, Lee J-K. Serious adverse events following receipt of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in Korea 2003–2010. Vaccine 2011; 29:7727-32; PMID:21827815; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.07.129.
  • Kim JH, Cho HY, Hennessey KA, Lee HJ, Bae GR, Kim HC. Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) with the novel influenza A (H1N1) 2009 vaccine: Findings from the national registry of all vaccine recipients and AEFI and the passive surveillance system in South Korea. Jpn J Infect Dis 2012; 6:99-104.
  • Micheletti F, Moretti U, Tridente G, Zanoni G. Consultancy and surveillance of post-immunisation adverse events in the Veneto region of Italy for 1992–2008. Hum Vaccin 2011; 7(supl):234-9; PMID:21301223; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/hv.7.0.14613.
  • Klar S, Harris T, Wong K, Fediurek J, Deeks SL. Vaccine safety implications of Ontario, Canada's switch from DTaP-IPV to Tdap-IPV for the pre-school booster. Vaccine 2014; 32:6360-3; PMID:25252195; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.09.017.
  • Schmidt MA, Crane B, Mullooly JP, Naleway AL. Frequency of medically attended events following rapid revaccination with trivalent inactivated influenza. Vaccine 2010; 28:7713-5; PMID:20875495; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.09.043.
  • Burwen DR, La Voie L, Braun MM, Houck P, Ball R. Evaluating adverse events after vaccination in the Medicare population. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2007; 16:753-61; PMID:17385786; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pds.1390.
  • Aderibigbe SA, Osagbemi GK, Bolarinwa OA. Adverse event following immunisation in a Nigerian tertiary health institution. Am J Sci Ind Res 2010; 1:496-9.
  • Gattas VL, Cardoso MRA, Mondini G, Machado CM, Luna EJA. Effectiveness of influenza vaccination of school children in the city of Sao Paulo, Brazil 2009. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2015; 9:323-30; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/irv.12328.
  • Agnandji ST, Asante KP, Lyimo J, Vekemans J, Soulanoudjingar SS, Owusu R, Shomari M, Leach A, Fernandes J, Dosoo D, et al. Evaluation of the safety and immunogenicity of the RTS,S/AS01E malaria candidate vaccine when integrated in the Expanded Program of Immunization. J Infect Dis 2010; 202:1076-87; PMID:20735271; http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/656190.
  • Tregnaghi M, Lopez P, Rocha C, Rivera L, David M-P, Ruttimann R, Schuerman L. A new DTPw-HB/Hib comination vaccine for primary and booster vaccination of infants in Latin America. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2006; 19:179-88; PMID:16640847; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1020-49892006000300006.
  • Abdelnour A, Silas PE, Lamas MRV, Aragon CFG, Chiu N-C, Chiu C-H, Acuña TH, Castrejón Tde L, Izu A, Odrljin T, et al. Safety of a quadrivalent meningococcal serogroups A, C, W and Y conjugate vaccine (MenACWY-CRM) administered with routine infant vaccinations: results of an open-label, randomized, phase 3b controlled study in healthy infants. Vaccine 2014; 32:965-72; PMID:24397906; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.12.034.
  • Klopfer SO, Stek JE, Petrecz M, Reisinger KS, Black SB, Goveia MG, Nicholson O, Gardner JL, Grosso AD, Brown ML, et al. Analysis of safety data in children after receiving two doses of ProQuad® (MMRV). Vaccine 2014; 32:7154-60; PMID:25219563; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.08.067.
  • Rivera Medina DM, Valencia A, de Velasquez A, Huang L-M, Prymula R, Garcia-Sicilia J, Rombo L, David MP, Descamps D, Hardt K, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of the HPV-16/18 ASO4-adjuvanted vaccine: A randomised, controlled trial in adolescent girls. J Adolsc Health 2010; 46:414-21; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.02.006.
  • Tseng HF, Liu A, Sy L, Marcy SM, Fireman B, Weintraub E, Baggs J, Weinmann S, Baxter R, Nordin J, et al. Safety of zoster vaccine in adults from a large managed care cohort: A Vaccine Safety Datalink study. J Intern Med 2012; 271:510-20; PMID:22026504; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2011.02474.x.
  • Glanz JM, Newcomer SR, Hambidge SJ, Daley MF, Narwaney KJ, Xu S, Lee GM, Baggs J, Klein NP, Nordin JD, et al. Safety of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in children aged 24–59 months in the Vaccine Safety Datalink. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2011; 165:749-55; PMID:21810637; http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.112.
  • Klein NP, Hansen J, Chao C, Velicer C, Emery M, Slezak J, Lewis N, Deosaransingh K, Sy L, Ackerson B, et al. Safety of quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine administered routinely to females. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2012; 166:1140-8; PMID:23027469; http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpediatrics.2012.1451.
  • Kohl KS, Ball L, Gidudu J, Hammer SJ, Halperin S, Heath P, Hennig R, Labadie J, Rothstein E, Schuind A, et al. Abscess at injection site: case definition and guidelines for collection, analysis and presentation of immunization safety data. Vaccine 2007; 25:5821-38; PMID:17540485; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.04.057.
  • Oka S, Sato M. A thirteen-year followup study of an epidemic of inoculation tuberculosis in children caused by vaccination against pertussis. Am Rev Resp Dis 1963; 84L:462-72.
  • Tamura M, Ogawa G, Sagawa I, Amano S. Observations on an epidemic of cutaneous and lymphatic tuberculosis which followed the use of anti-typhoid vaccine. Am Rev Tubercul Pulmon Diseases 1955; 71:465-72.
  • He F, Hu D, Yu X, Li F, Chen E, Wang X, Huang D, Lin Z, Lin J. An outbreak of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection associated with acupuncture in a private clinic of Zhejiang Province, China 2012. Int J Infect Dis 2014; 29:287-9; PMID:25448339; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2014.08.023.
  • Dixit R, Dixit K, Patil CB, Pawar KS. Injection site abscess due to Mycobacterium tuberculosis following DPT vaccination. Indian J Tuberc 2014; 61:246-9; PMID:25241575.
  • Mishra D, Mohta A, Arora P. Cold abscess of the thigh in an infant. Kathmandu Univ Med J 2013; 41:86-7.
  • Agrawal A, Jain A. Tuberculosis cold abscess. Indian J Pediatr 2007; 74:771-3; PMID:17785903; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12098-007-0137-4.
  • Gonzalez-Santiago TM, Drage LA. Non tuberculous Mycobacteria. Dermatol Clinics 2015; 33:563-77; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.det.2015.03.017.
  • Borghans JGA, Stanford JL. Mycobacterium chelonae in abscesses after injection of diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus-polio vaccine. Am Rev Resp Dis 1973; 107:1-8; PMID:4683319.
  • Owen M, Smith A, Coultras J. Granulomatous lesions occurring at site of injections of vaccines and antibiotics. South Med J 1963; 56:949-52; PMID:13940841; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00007611-196309000-00004.
  • Cayton HR, Morris CA. Injection site streptococcal abscesses in a clinic using disposable syringes. Mon Bull Minist Health Public Health Lab Serv 1966; 25:87-91; PMID:5952345.
  • Chi-Thuong TC, Tho ND, Hoa NT, Phuong NTM, Tuan LV, Diep TS, Lindsay J, et al. An outbreak of severe infections with community-acquired MRSA carrying the Panton-Valentine-Leukocidin following vaccination. PLoS One 2007; 2(9):e822; PMID:17786194; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000822.
  • Simon PA, Chen RT, Elliott JA, Schwartz R. Outbreak of pyogenic abscesses after diphtheria and tetanus toxoid and pertussis vaccination. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1993; 12:368-71; PMID:8327295; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006454-199305000-00003.
  • Stetler HC, Garbe PL, Dwyer DM, Facklam RR, Orenstein WA, West GR, Dudley KJ, Bloch AB. Outbreaks of group A streptococcal abscesses following diphtheria-tetanus toxoid-pertussis vaccination. Pediatrics 1985; 75:299-301; PMID:3881728.
  • Greaves WL, Hinman AR, Facklam RR, Allman KC, Barrett CL, Stetler HC. Streptococcal abscesses following diphtheria-tetanus toxoid-pertussis vaccination. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1982; 1:388-90; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006454-198211000-00005.
  • Tan NWH, Pan W-J, Yunos HBM, Tan WC, Lim KB-L. Post vaccination abscesses requiring surgical drainage in a tertiary children's hospital in Singapore. J Pediatr Infect Dis 2010; 5:139-47.
  • Kuyubasi SN, Zengin EC, Cirakli A, Cirakli S, Kilic M. Unusual cause of thigh abscess in infant following hepatitis B vaccine administration. J Exp Clin Med 2013; 30:181-2; http://dx.doi.org/10.5835/jecm.omu.30.02.019.
  • Niederman LG, Marcinak JF. Haemophilus influenzae type B abscess after diphtheria-tetanus toxoid-pertussis immunization. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1990; 9:597-8; PMID:2235180; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006454-199008000-00018.
  • Chaibou MS, Bako H, Salisou L, Yameogo TM, Sambo A, Kim SH, Djingarey MH, Zuber PL, Perea WA, Pezzoli L. Monitoring adverse events following immunization with a new conjugate vaccine against group A meningococcus in Niger. September 2010. Vaccine 2012; 30:5229-34; PMID:22709955; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.06.006.
  • Ouandaogo C-R, Yameogo TM, Diomande FVK, Sawadogo C, Ouedraogo B, Ouedraogo-Traore R, et al. Adverse events following immunization during mass vaccination campaigns at first introduction of a meningococcal A conjugate vaccine in Burkina Faso 2010. Vaccine 2012; 30:B46-51; PMID:22230584; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.12.112.
  • Bentsi-Enchill AD, Zongo I, Khamassi S, Pless R, Thombiano R, Tiendrebeogo S, Nelson CB, Duclos P. Monitoring of adverse events during the 2003 mass vaccination campaign with a trivalent meningococcal A/C/W135 polysaccharide vaccine in Burkina Faso. Vaccine 2007; 25:A72-8; PMID:17544552; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.04.045.
  • Burton DC, Bigogo GM, Audi AO, Williamson J, Munge K, Wafula J, et al. Risk of infection-site abscess among infants receiving a preservative-free, two-dose vial formulation of pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in Kenya. PloS ONE 1896; 10(10):e014.
  • Sokhey J. Adverse events following immunization: 1990. Indian Pediatr 1991; 28:593-607; PMID:1748507.
  • Berhane Y, Worku A, Demissie M, Tesfaye N, Asefa N, Aniemaw W, Weldearegawi B, Kebede Y, Shiferaw T, Worku A, et al. Children who received PCV-10 vaccine from a Two-dose vial without preservative are not more likely to develop injection site abscess compared with those who received pentavalent (DPT-Hep B-Hib) vaccine: a longitudinal multi-site study. PloS ONE 9(6):e97376; PMID:24896582; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097376.
  • Smeets L, Bous A, Heymans O. Necrotizing fasciitis: case report and review of literature. Acta Chir Belg 2007; 107:29-36; PMID:17405595; http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2007.11680007.
  • Pitta GBB, Dantas JM, Pitta MR, Raposo RC, Seganfredo IB, Gomes MM. Necrotizing fasciitis after influenza vaccine: case report. J Vasc Bras 2011; 10:185-8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-54492011000200017.
  • Senaran H, Karalezli N, Ogun TC. A very uncommon complication following vaccination: necrotizing fasciitis and myonecrosis: case report. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2010; 30:384-6; http://dx.doi.org/10.5336/medsci.2008-8341.
  • Thapa R, Mallick D, Biswas B. Necrotizing fasciitis following BCG vaccination. Indian Pediatr 2011; 48:235-7; PMID:21478557.
  • Okeniyi J, Adegbehingbe O, Dedeke I, Olorunnisola O, Ogunlesi T, Oginni LM. Post-BCG axillary necrotizing fasciitis. Internet J Pediatrics Neonatalol 2005; 6(1)..
  • Thomas MG. Clostridium septicum gas gangrene following intramuscular infection from an influenza vaccine booster. Br J Clin Pract 1990; 44:709-10; PMID:2102204.
  • Popa C, Wever PC, Moviat M. H1N1 vaccination: expect the unexpected. Neth J Med 2011; 69:223, 246; PMID:21646670.
  • Drosos G. Pyomyositis: A literature review. Acta Orthop Belg 2005; 71:9-16; PMID:15792201.
  • Bae Y-J, Choi J-S, Lee YA, Kim S-S, Rha S-H, Jung J-A. A case of pyomyositis due to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Korean J Pediatr 2006; 49:1116-9; http://dx.doi.org/10.3345/kjp.2006.49.10.1116.
  • Lew DP, Waldvogel FA. Osteomyelitis. N Eng J Med 1997; 336:999-1007; http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199704033361406.
  • Offiah AC. Acute osteomyelitis, septic arthritis and discitis: differences between neonates and older children. Eur J Radiol 2006; 60:221-32; PMID:16971078; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.07.016.
  • Margaretten ME, Kohlwes J, Moore D, Bent S. Does this adult patient have septic arthritis? JAMA 2007; 297:1478-88; PMID:17405973; http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.297.13.1478.
  • Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, Dellinger RP, Fein AM, Knaus WA, Schein RM, Sibbald EJ. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Chest 1992; 101:1644-55.
  • Liu C, Bayer A, Cosgrove SE, Daum RS, Fridkin SK, Gorwitz RJ, et al. Clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 52:e18-55; PMID:21208910; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciq146.
  • Elzi L, Babouee B, Vogeli N, Laffer R, Dangel M, Frei R, et al. How to discriminate contamination from bloodstream infection due to coagulase-negative staphylococci: a prospective study with 654 patients. Clin Microbiol Infect 2012; 18:E355-61; PMID:22784359; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03964.x.
  • Fowler VG, Olsen MK, Corey GR, Woods CW, Cabell CH, Reller LB, et al. Clinical identifiers of complicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. Arch Intem Med 2003; 163:2066-72; http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archinte.163.17.2066.
  • Chae SH, Kim DH, Kim JW, Kim YT, Kim JB, Choi YS. Multiple subcutaneous abscesses complicating Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia associated with BCG vaccination. Soonchunhyang Med Sci 2013; 19:133-5; http://dx.doi.org/10.15746/sms.13.030.
  • Fullerton HJ, Hills NK, Elkind MS, Dowling MM, Wintermark M, Glaser CA, Tan M, Rivkin MJ, Titomanlio L, Barkovich AJ, et al. Infection, vaccination and childhood arterial ischemic stroke. Neurology 2015; 85:1459-66; PMID:26423434; http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002065.
  • Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, Abraham E, Angus D, Cook D, et al. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International sepsis definitions conference. Intens Care Med 2003; 29:530-8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-003-1662-x.
  • Sood DK, Kumar S, Singh S, Sokhey J. Adverse reactions after measles vaccination in India. Natl Med J India 1995; 8:208-10; PMID:7549850.
  • Plueckhahn VD, Banks J. Fatal haemolytic streptococcal septicaemia following mass inoculation with influenza vaccine. Med J Aust 1970; 1:405-411; PMID:5445853.
  • Rutishauser J, Funke G, Lutticken R, Ruef C. Streptococcal toxic shock syndrome in two patients infected by a colonized surgeon. Infection 1999; 27:259-60; PMID:10885838; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s150100050024.
  • Italiano CM, Toi CS, Chan SP, Dwyer DE. Prolonged varicella viraemia and streptococcal toxic shock syndrome following varicella vaccination of a health care worker. Med J Aust 2009; 190:451-3; PMID:19374621.
  • Kirby JP, Mazuski JE. Prevention of surgical site infection. Surg Clin N Am 2009; 89:365-89; PMID:19281889; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2009.01.001.
  • Wiley AM, Ha'eri GB. Routes of infection: a study using “tracer particles” in the orthopaedic operating room. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1979; 139:150-5; PMID:455832.
  • Li GQ, Guo FF, Ou Y, Dong GW, Zhou W. Epidemiology and outcomes of surgical site infections following orthopedic surgery. Am J Infect Control 2013; 41:1268-71; PMID:23890741; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2013.03.305.
  • Yavuz SS, Tarcin O, Ada S, Dincer F, Toraman S, Birbudak S, Eren E, Yekeler I. Incidence, aetiology and control of sternal site infections. J Hosp Infect 2013; 85:206-12; PMID:24035582; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2013.07.010.
  • Babcock HM, Matava MJ, Fraser V. Post arthroscopy surgical site infections: review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis 2002; 34:65-71; PMID:11731947; http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/324627.
  • Diamond MR, O'Brien-Malone A. Vaccination, consent and multidose vials. Med J Aust 2011; 194:414-6; PMID:21495943.
  • Chambers HF. Cellulitis by any other name. Clin Infect Dis 2013; 56:1763-4; PMID:23457076; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/cit126.
  • Chira S, Miller LG. Staphylococcus aureus is the most common identified cause of cellulitis: A systematic review. Epidemol Infect 2010; 138:313-7; http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0950268809990483.
  • Gunderson CG, Martinello RA. A systematic review of bacteremjias in cellulitis and erysipelas. J Infect 2012; 64:148-55; PMID:22101078; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2011.11.004.
  • Jeng A, Beheshti M, Li J, Nathan R. The role of β-hemolytic streptococci in causing diffuse, non-culturable cellulitis. Medicine 2010; 89:217-26; PMID:20616661; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0b013e3181e8d635.
  • Ray GT, Suaya JA, Baxter R. Microbiology of skin and soft tissue infections in the age of community-aquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Diag Microbiol Infect Dis 2013; 76:24-30; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.02.020.
  • Van Zyl L, du Plessis J, Viljoen J. Cutaneous tuberculosis overview and current treatment regimens. Tuberculosis 2015; 95:629-38; PMID:26616847; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tube.2014.12.006.
  • www.walmart.com/ip/Curad-Sterile-Alcohol-Swabs-200-count.
  • https://www.priceline.com.au/kendall-webcol-skin-cleansing-alcohol Swabs 200 pack.
  • How much does cellulitis treatment cost? http://healthcosthelper.com>Health&PersonalCare>DermatologyandSkinCare>CellulitisTreatment.
  • Hospital performance. Costs of acute admitted patients in public hospitals in 2011–12. www.myhospitals.gov.au/our-reports/cost-of-acute-admitted-patients-in -public-hospitals-2011-12.
  • Guyatt G, Cairns J, Churchill D, Cook D, Haynes B, Hirsh J, et al. Evidence – based medicine: a new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA 1992; 268:2420-5; PMID:1404801; http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.1992.03490170092032.
  • Kault D. False negatives in evidence based medicine. J Med Stat Inform 2014; 2:5; http://dx.doi.org/10.7243/2053-7662-2-5.