3,760
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

Plant microbe based remediation approaches in dye removal: A review

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 7798-7828 | Received 20 Dec 2021, Accepted 01 Mar 2022, Published online: 16 Mar 2022

ABSTRACT

Increased industrialization demand using synthetic dyes in the newspaper, cosmetics, textiles, food, and leather industries. As a consequence, harmful chemicals from dye industries are released into water reservoirs with numerous structural components of synthetic dyes, which are hazardous to the ecosystem, plants and humans. The discharge of synthetic dye into various aquatic environments has a detrimental effect on the balance and integrity of ecological systems. Moreover, numerous inorganic dyes exhibit tolerance to degradation and repair by natural and conventional processes. So, the present condition requires the development of efficient and effective waste management systems that do not exacerbate environmental stress or endanger other living forms. Numerous biological systems, including microbes and plants, have been studied for their ability to metabolize dyestuffs. To minimize environmental impact, bioremediation uses endophytic bacteria, which are plant beneficial bacteria that dwell within plants and may improve plant development in both normal and stressful environments. Moreover, Phytoremediation is suitable for treating dye contaminants produced from a wide range of sources. This review article proves a comprehensive evaluation of the most frequently utilized plant and microbes as dye removal technologies from dye-containing industrial effluents. Furthermore, this study examines current existing technologies and proposes a more efficient, cost-effective method for dye removal and decolorization on a big scale. This study also aims to focus on advanced degradation techniques combined with biological approaches, well regarded as extremely effective treatments for recalcitrant wastewater, with the greatest industrial potential.

Graphical abstract

1. Introduction

Textile industry contributes significantly to global environmental degradation by the emission of unfavorable textile effluent. Textile wastewater comprises colors and a variety of pollutants in varying concentrations [Citation1-4]. With increased pollution and environmental concern, scientists concentrated on these issues, since major water contamination issues not only cause health issues but also social issues [Citation5]. As a result, environmental regulations often require textile mills to remediate effluents before discharging them into receiving waterways. The rapidly developing industrial sector particularly the textile industry (85%), is a source of harmful synthetic chemicals discharged mostly in the form of toxic dyes [Citation6,Citation7]. Globally, almost 80% of wastewater is not properly treated [Citation8]. It is imperative to note that approximately 10–15% of synthetic colorants have oncogenic or mutagenic properties that pose detrimental effects on all living form [Citation1,Citation9–11]. Water sources that are vital for drinking, agriculture and for further purposes like domestic and industrial needs are now been contaminated by textile colors discharged into wastewater [Citation12]. Every large-scale treatment effectiveness may be determined by feeding the system either with actual textile wastes or with synthetic wastewater with properties similar to those found in normal textiles manufacturing discharge.

Discharging textile toxic chemicals into river systems modifies the critical properties of the aquatic environment by affecting the BOD, COD, TSS, TOC, TDS, color and pH [Citation13–16]. This ultimately leads to the formation of stink and a deterioration of the reservoir’s water quality [Citation17]. Textile dyes’ resistance to breakdown in soil and water is a result of their complex chemical structure [Citation18]. Textile effluents include reactive dyes including triazine that may cause cancer, birth abnormalities, and hormone disruption. Electrochemical degradation of azo reactive dye was shown to be beneficial in minimizing the formation of carcinogenic compounds during biodegradation [Citation19,Citation20]. Textile wastewater contains unfixed colours, inorganic and organic compounds, and trace metals that are toxic to the environment and may result in bleeding, vomiting, dermatitis illnesses, tumors, and genomic instability [Citation21]. Hazardous chemicals’ endurance in aqueous and soil habitats may result in their buildup in plankton, fish, and plants. Similar to textile industry effluents, municipal sewage is also a major contaminant that has been released in water bodies [Citation22]. Due to the limitations of both inorganic and organic materials, scientists are now focusing on the natural materials like bacteria, algae, fungi and actinomycetes for development of more active and safe materials for dye degradation [Citation23]. Phytoremediation is a more efficient and cost-effective method of treatment than traditional methods. It makes use of the root systems of plants to absorb nutrients from wastewater. Plant species used for phytoremediation have the capacity to accumulate a narrow or broad spectrum of contaminants [Citation24,Citation25]. The objective of this review is to assess potential of several approaches for dye bioremediation. The methods of removal and the roles of microorganisms in the removal process are evaluated critically. In addition, a comprehensive analysis of important literature data on effluent properties, as well as substances, such as chemicals used to manufacture simulated sewage water, including dye, and treatments used to treat the generated effluents, were explored. Finally, the current state of knowledge about bioremediation of textile dyes is presented, along with recommendations for strategies enhancement and scientific advancement.

2. Review of literature methodology

The relevant literature using the keywords “bioremediation of dyes” was search (as on May 2021) in Scopus, Google Scholar, and Science Direct to understand the significance of this research in present era. show the different subject areas, where dye bioremediation is used. The results were narrowed for the last 2 decades by specifying a time range ranging from 2000 to 2021. summarizes the number of papers describing dye bioremediation from 2000 to 2021. It may be seen that the number of papers on bioremediation of textile effluents has increased in recent years.

Figure 1. Summary of research papers published between 2000 to 2021 on dye bioremediation.

Figure 1. Summary of research papers published between 2000 to 2021 on dye bioremediation.

3. Dyes

Dyes are a class of chemicals that are often used in textiles. They are chemically synthesized or derived from plants and animals (). They are unique in that, unlike paint, they do not accumulate on the surface of the fiber but are absorbed into the molecule<apos;>s holes. This is conceivable for two reasons: -

  1. To begin, the dye molecules are smaller than the pores in the fiber.

  2. The dye molecules resemble narrow strips of paper in terms of length and width but have a comparatively thin thickness.

When the fiber, yarn, or cloth is placed into the dye bath, their planar form facilitates them in slipping into the polymer system. The main aspect is the dye’s attraction for the fiber is due to their attraction forces. The dye that has diffused or penetrated into the fiber is kept fixed in place because of the dye’s adhesion to the fiber [Citation26,Citation27]. According to a recent survey, about 100,000 dyestuffs are available commercially and about one million tons of dyes are manufactured yearly, with around 10% of dyes being dumped within the realm of natural assets as waste [Citation28]. So, the dye removal from the waste water of the cosmetic, plastic, textile and paper industries is a current area of research in environmental protection. The majority of synthetic colors are non-biodegradable and poisonous [Citation29,Citation30]. Their potential pollution of water sources in the vicinity of dye-based industry raises environmental concerns [Citation31,Citation32].

There are around twenty-five different kinds of dyes depending on their chromophore’s chemical structure [Citation33,Citation34]. There are over a thousand dyes designated as textile dyes that are used for dyeing in wide range of clothing and accessories [Citation35,Citation36]. There are also several intermediates in the dyeing process that acts as a precursor to dyes. They can be produced using basic materials such as naphthalene and benzene through a wide range of chemical processes [Citation37].

Table 1. Natural dyes obtained from Plant and Animal

3.1. dye classification

There were just a few natural dyes available prior to the introduction of synthetic dyes. As a result of the growth in the yearly world output of dyes, categorization of dyes has become necessary. They are expected to be in the range of many tens of millions of tonnes [Citation38]. Dyes may be classified into a variety of classes depending upon its source, colour, structure, and manner of absorption (: Textile dyes classification according to their structure).

3.2. Impact of dyes

The existence of colors in sewage at extremely low quantities is very apparent and undesired [Citation39]. Over one lakh synthetic dye are in market with average production of 7 × 105 tonnes colorants are synthesized yearly [Citation40,Citation41]. If exposed to light, water, or to any stress many complex dyes will not fade [Citation42,Citation43] Because of the complexity of their structural configuration and origin, dyes are difficult to decolorize. There are several structural variants, including acid, alkaline, dispersion, aldehyde, diazo, and anthroquinone-based dyes. When municipality drainage systems process textile dye wastewater aerobically, minimal decolonization occurs [Citation44]. ETAD is a worldwide organization launched in 1974 with member companies located around the world. Its mission is to protect the environment. Members must follow the ETAD Code of Ethics, which is based on the principles of ethical treatment. They must also follow all national and international chemical rules [Citation45]. ETAD has tested approximately four thousand dyes, which had a higher LD50 value of 2 × 103 mg/kg. Basic and diazo direct dyes are considered as most hazardous dyes that considered as major mutagens to the all living organism.

3.3. Effect of dyes on health

Sewage contains a range of toxic azo dyes and other organic contaminants. The hazardous contaminants are often discharged into the surroundings through a number of industries, including medicines, dyes, chemical synthesis, plastics, and petrochemicals. Numerous studies have focused on these toxic compounds due to their detrimental effects because of their toxicity which directly or indirectly affects all organisms [Citation46–49]. Nitrophenols irritate the eyes and cause skin necrosis. Additionally, nitrophenols are toxic to all the major organs, mainly the kidney. Exposure to 4-nitrophenol, in particular, produces a variety of health issues in humans, including vomiting, sleepiness, migraines, and tachypnoea, through inhalation or ingestion, because of its cytotoxic, embryotoxic, oncogenic, and mutagenesis properties [Citation50,Citation51]. The majority of artificial azo dyes have a complex structure containing mono-di- azo dyes that exhibit severe allergic reactions when released in the ecosystem. It may ultimately cause mutation in different body parts [Citation52–54] Diazo dyes, such as Congo red and Bismarck brown R, contain two azo groups and are very oncogenic and genotoxic. Additional consequences of azo dyes in water bodies include lower penetration of light into the water and decreased oxygen levels, both of which have an influence on the development of aquatic creatures and biota owing to lower photosynthetic activity. As a consequence, several governments have outlawed the use of azo dyes, while many nations continue to use those [Citation55,Citation56]. ()

Figure 2. Methods in Dye treatment in Industries.

Figure 2. Methods in Dye treatment in Industries.

Figure 3. Textile dyes classification according to their structure °.

Figure 3. Textile dyes classification according to their structure °.

4. Biomaterials as adsorbent

Eliminating dye waste by traditional biodegradation procedures is unsuccessful because none of the textile chemicals are biodegradable [Citation57,Citation58]. Physicochemical processes such as membrane separation, filtering, chemical oxidation, and coagulation are cost-effective [Citation59,Citation60] (). While adsorption techniques incorporating active carbons are shown efficacy in removing colors from industrial wastewaters, they are also rather costly [Citation61,Citation62]. There has been a surge in research interest in recent years on the sorption capabilities of bio-waste materials of plants and animals in regulating contaminants. These biomaterials, in conjunction with other biological processes, are demonstrating promising as a better solution to currently used techniques of remediation and recovery of ions of high value derived from wastewater wastes waterways [Citation61,Citation62]. Laccases may be used to decolorize textile effluents in bioremediation [Citation62]. Such biological techniques have sparked an explosion and the research scientists started exploring biomaterials types that can be used as bioremediator in the various industrial sectors. The efficacy of many biomaterials shows promising results to mention a few: fly ash [Citation63] modified calcined diatomite [Citation64] unburned carbon [Citation65] sand [Citation66,Citation67] Chitosan beads (Cdstari 2008), sugarcane bagasse [Citation68,Citation69] plasma-treated synthesized polyester fibers in removing synthetic dyes [Citation70] and Mango stone [Citation71] peanut husk [Citation72], date stones [Citation73], citrus limetta peel [Citation74], and oil palm [Citation75] have all been documented, because to their availability & regenerative character, as well as their active functional groups such as hydroxyl and carboxyl groups [Citation76]. Over the last decades, many studies have been elicited in the sorption potentials of solid waste of flora and fauna origin, either in their original condition or chemically altered forms, with the purpose of regulating harmful contaminating ions in waste waters. These techniques are shown themselves to be viable alternatives to conventional and traditional ways of pollution avoidance, spurring ongoing and expanded study in this sector

5. Biological methods

Biological approaches, namely the breakdown of dyes by biological processes like phytoremediation, are a low-cost, high-efficiency approach for removing dye from textiles discharge [Citation77]. Biological material like algae, bacteria, fungus, and yeasts that can degrade and remove a variety of synthetic colors [Citation78]. Phytoremediation-based techniques have indeed been effectively employed to degrade textile industry wastewater. Especially compared to other approaches, biological treatment (i.e., bioremediation) is cost-effective, environmentally beneficial, and creates less sludge [Citation79]. It results in the oxidation of reactive polymers to a less hazardous inorganic product (i.e., chromophoric group) which ultimately aids in eliminating toxic compounds [Citation80]. Recently adsorption of synthetic dyes was being analyzed by using a synergistic plant-microbe combination that maintains a sequential anaerobic-aerobic phase [Citation81]. Synthetic dye like azo dye degradation takes place by a two-step procedure: first, the dyes are broken down to generate aromatic amines, and then the aromatic amines are further hydrolyzed to generate tiny non-toxic compounds in aerobic condition [Citation82,Citation83]. The strategies are been designed to reap the benefits of bacteria’s ability to survive both in aerobic and anaerobic environments in order to completely degrade the azo linkages produced inside the dyes. Microorganisms are effective at lowering COD and turbidity but ineffective at eliminating color [Citation84,Citation85]. So, in the coming decades, the usage of biological approaches for color removal may include the first phase as anaerobic processes and the second stage as aerobic processes [Citation86].

5.1. Phytoremediation

In the past two decades, phytoremediation has gained popularity as an environmentally benign, cost-effective, and complimentary technique to other readily available remediation methods [Citation87–89]. Based on the properties and hydrophilicity of the pollutant, plants using one of two techniques to deal with them. They either collect pollutants in their cell organelles or breakdown to form intermediate metabolites or CO2 and water via enzymatic systems [Citation90,Citation91]. Antioxidants from plants that are not enzymatic and have two critical properties namely phenols and flavonoids. The composition of both substances has been attributed to their capability in eliminating generated Reactive oxygen species under stressful circumstances due to their redox characteristics that enable them to operate as singlet oxygen quenchers [Citation92]. The need for plant species and microbes to neutralize and detoxify textile dyes as well as at the contaminated site definitely sounds to be a promising solution [Citation93Citation94]. Phytoremediation is a renewable energy-based remedial technique that utilizes flora to decontaminate polluted places. Plants retain and stabilize toxins via their intrinsic enzymatic and absorption systems ().

Figure 4. Classification of Bioremediation.

Figure 4. Classification of Bioremediation.

5.2. Green remediation of dyes

Green chemistry seems to be an appropriate prospective method of treatment of pollutants; it is accepted for its renewable energy sources, low cost, give the most accurate and can be used directly in polluted sites due to its long-term degradation potential. Many indigenous plants have been offered for dye removal, including Typhonium flagelliforme, Phragmites australis, Rheum rabarbarum (rhubarb), Blumea malcolmii, and Rheum hydrolapatum [Citation95–99]. Similarly, Glandularia pulchella, Tagetes patula,Petunia grandiflora, Aster amellus, Zinnia angustifolia and Portulaca grandiflora are prepared flora in dye degradation [Citation100–107]. In warmer climates, the use of L. minor Linn. favored the elimination of the Basic Red 46. Diverse species, including Scirpsu grossus, Tecoma stans var. angustata, aquatic plant Spirodela polyrrhiza and Eichhornia crassipes (water hyacinth), have also been considered for their dye degradation capability. For their function in dye biodegradation, a consortium of P. grandiflora and G. grandiflora plants has been created. Additionally, a combining method using plant-associated microorganisms in combination with M. sativa L. and S. cannabina Pers. has been suggested.

Some native species, such as B.malcolmii, T. flagelliforme, R. hydrolapathum,R. rabarbarum, and P. australis were used to treat nylon effluent [Citation108–112]. Aquatic plants are capable of discoloration and detoxify dye-containing effluent. They were employed in dye degradation experiments at the laboratory scale and in situ [Citation113,Citation114]. Aquatic macrophytes like Ammannia baccifera, Typha domingenesis Paspalum scrobiculatum Fimbristylis dichotoma, Ipomoea aquatica, Alternenthera philoxeroides, Typha angustifolia, Phragmites australis and Salvinia molesta have recently been used as a decolorizer in a variety of manmade pollutants [Citation115]. Most developing nations have used HRTS practices to achieve zero discharge from industrial dyes via the growth and maintenance species [Citation116]. Plants such as Accasia mangium, Dalbergia sisoo, Azadirachta indica, and Eucalyptus sp. have the ability to degrade a huge quantity of pollutants. The contaminants adsorbed through trees are later evaporated into the atmosphere through stomatal pores [Citation117]. Even though the usage of blooming and decorative plants seems appealing, their dye removal efficiency in the site is still to be validated. Panicum virgatum has reported that they have the ability to break down popular herbicides like atrazine [Citation118]. Vetiver grass, mustard and tomato, and have all been shown to absorb EtBr from polluted locations [Citation119]. Salix viminalis and B. juncea have shown the ability to phytoremediate polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-contaminated areas [Citation120]. The use of S. portulacastrum, T. vulgaris, R. officinalis, B. juncea and T. angustifolia was investigated for in situ waste water treatment at artificial wetland and known to be potential species for dye removal. However, field implementation of phytoremediation continues to encounter a number of challenges, including the pollutants’ bioavailability, absorption, phytotoxicity, and evapotranspiration [Citation121,Citation122]. (: List of plant with structure and mechanism of the dyes).

Table 2. Plant in remediation of dyes

5.3. Remediation of dye using plant-microbe synergism

One among recent techniques in phytoremediation is that using the plant species and microbes (synergism) that are indigenous in marshes and upland areas over hundreds of years may prove to be more effective at cleanup. Plants’ root systems disseminate microbes throughout the ground surface and aid in their penetration of such impenetrable subsoil. Metabolic by-products from the roots promote the survivability and activity of microbes, resulting in an even more effective breakdown of contaminants [Citation123]. Microbes either increase the bioavailability of contaminants to plants or minimize their cytotoxicity. Therefore, a synergism approach may increase the efficacy of phytoremediation. Several research on the synergistic removal of pollutants by flora and microorganisms have been documented. The elimination of PAHs and TPHs was enhanced in F. arundinacea by inoculating with rhizobacterial cultures [Citation124,Citation125]. Thlaspi caerulescens rhizospheric bacteria were inoculated in the roots, which resulted in a threefold rise in zinc concentration and a fourfold increase in zinc accumulation in shoots [Citation126]. Studies show Bacillus subtilis SJ-101 promotes nickel building up in Brassica juncea [Citation127].B. subtilis is an suitable strain that has alkaline pectinase properties, which is unique parameter for pretreatment of waste water from both paper and fabric industries [Citation128]. In aquatic circumstances, O. intermedium BN-3 stimulated lead (Pb) absorption in the woody E. camaldulensis [Citation129]. The synergy between P. nigra and P.putida has been shown to be highly efficacious in degrading diesel oil [Citation130]. The consortial activity of Z. angustifolia and E. aestuarii ZaK resulted in a much more effective breakdown of the dye Remazol Black B [Citation131]. (: List of plant-microbe synergism with structure and mechanism of the dyes).

Table 3. Plant Microbe synergism in remediation of dyes

5.4. Remediation of dye using phytoplanktons

Several macrophytes were recommended for dye degradation, and they are few to mention: Spirodela polyrhiza, Nasturtium officinale, Paspalum scrobiculatum, Alternanthera philoxeroides and Typha angustifolia [Citation132–135]. The influence of the plant’s initial biomass (1–6 g) on the Acid Bordeaux B decolorization efficiency shows raising the plant’s initial biomass resulted in a higher ability for dye removal [Citation136]. The increased plant biomass may result in a large concentration of internal and extracellular enzymes involved in dye breakdown, resulting in a rapid rate of dye removal [Citation137]. Furthermore, high macrophytes abundance provides an abundance of surface areas for dye sorption [Citation138]. For example, increasing the biomass of Nasturtium officinale, Spirodela polyrhiza, and Lemna minor (from 1 to 4 g) has been shown to increase the decolorization effectiveness of Acid Blue 92, Basic Red 46 and Direct Blue 129, and by 29%, 51%, and 58% respectively [Citation139–141].

5.5. Remediation of dye using Algae

Algae are prevalent in both fresh and sea water and are now being widely explored as a biosorbent [Citation142,Citation143]. Microalgae plays pivotal role in the treatment of biological pollution. Its capacity to biologically purify wastewaters from a variety of sources while employing effluent as a growing medium has shown considerable promise as a sustainable and cost-effective wastewater treatment technique [Citation144,Citation145]. Algae have the greatest biosorption potential and electrostatic force of attraction for pollutants due to their enormous porous structure and affinity. Developing effective biodegradation strategies for microalgae is a major focus of research community [Citation146]. Microalgae bioremediation is a relatively new technology because it is more environmentally friendly and has a smaller carbon footprint than other traditional approaches [Citation147]. Numerous researches have shown that metabolites of toxic chemicals found in effluents, such as PO43-, RCOO, -OH, and -NH2, are digested by algae [Citation148].

Algae decolorize the pigment in three distinct ways:

  1. To begin, algae collect algal biomass, CO2, and H2O via the use of chromophores;

  2. algae play an important role in the transition of chromophore elements to non-chromophore element;

  3. finally the resultant chromophores are absorbed on algae [Citation149].

Numerous investigations have shown that the algae have more efficacies in decolorizing azo dyes by generating the azoreductase enzymatic activity [Citation150–152]. According to certain research, algae species such as S. rhizopus for acid red 247, Chlorella pyrenoidosa for methylene blue, N. muscorum, U. lactuca, Desmodesmus sp, Cosmarium sp, Sargassum sp and Pithophora sp, potential species in degrading azo dyes into aromatic amines, which are then catabolized into simpler nontoxic forms. Several researchers have revealed that algae species use azo dyes as a source of carbon and nitrogen for growth [Citation153]. C. vulgaris are applied as a natural adsorbent for removing cationic dyes. Electrostatic interaction causes the negative charged C. vulgaris to absorb the positively charged methylene blue [Citation154].

U. lactuca is a tiny algae that is widespread across the ocean and is edible, sometimes referred to as sea lettuce. Ulva lactuca has been authorized as an adsorbent for remediating dye effluent [Citation155–158] and hazardous heavy metals [Citation159,Citation160]. U. lactuca, green algae, was widely used as a biosorption for removing methylene blue dye. The capacity of U. lactuca to remove dye colour is time-dependent, algal biomass-dependent, dye concentration-dependent, and pH-dependent. The increased biosorption during the first contact period might be a result of the dye’s key driver onto the surface of U. lactuca [Citation161]. (: List of macrophytes, structure and mechanism of dye)

Table 4. Macrophytes in remediation of dyes

5.6. Remediation of dye using Fungi

Fungi-mediated remediation has been shown to be successful in the elimination of triphenylmethane dyes [Citation162]. Usually, remediation is accomplished by the employment of P. chrysosporium, multicolored T. versicolor [Citation163,Citation164]. L. lacteus [Citation165], F. solani [Citation166], and P. simplicissimum have all shown to be potential strain in dye removal [Citation167,Citation168]. Fungi are widely used to cultivate and provide a proteolytic enzyme that is effective for color degradation [Citation169,Citation170]. They produce enzymes that naturally degrade hazardous dye compounds into less or harmless simplified variants [Citation171]. Coriolopsis sp. (1c3) has been reported to decolorize MG, CB, CV and MV with 52, 91, 94, 52, 97% decolorization respectively [Citation172]. It is successively studied that Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus oryzae, and Rhizopus arrhizus is capable of removing acid orange 7 dye with a stability of 9.97, 9.76, and 11.43% in a neutralized aqueous media. This is because the amino groups on the chitosan molecules on the attenuated fungal cell wall were positively charged, resulting in positively charged – NH3+ groups that are electrostatically attracted to the acid orange 7 dye. The adsorption of acid orange 7 dyes by dead fungal cells was at low pH. Instead of using free mycelium, the administration of Coriolopsis (1c3) sp. in biofilm form was more effective, resulting in a much higher level of Crystal violet and Cotton blue removal. The decolorization of CB and CV was 79.6 and 85.1% respectively, with the application of biofilm [Citation173]. Aspergillus carbonarius, a dead biomass, is an efficient quencher of hexavalent chromium from e-waste polluted water [Citation174]. (: List of Fungi, structure and mechanism of dye).

Table 5. Fungi used in remediation of dyes

5.7. Remediation of dye using Yeast

Many studies have utilized yeasts to breakdown dye from effluents. Debaryomyces polymorphus has been used to breakdown the dye Reactive Black 5 [Citation175], while several yeast species isolated from tropical rainforests, including as Trichosporon, Cyberlindera, Barnettozyma, and Candida, have also been used to breakdown colors [Citation176]. Baker<apos;>s yeast has also been used recently to degrade Astrazone basic dye [Citation177] Galactomyces geotrichum MTCC 1360 was shown to have an 88 percent removal efficiency in mixes of structurally distinct dyes (Remazol Red, Golden Yellow HER, Rubine GFL, Scarlet RR, Methyl Red, Brown 3 REL, and Brilliant Blue) [Citation178]. Staphylococcus epidermidis was used to breakdown Crystal Violet, Phenol Red, Malachite Green, Methyl Green, and Fuchsin into non-toxic compounds [Citation179]. Moreover, a comprehensive investigation on the isolation of yeasts and their capacity to breakdown diverse colors was reported [Citation180]. The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is often used as a biomaterial in textile wastewater remediation [Citation181]. The elimination of methylene blue (MB), a reactive dye, was investigated using Saccharomyces cerevisiae, on the other hand, significantly reduces the color absorbance and COD value of azo dyes, ramazole blue (Vinyl sulfone), by 100% and 61.82 percent, accordingly [Citation182]. The use of yeast as a mediator for adsorbing congo red and methylene blue demonstrated that electrons were transported to anode from the substrate through the dyes, resulting in the generation of electrostatic force. MOP<apos;>s high ability for removing CR paves the way to the development of a high-performance biosorbent for the removal of anionic dyes from aqueous environments [Citation183]. For the treatment of industrial waste, the adsorbent containing Brevibacillus parabrevis bacteria holds great potential [Citation184]. The energy generated by the fuel cell was then used to remove traces of potential lead from a dilution water solution [Citation185]. Candida tropicalis had the capacity to adsorb basic violet 3, and this is due to the smallest particle size (150–300 µm) and larger surface area [Citation186].

5.8. Microbial remediation

Microbial degradation has been extensively explored and evaluated, mostly with the purpose of enhancing dye degradation [Citation187]. Microorganisms play a critical role in the full breakdown of dyes. Microbial degradation of dyes has been proved to be very effective for resource recovery and sustainability [Citation188]. Various microbes have already been identified as bioremediator in various industries [Citation189–193]. Microbes based researches have been published using a variety of microorganisms in liquid and consortiums culture [Citation194–197]. Adsorption of synthetic dyes using laccase enzymes from P. rubidus, B. juncea, T. versicolor and T. hirsuta [Citation198–201] and lignin peroxidase enzymes from B. laterosporus MTCC 2298 show 90% degradation potential. There is a surge for bio remediating techniques in waste disposal. So, there is a need to develop new and innovative procedures for the effective and environmentally friendly disposal of diverse kinds of pollutants at a low operating cost.

5.9. Genetically modified organism in bioremediation

The introduction of a desired gene of interest into a microbe for a specific reason that is not normally found in the target host results in a genetically modified organism. Although the environment has a self-cleaning mechanism in response to climate and ecological stress, there is evidence that it would be inadequate and sluggish to remove contaminants [Citation202,Citation203]. Numerous chemical, physical and biological methods for the elimination of toxic chemicals including dyes have been explained. These methods may be applied alone or in combination [Citation204–206]. Nowadays, toxic chemicals from dyes can be easily removed by genetically modified microbes, which will have high resistance for pH, light and temperature, but it is time consuming and labour intensive technique [Citation207]. Each genetically modified microbe is unique in its capacity to degrade, detoxify, and decolorize dyes. GMOs are the most often utilized organisms in bioremediation with zero toxic discharge in water bodies [Citation208].

Genetic modification has revolutionized the concept of bioremediation [Citation209]. Under certain climatic circumstances, it is possible to enhance dye removal by employing genetically engineered microorganisms. GMOs may be created by genetic modifications across species or via genetic manipulation [Citation210–213]. To create GMOs, functional genes from a variety of bacteria were isolated from R. eutropha, B. idriensis, P. putida, M. marinum, E. coli and S. desiccabilis. The organism modified showed the elimination of toxic chemicals, including synthetic dyes [Citation214]. Many innovative techniques were available to determine microbial genome expression, including polymerase chain reaction (PCR), single-stranded conformation polymorphism, 16S rDNA sequencing, randomly amplified polymorphic DNA and other emerging sequencing technologies [Citation215–217]. Genetically modified E. coli SS125 were used for the breakdown of Remazol red dye by cloning the azoreductase gene from B. latrosporus RRK1 into E. coli DH5a and pAZR-SS125 [Citation218]. Engineered E. coli JM109 (pGEX-AZR) strain in the laboratory that decolorizes direct blue 7[Citation219]. Remazol red may be degraded in the presence of 0.8 mg/L of O2 using the azoreductase gene from B. latrosporus RRK1 and inserted into E.coli [Citation220]. To break down and denature triphenylmethane dyes, a novel consortium of four strains namely A. hydrophila, A. radiobacter, Bacillus sp and S. paucimobilis [Citation221], were used. CV and MG were triphenylmethane color are employed in dyestuff industry sectors and in the making of printing paper were successfully degraded using the above mentioned 4 novel consortiums [Citation222–224]. Certain TPM dyes are xenobiotic chemicals, which are commonly regarded as a major source of environmental contamination [Citation225,Citation226]. The mutagenicity of CV and MG were degraded using Salmonella typhimurium TA98 and TA100. The bacterial consortium has been proven as one of the vital techniques to be used in dye industries [Citation227] (: Bacteria/ Bacteria Consortium used in the remediation of dyes).

Table 6. Bacteria/ Bacteria Consortium used in the remediation of dyes

5.10. Bioflocculants in dye removal

Bacteria capable of creating bioflocculants are widely separated from wastewater treatment plants. The bioflocculants derived from indigenous microorganisms were extremely successful in decolorizing the various colours. Bioflocculants are used in many industries including treating wastewater, household, brewery, and pharmaceutical wastewater treatment, textile manufacturing, sewage treatment systems, and cosmetics processing [Citation228,Citation229]. Bioflocculants generated by strains xn11 + xn7 were successful in eliminating the basic fuchsin (100 mg L1) but comparatively less efficient at decolorizing reactive black (50 mg L1), with dye removal efficiencies of 93 and 95%, respectively [Citation230]. Due to their low cost and ease of application, biological approaches have become the subject of interest on dye degradation and decolorization [Citation231]. Bioflocculants generated by B. subtilis (E1), E. acetylicum (D1), K. terrigena (R2), S. aureus (A22), P. pseudoalcaligenes (A17), and P. plecoglossicida (A14) were capable of decolorizing textile industrial effluent with maximum adsorption. Fungus F. carnea was used as a bioflocculant, that enhanced the reduction and removal of three cationic dyes namely Orlamar Red BG, Orlamar Blue G, and Orlamar Red GTL [Citation232]. Bioflocculant Rhizopus arrhizus was used to degrade Remazol Black B reactive dye at optimal adsorption temperature 35°C.Due to decreased surface activity, there was a decrease in adsorption as the temperature increased [Citation233,Citation234].

Cations promote flocculation by neutralizing and stabilizing functional groups’ residue negative charge and by establishing links interconnecting particle. Divalent and trivalent cations promote the initial sorption of biopolymers on suspended solids by lowering the negative charge on both the polymer and the particle [Citation235]. Mn2+, Mg2+, and Ca2+ have been found to form complexes with bioflocculants, so increasing flocculation and decolorization [Citation236]. However [Citation237,Citation238], demonstrated that the presence of any cation, including Ca2+, did not improve the flocculating activity of Citrobacter sp. TKF04 and G. impudicum KG03. Due to the high salt content in dyeing operations, the salt concentration in dye-containing effluent is a critical factor affecting biosorption ability [Citation239]. Flocculants may remove dyes (anionic azo-dyes) by neutralization of charges as well as by bridging effects, with the former being the primary mechanism [Citation240,Citation241]. The dye functional elements seem to favour new interactions, which results in the development of insoluble dye which may be precipitated. Furthermore, the efficacy of decolorization by microbial bioflocculants is highly dependent on the kind of dye, pH, exposure to light and flocculation concentrations.

6. Recommendation and future perspectives

Although bioremediation had already established as an effective treatment option for water purification, various obstacles prevent its widespread commercial applicability. The current practices must be resolved in order to maximize the significance of bioremediation technologies in industrial wastewater treatment [Citation242].

  • Future research on dye degradation should focus on reducing the challenges posed by constraints on plants and microorganisms.

  • Recent and early successful research must be re-examined to optimize their effectiveness.

  • A biodegradation method that is effective should take into consideration degradation pathways, environmental conditions, interfacial properties, and degradation processes that impact pollutant removal.

  • It is vital to ensure that the degraded products do not pose a threat to aquatic life or vegetation.

  • The notable intent of the research was to create marine psychrophilic bacteria with novel and unique biodegradation capabilities for the biosorption of chemically polluted cold environmen.

The investigation of the processes and hypotheses behind bacterial degradation of dye wastewater would benefit the exploration of bacterial degradation kinetics ().

Figure 5. Protocol to be followed to achieve remarkable dye biodegradation.

Figure 5. Protocol to be followed to achieve remarkable dye biodegradation.

7. Pros and cons of plant microbe based dye remediation

Pros:

  • Despite certain limitations, phytoremediation and microbial remediation is mostly beneficial and may be incrementally improved using contemporary biotechnology approaches including the development of more degrading and resistant engineered organisms.

Cons:

  • Effective in removing contaminants at low volumes and concentrations. Extremely excellent for removing certain colors

  • Resistant against a broad range of colored chemicals with a complicated structure.

8. Conclusions

Discharge of textile industry effluents to natural water bodies (such as natural ponds, rivers, creeks, streams, and river systems) may be classified according to the presence of non-degradable colors and hazardous compounds. This chapter discussed the environmental impacts of dye contamination caused by some dye industries, as well as the many techniques employed by plants and bacteria to efficiently remediate polluted reservoirs and ecosystems. It is found that the use of bioremediation will be cheaper, and efficient for removing dyes from polluted water bodies. It is also cost-effective than the traditional than the physico–chemical approaches, which take higher energy. Microorganisms, yeast, fungi and plants are endowed with biological mechanisms that enable them to survive under synthetic dye stress and degrade the components to a less toxic or non-toxic state. These bacteria use a variety of activities, including precipitation, adsorption, enzyme-mediated ion transformation, sorption, and bioconversion strategies, in which the most successful techniques are phyto-extraction and phyto-volatilization. Furthermore, the changes in the environment must be favorable for bioremediation to be effective. The application of biosorbents plants and microbes to polluted water bodies is dependent on the level of dye present and the kind of aqueous solution. Ecological variables are important for bioremediation effectiveness, since the microorganisms that were used will be killed in presence of unfavorable environmental conditions. Particularly fast-growing flora with a larger efficiency for phytoextraction should be identified for treating wastewater. Additionally, a study of the impact of dye stress on beneficial endophytic bacteria should be performed, and efficient methods for increasing the bioremediation process should be recommended. While transgenic microorganisms and plants have the potential to efficiently remediate dye and organic pollutant-contaminated environments, their usage should be subject to severe biosafety standards to guarantee that there are no health or environmental risks. Improved effective methods of using transgenic plants and bacteria should be identified that would enable successful restoration of contaminated habitats without the need for horizontal transfer of recombinant plasmids to indigenous species, which is presently a significant barrier.

Genetic engineering is an emerging field of study that will support the development of synergetic microbes capable of degrading and removing colours from industrial effluents through the metabolic features of these consortia of organisms. This technique should be encouraged to enable more effective pollution treatment. So, plant and yeast microbial-based wastewater treatment techniques have now been achieved utilizing microbial consortia or a single dye-degrading microbial strain. However, metagenomic and enzymatic techniques must also be employed to investigate the functional makeup of bacterial diversity inside the polluted locations. The metal resistance genes that may be utilized to enhance particular heavy metal degrading strains of microorganisms. These concerns the adoption of alternative green technologies for the remediation of harmful synthetic chemicals found in wastewater.

Highlights

  • Dyes play a pivotal role in our everyday life.

  • Categorization, structure, and degradation of dyes in textile wastewater effluent.

  • Critiques of several physicochemical factors on the dye removal effectiveness

  • Emphasizes on plant metabolic and extractive ability to deal with colorant

  • Readers will get insight into the future prospects and pitfalls of remediation.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea by the Korean Government (MSIT) (2020R1G1A1012069).

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea by the Korean Government (MSIT) (2020R1G1A1012069).

References

  • Zubair M, Ihsanullah I, Jarrah N, et al. Starch-NiFe-layered double hydroxide composites: efficient removal of methyl Orange from aqueous phase. J Mol Liq. 2018;249. DOI:10.1016/j.molliq.2017.11.022
  • Cheah YT, Chan DJC, Yi Tong C, et al. Physiology of microalgal biofilm: a review on prediction of adhesion on substrates. Bioengineered. 2021;12(1):7577–7599. DOI:10.1080/21655979.2021.1980671.
  • Ahlawat W, Kataria N, Dilbaghi N, et al. Carbonaceous nanomaterials as effective and efficient platforms for removal of dyes from aqueous systems. Environ Res. 2020;181:108904.
  • Chong MY, Tam YJ. Bioremediation of dyes using coconut parts via adsorption: a review. SN Appl Sci. 2020;2:187.
  • Ting-Yang LW, Chai S, Shu-Jen CJ-Y, et al. Liu Yu-Kaung Chang. removal of soluble microbial products and dyes using heavy metal wastes decorated on eggshell. Chemosphere. 2021;270:128615. 101016/jchemosphere2020128615
  • Rauf MA, Salman Ashraf S. Survey of recent trends in biochemically assisted degradation of dyes. Chem Eng J. 2021;209:520–530.
  • Forgacs E, Cserháti T, Oros G. Removal of synthetic dyes from wastewaters: a review. Environ Int. 2004;30:953–971.
  • Devda V, Chaudhary K, Varjani S, et al. Recovery of resources from industrial wastewater employing electrochemical technologies: status, advancements and perspectives. Bioengineered. 2021;12(1):4697–4718.
  • Khalid A, Zubair M, Ihsanullah I. A comparative study on the adsorption of eriochrome black T Dye from aqueous solution on graphene and acid-modified graphene. Arab J Sci Eng. 2018;43:2167–2179.
  • Ahlawat W, Kataria N, Dilbaghi N, et al. Carbonaceous nanomaterials as effective and efficient platforms for removal of dyes from aqueous systems. Environ Res. 2020;181:108904.
  • Chong MY, Tam YJ. Bioremediation of dyes using coconut parts via adsorption: a review. SN Appl Sci. 2020;2(2):187.
  • Khataee AR, Dehghan G, Ebadi A, et al. Biological treatment of a dye solution by MacroalgaeChara sp.: effect of operational parameters, intermediates identification and artificial neural network modeling. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(7):2252–2258.
  • Kabra A, Khandare R, Govindwar S. Development of a low-cost, phyto-tunnel system using Portulaca grandiflora and its application for the treatment of dye-containing wastewaters. Water Res. 2013;471035–471048.
  • Fazal T, Mushtaq A, Rehman F, et al. Bioremediation of textile wastewater and successive biodiesel production using microalgae. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 2018;82:3107–3126.
  • Yaseen DA, Scholz M. Textile dye wastewater characteristics and constituents of synthetic effluents: a critical review. Int J Environ Sci Technol (Tehran). 2019;16(2):1193–1226.
  • Yogalakshmi KN, Das A, Rani G, et al. Nano-bioremediation: a new age technology for the treatment of dyes in textile effluents. In: Saxena G, Bharagava RN, editors. Bioremediation Ind. Waste Environ. Saf. Springer. 313–347. 10.1007/9789811318917_15. 10.1007/9789811318917_15
  • Khandare RV, Kabra AN, Awate AV, et al. Synergistic degradation of diazo dye direct red 5B by portulaca grandiflora and pseudomonas putida. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2013;10(5):1039–1050.
  • Ahlawat W, Kataria N, Dilbaghi N, et al. Carbonaceous nanomaterials as effective and efficient platforms for removal of dyes from aqueous systems. Environ Res. 2020;181:108904.
  • Siong W, Jie Ying C, Cheun P, et al. A review on conventional and novel materials towards heavy metal adsorption in wastewater treatment application. J Clean Prod. 2021;296:126589. 101016/jjclepro2021126589.
  • Kumar Gaur V, Sharma P, Gaur P, et al. Sustainable mitigation of heavy metals from effluents: toxicity and fate with recent technological advancements. Bioengineered. 2021;12(1):7297–7313.
  • Palanisamy S, Nachimuthu P, Awasthi MK, et al. Application of electrochemical treatment for the removal of triazine dye using aluminium electrodes. J Water Supply. 2020;69(4):345–354 102166/aqua2020109.
  • Khandare RV, Kabra AN, Awate AV. Govindwar SP synergistic degradation of diazo dye direct red 5B by Portulaca grandiflora and Pseudomonas putida. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2013;10(5):1039–1050.
  • Reshmy R, Philip E, Thomas D, et al. Bacterial nanocellulose: engineering, production, and applications. Bioengineered. 2021;12(2):11463–11483.
  • Rajendran S, Priya TAK, Shiong Khoo K, et al. A critical review on various remediation approaches for heavy metal contaminants removal from contaminated soils. Chemosphere. 2022;2874:132369. 101016/jchemosphere2021132369
  • Yaashikaa PR, Senthil Kumar P, Varjani S, et al. Rhizoremediation of Cu(II) ions from contaminated soil using plant growth promoting bacteria: an outlook on pyrolysis conditions on plant residues for methylene Orange dye biosorption. Bioengineered. 2020;11(1):175–187.
  • Yagub MT, Sen TK, Afroze S, et al. Dye and its removal from aqueous solution by adsorption. A Review Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2014;209:172–184 101016/jcis201404002.
  • Ali H. Biodegradation of synthetic dyes-a review. Water Soil Pollut. 2010;213:251–273.
  • Jadhav JP, Phugar SS, Dhanve RS, et al. Rapid biodegradation and decolorization of Direct Orange 39 (Orange TGLL) by an isolated bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain BCH. Biodegrdation. 2010;21(3):453–463.
  • Fazal T, Mushtaq A, Rehman F, et al. Bioremediation of textile wastewater and successive biodiesel production using microalgae renewable Sustainable. Energy Rev. 2018;82:3107–3126. 101016/jrser201710029.
  • Yogalakshmi KN, Das A, Rani G, et al. Nano-bioremediation: a new age technology for the treatment of dyes in textile effluents. In: Saxena G, Bharagava RN, editors. Bioremediation Ind waste environ saf springer. 2020. 313–347. 101007/9789811318917_15. 101007/9789811318917_15
  • Lellis B, Fávaro-Polonio CZ, Pamphile JA, et al. Effects of textile dyes on health and the environment and bioremediation potential of living organisms. Biotechnol Res Innov. 2019;3:275–290 101016/jbiori201909001.
  • Padhiyar H, Thanki A, Kumar Singh N, et al. Parametric and kinetic investigations on segregated and mixed textile effluent streams using moringa oleifera seed powders of different sizes. J Water Process Eng. 2020;34:101159. 101016/jjwpe2020101159.
  • Sudha M, Saranya A, Selvakumar G, et al. Microbial degradation of Azo Dyes: a review Int. J Curr Microbiol App Sci . 2014;3(2):670–690.
  • Benkhaya S, M’rabet S, Harfi E. A Classifications properties recent synthesis and applications of azo dyes. Heliyon. 2020;6(1):03271.
  • Sponza DT. Toxicity studies in a chemical dye production industry in Turkey. J Hazard Mater. 2006;138(3):438–447.
  • Abe FR, Machado AL, Soares AMVM, et al. Life history and behavior effects of synthetic and natural dyes on Daphnia magna. Chemosphere. 2019;236:124390.
  • Guo Y, Xue Q, Cui K, et al. Study on the degradation mechanism and pathway of benzene dye intermediate 4-methoxy-2- nitroaniline via multiple methods in Fenton oxidation process. RSC Adv. 2018;8:10764–10775.
  • Gürses A. Classification of dye and pigments in Dyes Pigments. Springer. 2016;31–45.
  • Nigam P, Armour G, Banat IM, et al. Physical removal of textile dyes and solid state fermentation of dye adsorbed agricultural residues. Bio Resource Technol. 2000;72:219–226.
  • Vikrant K, Giri BS, Raza N, et al. Recent advancements in bioremediation of dye: current status and challenges. Bioresour Technol. 2018;253:355–367. 101016/jbiortech201801029.
  • Giovanella P, Vieira GAL, Ramos Otero IV, et al. Metal and organic pollutants bioremediation by extremophile microorganisms. J Hazard Mater. 2020;382:121024. 101016/jjhazmat2019121024.
  • Jadhav SA, Garud HB, Patil PH, et al. Recent advancements in silica nanoparticles-based technologies for removal of dyes from water. Colloid Interface Sci Commun. 2019;30:100181. 101016/jcolcom2019100181.
  • Sarker M, Shin S, Jeong JH, et al. Mesoporous metal-organic framework PCN-222(Fe): promising adsorbent for removal of big anionic and cationic dyes from water. Chem Eng J. 2019;371:252–259. 101016/jcej201904039.
  • Khalid A, Zubair M, Ihsanullah I. A comparative study on the adsorption of eriochrome black T Dye from aqueous solution on graphene and acid-modified grapheme. Arab J Sci Eng. 2018;43:2167–2179. 101007/s13369-017-2543-x.
  • Anliker R. Ecotoxicology of dyestuffs a joint effort by industry. Ecotoxicol Environ Safe. 2017;3:59–74.
  • Ismail M, Khan MI, Khan SB, et al. Catalytic reduction of picric acid nitrophenols and organic azo dyes via green synthesized plant supported Ag nanoparticles. J Mol Liq. 2018;268:87–101.
  • Abdulla NK, Siddiqui SI, Tara N, et al. Psidium guajava leave-based magnetic nanocomposite γ-Fe2O3@ GL: a green technology for methylene blue removal from water. J Environ Chem Eng. 2019;7:103423.
  • Fatima B, Siddiqui SI, Ahmed R, et al. Green synthesis of f-CdWO4 for photocatalytic degradation and adsorptive removal of Bismarck Brown R dye from water. Water Resour Ind. 2019a;22:100119.
  • Fatima B, Siddiqui SI, Ahmed R, et al. Preparation of functionalized CuO nanoparticles using Brassica rapa leave extract for water purification. Desalination Water Treat. 2019b;164:192–205.
  • Lellis B, Fávaro-Polonio CZ, Pamphile JA, et al. Effects of textile dyes on health and the environment and bioremediation potential of living organisms. Biotechnol Res Innov. 2019;3:275–290 101016/jbiori201909001.
  • Ismail M, Khan MI, Khan MA, et al. Plant-supported silver nanoparticles: efficient economically viable and easily recoverable catalyst for the reduction of organic pollutants. Appl Organomet Chem. 2019;4971.
  • Ismail M, Khan MI, Khan SB, et al. Catalytic reduction of picric acid nitrophenols and organic azo dyes via green synthesized plant supported Ag nanoparticles. J Mol Liq. 2018;268:87–101.
  • Siddiqui SI. Chaudhry SA Nigella sativa plant based nanocomposite-MnFe2O4/ BC: an antibacterial material for water purification. J Cleaner Prod. 2018;200:996–1008.
  • Siddiqui SI, Manzoor O, Mohsin M, et al. Nigella sativa seed based nanocomposite-MnO2/BC: an antibacterial material for photocatalytic degradation and adsorptive removal of Methylene blue from water. Environ Res. 2019;171:328–340.
  • Ismail M, Khan MI, Khan SB, et al. Catalytic reduction of picric acid nitrophenols and organic azo dyes via green synthesized plant supported Ag nanoparticles. J Mol Liq. 2018;268:87–101.
  • Ismail M, Khan MI, Khan MA, et al. Plant-supported silver nanoparticles: efficient economically viable and easily recoverable catalyst for the reduction of organic pollutants. Appl Organomet Chem. 2019;4971.
  • Mu’azu ND, Jarrah N, Kazeem TS, et al. Bentonite-layered double hydroxide composite for enhanced aqueous adsorption of Eriochrome Black T. Appl Clay Sci. 2018;161:23–34 101016/jclay201804009.
  • Singh NB, Nagpal G, Agrawal S, et al. Water purification by using adsorbents: a review. Environ Technol Innov. 2018;11:187–240 101016/jeti201805006.
  • Gupta VK, Mittal A, Krishnan L, et al. Adsorption treatment and recovery of the hazardous dye brilliant blue FCF over bottom ash and de-oiled soya. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006;293:16.
  • Han R, Wang Y, Zou W, et al. Comparison of linear and nonlinear analysis in estimating the Thomas model parameters for methylene blue adsorption onto natural zeolite in fixed-bed column. J Hazard Mater. 2007;145:331.
  • Chu JH, Kang JK, Park SJ, et al. Application of magnetic biochar derived from food waste in heterogeneous sono-Fenton-like process for removal of organic dyes from aqueous solution. J Water Process Eng. 2020;37:101455. 101016/jjwpe2020101455.
  • Piscitelli A, Pezzella C, Giardina P, et al. Heterologous laccase production and its role in industrial applications. Bioengineered Bugs. 2010;1(4):254–264.
  • Mohan D, Kunwar P, Singh GS, et al. Removal of dyes from wastewater using flyash a low-cost adsorbent. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2002;41:3688–3698.
  • Khraisheh MA, Alg-Houti MS. Enhanced dye adsorption by micro emulsion modified calcined diatomite (E-CD). Adsorption. 2005;11:547–549.
  • Wang S, Li H. Kinetic modelling and mechanism of dye adsorption on unburned carbon. Dyes Pigment. 2007;72:308–314.
  • Bakaullah SB, Rauf MA, Al-Ali SS. Removal of methylene blue from aqueous solution by adsorption on sand. Dyes Pigment. 2007;74:85–87.
  • Chakraborty S, Chowdhury S, Saha PD. Adsorption of crystal violet from aqueous solution onto sugarcane bagasse: central composite design for optimization of process variables. J Water Reuse Desalin. 2012;2:55–65.
  • Sana S, Haq Nawaz B, Sana N, et al. Application of a novel lignocellulosic biomaterial for the removal of Direct Yellow 50 dye from aqueous solution: batch and column study.J of the Taiwan. Ins Chem Eng. 2015;47:160–170.
  • Lehocky M, Mracek A. Improvement of dye adsorption on synthetic polyester fibers by low temperature plasma pre-treatment. Czech J Physics. 2006;56:1277–1282.
  • Tahir N, Bhatti HN, Iqbal M, et al. Biopolymers composites with peanut hull waste biomass and application for crystal violet adsorption. Int J Biol Macromol. 2017;94:210–220.
  • Messaoudi NE, Khomri ME, Bentahar S, et al. Evaluation of performance of chemically treated date stones: application for the removal of cationic dyes from aqueous solutions. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2016;244–253.
  • Shakoor S, Nasar A. Removal of methylene blue dye from artificially contaminated water using citrus limetta peel waste as a very low cost adsorbent. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2016;66:154–163.
  • Setiabudi HD, Jusoh R, Suhaimi SFRM, et al. Adsorption of methylene blue onto oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) leaves: process optimization isotherm kinetics and thermodynamic studies. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2016;63:363–370.
  • Li Y, Wu M, Wang B, et al. Synthesis of magnetic lignin-based hollow microspheres: a highly adsorptive and reusable adsorbent derived from renewable resources. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2016;4(10):5523–5532.
  • Ekambaram SP, Perumal SS, Annamalai U. Decolorization and biodegradation of remazol reactive dyes by Clostridium species. Biotechology. 2016;6:20.
  • Ali H. Biodegradation of synthetic dyes-a review. Water Soil Pollut. 2010;213:251–273.
  • Babu SS, Mohandass C, Vijayaraj AS, et al. Detoxification and color removal of Congo Red by a novel Dietzia sp (DTS26) a microcosm approach. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety. 2015;114:52–60.
  • Jayapal M, Jagadeesan H, Shanmugam M, et al. Sequential anaerobic-aerobic treatment using plant microbe integrated system for degradation of azo dyes and their aromatic amines by-products. J Hazard Mater. 2018;354:231–243.
  • Zuo N, Jinchao H, Xiqin M, et al. Phosphorus removal performance and population structure of phosphorus-accumulating organisms in HA-A/A-MCO sludge reduction process. Bioengineered. 2016;7(5):327–333.
  • Chequer FMD, Dorta DJ, de Oliveira. Azo dyes and their metabolites: does the discharge of the azo dye into water bodies represent human and ecological risks? Advances in Treating Textile Effluent InTech. 2011;27–49. doi:10.5772/19872.
  • Brüschweiler BJ, Merlot C. Azo dyes in clothing textiles can be cleaved into a series of mutagenic aromatic amines which are not regulated yet. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2017;88:214–226. 101016/jyrtph201706012.
  • Lewinsky AA. Hazardous materials and wastewater: treatment removal and analysis. New York: Nova Science Publishers; 2007.
  • Lin SH, Lo CC. Fenton process for treatment of desizing wastewater. Water Res. 1997;31:2050–2056.
  • Muda K, Aris A, Salim MR, et al. Sequential anaerobic-aerobic phase strategy using microbial granular sludge for textile wastewater treatment in biomass now-sustainable growth and use. InTech. 2013;231–264. https://doi.org/10.5772/54458.
  • Pilon-Smits E. Phytoremediation. Annu Rev Plant Biol . 2005;56:15–39.
  • Ali H. Biodegradation of synthetic dyes-a review Water. Soil Pollution. 2010;213:251–273.
  • Chandanshive VV, Kadam SK, Khandare RV, et al. In situ phytoremediation of dyes from textile wastewater using garden ornamental plants effect on soil quality and plant growth. Chemosphere. 2018;210:968–976.
  • Chacko JT, Kalidass S. Enzymatic degradation of azo dyes- a review. Int J Environ Sci. 2011;1:1250–1260.
  • Ali I, Burakova I, Galunin E, et al. High-speed and high-capacity removal of methyl Orange and malachite green in water using newly developed mesoporous carbon: kinetic and isotherm studies. ACS Omega. 2019;4:19293–19306. 101021/acsomega9b02669.
  • Michalak A. Phenolic compounds and their antioxidant activity in plants growing under heavy metal stress. Pol J Environ Stud. 2006;15:523–530.
  • Khataee AR, Dehghan G, Ebadi A, et al. Biological treatment of a dye solution by MacroalgaeChara sp: effect of operational parameters intermediates identification and artificial neural network modeling. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:2252–2258.
  • Kabra A, Khandare R, Govindwar S. Development of a low-cost phyto-tunnel system using Portulaca grandiflora and its application for the treatment of dye-containing wastewaters. Water Res. 2013;36:471035–471048. doi:10.1007/s10529-013-1324-1.
  • Khataee AR, Dehghan G, Ebadi A, et al. Biological treatment of a dye solution by Macroalgae Chara sp: effect of operational parameters intermediates identification and artificial neural network modeling. BioresourTechnol. 2010;101:2252–2258.
  • Whiting SN, De Souza MP. Terry N Rhizosphere bacteria mobilize Zn for hyperaccumulation by Thlaspi caerulescens. Environ Sci Technol. 2001;35:3144–3150.
  • Kagalkar A, Jagtap U, Jadhav J, et al. 2019;Bioresour Technolology. 100:4104–4110
  • Dietz A, Schnoor J. Environ Advances in phytoremediation. Health Perspect. 2001;109:163–168.
  • Kabra AN, Khandare RV, Kurade MB, et al. Phytoremediation of a sulphonated azo dye Green HE4B by Glandularia pulchella (Sweet) Tronc (Moss Verbena). En Sci Poll Res. 2011;18(8):1360–1373.
  • Davies LC, Carias CC, Novais JM, et al. Phytoremediation of textile effluents containing azo dye by using Phragmites australis in a vertical flow constructed intermittent feeding constructed wetland. Ecol Eng. 2005;25:594–605.
  • Kagalkar A, Jadhav M, Bapat V, et al. Phytodegradation of the triphenylmethane dye Malachite Green mediated by cell suspension cultures of Blumeamalcolmii Hook. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:10312–10318.
  • Ong S, Uchiyamam K, Inadama D, et al. Simultaneous removal of color organic compounds and nutrients in azo dye containing wastewater using up- of constructed wetland. Bioresour Technol. 2011;101:9049–9057.
  • Saratale RG, Gandhi SS, Purankar MV, et al. Decolorization and detoxification of sulfonated azo dye CI Remazol Red and textile effluent by isolated Lysinibacillus sp RGS. J Biosci Bioeng. 2013;115(6):658–667.
  • Khandare RV, Kabra AN, Tamboli DP, et al. The role of Aster amellus Linn in the degradation of a sulfonated azo dye Remazol Red: a phytoremediation strategy. Chemosphere. 2011b;82:1147–1154. 101016/jchemosphere201012073.
  • Kabra AN, Khandare RV, Kurade MB, et al. Phytoremediation of a sulphonated azo dye green HE4B by Glandulariapulchella (Sweet) Tronc (Moss Verbena). Env Sci and Pollution Res. 2011a;18:1360–1373.
  • Kagalkar AN, Khandare RV, Govindwar SP. Textile dye degradation potential of plant laccase significantly enhances upon augmentation with redox mediators. RSC Adv. 2015;5(98):80505–80517.
  • Yim JH, Kim SJ, Ahn SH, et al. Characterization of a novel bioflocculant p-KG03 from a marine dinoflagellate Gyrodinium impudicum KG03. Bioresour Technol. 2007;98:361–367.
  • Davies LC, Carias CC, Novais JM, et al. Phytoremediation of textile effluents containing azo dye by using Phragmites australis in a vertical flow constructed intermittent feeding constructed wetland. Ecol Eng. 2005a;25(5):594–605.
  • Kagalkar A, Jagtap U, Jadhav J, et al. Bioresour Technology. 2009; 100:4104–4110
  • Kagalkar AN, Jagtap UB, Jadhav JP, et al. Bapat VA Studies on phytoremediation potentiality of Typhonium flagelliforme for the degradation of Brilliant Blue R. Planta. 2010;232(1):271–285. 101007/s00425-010-1157-2.
  • Rane N, Chandanshive V, Watharkar A, et al. Phytoremediation of sulfonated Remazol Red dye and textile effluents by Alternanthera philoxeroides: an anatomical enzymatic and pilot scale study. Water Res. 2015;83:271–281.
  • Rane N, Patil S, Chandanshive V, et al. Ipomoea hederifolia rooted soil bed and Ipomoea aquatic rhizofiltration coupled phytoreactors for efficient treatment of textile wastewater. Water Res. 2016;96:1–11.
  • Shehzadi M, Afzal M, Khan M, et al. Enhanced degradation of textile effluent in constructed wetland system using Typha domingensis and textile effluent-degrading endophytic bacteria. Water Res. 2014;58:152–159.
  • Chandanshive VV, Rane NR, Tamboli AS, et al. Govindwar SP Co-plantation of aquatic macrophytes Typha angustifolia and Paspalum scrobiculatum for effective treatment of textile industry effluent. J Hazard Mater. 2017;338:47–56.
  • Yadav S, Thawale P, Kulkarni A, et al. Phytoremediation technology for wastewater treatment: high rate transpiration system. Int J Environ Pollut. 2010;43(1/2/3):117–128.
  • Murphy I, Coats J. The capacity of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) to degrade atrazine in a phytoremediation setting. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2011;30(3):715–722.
  • Uera R, Paz-Alberto A, Sigua G. Phytoremediation potentials of selected tropical plants for ethidium bromide. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2007;14(7):505–509.
  • Roy S, Labelle S, Meht P, et al. Phytoremediation of heavy metal and PAH-contaminated brownfield sites. Plant Soil. 2005;272(1–2):277–290.
  • Gerhardt KE, Huang XD, Glick BR, et al. Phytoremediation and rhizoremediation of organic soil contaminants: potential and challenges. Plant Sci. 2009;176(1):20–30.
  • Weyens N, Lelie D, Taghavi S, et al. Phytoremediation: planteendophyte partnerships take the challenge. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2009;20(2):248–254.
  • Huang XD, El-Alawi YS, Penrose D, et al. A multiprocess phytoremediation system for removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from contaminated soils. Environ Pollut. 2004;130(3):465–476.
  • Huang XD, El-Alawi YS, Gurska J, et al. A multi-process phytoremediation system for decontamination of persistent total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPHs) from soils. Microchem J. 2005;81(1):139–147.
  • Whiting SN, De Souza MP, Terry N. Rhizosphere Bacteria Mobilize Zn for Hyperaccumulation by Thlaspi caerulescens. Environ Sci Technol. 2001;35(15):3144–3150.
  • Backer R, Rokem JS, Ilangumaran G, et al. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: Context mechanisms of action and roadmap to commercialization of bio stimulants for sustainable agriculture. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9. 103389/fpls201801473.
  • Zaidi S, Usmani S, Singh BR, et al. Significance of Bacillus subtilis strain SJ-101 as a bioinoculant for concurrent plant growth promotion and nickel accumulation in Brassica juncea. Chemosphere . 2006;64(6):991–997.
  • Waranusantigul P, Lee H, Kruatrachue M, et al. Isolation and characterization of lead-tolerant Ochrobactrum intermedium and its role in enhancing lead accumulation by Eucalyptus camaldulensis. Chemosphere. 2011;85(4):584–590.
  • Tesar M, Reichenauer TG, Sessitsch A. Bacterial rhizosphere populations of black poplar and herbal plants to be used for phytoremediation of diesel fuel. Soil Biol Biochem. 2002;34(12):1883–892l.
  • Khandare RV, Rane NR, Waghmode TR, et al. Bacterial assisted phytoremediation for enhanced degradation of highly sulfonated diazo reactive dye. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2011c;19(5):1709–1718.
  • Ping Y, Zhang Y, Donglu G. Production optimization of a heat-tolerant alkaline pectinase from Bacillus subtilis ZGL14 and its purification and characterization. Bioengineered. 2017;8(5):613–623.
  • Chandanshive V, Rane N, Tamboli A, et al. Co-plantation of aquatic macrophytes Typha angustifolia and Paspalum scrobiculatum for effective treatment of textile industry effluent. J Hazard Mater. 2017;338:47–56.
  • Rane N, Chandanshive V, Watharkar A, et al. Phytoremediation of sulfonated remazol red dye and textile effluents by Alternanthera philoxeroides: an anatomical enzymatic and pilot scale study. Water Res. 2015;83:271–281.
  • Torbati S, Khataee AR, Movafeghi A. Application of watercress (Nasturtium officinale R. Br.) for biotreatment of a textile dye: investigation of some physiological responses and effects of operational parameters. Chem Eng Res Des. 2014;92(10):1934–1941.
  • Torbati S. Artificial neural network modeling of biotreatment of malachite green by Spirodelapolyrhiza: study of plant physiological responses and the dye biodegradation pathway. Process Saf Environ. 2016;99:11–19.
  • Kabra AN, Khandar RV, Kurade MB. Phytoremediation of a sulphonated azo dye Green HE4B by Glandularia pulchella (Sweet) Tronc. (Moss Verbena). Environ SciPollut Res. 2011;18(8):1360–1373.
  • Khataee AR, Dehghan G, Ebadi A, et al. Biological treatment of a dye solution by Macroalgae Chara sp: effect of operational parameters intermediates identification and artificial neural network modeling. BioresourTechnol. 2010;101(7):2252–2258.
  • Khataee AR, Movafeghi A, Torbati S, et al. Phytoremediation potential of duckweed (Lemna minor L) in degradation of CI Acid Blue 92: artificial neural network modeling. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf . 2012;80:291–298.
  • Ledakowicz S, Paździor K. Recent achievements in dyes removal focused on advanced oxidation processes integrated with biological methods. Molecules. 2021;26(4):870. (Basel Switzerland). ; () 103390/molecules26040870
  • Movafeghi A, Khataee AR, Moradi Z, et al. Biodegradation of direct blue 129 diazo dye by Spirodela polyrrhiza : an artificial neural networks modeling. Int J Phytoremed. 2010;18(4):337–347.
  • Torbati S, Khataee AR, Movafeghi A. Application of watercress (Nasturtium officinale R Br) for biotreatment of a textile dye: investigation of some physiological responses and effects of operational parameters. ChemEng Res Des. 2014;92:1934–1941.
  • Devi S, Murugappan A, Rajesh Kannan R. Sorption of Reactive blue 19 onto freshwater algae and seaweed. Desalin Water Treat. 2015;54(9):2611–2624.
  • Gupta VK, Bhushan R, Nayak A, et al. Biosorption and reuse potential of a blue green alga for the removal of hazardous reactive dyes from aqueous solutions. Bioremed J. 2014;18(3):179–191.
  • Sayre R. Microalgae: the potential for carbon capture. Bioscience. 2010;60(9):722–727.
  • Al-Fawwaz AT, Abdullah M. Decolorization of methylene blue and malachite green by immobilized desmodesmus sp isolated from North Jordan. Int J Environ Sci Dev. 2016;7(2):95.
  • Chaudhry MT, Zohaib M, Rauf N, et al. Biosorption characteristics of Aspergillus fumigatus for the decolorization of triphenylmethane dye acid violet 49. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;98(7):3133–3141.
  • Siong Chai W, Gee Tan W, Siti H, et al. Multifaceted roles of microalgae in the application of wastewater biotreatment: a review. Environ Pollut. 2021:269116236. 101016/jenvpol2020116236.
  • Jahir Khan M, Rai A, Ahirwar A, et al. Diatom microalgae as smart nanocontainers for biosensing wastewater pollutants: recent trends and innovations. Bioengineered. 2021;12(2):9531–9549.
  • Yan Cheah W, Loke Show P, Jiun Yap Y, et al. Yeek-Chia Ho & Yang Tao. enhancing microalga chlorella sorokiniana CY-1 biomass and lipid production in palm oil mill effluent (POME) using novel-designed photobioreactor. Bioengineered. 2020;11(1):61–69.
  • Sen Tan J, Ying Lee S, Wayne Chew K, et al. A review on microalgae cultivation and harvesting, and their biomass extraction processing using ionic liquids. Bioengineered. 2020;11(1):116–129.
  • Thirumagal J, Panneerselvam A. Isolation of azoreductase enzyme in its various forms from Chlorella pyrenoidosa and its immobilization efficiency for treatment of water. International of Journal of Science Research . 2016;5:2133–2138.
  • Pathak VV, Kothari R, Chopra AK, et al. Experimental and kinetic studies for phytoremediation and dye removal by Chlorella pyrenoidosa. From Textile Wastewater J Environ Manage. 2015;163:270–277.
  • Waqas R, Arshad M, Asghar HN, et al. Optimization of factors for enhanced phycoremediation of reactive blue azo dye. Int J Agric Biolog. 2015;17(4):803‒808. doi:10.17957/IJAB/14.0022.
  • Chaudhry MT, Zohaib M, Rauf N, et al. Biosorption characteristics of Aspergillus fumigatus for the decolorization of triphenylmethane dye acid violet 49. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;98(7):3133–3141.
  • El Nemr A, Abdelwahab O, Khaled A, et al. Biosorption of direct yellow 12 from aqueous solution using green alga Ulva lactuca. Chem Ecol. 2006;22(4):253–266.
  • Tahir H, Sultan M, Jahanzeb Q. Removal of basic dye methylene blue by using bioabsorbents Ulva lactuca and Sargassum. Afr J Biotechnol. 2008;7:2649–2655.
  • Dahlia MEM. Evaluation of non-viable biomass of Laurenciapapillosa for decolorization of dye waste water. Afr J Biotechnol. 2013;12(17):2215–2223.
  • El Sikaily A, Khaled A, Nemr AE, et al. Removal of methylene blue from aqueous solution by marine green alga Ulva lactuca. Chem Ecol. 2006;22(2):149–157.
  • Ghoneim MM, El-Desoky HS, El-Moselhy KM, et al. Removal of cadmium from aqueous solution using marine green algae Ulva lactuca Egypt. J Aquat Res. 2014;40(3):235–242.
  • Ibrahim WM, Hassan AF, Azab YA. Biosorption of toxic heavy metals from aqueous solution by Ulva lactuca activated carbon. Egypt J Basic Appl Sci . 2016;3(3):241–249.
  • ElSikaily A, Khaled A, Nemr AE, et al. Removal of Methylene Blue from aqueous solution by marine green alga Ulva lactuca. Chem Ecol. 2006;22(2):149–157.
  • Radha KV, Regupathi I, Arunagiri A, et al. Decolorization studies of synthetic dyes using Phanerochaete chrysosporium and their kinetics. Process Biochem. 2005;40(10):3337–3345.
  • Hu L, Zeng GM, Chen GG, et al. Treatment of landfill elachate using immobilized Phanerochaete chrysosporium loaded with nitrogen-doped TiO2 nanoparticles. J Hazard Mater. 2016;301:106–118.
  • Casas N, Parella T, Vincent T, et al. Metabolites from the biodegradation of triphenylmethane dyes by Trametes versicolor or laccase. Chemosphere. 2009;75(10):1344–1349.
  • Huiran P, Xiaolin X, Wen Z, et al. Decolorization pathways of anthraquinone dye Disperse Blue 2BLN by Aspergillus sp. XJ-2 CGMCC12963. Bioengineered. 2017;8(5):630–641.
  • Chaudhry MT, Zohaib M, Rauf N, et al. Biosorption characteristics of Aspergillus fumigatus for the decolorization of triphenylmethane dye acid violet 49. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;98(7):3133–3141.
  • Chen SH, Ting ASY. Biodecolorization and biodegradation potential of recalcitrant triphenylmethane dyes by Coriolopsis sp isolated from compost. J Environ Manage. 2015a;150:274–280.
  • Chen SH, Ting ASY. Biosorption and biodegradation potential of triphenylmethane dyes by newly discovered Penicillium simplicissimum isolated from indoor wastewater sample. Int Biodeterior Biodegr. 2015b;103:1–7.
  • Shedbalkar U, Dhanve R, Jadhav J. Biodegradation of triphenylmethane dye cotton blue by Penicillium ochrochloron MTCC 517. J Hazard Mater. 2008;157(2–3):472–479.
  • Hofrichter M, Ullrich R, Pecyna MJ, et al. New and classic families of secreted fungal heme peroxidases. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;87(3):871–897.
  • Trovaslet M, Enaud E, Guiavarc’h Y, et al. Potential of a Pycnoporussanguineus laccase in bioremediation of wastewater and kinetic activation in the presence of an anthraquinonic acid dye. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2007;41(3):368–376.
  • Chen SH, Ting ASY. Biodecolorization and biodegradation potential of recalcitrant triphenylmethane dyes by Coriolopsis sp isolated from compost. J Environ Manage. 2015a;150:274–280.
  • Munck C, Thierry E, Gräßle S, et al. Bio film formation of filamentous fungi Coriolopsis sp on simple muslin cloth to enhance removal of triphenylmethane dyes. Environ Manage. 2018;214:261–266.
  • Huiran P, Xiaolin X, Zhu W, et al. Decolorization pathways of anthraquinone dye Disperse Blue 2BLN by Aspergillus sp XJ-2 CGMCC12963. Bioengineered. 2017;8(5):630–641.
  • Martorell MM, Pajot HF, de Figueroa LIC. Dye-decolourizing yeasts isolated from Las Yungas rainforest Dye assimilation and removal used as selection criteria. Int Biodetr Biodegr. 2012;66(1):25–32.
  • Farah JY, El-Gendy NS, Farahat LA. Biosorption of Astrazone Blue basic dye from an aqueous solution using dried biomass of Baker’s yeast. J Hazard Mater. 2007;148(1–2):402–408.
  • Lakshmi S, Suvedha K, Sruthi R, et al. Hexavalent chromium sequestration from electronic waste by biomass of Aspergillus carbonarius. Bioengineered. 2020;11(1):708–717.
  • Waghmode TR, Kurade MB, Govindwar SP. Time dependent degradation of mixture of structurally different azo and non azo dyes by using Galactomyces geotrichum MTCC 1360. Int Biodetr Biodegr. 2011;65(3):479–486.
  • Ayed L, Chaieb K, Cheref A, et al. Biodegradation and decolorization of triphenylmethane dyes by Staphylococcus epidermidis. Desalination. 2010;260(1–3):137–146.
  • Yang Q, Angly FE, Wang Z, et al. Wastewater treatment systems harbor specific and diverse yeast communities. Biochem Eng J. 2011;58–59:168–176.
  • Waghmode T, Kurade M, Govindwar S. Time dependent degradation of mixture of structurally different azo and non azo dyes by using Galactomyces geotrichum. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 2011;65(3):479–486 101016/jibiod201101010.
  • Mahmoud MS. Decolorization of certain reactive dye from aqueous solution using baker’s yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) strain. HBRC J. 2016;12(1):88–98.
  • Yahiaoui C, Kameche M, Innocent C, et al. Conception of yeast microbial desalination cell: applications to dye wastewater treatment and lead removal. Chem Eng Commun. 2020;1–12. DOI:10.1080/0098644520201721479
  • Charumathi D, Das N. Biotechnological approach to assess the performance of dried biomass of Candida tropicalis for removal of basic violet 3 from aqueous solution. Int J Sci Nat. 2010;1:47–52.
  • Jadhav JP, Govindwar SP. Biotransformation of malachite green by Saccharomyces cerevisiae MTCC 463. Yeast. 2006;23(4):315–323.
  • Karaman C, Karaman O, Show P-L, et al. Congo red dye removal from aqueous environment by cationic surfactant modified-biomass derived carbon: equilibrium kinetic and thermodynamic modeling and forecasting via artificial neural network approach. Chemosphere. 2022;290:133346. 101016/jchemosphere2021133346.
  • Shekher Giri B, Gun S, Pandey S, et al. Reusability of brilliant green dye contaminated wastewater using corncob biochar and Brevibacillus parabrevis: hybrid treatment and kinetic studies. Bioengineered. 2020;11(1):743–758.
  • Kalme SD, Parshetti GK, Jadhav SU, et al. Biodegradation of benzidine based dye direct blue-6 by Pseudomonas desmolyticum NCIM 2112. Bioresour Technol. 2007;98(7):1405–1410.
  • Telke A, Kalyani D, Jadhav J, et al. Kinetics and mechanism of reactive141 degradation by a bacterial isolate Rhizobium radiobacter MTCC 8161. Acta Chim Slov. 2008;55:320–329.
  • Shindhal T, Rakholiya P, Varjani S, et al. A critical review on advances in the practices and perspectives for the treatment of dye industry wastewater. Bioengineered. 2021;12:1 70–87.
  • Varjani S, Rakholiya P, Ng HY, et al. Microbial degradation of dyes. An Overview Bioresour Technol . 2020;314:123728.
  • Jadhav SU, Kalme SD, Govindwar SP. Biodegradation of methyl Red by Galactomyces geotrichum MTCC 1360. Int Bio Deterior Biodegra. 2008;62(2):135–142.
  • Delee W, Neill C, Hawkes F, et al. Anaerobic treatment of textile effluents: a review. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 1998;73(4):323–335.
  • Georgiou D, Hatiras J, Aivasidis A. Microbial immobilization in a two-stage fixed-bed-reactor pilot plant for on-site anaerobic decolorization of textile wastewater. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2005;37(6):597–605.
  • Anastasi A, Spina F, Prigione V, et al. Scale-up of a bioprocess for textile wastewater treatment using Bjerkandera adusta. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(9):3067–3075.
  • Hai F, Yamamoto K, Nakajima F, et al. Bioaugmented membrane bioreactor (MBR) with a GAC packed zone for high rate textile wastewater treatment. Water Res. 2011;45(6):2199–2206.
  • Wong Y. Laccase-catalyzed decolorization of synthetic dyes. Water Res. 1999;33(16):3512–3520.
  • Dayaram P, Dasgupta D. Decolorisation of synthetic dyes and textile wastewater using Polyporus rubidus. journal of Environmental Biology. 2008;29(6):831–836.
  • Ulla M, Osma JF, Winquist E, et al. Decolorization of simulated textile dye baths by crude laccases from Trametes hirsuta and Cerrena unicolor. Eng Life Sci. 2010;10(3):242–247.
  • Telke A, Kalyani D, Jadhav J, et al. Kinetics and mechanism of reactive141 degradation by a bacterial isolate Rhizobium radiobacter MTCC 8161. Acta Chim Slov. 2008;55:320–329.
  • Peter R, Mojca J, Primoz P. Genetically modified organisms (GMOs. Encycl Environ Health. 2011;2(3):199–207.
  • Mishra B, Varjani S, Iragavarapu GP, et al. Microbial fingerprinting of potential biodegrading organisms. Curr Pollut Rep. 2019;1–17. DOI:10.1007/s40726-019-00116-5
  • Li H, Wang Y, Wang Y, et al. Bacterial degradation of anthraquinone dyes. J Zhejiang Uni-Sci B. 2019;20(6):528–540.
  • Wang Q, Liu S, Gao H. Treatment of hydroxyquinone-containing wastewater using precipitation method with barium salt. Water Sci Eng. 2019;12(1):55–796 61.
  • Varjani S, Upasani VN, Pandey A. Bioremediation of oily sludge polluted soil employing a novel strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and phytotoxicity of petroleum hydrocarbons for seed germination. Sci Total Environ. 2020;737:139766.
  • Rebello S, Kumar Nathan V, Sindhu R, et al. Bioengineered microbes for soil health restoration: present status and future. Bioengineered. 2021;12(2):12839–12853.
  • Kumar V, Chandra R, Thakur IS, et al. Recent advances in physicochemical and biological treatment approaches for distillery wastewater. In: Shah M, Banerjee A, editors. Combined Application of Physico Chemical and Microbiological Processes for Industrial Effluent Treatment Plant. Vol. 620, (CRC Press Boca Raton). 2020. pp. 79–118. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003029885.
  • Mishra B, Varjani S, Kumar G, et al. Microbial approaches for remediation of pollutants: Innovations future outlook and challenges. Energy Environ. 2021;32(6):1029–1058. doi:10.1177/0958305X19896781.
  • Peter R, Mojca J, Primoz P. Genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Encycl Environ Health. 2011;2(3):199–207.
  • Tahri N, Bahafid W, Sayel H, et al. Biodegradation: Involved microorganisms and genetically engineered microorganisms in: biodegradation – life of science. In:: Chamy R, Rosenkranz F, editors. janezaTrdine. Intech Open Rijeka Croatia, (London). 2013. p. 289–320.
  • Saxena G, Kishor R, Saratale GD, et al. Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and their potential in environmental management: constraints prospects and challenges bioremediation of industrial waste for environmental safety. In: Bharagava R, Saxena G, editors. Bioremediation of Industrial Waste for Environmental Safety Springer Singapore. 2019. p. 1–19.
  • Kumar V, Chandra R, Thakur IS, et al. Recent Advances in Physicochemical and Biological Treatment Approaches for Distillery Wastewater. In: Shah M, Banerjee A, editors. Combined application of physico chemical and microbiological processes for industrial effluent treatment plant, 620. Singapore: Springer; 2020. 79–118.
  • Saxena G, Kishor R, Saratale GD, et al. Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and their potential in environmental management: Constraints prospects and challenges bioremediation of industrial waste for environmental safety. In: Bharagava R, Saxena G, editors. Bioremediation of Industrial Waste for Environmental Safety (Singapore: Springer). 2019. p. 1–19.
  • Urgun-Demirtas M, Stark B, Pagilla K. Use of Genetically Engineered Microorganisms (GEMs) for the Bioremediation of Contaminants. Crit Rev Biotechno. 2006;26(3):145–164.
  • Holst-Jensen A, Spilsberg B, Arulandhu AJ, et al. Application of whole genome shotgun sequencing for detection and characterization of genetically modified organisms and derived products. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2016;408(17):4595–4614.
  • Mishra S, Nayak JK, Maiti A. Bacteria-mediated bio-degradation of reactive azo dyes coupled with bio-energy generation from model wastewater. Clean Techn Environ Policy. 2020;22(3):651–667 doiorg/101007/s10098-020-01809-y.
  • Sandhya S, Sarayu K, Uma B, et al. Decolorizing kinetics of a recombinant Escherichia coli SS125 strain harboring azoreductase gene from Bacillus latrosporus RRK1. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99(7):2187–2191.
  • Jin R, Yang H, Zhang A, et al. Bioaugmentation on decolorization of CI Direct Blue 71 by using genetically engineered strain Escherichia coli JM109 (pGEX-AZR). J Hazard Mater. 2009;163(2–3):1123–1128.
  • Ajaz M, Shakeel S, Rehman A. Microbial use for azo dye degradation-a 463 strategy for dye bioremediation. Int Microbiol. 2020;23(2):149‐159.
  • Jihane C, Monia K, Mahmoud R, et al. Removal of Triphenylmethane Dyes by Bacterial Consortium. Sci World J. 2012. DOI:10.1100/2012/512454
  • Kumar RS, Banerjee UC. Decolourization of triphenylmethane dyes and textile and dye-stuff effluent by Kurthia sp. Enzyme Microbial Technol. 1999;24(7):433–437.
  • Kavita V, Kuhad RC, Saxena RK. Decolorization of triphenylmethane dyes by the bird’s nest fungus. Cyathusbulleri Curr Microbiol. 1995. 30:269–272.10.1007/BF00295500.
  • Waqas R, Arshad M, Asghar HN, et al. Optimization of Factors for Enhanced Phycoremediation of Reactive Blue Azo Dye. Int J Agric Biol. 2015;17(4):803–808.
  • Waranusantigul P, Lee H, Kruatrachue M, et al. Isolation and characterization of lead-tolerant Ochrobactrum intermedium and its role in enhancing lead accumulation by Eucalyptus camaldulensis. Chemosphere. 2011;85(4):584–590.
  • Weyens N, Lelie D, Taghavi S, et al. Phytoremediation: plante endophyte partnerships take the challenge. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2009;20(2):248–254.
  • Jihane C, Monia K, Mahmoud R, et al. Removal of Triphenylmethane Dyes by Bacterial Consortium. Sci World J. 2012;1–9.
  • Wang S, Li H. Kinetic modeling and mechanism of dye adsorption on unburned carbon. Dyes Pigment. 2007;72(3):308–314.
  • Gong WX, Wang SG, Sun XF, et al. Bioflocculant production by culture of Serratia ficaria and its application in wastewater treatment. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99(11):4668–4674.
  • Zhang CL, Cui Y, Wang Y. Bioflocculant produced from bacteria for decolorization Cr removal and swine wastewater application. Sustain Environ Res. 2012;22:129–134.
  • Sirianuntapiboon S, Srisornsak P. Removal of disperses dyes from textile wastewater using bio-sludge. Bioresour Technol. 2007;98(5):1057–1066.
  • Mittal AK, Gupta SK. Biosorption of cationic dyes by dead macro-fungus Fomitopsiscarnea: batch studies. Water Sci Technol. 1996;34(10):157–181.
  • Pearce CI, Lloyd JR, Guthrie JT. The removal of colour from textile wastewater using whole bacterial cells. Dyes Pigm. 2003;58(3):179–196.
  • Fang R, Cheng X, Xu X. Synthesis of lignin-base cationic flocculant and its application in removing anionic azo-dyes from simulated wastewater. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(19):7323–7329.
  • Xie XH, Zheng XL, Yu CZ, et al. High-efficient biodegradation of refractory dye by a new bacterial flora DDMY1 under different conditions. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2020;17(3):1491–1502101007/s13762-019-02582.
  • Zhou JL, Banks CJ. Removal of humic acid fractions by Rhizopus arrhizus: Uptake and kinetic studies. Environ Technol. 1991;12(10):859–869.
  • Zhou JL, Banks CJ. Mechanism of humic acid colour removal from natural waters by fungal biomass biosorption. Chemosphere. 1993;27(4):607–620.
  • Aksu Z, Tezer S. Equilibrium and kinetic modelling of biosorption of remazol black B by Rhizopus arrhizus in a batch system: effect of temperature. Process Biochem. 2006;36(5):431–439.
  • Pearce CI, Lloyd JR, Guthrie JT. The removal of color from textile wastewater using whole bacterial cells. Dyes Pigm. 2003;58(3):179–196.
  • Xie XH, Zheng XL, Yu CZ, et al. High-efficient biodegradation of refractory dye by a new bacterial flora DDMY1 under different conditions. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2020;17(3):1491–1502101007.
  • Zubair M, Ihsanullah I, Jarrah N, et al. Starch-NiFe-layered double hydroxide composites: efficient removal of methyl Orange from aqueous phase. J Mol Liq. 2018;249:101016/jmolliq201711022.
  • Yahiaoui C, Kameche M, Innocent C, et al. Conception of yeast microbial desalination cell: applications to dye wastewater treatment and lead removal. Chem Eng Commun. 2020;1–12. DOI:10.1080/0098644520201721479
  • Jin X-C, Liu G-Q, Xu ZH, et al. Decolorization of a Dye Industry Effluent by Aspergillus fumigatus XC6 Applied. Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;74(1):239–243.
  • Ishak SA, Murshed MF, Md Akil H, et al. The application of modified natural polymers in toxicant dye compounds wastewater: a review. Water. 2020;12(7):2032.
  • Chung WJ, Shim J, Ravindran B. Application of wheat bran based biomaterials and nano-catalyst in textile wastewater. J King Saud Univ Sci. 2022;34(2):101775. doi: 10.1775101016/jjksus2021101775
  • Mohamed Khalith SB, Rishabb R, Anirud Raghavendra R, et al. Synthesis and characterization of magnetite carbon nanocomposite from agro waste as chromium adsorbent for effluent treatment. Environ Res. 2021;202111669:10.1016/jenvres2021111669.
  • Parrilli E, Papa R, Luisa Tutino M, et al. Engineering of a psychrophilic bacterium for the bioremediation of aromatic compounds. Bioengineered Bugs. 2010;1(3):213–216.