Abstract
The present article provides commentary on this pioneering special issue covering the usefulness of so-called mind-body practices with youth and in schools. I begin by addressing the way we talk about this approach to practice, describing a few undesirable consequences that can follow from using the mind-body moniker adopted from the world of medicine, and then calling for new verbal framings that are grounded in scientific psychology and education. The remainder of the commentary discusses three critical issues that run throughout the articles in this special issue: specifically, the therapeutic outcomes, strategies, and processes associated with so-called mind-body practices. Ultimately, I conclude that mind-body practices are likely broadly useful for promoting youths' well-being outcomes in schools, that many of these practices appear to share the common therapeutic strategy of mindfulness training, and that increased attention is warranted toward identifying the therapeutic processes that drive these practices. Along the way, I also offer an optimistic response to skeptical critiques of mindfulness training raised in this special issue, encouraging readers to further consider the bulk of empirical evidence available via recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Tyler L. Renshaw
Tyler L. Renshaw, PhD, NCSP, is an assistant professor in the School Psychology Program within the Department of Psychology at Louisiana State University. Dr. Renshaw's orientation toward psychology is grounded in contextual behavioral science and his research is broadly focused on school mental health. He aims to understand well-being using basic psychological principles and to advance assessment and intervention practices in schools that are squarely grounded in these principles.