Association between the FMR1 CGG repeat lengths and the severity of idiopathic primary ovarian insufficiency: a meta analysis

Abstract

Aim

Reports on the association of the CGG repeat length in the FMR1 gene with the severity of idiopathic POI are inconclusive. Therefore, a meta analysis was performed to investigate the relationship between the expansion of repeat CGG and idiopathic POI risk.

Methods

Up to January 2019, 18 case-control or cohort studies involving 3022 idiopathic POI patients and 8461 controls were included for meta analysis.

Results

Thirteen studies, including 2047 cases and 6912 controls, met our criteria for the assessment of the premutation and intermediate repeat length in patients patients with POI. Compared with controls, FMR1 gene premutation is significantly associated with POI (OR = 8.13; 95% CI: 4.35–15.19; p < .00001), whereas there was no significant correlation between intermediate repeat length and POI (OR = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.62–1.18; p = .34). Six studies, representing 975 patients and 1749 controls, were eligible for evaluation of the premutation and intermediate repeat length in diminished ovarian reserve (DOR). The association between premutation and DOR was significant (OR=14.87; 95% CI:5.20-42.52; p < 0.00001), while no significant correlation of intermediate size to DOR was found in the case-control comparison (OR = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.65–1.47; p = 0.93).

Conclusion

There is a close association between premutation of the FMR1 gene and increased susceptibility to idiopathic POI of each stage and no correlation between intermediate repeat length of the FMR1 gene and the severity of idiopathic POI.

Keywords:

• Idiopathic primary ovarian insufficiency
• diminished ovarian reserve
• fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1)
• CGG repeat length
• meta analysis

Introduction

Primary ovarian insufficiency (POI), a term to describe a wide range of impaired ovarian function, is a heterogeneous disorder diagnosed in women before the age of 40 years [1,2]. It starts with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) (regular or irregular menstrual cycle, subfertility, normal or slightly elevated follicle-stimulating hormone(FSH) levels, low anti-mullerian hormone (AMH), antral follicle counts (AFC) < 5–7 (2–10 mm in diameter)); and finally reaches to premature ovarian failure (POF) (amenorrhea, significantly elevated FSH levels, infertility) [3,4]. The incidence of POF is about 1:10,000 in women by the age of 20 years, 1:1000 in women under 30 years and 1:100 in women under 40 years old [5]. Ovarian dysfunction and follicle depletion are two major mechanisms in the development of POI [1]. A variety of known causes may be involved in the heterogeneity of POI including enzyme deficiency, autoimmune disease, infections and iatrogenic factors. But for most of the cases, the etiology is idiopathic [3,6]. According to the epidemiological studies of several large cohorts of idiopathic POI, the incidence of familial cases varies from 4 to 31%, strongly a suggesting genetic component of POI [7], and some genetic aberrations, such as the X chromosome-linked defects and autosomal monogenic forms, had been demonstrated involving the pathogenesis of POI [8].

The prevalence of the X-linked gene FMR1 (the fragile X mental retardation 1 gene) premutation is 2 ∼ 7% in sporadic POI patients and up to 13% in women with familial forms [9], and several studies have demonstrated that women with POI were associated with the expansion of repeat CGG trinucleotide segments of DNA located in the 5’ untranslated region of FMR1. Recent studies also suggested that the CGG repeat length, background modifier genes, and environmental factors are related to the severity of POI [10–12]. It is conceivable that the interaction of genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors play roles at each stage of POI. However, current individual studies showed inconsistent results regarding the role of the CGG repeat length and the severity of POI [13–33]. A single study may have been underpowered in clarifying the associations of the CGG repeat length with POI susceptibility. Therefore, a meta analysis of all relevant published randomized and cohort studies was carried out in this study to further explore the relationship between the expansion of repeat CGG and the risk of idiopathic POI.

Methods

All relevant studies published until January 2019 were identified from PubMed, EMBASE, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure using a combined free text and the following MeSH search strategy: (“fragile X mental retardation I” OR “FMR1”) AND (“premature ovarian failure” OR “POF” OR “primary ovarian insufficiency” OR “POI” OR “poor ovarian response” OR “POR” OR “diminished ovarian reserve” OR “DOR” OR “early menopause”). No language restriction was applied. References from these studies were also scrutinized to identify other relevant studies by a manual search of the original publications.

Two authors (Huang J and Zhang WX) extracted the available articles independently. Titles of all articles retrieved from the database were screened. We excluded studies without results on the relationship between the CGG repeat length and POI. Of the articles with the overlapping data, we only selected the publication with the most extensive information. The abstracts of relevant articles investigating the relationship between the expansion of repeat CGG and POI risk were examined and all studies that could potentially be included in the review were retrieved. The eligible articles had to meet all the following criteria: (i) there is quantitative information on the estimated risk of the CGG repeat length in the FMR1 gene for idiopathic POI, (ii) case-control or cohort design, (iii) contained complete information about the CGG repeat length identified by PCR ABI sequencing analyzer or by PCR Southern blot analysis, and (iv) clear definition of idiopathic POI. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (i) the research was not for the CGG repeat length in the FMR1 gene and idiopathic POI, (ii) review articles, animal studies, case reports, or unpublished reports, (iii) reports containing no usable data, and (iv) duplicate publications or paper less than 20 sample size. The following data were abstracted from the eligible studies: the first author’s name; year of publication; country; ethnicity, design type of study, methodology, diagnostic criteria for POI and its severity, and sample size of case and control groups.

In the present study, idiopathic POI was defined as [4]: (i) none of the patients showed an abnormal karyotype; (ii) none of the patients had a family history of the fragile X syndrome; (iii) patients caused by medical interventions, such as chemotherapy and/or radiation were excluded. DOR was defined as: women with regular or irregular cycles and/or elevated FSH levels > 10 IU/L and/or antral follicle counts (AFC) < 5–7 (2–10 mm in diameter) and/or a poor response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) before the age of 40 years [18,19]. POI was defined as: (i) secondary amenorrhea more than three months; and (ii) FSH level >40 IU/L [22]. The premutation of FMR1 is defined as more than 55 but less than 200 CGG repeats, the intermediate of FMR1 is defined as a CGG repeat length of 45 to 54, whereas those less than 45 are termed as normal [34]. The allele with the longest repeat length of FMR1 was evaluated.

The meta analyses were performed using RevMan 5.3 software (The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014). The strength of the association between the CGG repeat length in the FMR1 gene and the severity of idiopathic POI was measured by ORs with their 95% CIs. The Mantel–Haenszel method was applied to estimate pooled effect sizes. Heterogeneity of the exposure effects was evaluated graphically using forest plots. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed by the measure of the I2. An I2 measurement greater than 50% was considered to denote heterogeneity. A random-effect model was used in case of substantial heterogeneity and a fixed-effect model in the absence of heterogeneity. Two sides p-values less than .05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

With the search strategy applied, 50 published articles were identified as possible for evaluating the association of the CGG repeat length in the FMR1 gene with POI. There were 18 studies retrieved on the basis of the search criteria at last (Figure 1, Tables 1 and 2), involving 3022 POI patients and 8461 controls. Fifteen review articles, three case report papers, two animal studies, four methodologically inconsistent articles and three unextractable papers, as well as four papers not involved in the CGG repeat length, were excluded. Another paper written by Murry et al., which enrolled the same participants as their latest publication, were also excluded. Meanwhile, one study [20] with a sample size of DOR more than 20 were included in the analysis. Detailed characteristics of each study are described in Table 1. The distributions of intermediate and premutation alleles of the included studies in women with POI and DOR were presented in Table 2.

Figure 1. Flow diagram of screening for relevant articles in meta-analysis of data on the CGG repeat length and idiopathic POI.

Table 1. Characteristics of studies included in the Meta-Analysis between the CGG repeat length in the FMR1 gene and idiopathic POI.

						Sample size
Author	Year	Study type	Country	Ethnicity	Method	DOR	POI	Controls
Bretherick et al.	2005	A prospective cohort study	Canada	Caucasian	PCR + ABI 3100 analyzer	--	53	182
Bodega et al.	2006	Case-control study	Italy	Italian	PCR + ABI 3100 analyzer	--	190	200
Streuli et al	2009	Retrospective, case-control study	Switzerland	NA	PCR + Southern blot analysis	27	--	32
Chatterjee et al.	2009	Case-control study	India	South Asian	PCR + Southern blot analysis	--	78	70
Ishizuka et al.	2011	Retrospective, controlled cohort study	Japan	East Asian	PCR + ABI 3100 analyzer	--	128	98
Karimov et al	2011	Case-control study	USA	NA	PCR + Southern blot analysis	535	--	521
Pastore et al.	2012	Prospective multicenter cohort study	USA	Caucasian	PCR + Southern blot analysis	62	--	161
Lin et al	2013	Case-control study	China	Chinese	PCR + ABI 3730 analyzer	--	85	80
De Geyter et al.	2013	A prospective cohort study	Switzerland	Caucasian	PCR + ABI 3130 analyzer	--	48	199
Murray et al.	2013	A prospective cohort study	UK	European	PCR + ABI 3730 analyzer	--	254	1915
Barasoain M	2013	Case-control study	Basque	Basque	PCR + ABI 3130 analyzer	34	7a	32
Ye et al.	2014	Case-control study	China	Chinese	PCR + ABI 3130 analyzer	--	117	82
Guo et al.	2014	A large cohort study	China	Chinese	PCR + ABI 3130 analyzer	--	379	402
Voorhuis et al.	2014	A large Case-control study	Netherlands	European	PCR + Southern blot analysis and PCR + ABI 3130 analyzer		379	3370
Lisa M. Pastore et al.	2016	Case-control study	USA	Caucasian	PCR + ABI 3700 analyzer	129	--	803
Rezvaneh Asadi et al.	2018	Case-control study	Iran	Iranian	PCR + ABI 3730 analyzer	--	30	30
Luc ía Daniela Espeche et al.	2017	Case-control study	Argentina	Latin American populations	PCR + Southern blot analysis	--	133	84
Ali Eslami et al.	2016	Case-control study	Iran	Iranian	PCR + ABI 3730 analyzer	188	173	200

Notes: NA: data not available; --: data didn’t mention in the studies; a: small sample size didn’t include in meta-analysis.

Table 2. The distributions of intermediate and premutation alleles of the included studies in women with POI and DOR.

	Cases				Controls
Articles	Intermediate (45–54)	Premutation (55–200)	Total	Intermediate (45–54)	Premutation (55–200)	Total
(POI)
Bretherick KL, 2005	0 (0.0%)	2 (3.8%)	53	3 (1.6%)	1 (0.5%)	182
Bodega B, 2006	4 (2.1%)	19 (10.0%)	190	2 (1.0%)	0 (0.0%)	200
Chatterjee S, 2009	1 (1.3%)	1 (1.3%)	78	1 (1.4%)	1 (1.4%)	70
Ishizuka B, 2011	1 (0.8%)	2 (1.6%)	128	1 (1.0%)	0 (0.0%)	98
Lin L, 2013	1 (1.2%)	1 (1.2%)	85	1 (1.3%)	1 (1.3%)	80
De Geyter C, 2013	0 (0.0%)	1 (2.1%)	48	4 (2.0%)	1 (0.5%)	199
Murray A, 2013	7 (2.8%)	5 (2.0%)	254	53 (2.8%)	7 (0.4%)	1915
Ye Y, 2014	0 (0.0%)	1 (0.9%)	117	0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)	82
Guo T, 2014	11 (2.9%)	2 (0.5%)	379	7 (1.7%)	0 (0.0%)	402
Voorhuis, 2014	10 (2.6%)	4 (1.1%)	379	123 (3.6%)	2 (0.006%)	3370
Ali Eslami, 2016	26 (15.0%)	20 (11.6%)	173	40 (20.0%)	0 (0.0%)	200
Rezvaneh Asadi, 2018	4 (13.3%)	1 (3.3%)	30	1 (3.3%)	0 (0%)	30
Luc ía Daniela Espeche, 2017	1 (0.8%)	2 (1.5%)	133	1 (1.2%)	1 (1.2%)	84
Total	66 (3.2%)	61 (2.0%)	2047	236 (3.4%)	14 (0.2%)	6912
(DOR)
Streuli I, 2009	1 (3.7%)	2 (7.4%)	27	1 (3.1%)	0 (0.0%)	32
Karimov CB, 2011	17 (3.2%)	7 (1.3%)	535	7 (1.3%)	1 (0.2%)	521
Pastore LM, 2012	1 (1.6%)	1 (1.6%)	62	3 (1.9%)	1 (0.6%)	161
Barasoain M, 2013	1 (2.9%)	2 (5.9%)	34	0 (0.0%)	0 (0.0%)	32
Pastore LM, 2016	3 (2.3%)	1 (0.8%)	129	13 (1.6%)	1 (0.1%)	803
Ali Eslami, 2016	25 (13.3%)	30 (15.95%)	188	40 (20.0%)	0 (0.0%)	200
Total	48 (4.9%)	43 (4.4%)	975	64 (3.7%)	3 (0.2%)	1749

Thirteen studies, including 2047 cases and 6912 controls, met our criteria for the assessment of the premutation and intermediate alleles in patients with POI [13,14,17,19,21–23,27–29,31,32]. In 13 POI studies, the frequency of premutation varied from 0.5 to 11.6% among cases and from 0.0 to 1.4% among controls, while the frequency of intermediate varied from 0.0 to 15.0% among 13 POI studies and from 0.0 to 20.0% among controls (Table 2). Fixed effects models were used according to the heterogeneities in the comparisons (I2 < 50%, fixed effect model). As shown in Figure 2, the pooled fixed effect OR and corresponding 95% CI of premutation in POI compared with controls was 8.13 (4.35–15.19), suggesting that premutation of FMR1 gene is significantly associated with POI (p < .00001). But no significant association of intermediate alleles with POI was found (OR = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.62–1.18; p = .34).

Figure 2. The prevalence of premutation and intermediate alleles in POI.

Six studies, representing 975 patients and 1749 controls, were eligible for evaluation of the premutation and intermediate alleles in DOR [15,18–20,30,33]. The prevalence of premutation varied from 1.3 to 15.95% among cases and from 0.0 to 0.6% among controls, while the prevalence of intermediate varied from 1.6 to 13.3% among DOR, and from 0.0 to 20.0% among controls (Table 2). The association between premutation and DOR was significant (p < .00001), with a pooled fixed effect OR of 14.87 (5.20–42.52) between case and control groups. No significant correlation of intermediate alleles to DOR was found in the case control comparison (OR = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.65–1.47; p = .93) (Figure 3).

Figure 3. The prevalence of premutation and intermediate alleles in DOR.

Discussion

In this study, we evaluated the association between the FMR1 CGG repeat lengths and the severity of idiopathic POI using Meta-analysis. Eighteen studies were included in this study, we found that the FMR1 premutation was significantly associated with increased risks for both POI (OR = 8.13; 95% CI: 4.35–15.19; p < .00001) and DOR (OR = 14.87; 95% CI:5.20–42.52; p < .00001), whereas no correlation between the FMR1 CGG intermediate repeat length and the severity of idiopathic POI.

Several studies had demonstrated the association between some candidate genes and the risk of POI [8]. For example, Aittomaki et al. [35] identified that the variant in the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor gene was associated with hypergonadotropic ovarian dysgenesis, and Kovanci et al. [36] found that GDF-9 might be a susceptibility gene of POF. The association between the CGG repeat length in the FMR1 gene and POI risk has been a topic of particular interest, but the results from individual studies were inconsistent and sometimes contradictory, especially for idiopathic POI. In 2005, a case-control study [13] revealed that the prevalence of premutation in idiopathic POI patients increased significantly compared with control women, and there was a significant association between POI and intermediate expansions. In another prospective cohort study performed in Canada, Bretherick et al. [14] found a significant increase in the frequency of intermediate expansions with the risk of POI, considering that the FMR1 gene plays a significant role in the occurrence of idiopathic POI. Currently, a similar study on Chinese population also supported the notion that the intermediate-sized FMR1 CGG repeat alleles in idiopathic POI patients were significantly more than that in the control group [27]. However, in a population-based study on predominated European individuals, Murray et al. [22] revealed that premutation-sized FMR1 repeats are substantial risk factors for the POI, whereas intermediate alleles were not significant risk factors for the POI. De Geyter et al. [21] in their prospective cohort study found that neither of the categories of FMR1 CGG repeat length expansions (premutation, intermediate range) was more prevalent in infertile women with POI than control women, and nor CGG repeat length was correlated with the severity of primary ovarian insufficiency. Moreover, interesting results were found that there was a significant increase in the number of intermediate and premutation FMR1 alleles in DOR patients compared with controls [15,20,33]. A study performed by Eslami A et al. [19] found that the frequency of FMR1 premutation in both DOR and POI patients was significantly higher than that in control group, while no significant differences in the frequency of intermediate alleles were observed between POI patients and control subjects. Another larger case-control study carried out by Bennett et al. [16] did not reveal a positive association between different intermediate-range and idiopathic POI. Recently, a review on FMR1 and the continuum of primary ovarian insufficiency conducted by Sullivan et al. supported the viewpoint that increased CGG repeat numbers may play a role in POI etiopathogenesis and could be helpful to identify, counsel, and treat the women with the FMR1 premutation [4].

It is difficult to interpret the inconsistencies between the role of the CGG repeat length and the severity of POI. Additional research is needed to clarify the relationship between the expansion of repeat CGG and the risk of idiopathic POI. In this study, the most comprehensive meta analysis based on all currently available data was performed to investigate the associations of the CGG repeat length with idiopathic POI susceptibility, and the results showed that FMR1 premutation was significantly associated with increased risks for both idiopathic POI and DOR (OR = 8.13 and OR = 14.87, respectively; p < .05). In addition, it was demonstrated that intermediate size was not significantly associated with idiopathic POI and DOR (OR = 0.86 and OR = 0.98, respectively; p > .05). To our knowledge, this is the first meta analysis on the association of the CGG repeat length with idiopathic POI, and the results might be helpful to genetic counselors to give patients more reasonable interpretation between the CGG repeat length in the FMR1 gene and the severity of idiopathic POI. Currently, the mechanisms of FMR1 premutation and intermediate alleles increasing POI risk are not fully known. Some molecular mechanisms (such as increased FMR1 mRNA, possibly X inactivation and FMRP levels), might play a role in ovarian dysfunction [4].

One of the important limitations of this study concerns the lack of analyses stratified by other related susceptible factors, such as race and ethnicity have not been conducted in the present study because insufficient data were available from the primary studies. Race/ethnic differences in the FMR1 CGG repeat distribution have been reported [37–39]. However, the results from individual studies were inconsistent. Genereux and Laird used eight general population studies and found that the Asian and non-Asian populations had similar distribution curves, but the Asian curve was left-shifted and “almost completely non-overlapping” relative to the non-Asian distribution [38]. A study performed by Pastore et al. [18] found that DOR cases had fewer CGG repeats in the shorter FMR1 allele than controls among Whites, but this was not significant among Asians. White cases had fewer CGG repeats in the shorter allele than Asian cases. No significant differences were found in the high normal/intermediate range between cases and controls or by race/ethnic group within cases in the longer allele. Despite the limitation, the data of the present meta-analysis did show an association of FMR1 premutation with increased susceptibility to idiopathic POI and its severity and a non-correlation of intermediate size with increased risk to idiopathic POI.

In conclusion, our analysis supports the association of premutation with increased susceptibility to idiopathic POI (POI and DOR) and further pointed out that intermediate alleles might not be correlated with idiopathic POI and its severity. Further studies are warranted to confirm the meta analysis conclusion.

Disclosure statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Correction Statement

This article has been republished with minor changes. These changes do not impact the academic content of the article.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [81501216] and Anhui Province Natural Science Foundation [1608085MH165].