ABSTRACT
One of the most commonly used forms of educational evaluation is by means of student surveys. In Colombia, as in all countries of Latin America, student course evaluations in higher education remain focused on teaching performance, while the results of these instruments are frequently used as an indicator (and in some cases the only indicator) of quality and effectiveness of both undergraduate and postgraduate programmes. This article argues that the teacher-centred evaluation provides insufficient information to improve the quality of higher education. Therefore, a process-based evaluation model (PBEM) is proposed for a Colombian university offering engineering programmes. The PBEM is intended to provide reliable information on teaching effectiveness, but also about other factors influencing teaching and learning such as course design. The PBEM was designed in accordance with the EIA University’s pedagogical model, which encompasses competencies, values, and key areas of transversal learning. The implementation of the instrument started in 2015. Since then, more than 2500 lecture groups have been evaluated. This article addresses some key issues and challenges related to the implementation of this evaluation model.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Engelberth Soto-Estrada
Engelberth Soto-Estrada is a civil engineer, MEng, and Ph. D. in environmental engineering. Lecturer at the Civil Engineering programme at the EIA University.
Ann Wellens
Ann Wellens is a chemical engineer, MEng. Lecturer at the Systems Engineering programme at the Facultad de Ingeniería, UNAM.
Jairo Gómez-Lizarazo
Jairo Gómez-Lizarazo is an industrial engineer. Lecturer at the Industrial Engineering programme at the EIA University.