ABSTRACT
This article explores how brain-computer interfaces (BCI) are depicted in the English-speaking media, especially by news outlets. We use the FACTICA database to analyze depictions of BCIs from the first time the term appeared in the media (1993) up until 31 December 2017. We found a sample of over 4064 articles on BCIs. Results indicate that 76.91% of articles portrayed BCI positively, including 25.27% that were overly positive, while 26.64 % of the total articles contain claims about BCI-enabled enhancement. In contrast, 1.6% of articles had a negative tone and only 2.7% of articles flag issues explicitly related to ethical concerns surrounding BCI technology. We propose: 1) A proactive effort by the scientific community to push-out to the media stories focused on the limits and actual capabilities of BCIs, separating science from science fiction; 2) More influence should be brought to bear on the technological risks and process of informed consent.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the Neuroethics team at the University of Washington.
Availability of data and materials
There is an Excel spreadsheet summarizing the results of the systematic literature search and evaluation as well as any calculations performed. It is available at reasonable request from the corresponding author.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.