![Sample our Bioscience journals, sign in here to start your access, Latest two full volumes FREE to you for 14 days]({"type":"image" , "src" : "/sda/5925/TOC-Subject-Sample-2021-Bioscience.jpg"})
ABSTRACT
Listeners are sensitive to speakers’ co-speech iconic gestures. Concurrent visual and verbal information compete for attentional resources during multimodal comprehension. The current study examined the role of individual differences in visual-spatial vs. verbal abilities on individuals’ differential sensitivity to gestural vs. spoken expressions. Turkish-speaking adults (N = 83) were tested on their sensitivity to concurrent gesture vs. speech in an online task (Kelly, S. D., Özyürek, A., & Maris, E. (2010a). Two sides of the same coin. Psychological Science, 21(2), 260–267) and were administered spatial and verbal working memory measures. Participants were slower and less accurate when gesture and speech were incongruent to one another compared to the baseline condition, in which they expressed congruent information. People with higher spatial working memory capacity were more efficient in processing gestures whereas people with higher verbal working memory capacity were more sensitive to spoken expressions. These suggest that not all people are equally sensitive to co-speech gestures and some people may benefit more from gestures during comprehension.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Spencer Kelly for sharing the stimuli with us and Merve Tansan for assistance with data collection. We are grateful to the helpful feedback we received from Aslı Özyürek, Aylin Küntay, and Sami Gülgöz as well as the graduate students at Language & Cognition Lab and Language and Communication Development Lab at Koç University, particularly Aslı Aktan-Erciyes, Cansu Oranç, Berna Uzundağ, and Junko Kanero.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.