1,193
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Regular Articles

Visual-spatial and verbal abilities differentially affect processing of gestural vs. spoken expressions

&
Pages 896-914 | Received 04 Mar 2019, Accepted 29 Nov 2019, Published online: 18 Dec 2019

References

  • Alfred, K. L., & Kraemer, D. J. (2017). Verbal and visual cognition: Individual differences in the lab, in the brain, and in the classroom. Developmental Neuropsychology, 42(7–8), 507–520.
  • Alibali, M. W. (2005). Gesture in spatial cognition: Expressing, communicating, and thinking about spatial information. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 5(4), 307–331.
  • Alibali, M. W., Heath, D. C., & Myers, H. J. (2001). Effects of visibility between speaker and listener on gesture production: Some gestures are meant to be seen. Journal of Memory and Language, 44(2), 169–188.
  • Alibali, M. W., & Nathan, M. J. (2012). Embodiment in mathematics teaching and learning: Evidence from learners’ and teachers’ gestures. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(2), 247–286.
  • Andersen, G. J., & Ni, R. (2008). Aging and visual processing: Declines in spatial not temporal integration. Vision Research, 48(1), 109–118.
  • Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes1. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 2, 89–195.
  • Ausburn, L. J., & Ausburn, F. B. (1978). Cognitive styles: Some information and implications for instructional design. ECTJ, 26(4), 337–354.
  • Aussems, S., & Kita, S. (2019). Seeing iconic gestures while encoding events facilitates children’s memory of these events. Child Development, 90(4), 1123–1137.
  • Azar, Z., Backus, A., & Özyürek, A. (2019). Language contact does not drive gesture transfer: Heritage speakers maintain language specific gesture patterns in each language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672891900018X
  • Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412.
  • Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255, 556–559.
  • Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 417–423.
  • Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 8, 47–89.
  • Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S., Bojesen, R. H., Singmann, H., … Fox, J. (2019). Linear mixed-effects models using “Eigen” and S4. Retrieved from https://cran-r.project.org/web/packages/lme4/lme4.pdf
  • Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.5823
  • Beattie, G., & Shovelton, H. (1999). Do iconic hand gestures really contribute anything to the semantic information conveyed by speech? An experimental investigation. Semiotica, 123(1–2), 1–30.
  • Beattie, G., & Shovelton, H. (2002). What properties of talk are associated with the generation of spontaneous iconic hand gestures? British Journal of Social Psychology, 41(3), 403–417.
  • Beauchamp, M. S., Lee, K. E., Argall, B. D., & Martin, A. (2004). Integration of auditory and visual information about objects in superior temporal sulcus. Neuron, 41(5), 809–823.
  • Calvert, G. A. (2001). Crossmodal processing in the human brain: Insights from functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex, 11(12), 1110–1123.
  • Calvert, G., Spence, C., & Stein, B. E. (2004). The handbook of multisensory processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Calvert, G. A., & Thesen, T. (2004). Multisensory integration: Methodological approaches and emerging principles in the human brain. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 98(1–3), 191–205.
  • Cassell, J., McNeill, D., & McCullough, K. E. (1999). Speech-gesture mismatches: Evidence for one underlying representation of linguistic and nonlinguistic information. Pragmatics & Cognition, 7(1), 1–34.
  • Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293–332.
  • Chu, M., Meyer, A., Foulkes, L., & Kita, S. (2014). Individual differences in frequency and saliency of speech-accompanying gestures: The role of cognitive abilities and empathy. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 694–709.
  • Church, R. B., Garber, P., & Rogalski, K. (2007). The role of gesture in memory and social communication. Gesture, 7(2), 137–158.
  • Clark, H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149–210.
  • Cocks, N., Byrne, S., Pritchard, M., Morgan, G., & Dipper, L. (2018). Integration of speech and gesture in aphasia. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 53(3), 584–591.
  • Cocks, N., Morgan, G., & Kita, S. (2011). Iconic gesture and speech integration in younger and older adults. Gesture, 11(1), 24–39.
  • Cohen, R. L., & Borsoi, D. (1996). The role of gestures in description-communication: A cross-sectional study of aging. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 20(1), 45–63.
  • Conway, A. R., Cowan, N., & Bunting, M. F. (2001). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: The importance of working memory capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(2), 331–335.
  • Conway, A. R., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(5), 769–786.
  • Copeland, D. E., & Radvansky, G. A. (2007). Aging and integrating spatial mental models. Psychology and Aging, 22(3), 569–579.
  • Corsi, P. M. (1972). Human memory and the medial temporal region of the brain (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
  • Drijvers, L., & Özyürek, A. (2017). Visual context enhanced: The joint contribution of iconic gestures and visible speech to degraded speech comprehension. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(1), 212–222.
  • Eielts, C., Pouw, W., Ouwehand, K., Van Gog, T., Zwaan, R. A., & Paas, F. (2018). Co-thought gesturing supports more complex problem solving in subjects with lower visual working-memory capacity. Psychological Research. doi:10.1007/s00426-018-1065-9
  • Enfield, N. J. (2009). The anatomy of meaning: Speech, gesture, and composite utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(1), 19–23.
  • Feyereisen, P., & Havard, I. (1999). Mental imagery and production of hand gestures while speaking in younger and older adults. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 23(2), 153–171.
  • Galati, A., Weisberg, S., Newcombe, N., & Avraamides, M. N. (2015). Individual differences in spatial ability influence the effect of gesturing on navigation and spatial memory. Proceedings of Gesture and Speech in Interaction-4th edition (GESPIN 4), 119–124.
  • Gillespie, M., James, A. N., Federmeier, K. D., & Watson, D. G. (2014). Verbal working memory predicts co-speech gesture: Evidence from individual differences. Cognition, 132(2), 174–180.
  • Göksun, T., Goldin-Meadow, S., Newcombe, N., & Shipley, T. (2013). Individual differences in mental rotation: What does gesture tell us? Cognitive Processing, 14(2), 153–162.
  • Goldin-Meadow, S., Nusbaum, H., Kelly, S. D., & Wagner, S. (2001). Explaining math: Gesturing lightens the load. Psychological Science, 12(6), 516–522.
  • Goldin-Meadow, S., & Sandhofer, C. M. (1999). Gestures convey substantive information about a child’s thoughts to ordinary listeners. Developmental Science, 2(1), 67–74.
  • Hadar, U., & Butterworth, B. (1997). Iconic gestures, imagery, and word retrieval in speech. Semiotica, 115(1–2), 147–172.
  • Hagoort, P. (2005). On Broca, brain, and binding: A new framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(9), 416–423.
  • Hagoort, P. (2013). MUC (memory, unification, control) and beyond. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 416.
  • Hagoort, P., Baggio, G., & Willems, R. M. (2009). Semantic unification. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neuroscience (pp. 819–836). Boston, MA: MIT Press.
  • Hilverman, C., Clough, S., Duff, M. C., & Cook, S. W. (2018). Patients with hippocampal amnesia successfully integrate gesture and speech. Neuropsychologia, 117, 332–338.
  • Holle, H., & Gunter, T. C. (2007). The role of iconic gestures in speech disambiguation: ERP evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(7), 1175–1192.
  • Holle, H., Obleser, J., Rueschemeyer, S. A., & Gunter, T. C. (2010). Integration of iconic gestures and speech in left superior temporal areas boosts speech comprehension under adverse listening conditions. Neuroimage, 49(1), 875–884.
  • Holler, J., Schubotz, L., Kelly, S., Hagoort, P., Schuetze, M., & Özyürek, A. (2014). Social eye gaze modulates processing of speech and co-speech gesture. Cognition, 133(3), 692–697.
  • Hostetter, A. B., & Alibali, M. W. (2007). Raise your hand if you’re spatial: Relations between verbal and spatial skills and gesture production. Gesture, 7(1), 73–95.
  • Hostetter, A. B., & Alibali, M. W. (2008). Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(3), 495–514.
  • Hostetter, A. B., & Alibali, M. W. (2011). Cognitive skills and gesture–speech redundancy: Formulation difficulty or communicative strategy? Gesture, 11(1), 40–60.
  • Hostetter, A. B., & Alibali, M. W. (2019). Gesture as simulated action: Revisiting the framework. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(3), 721–752.
  • Hostetter, A. B., & Hopkins, W. D. (2002). The effect of thought structure on the production of lexical movements. Brain and Language, 82(1), 22–29.
  • Hostetter, A., & Sullivan, E. (2011). Gestures are produced during spatial tasks. In L. Carlson, C. Hoelscher, & T. F. Shipley (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1965–1970). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
  • Hubbard, A. L., McNealy, K., Scott-Van Zeeland, A. A., Callan, D. E., Bookheimer, S. Y., & Dapretto, M. (2012). Altered integration of speech and gesture in children with autism spectrum disorders. Brain and Behavior, 2(5), 606–619.
  • Huk, T. (2006). Who benefits from learning with 3D models? The case of spatial ability. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(6), 392–404.
  • Huyse, A., Leybaert, J., & Berthommier, F. (2014). Effects of aging on audio-visual speech integration. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 136(4), 1918–1931.
  • Jonassen, D. H., & Grabowski, B. (1993). Handbook of individual differences, learning and instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. R., & Engle, R. W. (2001). A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(2), 169–183.
  • Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132(1), 47–70.
  • Kelly, S. D. (2001). Broadening the units of analysis in communication: Speech and nonverbal behaviours in pragmatic comprehension. Journal of Child Language, 28(2), 325–349.
  • Kelly, S. D., Barr, D. J., Church, R. B., & Lynch, K. (1999). Offering a hand to pragmatic understanding: The role of speech and gesture in comprehension and memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(4), 577–592.
  • Kelly, S. D., Creigh, P., & Bartolotti, J. (2010b). Integrating speech and iconic gestures in a Stroop-like task: Evidence for automatic processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(4), 683–694.
  • Kelly, S. D., Kravitz, C., & Hopkins, M. (2004). Neural correlates of bimodal speech and gesture comprehension. Brain and Language, 89(1), 253–260.
  • Kelly, S. D., Özyürek, A., & Maris, E. (2010a). Two sides of the same coin. Psychological Science, 21(2), 260–267.
  • Kelly, S. D., Ward, S., Creigh, P., & Bartolotti, J. (2007). An intentional stance modulates the integration of gesture and speech during comprehension. Brain and Language, 101(3), 222–233.
  • Kiat, J. E., & Belli, R. F. (2018). The role of individual differences in visual\verbal information processing preferences in visual\verbal source monitoring. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 30(7), 701–709.
  • Kim, M., Roth, W. M., & Thom, J. (2011). Children’s gestures and the embodied knowledge of geometry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(1), 207–238.
  • Kirby, J. R., Moore, P. J., & Schofield, N. J. (1988). Verbal and visual learning styles. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 13(2), 169–184.
  • Kita, S. (2000). How representational gestures help speaking? In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 162–185). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kita, S. (2009). Cross-cultural variation of speech-accompanying gesture: A review. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(2), 145–167.
  • Kita, S., & Özyürek, A. (2003). What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(1), 16–32.
  • Koć-Januchta, M., Höffler, T., Thoma, G. B., Prechtl, H., & Leutner, D. (2017). Visualizers versus verbalizers: Effects of cognitive style on learning with texts and pictures–An eye-tracking study. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 170–179.
  • Kollöffel, B. (2012). Exploring the relation between visualizer–verbalizer cognitive styles and performance with visual or verbal learning material. Computers & Education, 58(2), 697–706.
  • Kraemer, D. J., Rosenberg, L. M., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2009). The neural correlates of visual and verbal cognitive styles. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(12), 3792–3798.
  • Krauss, R. M., Chen, Y., & Gottesman, R. F. (2000). Lexical gestures and lexical access: A process model. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 261–284). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Krauss, R. M., Morrel-Samuels, P., & Colasante, C. (1991). Do conversational hand gestures communicate? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(5), 743–754.
  • La Pointe, L. B., & Engle, R. W. (1990). Simple and complex word spans as measures of working memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(6), 1118–1133.
  • Laurent, A., & Nicoladis, E. (2015). Gesture restriction affects French–English bilinguals’ speech only in French. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(2), 340–349.
  • Lavergne, J., & Kimura, D. (1987). Hand movement asymmetry during speech: No effect of speaking topic. Neuropsychologia, 25(4), 689–693.
  • Leonard, T., & Cummins, F. (2011). The temporal relation between beat gestures and speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26(10), 1457–1471.
  • Macedonia, M., Müller, K., & Friederici, A. D. (2011). The impact of iconic gestures on foreign language word learning and its neural substrate. Human Brain Mapping, 32(6), 982–998.
  • Marstaller, L., & Burianová, H. (2013). Individual differences in the gesture effect on working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(3), 496–500.
  • McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Mendelson, A. L. (2004). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Effects of the visualizing cognitive style and attention on processing of news photos. Journal of Visual Literacy, 24(1), 1–22.
  • Meneghetti, C., Labate, E., Grassano, M., Ronconi, L., & Pazzaglia, F. (2014). The role of visuospatial and verbal abilities, styles and strategies in predicting visuospatial description accuracy. Learning and Individual Differences, 36, 117–123.
  • Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). Verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: When reading helps listening. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 156–163.
  • Morrel-Samuels, P., & Krauss, R. M. (1992). Word familiarity predicts temporal asynchrony of hand gestures and speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(3), 615–622.
  • Nagels, A., Kircher, T., Grosvald, M., Steines, M., & Straube, B. (2018). Evidence for gesture-speech mismatch detection impairments in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research, 273, 15–21.
  • Nagels, A., Kircher, T., Steines, M., Grosvald, M., & Straube, B. (2015). A brief self-rating scale for the assessment of individual differences in gesture perception and production. Learning and Individual Differences, 39, 73–80.
  • Nath, A. R., & Beauchamp, M. S. (2012). A neural basis for interindividual differences in the McGurk effect, a multisensory speech illusion. Neuroimage, 59(1), 781–787.
  • Obermeier, C., Dolk, T., & Gunter, T. C. (2012). The benefit of gestures during communication: Evidence from hearing and hearing-impaired individuals. Cortex, 48(7), 857–870.
  • Obermeier, C., Holle, H., & Gunter, T. C. (2011). What iconic gesture fragments reveal about gesture–speech integration: When synchrony is lost, memory can help. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(7), 1648–1663.
  • Obermeier, C., Kelly, S., & Gunter, T. C. (2015). A speaker’s gesture style can affect language comprehension: ERP evidence from gesture-speech integration. SCAN, 10, 1236–1243.
  • Özyürek, A. (2014). Hearing and seeing meaning in speech and gesture: Insights from brain and behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1651), 20130296. doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0296.
  • Özyürek, A., Willems, R. M., Kita, S., & Hagoort, P. (2007). On-line integration of semantic information from speech and gesture: Insights from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(4), 605–616.
  • Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1–4.
  • Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2004). Cognitive load theory: Instructional implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32(1), 1–8.
  • Paas, F., Van Gog, T., & Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory: New conceptualizations, specifications, and integrated research perspectives. Educational Psychology Review, 22(2), 115–121.
  • Plass, J. L., Chun, D. M., Mayer, R. E., & Leutner, D. (2003). Cognitive load in reading a foreign language text with multimedia aids and the influence of verbal and spatial abilities. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(2), 221–243.
  • Pouw, W. T., Mavilidi, M. F., van Gog, T., & Paas, F. (2016). Gesturing during mental problem solving reduces eye movements, especially for individuals with lower visual working memory capacity. Cognitive Processing, 17(3), 269–277.
  • Rauscher, F. H., Krauss, R. M., & Chen, Y. (1996). Gesture, speech, and lexical access: The role of lexical movements in speech production. Psychological Science, 7(4), 226–231.
  • R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
  • Riding, R. J., & Ashmore, J. (1980). Verbaliser-imager learning style and children’s recall of information presented in pictorial versus written form. Educational Studies, 6(2), 141–145.
  • Riding, R., Burton, D., Rees, G., & Sharratt, M. (1995). Cognitive style and personality in 12-year-old children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 65(1), 113–124.
  • Roth, W. M., & Welzel, M. (2001). From activity to gestures and scientific language. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(1), 103–136.
  • Schmalenbach, S. B., Billino, J., Kircher, T., van Kemenade, B. M., & Straube, B. (2017). Links between gestures and multisensory processing: Individual differences suggest a compensation mechanism. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1828.
  • Sekine, K., & Kita, S. (2015). Development of multimodal discourse comprehension: Cohesive use of space by gestures. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(10), 1245–1258.
  • Sekine, K., Sowden, H., & Kita, S. (2015). The development of the ability to semantically integrate information in speech and iconic gesture in comprehension. Cognitive Science, 39(8), 1855–1880.
  • Silverman, L. B., Bennetto, L., Campana, E., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2010). Speech-and-gesture integration in high functioning autism. Cognition, 115(3), 380–393.
  • Skipper, J. I., Goldin-Meadow, S., Nusbaum, H. C., & Small, S. L. (2007). Speech-associated gestures, Broca’s area, and the human mirror system. Brain and Language, 101(3), 260–277.
  • Skipper, J. I., Goldin-Meadow, S., Nusbaum, H. C., & Small, S. L. (2009). Gestures orchestrate brain networks for language understanding. Current Biology, 19(8), 661–667.
  • So, W. C. (2010). Cross-cultural transfer in gesture frequency in Chinese–English bilinguals. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(10), 1335–1353.
  • So, W. C., Shum, P. L. C., & Wong, M. K. Y. (2015). Gesture is more effective than spatial language in encoding spatial information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(12), 2384–2401.
  • Spence, C., & Driver, J. (2004). Crossmodal space and crossmodal attention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Straube, B., Green, A., Jansen, A., Chatterjee, A., & Kircher, T. (2010). Social cues, mentalizing and the neural processing of speech accompanied by gestures. Neuropsychologia, 48(2), 382–393.
  • Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257–285.
  • Thompson, L. A. (1995). Encoding and memory for visible speech and gestures: A comparison between young and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 10(2), 215–228.
  • Thompson, L. A., & Guzman, F. A. (1999). Some limits on encoding visible speech and gestures using a dichotic shadowing task. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 54B(6), P347–P349.
  • Trafton, J. G., Trickett, S. B., Stitzlein, C. A., Saner, L., Schunn, C. D., & Kirschenbaum, S. S. (2006). The relationship between spatial transformations and iconic gestures. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 6(1), 1–29.
  • Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28(2), 127–154.
  • Vigliocco, G., Perniss, P., & Vinson, D. (2014). Language as a multimodal phenomenon: Implications for language learning, processing and evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369, 20130292.
  • Wagner, S. M., Nusbaum, H., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2004). Probing the mental representation of gesture: Is handwaving spatial? Journal of Memory and Language, 50(4), 395–407.
  • Wechsler, D. (1939). The measurement of adult intelligence. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins.
  • Werner, S., & Noppeney, U. (2010). Distinct functional contributions of primary sensory and association areas to audiovisual integration in object categorization. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(7), 2662–2675.
  • Willems, R. M., Özyürek, A., & Hagoort, P. (2007). When language meets action: The neural integration of gesture and speech. Cerebral Cortex, 17(10), 2322–2333.
  • Willems, R. M., Özyürek, A., & Hagoort, P. (2009). Differential roles for left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in multimodal integration of action and language. NeuroImage, 47(4), 1992–2004.
  • Wu, Y. C., & Coulson, S. (2005). Meaningful gestures: Electrophysiological indices of iconic gesture comprehension. Psychophysiology, 42(6), 654–667.
  • Wu, Y. C., & Coulson, S. (2007). How iconic gestures enhance communication: An ERP study. Brain and Language, 101(3), 234–245.
  • Wu, Y. C., & Coulson, S. (2014a). Co-speech iconic gestures and visuo-spatial working memory. Acta Psychologica, 153, 39–50.
  • Wu, Y. C., & Coulson, S. (2014b). A psychometric measure of working memory capacity for configured body movement. PloS One, 9(1), e84834.
  • Yeo, A., Ledesma, I., Nathan, M. J., Alibali, M. W., & Church, R. B. (2017). Teachers’ gestures and students’ learning: Sometimes “hands off” is better. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(1), 41.
  • Yeung, A. S., Jin, P., & Sweller, J. (1998). Cognitive load and learner expertise: Split-attention and redundancy effects in reading with explanatory notes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23(1), 1–21.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.