205
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

An exploratory study of therapeutic misconception among incarcerated clinical trial participants

, , , , &
Pages 24-30 | Published online: 16 Oct 2015
 

ABSTRACT

Background: Therapeutic misconception, the misunderstanding of differences between research and clinical care, is widely prevalent among non-incarcerated trial participants. However, little attention has been paid to its presence among individuals who participate in research while incarcerated. Methods: This study examined the extent to which 72 incarcerated individuals may experience therapeutic misconception about their participation in one of six clinical trials, and its correlation with participant characteristics and potential influences on research participation. Results: On average, participants endorsed 70% of items suggestive of therapeutic misconception. The tendency toward therapeutic misconception was significantly higher among African Americans and Latinos compared to Whites, among older and less educated participants, and among enrollment in a substance-abuse-related trial; it was also correlated with a belief that the trial was the only way to obtain needed treatment. Conclusions: Therapeutic misconception may be particularly high among select incarcerated individuals and is associated with a perceived lack of treatment options. Further examination of therapeutic misconception among incarcerated research participants is needed.

Author contributions

P. P. Christopher contributed to the study conception and design, data collection, and drafting/revising and final approval of the article. M. D. Stein, S. A. Springer, J. D. Rich, and J. E. Johnson contributed to the study design and drafting/revising and final approval of the article. C. W. Lidz contributed to the study conception and design, and drafting/revising and final approval of the article.

Disclaimer

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute on Drug Abuse or the National Institutes of Health.

Conflicts of interest

None reported.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the institutional review board at Butler Hospital.

Funding

Funding for this work was supported by awards K23DA034030 (Christopher) and K24DA022112 (Rich) from the National Institute on Drug Abuse.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 53.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 137.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.