Abstract
Background
Vector-borne diseases like West Nile virus (WNV) pose a global health challenge, with rising incidence and distribution. Culex mosquitoes are crucial WNV vectors. Avian species composition and bird community diversity, along with vector communities, influence WNV transmission patterns. However, limited knowledge exists on their impact in southwestern Spain, an area with active WNV circulation in wild birds, mosquitoes, and humans.
Methods
To address this, we conducted a comprehensive study investigating the contributions of migratory and exotic bird species to WNV transmission and the influence of mosquito community composition.
Results
Analysing 1194 serum samples from 44 avian species, we detected WNV antibodies in 32 samples from 11 species, four for the first time in Europe. Migratory birds had higher WNV exposure likelihood than native and exotic species, and higher phylogenetic diversity in bird communities correlated with lower exposure rates. Moreover, in 5859 female mosquitoes belonging to 12 species, we identified WNV competent vectors like Cx. pipiens s.l. and the Univittatus subgroup. Birds with WNV antibodies were positively associated with competent vector abundance, but negatively with overall mosquito species richness.
Conclusions
These findings highlight the complex interactions between bird species, their phylogenetics, and mosquito vectors in WNV transmission. Understanding these dynamics will help to implement effective disease control strategies in southwestern Spain.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Francisco Javier Oficialdegui and Gonzalo Cidoncha for their help in the fieldwork. We also appreciate the technical support provided by SAIUEx with the molecular analyses (financed by UEx, Junta de Extremadura, MICINN, FEDER, and FSE).
Ethical approval
Bird trapping was carried out with all necessary permits with the current regional and national laws of Spain. Bird and mosquito sampling on private land and in private residential areas was conducted with all the necessary permits and consent from the owners. Methods were evaluated and approved by the institutional Commission of Bioethics of University of Extremadura (CBUE 49/2019) and by Junta de Extremadura Local Government (87/2019) and (CN0055/19/ACA).
Authors’ contribution
MF, SM, FdL were involved in development of the study design. MF, SM, CM-R, AM, IHC, JAO collected the samples; MF, SM, CM-R, DB-B carried out the entomological identification; DB-B, FG-C performed the ELISA assays; PA-S, EP-R, FL performed the VNT analyses. MF conducted the statistical analyses and wrote the first draft of the manuscript; FdL, AM, EF and MAJ-C contributed to the reagents/materials/analysis tools. All authors read, contributed to, and approved, the final manuscript.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Data availability statement
Data supporting the conclusions of this review are available in the supporting information of this article.