Determination of apomixis by flow cytometry in two species of Lachemilla (Rosaceae) in Ecuador

ABSTRACT

The genus Lachemilla in Ecuador consists of 27 species distributed along the páramos and superpáramos of the Andes. With 11 species, it is one of the most species-rich genera in the superpáramo zone. We report the presence of apomixis in Lachemilla hirta and L. hispidula. Both species were regularly visited by entomofauna, where Diptera were the most representative group. Three treatments (enclosing the inflorescences with mesh bags, wax paper bags and the open-pollinated control) were used to determine the presence of pollination, apomixis and both processes respectively. In the fruiting assays with the mesh bags, L. hirta showed no significant differences when compared to the control treatments; whereas highly significant differences between treatments were found in L. hispidula, where the control treatment was the treatment with more fruit production, which according to the apomixis results, could mean and accidental pollination activity from the insects found in this study. The flow cytometric screen of seeds from all three treatments showed that these species are predominantly autonomous apomicts. Additionally, pseudogamous seeds in L. hirta, and triploid embryos in L. hispidula were also found though in smaller quantities. Interestingly, these results indicate Lachemilla as the very first case of documented apomixis from the páramo ecosystem. Our results suggest that populations of both species are asexual. Furthermore, insects found on these plants use them strictly as feeding sites, for protection and for reproduction, and rarely act as accidental pollinators.

KEYWORDS:

• Apomixis
• flow cytometry seed screen
• Lachemilla
• ploidy
• pollination

Introduction

Lachemilla is a neotropical genus pertaining to the Rosaceae family. It comprises approximately 80 species distributed from southern California to northern Argentina and Chile [1–4]. The region between Venezuela and Ecuador is the area of highest diversity with 36 species [2]. In Ecuador, Lachemilla has 27 species distributed within an altitude of 2000 and 5000 m.a.s.l. in the Andes [5–9] .

Pollination is defined as the transfer of pollen from the anthers to the stigma of the same or of another individual, which can be accomplished by the action of abiotic factors, water or wind, or biotic factors such as animals [10]. Within Rosaceae, we can find animal-pollinated genera such as Duchesnea, Fragaria, Potentilla, Rubus, Amelanchier, Crataegus, Malus and Sorbus [11–13] and wind-pollinated plants such as Polylepis [14]. Moreover, studies on the sister genera of Lachemilla, such as Alchemilla and Aphanes [12], found that these are possibly pollinated biotically. In Alchemilla vulgaris, Pont [15] determined that Muscidae present feeding activity, wherein they make contact with the anthers of this species. However, there is currently no published work on pollination studies in Lachemilla; therefore, we first made observations of the possible pollinators that we may found in these species.

Apomixis (sensu agamospermy), a process present in angiosperms, is defined as the asexual production of seeds from the maternal tissue of the ovule which gives rise to an embryo, even when fertilization and meiosis are circumvented [16–18]. Apomixis may be a facultative event, occurring simultaneously with sexual events [19]. Bicknell and Koltunow [17] observed that evergreen species that live in disturbed ecosystems and present mechanisms of vegetative reproduction are more likely to have apomictic events in their life cycle [17]. Apomictic species are characterized by the formation of microspecies (i.e. populations with morphological variation), which are often problematic for taxonomic determination [10,17,20].

Gametophytic apomixis is characteristic in Rosaceae, wherein the formation of the endosperm can be pseudogamous, when there is incentive fertilization; or autonomous, when it develops spontaneously [17,19,21]. Alchemilla is characterized by autonomous apomixis, while Aphanes, by pseudogamy [4,22]. The presence of apomixis has not yet been established in Lachemilla.

Apomixis is associated with plants that live in extreme environmental conditions because it ensures a successful reproduction. The conditions present in the páramos, such as extreme cold, high UV radiation and occasional frosts constantly threaten the action of pollinators and the development of seeds. Apomixis has allowed plants to colonize sites that have been disturbed or covered by glaciers and increase their distribution at an altitudinal and latitudinal level, even more than related taxa that reproduced sexually. It has been seen that in these regions the autonomous apomixis is more prevalent than the pseudogamy due to the weather conditions [23–25].

Two species were chosen to carry out this research, Lachemilla hirta (L. M. Perry) Rothm., distributed from Venezuela to Ecuador; and Lachemilla hispidula (L. M. Perry) Rothm., found in Colombia and Ecuador [2,5]. Our aim was to document the processes of pollination and apomixis in both species in order to have an overview of what happens in the genus Lachemilla, whose reproductive biology has been unknown.

Materials and methods

Study population and treatments

Collections were conducted in the páramos of Oyacachi, in Cayambe Coca National Park located in the province of Napo, Ecuador. Two Lachemilla populations located approximately 350 m away from the Oyacachi park checkpoint were chosen. The first population corresponds to L. hispidula, located near the edge of the road (S 0° 11ʹ 4.6ʹ’ and W 78° 6ʹ 10.3ʹ’) at 3858 m.a.s.l.; and the second, to L. hirta, located within the Polylepis forest (S 0° 11ʹ 10.2ʹ’ and W 78° 6ʹ 7.8ʹ’) at 3865 m.a.s.l.

A total of 24 Lachemilla hirta and 24 L. hispidula individuals were included in the study. One inflorescence per treatment was selected in an individual of each species and it was enclosed when they presented buttons, so they were not simultaneously performed. Three treatments were applied in order to collect seeds and study their reproductive biology. Each treatment consisted of: (1) enclosing the inflorescences within mesh bags to isolate biotic pollinators and determine pollination [26–30]; (2) enclosing the inflorescences within wax paper bags to completely isolate the biotic and abiotic plant pollinators and, by flow cytometry seed screen (FCSS), determine apomixis; treatment (3) was the control (open pollination) which implied no enclosing of the inflorescence and was used to determine additive effect of pollination and apomixis. Each inflorescence of Lachemilla hirta possess (2) 3–9 (12) flowers and L. hispidula, (5) 7–10 (13) flowers. The achenes produced by Lachemilla are small single seed indehiscent fruits [2,10]. Thus, the separation of the seeds from the fruits was not required for the analyses conducted in this study.

Pollination

Seeds

Lachemilla hirta inflorescences were enclosed within mesh bags during the dry season (October–December) and wet season (January–September), while the inflorescences of L. hispidula were only enclosed during the wet season due to the difficulties of preserving the treatments intact.

Mature flowers from the mesh bags and control treatments were collected and dissected in the laboratory, and the fruits formed were counted [27]. A one-way ANOVA and the Mann–Whitney test were performed based on the number of fruits obtained from each treatment using IBM SPSS Statistics 18® software.

Observation and pollinator collection

A total of 20 h of direct observation of each species, during midday hours (from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.), was conducted throughout the wet and dry season of 2013. For 10 min, insects visiting the flowers were observed, and for another 10 min insects found upon them were collected by means of a vacuum cleaner, tweezers and brush. Insects found anywhere in the studied plants, except the flowers, were also collected. The insects were preserved in 70% ethanol, and laboratory identification was made to the level of order, family and subfamily [26,28,31–37]. Specimens were deposited in the Museum of invertebrates (QCAZ) at the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador (PUCE).

Pollen plates

Pollen was removed from the insect collections and plated as described by Wodehouse [38]. The pollen plates were then compared with photographic pollen samples of Lachemilla hispidula, L. jamesonii, L. nivalis, L. orbiculata and L. vulcanica from the Paleobotany Laboratory (QCA) at PUCE.

Apomixis

Mature flowers enclosed within the wax paper bags were collected, and the seeds were extracted and dried to determine the mode of reproduction in both species, whether apomictic or sexual. Seeds obtained from the wax bag treatment, together with seeds from the mesh and control treatments, were used in the FCSS as described by Matzk et al. [16]. Each achene and maternal plant was analyzed separately using propidium iodide flow cytometry following the simplified two-step protocol using Otto buffers [39]. Pisum sativum cv. Ctirad (2C = 9.09 pg [39]) was used as the internal standard. Together with 0.5 cm² of internal standard leaf each achene was chopped up using a sharp razor blade in a Petri dish containing 0.5 ml of ice-cold Otto I buffer (0.1 Mcitric acid, 0.5% Tween-20 [40]). The suspension was filtered through a 42-μm nylon mesh and incubated for ~30 min at room temperature. The staining solution consisted of 1 ml of Otto II buffer (0.4 M Na2HPO4.12 H2O) supplemented with 2-mercaptoethanol (final concentration of 2 μl/ml), propidium iodide and RNase II type IIA (both at a final concentrations of 50 μg/ml). After a short incubation, the samples were analyzed using Cyflow SL instrument (Partec GmbH, Münster, Germany) equipped with a green solid-state laser (Cobolt Samba, 532 nm, 100 mW). Fluorescence intensity of 3000 particles was recorded.

Additionally, two adult mother plants per species were collected to determine the level of ploidy of the parent plants [39–41].

Results

Pollination

Fruit formation

A total of 315 fruits from the Lachemilla hirta inflorescences enclosed within the mesh bags during the wet season as well as 314 control treatment fruits were recovered. Each flower produced between 0–3 fruits (achenes), with an average production of 0.82 in the mesh bag treatment and of 0.72 in the control treatment. The Mann–Whitney test found no significant differences in fruit formation between treatments (p > 0.05) (Tables 1 and 2). Regarding L. hirta inflorescences enclosed during the dry season, 128 fruits from the mesh bag treatment and 128 control treatment fruits were counted. Each flower produced between 0–3 fruits, with an average production of 0.85 for the mesh bag treatment and of 0.71 for the control treatment. The Mann–Whitney test found no significant differences in fruit formation between treatments (p > 0.05) (Tables 1 and 2). The existence of flowers with no fruits or undeveloped fruits was also observed in high percentages, 41% of the total of flowers analyzed in the mesh bags and 48% in the control treatment (Table 1).

Table 1. Count of seeds in Lachemilla hirta and Lachemilla hispidula obtained in the mesh bag treatment and control treatment during wet and dry season.

Lachemilla hirta						Lachemilla hispidula
Wet season			Dry season			Wet season
Flowers analyzed	Number of seeds	Total seeds	Flowers analyzed	Number of seeds	Total seeds	Flowers analyzed	Number of seeds	Total seeds
Mesh bag treatment
130	0	0	54	0	0	61	1	61
119	1	119	44	1	44	114	2	228
59	2	118	25	2	50	37	3	111
7	3	21	5	3	15	1	4	4
Total seeds obtained		258	Total seeds obtained		109	Total seeds obtained		404
Control treatment
151	0	0	62	0	0	29	1	29
110	1	110	47	1	47	98	2	196
43	2	86	13	2	26	80	3	240
10	3	30	6	3	18	6	4	24
Total seeds obtained		226	Total seeds obtained		91	Total seeds obtained		489

Table 2. Average fruit formation and comparison of fruit formation between treatments.

	Lachemilla hirta				Lachemilla hispidula
Season	Wet season		Dry season		Wet season
Treatment	Mesh bag	Control	Mesh bag	Control	Mesh bag	Control
Average formation of fruits	0,82	0,72	0,85	0,71	1,90	2,30
P value	p > 0,05		p > 0,05		p < 0,01

Two hundred and thirteen flowers extracted from the mesh bags and control treatments were analyzed in Lachemilla hispidula. Each flower produced between 1–4 fruits (achenes), with an average fruit formation of 1.90 for the mesh bag treatment, and of 2.30 for the control treatment. The Mann–Whitney test determined that there were highly significant differences in fruit formation between treatments (p < 0.01) (Tables 1 and 2). The seeds of L. hispidula used in the study correspond only to the wet season due to the difficulties of preserving the treatments intact from the livestock and human activity. Flowers with no fruits were not registered (Table 1)

Visitors, parasitoids and hyperparasitoids

Twenty-one collections (the term collection refers to all the insects that were collected in 1 day) were made, 12 corresponding to Lachemilla hirta and 9 to L. hispidula (Table 3). The insects were classified, by bibliography, as visitors (predators, detritivores, herbivores, flower visitors), parasitoids and hyperparasitoids in order to determine their functional role with the plants studied (Tables 3 and 4) [33,34].

Table 3. List of the total of arthropods collected in L. hirta and L. hispidula.

Lachemilla hirta					Lachemilla hispidula
Collection	Order	Family	Subfamily	Individuals	Collection	Order	Family	Subfamily	Individuals
1	Acari^a			5	1	Acari^a			3
	Collembola^a	Hypogastruridae		1		Coleoptera^a	Lycidae		1
	Diptera^F	Fanniidae		1		Diptera^F	Fanniidae		3
		Sciaridae		2			Mycetophilidae		1
	Hemiptera^a	Cicadellidae		1			Sciaridae		3
2	Acari^a			23	2	Acari^a			3
	Araneae^a			4		Araneae^a			4
	Blattodea^a			1		Collembola^a	Isotomidae		43
	Diptera^F	Sciaridae		1		Diplopoda^a			1
		Sp.		1		Diptera^F	Megaspilidae		2
	Hemiptera (larvae)^a			1			Empididae		1
	Hymenoptera^F	Ichneumonidae	Brachycyrtinae	1			Phoridae		1
		Mymaridae		1			Scatophagidae		1
	Isopoda^a			2		Hymenoptera^F	Ceraphronidae		5
	Orthoptera^a			1	3	Acari^a			9
	Thysanoptera^a			1		Araneae^a			1
	Trichoptera^a			1		Coleoptera (larvae)^F			2
3	Acari^a			4		Collembola^a	Isotomidae		31
	Diptera^F	Scatopsidae		17		Diptera^F	Sciaridae		3
4	Acari^a			2		Hemiptera^a	Cicadellidae		1
	Diptera^F	Cecidomyiidae		5			Sp.		1
		Scatopsidae		29		Orthoptera^a			1
		Sciaridae		7
	Hymenoptera^F	Braconidae		1	4	Diptera^F	Tipulidae		1
		Ceraphronidae		1			Chironomidae		2
		Diapriidae	Belytinae	1			Scatopsidae		66
		Platygastridae		1	5	Diptera^F	Fanniidae		1
	Lepidoptera^F			1			Scatophagidae		1
5	Diptera^F	Mycetophilidae		3			Sciaridae		4
		Sciaridae		3		Hymenoptera^F	Figitidae	Eucoilinae	2
6	Diptera^F	Mycetophilidae		2			Ichneumonidae	Tryphoninae	1
		Phoridae		1			Mymaridae		1
		Sarcophagidae		1	6	Diptera^F	Scatopsidae		24
		Sciaridae		11	7	Diptera^F	Chironomidae		1
		Ulididae		1			Scatopsidae		56
	Lepidoptera^F			1			Sciaridae		6
7	Diptera^F	Drosophilidae		1		Lepidoptera^F			1
		Fanniidae		3	8	Diptera^F	Scatopsidae		27
		Mycetophilidae		1			Sciaridae		2
8	Acari^a			3	9	Diptera^F			5
	Diptera^F	Dolichopodidae		1
		Fanniidae		20
		Mycetophilidae		5
		Phoridae		4
		Sciaridae		9
	Hymenoptera^F	Braconidae		2
		Ceraphronidae		1
		Diapriidae	Belytinae	4
		Eulophidae		5
		Figitidae	Eucoilinae	4
		Megaspilidae		1
	Lepidoptera^F			1
9	Diptera^F	Phoridae		1
		Sciaridae		5
	Hymenoptera^F	Mymaridae		1
		Platygastridae		1
		Sp.		1
	Neuroptera^F			1
10	Diptera^F	Mycetophilidae		1
	Hymenoptera^F	Diapriidae	Belytinae	1
		Figitidae	Eucoilinae	2
11	Diptera^F	Scatopsidae		12
	Hymenoptera^F	Megaspilidae		1
12	Araneae^a			1
	Diptera^F	Scatopsidae		46
		Sciaridae		4
	Hymenoptera^F	Braconidae	Microgastrinae	1
		Diapriidae	Belytinae	1
		Formicidae		1
		Megaspilidae		1
		Mymaridae		1
		Pteromalidae		1
	Lepidoptera^F			2
Total insects collected				291	Total insects collected				322

^aarthropods collected anywhere in the plant, except the flowers, ^Finsects collected in the flowers

Table 4. List of visitors with its possible parasitoids and hyperparasitoids found in Lachemilla hirta and L. hispidula.

Lachemilla hirta			Lachemilla hispidula
Visitors	Parasitoids *	Hyperparasitoids *	Visitors	Parasitoids *	Hyperparasitoids *
Acari			Acari
Araneae	Eulophidae		Araneae
	Pteromalidae		Diplopoda
Isopoda			Collembola
Collembola			Isotomidae
Hypogastruridae			Orthoptera	Mymaridae
Orthoptera	Eulophidae		Hemiptera
	Mymaridae		Cicadellidae	Mymaridae
Blattodea	Eulophidae		Coleoptera	Megaspilidae
Hemiptera	Eulophidae		Coleoptera (larva)	Mymaridae
Cicadellidae	Ceraphronidae		Lycidae	Mymaridae
	Mymaridae		Lepidoptera	Tryphoninae^e
Larva	Ceraphronidae		Diptera
Thysanoptera	Ceraphronidae		Chironomidae
	Eulophidae		Empididae
Coleoptera	Ceraphronidae		Fanniidae
	Eulophidae		Mycetophilidae
	Mymaridae		Phoridae	Eucoilinae	Megaspilidae
	Pteromalidae		Scatophagidae
Neuroptera (larva)	Ceraphronidae		Scatopsidae
	Eulophidae		Sciaridae	Ceraphronidae
	Brachycyrtinae^a	Ceraphronidae	Tipulidae
	Pteromalidae
Trichoptera	Ceraphronidae
Lepidoptera	Microgastrinae^b	Ceraphronidae
		Megaspilidae
	Eulophidae
	Pteromalidae
Diptera
Cecidomyiidae	Braconidae	Ceraphronidae
		Megaspilidae
	Ceraphronidae
	Eulophidae
	Platygastridae
	Pteromalidae
Dolichopodidae
Drosophilidae	Ceraphronidae
	Eucoilinae^c	Megaspilidae
Fanniidae
Mycetophilidae	Belytinae^d
Phoridae	Braconidae	Ceraphronidae
		Megaspilidae
	Ceraphronidae
	Eucoilinae	Megaspilidae
Scatopsidae
Sarcophagidae	Braconidae	Ceraphronidae
		Megaspilidae
	Eucoilinae	Megaspilidae
Sciaridae	Ceraphronidae
	Belytinae
Ulididae

*All parasitoids and hyperparasitoids correspond to Hymenoptera. Families: ^aIchneumonidae, ^bBraconidae, ^cFigitidae, ^dDiapriidae and ^eFigitidae

As flowers visitors, Diptera was the predominant order in the collections of Lachemilla hirta (68% of all insects) and L. hispidula (65% of all insects), followed by Hymenoptera (Table 3). Scatopsidae and Sciaridae were always found in greater proportions than other fly families collected (Table 3). Scatopsidae forms large groups on flowers during the dry season; however, they have a passive behavior (Figure 1). Conversely, Sciaridae has an active behavior and is found throughout the year. Insects from both families were observed sucking the floral discs of the flowers when these presented a green color in Lachemilla hirta; or green with pink, in L. hispidula. The flowers that turned red were evaded by insects.

Figure 1. Scatopsidae in Lachemilla hirta flowers (above) and in L. hispidula (below).

Less abundance and lower entomofauna activity was recorded throughout the investigation in Lachemilla hispidula except for Scatopsidae which was always found in large numbers (Table 3).

Thirteen pollen plates from Lachemilla hispidula and eight from L. hirta were obtained; additionally, pollen from other plant families was also found occasionally (it was not measured) among which were Bromeliaceae (Puya sp.), Poaceae and the Moraceae/Urticaceae complex.

Apomixis

All 28 successfully analyzed Lachemilla hirta seeds extracted from the wax paper bag, mesh bag and control treatments contained diploid embryos (i.e. exhibiting 2C DNA content similar to that of the mother plant) (Table 5). Of the 26 seeds in which the ploidy of both embryo and endosperm were determined, 23 exhibited mean endosperm: embryo ratio of 1.98, consistent with autonomous apomixis (i.e. 4n:2n) (Figure 2(a)). Additionally, three seeds exhibited embryo: endosperm ratio of 2.91 which is closest to a scenario of pseudogamy involving pollination by unreduced pollen grain (i.e. 6n:2n) (Figure 2(b)). The Lachemilla hispidula sample comprised 39 diploid embryos (i.e. with genome size corresponding to that of the mother plant), while three seeds had putative triploid embryo with on average 1.47-fold larger DNA content (Figure 3(b)). The 15 successfully analyzed samples in which also endosperm was detected consistently showed and endosperm: embryo ratio of on average 2.03, suggesting that autonomous apomixis is the predominant mode of reproduction also in L. hispidula (Table 5, Figure 3(a)). In sum, seeds of both Lachemilla species analyzed were of apomictic origin, 92% of L. hirta and all L. hispidula seeds originated by autonomous apomixis. Eight percent of the seeds were originated by pseudogamous apomixis, possibly due to wind or insect activity.

Table 5. Flow cytometric seed screen of the achenes of the investigated Lachemilla species.

Species	Lachemilla hirta	Lachemilla hispidula
N of analyzed individuals^a	28/26	42/15
Diploid embryos^b	28/0.23 ± 0.021	39/0.17 ± 0.005
Triploid embryos^b	-	3/0.25 ± 0.002
Autonomous apomixis^c	23/1.98 ± 0.08	15/2.03 ± 0.11
Pseudogamy^c	3/2.91 ± 0.08	-

^aN of samples in which only embryo/both embryo and endosperm were detected

^bN of individuals/mean value ± SD of the embryo: Pisum ratio

^cN of individuals/mean value ± SD of the endosperm: embryo ratio

Figure 2. (a) Histogram of autonomous apomixis in Lachemilla hirta. The first peak corresponds to the embryo 2x while the second peak corresponds to the endosperm 4x. The third peak corresponds to the standard sample (Pisum sativum). (b) Histogram of pseudogamous apomixis in L. hirta. The first peak corresponds to the embryo 2x while the second peak corresponds to the endosperm 6x. The third peak corresponds to the standard sample (Pisum sativum).

Figure 3. (a) Histogram of autonomous apomixis in Lachemilla hispidula. The first peak corresponds to the embryo 2x while the second peak corresponds to the endosperm 4x. The third peak corresponds to the standard sample (Pisum sativum). (b) Histogram of triploid embryos in L. hispidula. The first peak corresponds to the embryo 3x while the second peak corresponds to the standard sample (Pisum sativum).

Discussion

Pollination

Fruit formation

The treatments determine the type of pollination present in a plant; that is, if there is fruit production in the mesh bag then it is assumed that plants are pollinated by the wind. However, if there is fruit formation in the control treatment it would mean that plants are pollinated by animals [30,31,45]. Lachemilla hirta presented no significant differences in fruit production when compared to the control treatment, during both wet and dry season. As for L. hispidula, highly significant differences between treatments were obtained, with more fruit production found in the control when compared to the mesh bags. There was always fruit formation in the results obtained, both in the mesh bags and in the control treatment; therefore, and according to the results from the FCSS (Figures 2 and 3), it is suggested that both species are apomictic.

Scarce formation of fruits, a high frequency of flowers that did not produce fruit and the existence of undeveloped fruits was evidenced in Lachemilla hirta (Table 1). The formation of fruits and seeds depends on several factors including: the number of female flowers and ovules present, the amount of pollinated flowers and fertilized ovules, predation of fruits and seeds, abiotic factors such as climate, and the ability of the parent plants to provide the necessary resources for the development of the fruits and seeds [46]. When a damaged and/or an unfeasible fruit is formed it is aborted as it is unnecessary to invest in fruits that contain nonviable seed, and thus initiates the formation of new fruits if available resources are sufficient [46].

Visitors, parasitoids and hyperparasitoids

Although Diptera was the predominant order in the collections, with 67% of all the individuals collected from both species, the composition of the genera within each order vary due to their genera-specific nutritional and shelter requirements and due to changes in the composition of the flora [47]. Changes in other abiotic factors such as in the water can also modify the entomofauna. For instance, Chironomidae (Diptera) was only collected from Lachemilla hispidula as there was a lake nearby and necessary for it to complete its life cycle (Tables 3 and 4) [33,45].

The functional role of each group of insects was determined based on bibliography and field observations, where detritivores (Acari and Collembola,), flower visiting insects (Diptera, Lepidoptera), herbivorous insects (Diptera larvae and Coleoptera), predatory Arthropods (Araneae and Neuroptera), parasitoids and hyperparasitoids coexist with the studied plants (Tables 3 and 4). Diptera, the most abundant order of the study area, corresponds to the second largest group of visitors and pollinators worldwide following Hymenoptera [48–51] (Table 3). Furthermore, Diptera is the main group of visitors and pollinators at high altitudes and latitudes due to its greater plasticity for adaptation to harsh weather conditions (e.g. low temperature, heavy rainfall and strong winds), less dependence on floral rewards, and longer foraging time as they do not feed progeny unlike Hymenoptera [15,23,48,51,52]. Because, they do not pollinate Lachemilla hirta and L. hispidula, their importance lies in that they are the main source of food for many predators and parasitoids present in these plant species [33,34,48].

Insects usually visit flowers for two reasons: the first, is related to food as nectar and pollen provide them with energy and proteins respectively; secondly, because it is an excellent place for reproduction, oviposition and for protection from harsh weather and predators [49,51,53]. Although no nectar was found in neither Lachemilla hirta nor L. hispidula, information on its brother genus, Alchemilla vulgaris, demonstrates that Muscidae feed on its nectar [15]; the main Diptera that visit Lachemilla, Scatopsidae and Sciaridae are nectarivores [49].

The insects collected from Lachemilla hirta were constantly found perched on green flowers; the flowers were green with pink in the case of L. hispidula (Figure 1). In a study on butterflies, the changing of flower color was associated with guiding the pollinators to flowers that were not pollinated, red being the color of evasion [50].

Pollen from Bromeliaceae (Puya sp.), Poaceae and the Moraceae/Urticaceae complex were also found scarcely (not measure) on the pollen plates. This is corroborated by direct observation of Scatopsidae specimens foraging other plant species.

Apomixis

The FCSS applied to Lachemilla hirta and L. hispidula indicated that these species are mostly autonomous apomictic (Figures 2(a) and 3(a)). In addition, three seeds of L. hirta were likely apomictic with fertilization of the endosperm by an unreduced sperm cell (i.e. originated by pseudogamy) (Figure 2(b)). Autonomous apomictic seeds presented a 2n peak for the embryo and a 4n peak for the endosperm (i.e. the observed ratio of the two peaks was ~2) (Table 5, Figures 2(a) and 3(a)). These values suggest that an unreduced female gamete was solely involved in the formation of the embryo (2n) while two unreduced central embryo sac nuclei merged (2n+ 2n = 4n) during formation of the endosperm. No male cell intervention was required in the formation of these apomictic seeds [16,19,23,54]. A similar autonomous apomictic mechanism has also been registered in the sister genus, Alchemilla [4,16], to our knowledge our result is the first case of such reproductive system in the New World genus Lachemilla.

In the three cases of pseudogamy, 2n peaks were determined for the embryo and 6n for the endosperm (Figure 2(b)). The formation of the embryo is equally parthenogenetic; however, the endosperm is formed by merger of the two unreduced nuclear cells (2n+ 2n = 4n) plus an unreduced sperm cell (2n). In other words, the endosperm must be fertilized [16,19,39,54]. These pseudogamous events were only reported for Lachemilla hirta seeds, and were present in mesh bags and control treatments, which could indicate accidental activity by insect visitors or by wind. Such presence of both autonomous apomixis and pseudogamy within the same species was previously documented from European flora (e.g. [22]). The FCSS also confirmed the presence of three triploid (2n = 3x) embryos in Lachemilla hispidula (Figure 3(b)).

A chromosome count study performed in the Alchemillinae clade determined that its base number is x = 8 and that polyploidy and alloploiploidy are common events within it [55,56]. Lachemilla is a genus mostly polyploid (with the exception of L. mandoniana x = 16), and within the species selected for this study only L. hispidula has chromosome count data 2n = 24 (3x) and 2n = 32 (4x) [55,56]. According to Sharbel and Mitchell-Olds [57], there are two theories for the association of polyploidy with apomictic species: one of which is that polyploidy is a requirement for apomixis because this way certain genes related to this reproductive mechanism can be transmitted more easily; or that polyploidy is non-essential for apomixis, but simply selected more easily in polyploid organisms than in diploid. Richards [18], on the other hand, explains that polyploidy is a consequence of apomixis, and arises due to the absence of gene recombination; thus, the occurrence of hybrids is also favorable. Diploidy in apomixis favors the accumulation of disadvantageous mutations, for this reason, it is rare to find apomictic diploid plants. Some genera may contain species with different ploidy levels, and often vary geographically in their reproductive mechanisms [56].

Triploid plants are unlikely to produce stable triploid seed through normal sexual mechanisms as genetically unbalanced gametes are formed; therefore, apomixis is the only viable mechanism for reproduction in these cases [56–58]. Triploid organisms play an important role in the formation of polyploidy [58].

With this article we propose a baseline research about the reproductive biology of one population of Lachemilla hirta and one of L. hispidula in the páramo of Oyacachi, there are still many other questions to answer and other methodologies to be use to understand with clarity all the reproductive and ecological aspects of this genus. What happens with other populations of Lachemilla hirta and L. hispidula in the páramos of Oyacachi? In other locations? Is the apomixis present for the entire Lachemilla genus? Is the pollination necessary for the formation of pseudogamous seeds (from which they came), self-fertilization, wind and insects? What is the complete network of interactions of the insects found with the plants studied?

Acknowledgments

We thank Andrea Villota for her help in the development and identification of pollen plates, Julio Sánchez for his advice in the statistical design, Diego Morales for his advice and comments, Petr Sklenář for his upholder on the project and the Ministry of Environment of Ecuador for the research permit MAE No. 03-2012-IC-FLO-CPAR-MA.

Associate Editor: Luis D Llambi

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador under the “Molecular phylogeny and reproductive biology of two Andean genera” project COD: I13062 and by the Czech Science Foundation under project 17-12420S