163
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Evaluating riverine hydrokinetic turbine operations relative to the spatial ecology of wild fishes

, , , , , & show all
Pages 53-67 | Received 27 May 2016, Accepted 21 Jan 2017, Published online: 06 Mar 2017
 

ABSTRACT

Hydrokinetic turbines (HTs) are being proposed for placement in riverine landscapes around the globe. Here, we implanted 40 adult lake sturgeon and 40 adult walleye with acoustic telemetry transmitters to monitor their lateral and vertical space use at the Canadian Hydrokinetic Turbine Testing Centre (CHTTC) located in the Seven Sisters Generating station (GS) tailrace on the Winnipeg River, Manitoba. Specifically, we tested whether fish behaviour was influenced by the operation of HTs relative to control periods, and estimate the threat of HTs towards lake sturgeon and walleye across seasons. The behaviour and habitat use of both species was not influenced by HT operations. Greater numbers of walleye were present when the discharge rate was ≥ 950 m3s–1, which is ≥ 77 m3s–1 greater than the average discharge rate (873 m3s–1) measured during the study period. Given the patterns of seasonal residency, movement, and depth use, lake sturgeon appeared more prone to interacting with HTs during spring and early summer months (i.e. May and June), whereas risk to walleye would be highest throughout the summer and autumn months. In the vicinity of the acoustic receivers, available habitat (areas with large boulders, and transitions between swift flow in the channel and slacker water near the shoreline) was used significantly more often by walleye than lake sturgeon. Lake sturgeon utilized similar depths where HTs would be installed (i.e. ≥ 6.5 m), while walleye commonly occupied shallower depths at the HT testing centre making the former more susceptible to interactions with substrate-HT's. Collectively, these are some of the first field-based results on fish behaviour and ecology while a riverine-HT is in operation. The findings present useful information to help guide best practices for commercial scale HT operations within river systems where lake sturgeon and walleye reside.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge B. Gardner, D. Leroux and A. Hossein Birjandi for their assistance in the field. S.J. Cooke and E. Bibeau are supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Canadian Research Chairs Program. D.P. Struthers received a scholarship in support of this project from Fish Futures Inc.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Funding

This work was supported by the Canadian Hydrokinetic Turbine Testing Centre of the University of Manitoba.

Log in via your institution

Log in to Taylor & Francis Online

PDF download + Online access

  • 48 hours access to article PDF & online version
  • Article PDF can be downloaded
  • Article PDF can be printed
USD 61.00 Add to cart

Issue Purchase

  • 30 days online access to complete issue
  • Article PDFs can be downloaded
  • Article PDFs can be printed
USD 221.00 Add to cart

* Local tax will be added as applicable

Related Research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.