163
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Evaluating riverine hydrokinetic turbine operations relative to the spatial ecology of wild fishes

, , , , , & show all
Pages 53-67 | Received 27 May 2016, Accepted 21 Jan 2017, Published online: 06 Mar 2017

References

  • Auer NA. 1996. Importance of habitat and migration to sturgeons with emphasis on lake sturgeon. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 53:152–160.
  • Barton K. 2014. MuMIn: Multi-model inference. R package version 1.12.1. Available from: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn
  • Bolker BM, Yu-Sung S. 2011. coefplot2: coefficient plots. R package version 0.1.3.2.
  • Bolker BM, Brooks ME, Clark CJ, Geange SW, Poulsen JR, Stevens MHH, White JSS. 2009. Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol. 24:127–135.
  • Bozek MA, Haxton TJ, Raabe JK. 2011. Chapter 5: walleye and sauger. In Barton BA, editor. Habitat, biology, management, and culture of walleye and sauger. Bethesda (MD): American Fisheries Society; p. 133–199.
  • Bruch RM, Binkowski FP. 2002. Spawning behaviour of lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens). J Appl Ichthyol 18:570–579.
  • Cada GF, Loar J, Garrison L, Fisher R, Neitzel D. 2006. Efforts to reduce mortality to hydroelectric turbine-passed fish: locating and quantifying damaging shear stresses. Environ Manage. 27:898–906.
  • Cada GF, Ahlgrimm J, Bahleda M, Bigford T, Stavrakas S, Hall D, Moursund R, Sale M. 2007. Potential impacts of hydrokinetic and wave energy conversion technologies on aquatic environments. Fisheries 32:174–181.
  • Cada GF, Bevelhimer MS. 2011. Attraction to and avoidance of instream hydrokinetic turbines by freshwater aquatic organisms (No. ORNL/TM-2011/131). Oak Ridge (TN): Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL).
  • Cada GF, Bevelhimer MS, Riemer KP, Turner JW. 2011. Effects on freshwater organisms of magnetic fields associated with hydrokinetic turbines. ORNL/TM-2011/244. Oak Ridge (TN): Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
  • Castro-Santos T, Haro A. 2015. Survival and behavioral effects of exposure to a hydrokinetic turbine on juvenile Atlantic salmon and adult American shad. Estuaries and Coasts. 38:203–214.
  • Cooke SJ, Hinch SG, Lucas MC, Lutcavage M. 2012. Biotelemetry and biologging. In Zale AV, Parrish DL, Sutton TM, editors. Fisheries techniques, Volume 3. Bethesda (MD): American Fisheries Society; p. 819–881.
  • Cooke SJ, Hinch SG, Wikelski M, Andrews RD, Kuchel LJ, Wolcott TG, Butler PJ. 2004. Biotelemetry: a mechanistic approach to ecology. Trends Ecol Evol. 19:334–343.
  • Cooke SJ, Thorstad EB. 2012. Is radio telemetry getting washed downstream? The changing role of radio telemetry in studies of freshwater fish relative to other tagging and telemetry technology. In Advances in Fish Tagging and Marking Technology. Am Fish Soc Symp 76:349–369.
  • Cooke SJ, Woodley CM, Eppard MB, Brown RS, Nielsen JL. 2011. Advancing the surgical implantation of electronic tags in fish: a gap analysis and research agenda based on a review of trends in intracoelomic tagging effects studies. Rev Fish Biol and Fish. 21:127–151.
  • COSEWIC (Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada). 2006. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the lake sturgeon Acipenser fulvescens in Canada. Ottawa: Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada.
  • Craig JF. 2000. Percid fishes: systematics, ecology and exploitation. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
  • DiStefano RJ, Hiebert JF. 2000. Distribution and movement of walleye in reservoir tailwaters during spawning season. J Fresh Ecol. 15:145–155.
  • Einfalt LM, Grace EJ, Wahl DH. 2012. Effects of simulated light intensity, habitat complexity and forage type on predator–prey interactions in walleye Sander vitreus. Ecol Fresh Fish. 21:560–569.
  • EPRI (Electric Power Research Institute). 2011b. Evaluation of fish injury and mortality associated with hydrokinetic turbines. . Report no. 1024569. Palo Alto (CA): EPRI.
  • Fetherman ER, Lepak JM, Harris DJ. 2015. Optimizing triploid walleye production in Colorado. Fort Collins (CO): Colorado Parks and Wildlife Services, Department of Natural Resources.
  • Forsythe PS, Scribner KT, Crossman JA, Ragavendran A, Baker EA, Davis C, Smith KK. 2012. Environmental and lunar cues are predictive of the timing of river entry and spawning-site arrival in lake sturgeon Acipenser fulvescens. J Fish Biol. 81:35–53.
  • Gallepp GW, Magnuson JJ. 1972. Effects of negative buoyancy on the behavior of the bluegill, Lepomis macrochirus Rafinesque. T Am Fish Soc. 101:507–512.
  • Gowans ARD, Armstrong JD, Priede IG. 1999. Movements of adult Atlantic salmon in relation to a hydroelectric dam and fish ladder. J Fish Biol. 54:713–726.
  • Hammar L, Andersson S, Eggertsen L, Haglund J, Gullstrom M, Ehnberg J, Molander S. 2013. Hydrokinetic turbine effects on fish swimming behaviour. PLoS One. 8:0084141.
  • Hart DD, Johnson TE, Bushaw-Newton KL, Horwitz RJ, Bednarek AT, Charles D, Velinsky DJ. 2002. Dam removal: challenges and opportunities for ecological research and river restoration. BioScience 52:669–682.
  • Holt CS, Grant GD, Oberstar GP, Oakes CC, Bradt DW. 1977. Movement of walleye, Stizostedion vitreum, in Lake Bemidji, Minnesota as determined by radio-biotelemetry. T Am Fish Soc. 106:163–169.
  • Houston JJ. 1987. Status of the lake sturgeon, Acipenser fulvescens, in Canada. Can Field Nat. 101:171–185.
  • Hrenchuk CL. 2009. Influences of water velocity and hydropower operations on spawning site choice and recruitment success of lake sturgeon, Acipenser fulvescens, in the Winnipeg River [MSc Thesis]. Winnipeg, MB (Canada): The University of Winnipeg; p. 153.
  • Hussey NE, Kessel ST, Aarestrup K, Cooke SJ, Cowley PD, Fisk AT, Harcourt RG. 2015. Aquatic animal telemetry: a panoramic window into the underwater world. Science. 348:1255642.
  • Kessel ST, Cooke SJ, Heupel MR, Hussey NE, Simpfendorfer CA, Vagle S, Fisk AT. 2013. A review of detection range testing in aquatic passive acoustic telemetry studies. Rev Fish Biol Fish. 24:199–218.
  • Linkov I, Satterstrom FK, Kiker G, Batchelor C, Bridges T, Ferguson E. 2006. From comparative risk assessment to multi-criteria decision analysis and adaptive management: recent developments and applications. Environ Int. 32:1072–1093.
  • Liu Y, Packey DJ. 2014. Combined-cycle hydropower systems – the potential of applying hydrokinetic turbines in the tailwaters of existing conventional hydropower stations. Renew Energ. 66:228–231.
  • Loures RC, Pompeu PS. 2015. Seasonal and diel changes in fish distribution in a tropical hydropower plant tailrace: evidence from hydroacoustic and gillnet sampling. Fisheries Manag Ecol. 22:185–196.
  • Lusseau D. 2005. Residency pattern of bottlenose dolphins Tursiops spp. in Milford Sound, New Zealand, is related to boat traffic. Mar Ecol Prog Series. 295:265–272.
  • Mazerolle MJ. 2015. AICcmodavg: Model selection and multimodel inference based on (Q)AIC(c). R package version 2.0-3. Available from: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=AICcmodavg
  • McConville DR, Fossum JD. 1981. Movement patterns of walleye (Stizostedion v. vitreum) in Pool 3 of the upper Mississippi River as determined by ultrasonic telemetry. J Freshwater Ecol. 1:279–285.
  • Murchie KJ, Smokorowski KE. 2004. Relative activity of brook trout and walleyes in response to flow in a regulated river. N Am J Fish Mana. 24:1050–1057.
  • NAI (Normandeau Associates, Inc.). 2009. An estimation of survival and injury of fish passed through the Hydro Green Energy hydrokinetic system, and a characterization of fish entrainment potential at the Mississippi Lock and Dam No. 2 Hydroelectric Project (P- 4306), Hastings, Minnesota. Prepared for Hydro Green Energy LLC. Houston (TX); p. 82.
  • Paragamian VL. 1989. Seasonal habitat use by walleye in a warmwater river system, as determined by radiotelemetry. N Am J Fish Mana. 9:392–401.
  • Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Core Team. 2015. nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-122. Available from: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme
  • Pincock DG. 2011. False detections: what they are and how to remove them from detection data. Document#: DOC-004691 version 02 April 13, 2011. Amirix Systems Inc. Available from: http://www.vemco.com/pdf/false_detections.pdf ( February 3, 2012).
  • Peterson DL, Vecsei P, Jennings CA. 2007. Ecology and biology of the lake sturgeon: a synthesis of current knowledge of a threatened North American Acipenseridae. Rev Fish Biol Fisher. 17:59–76.
  • Post JR, Sullivan M, Cox S, Lester NP, Walters CJ, Parkinson EA, Paul AJ, Jackson L, Shuter BJ. 2002. Canada's recreational fisheries: the invisible collapse? Fisheries. 27:6–17.
  • Prophet CW, Brungardt TB, Prophet NK. 1989. Diel behavior and seasonal distribution of walleye, Stizostedion vitreum Mitchill, in Marion Reservoir, based on ultrasonic telemetry. J Freshwater Ecol. 5:177–185.
  • R Core Team. 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. Available from: http://www.R-project.org/
  • Reubens JT, Pasotti F, Degraer S, Vincx M. 2013. Residency, site fidelity and habitat use of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) at an offshore wind farm using acoustic telemetry. Marine Environ Res. 90:128–135.
  • Rogers KB, White GS. 2007. Analysis of movement and habitat use. In telemetry data analysis and interpretation of freshwater fisheries data. Bethesda (MD): American Fisheries Society; p. 625–676.
  • Ross MJ, McCormick JH. 1981. Effects of external radio transmitters on fish. Prog Fish-Culturist. 43:67–72.
  • Ryder RA. 1977. Effects of ambient light variations on behavior of yearling, subadult, and adult walleyes (Stizostedion vitreum vitreum). J Fish Res Board Can. 34:1481–1491.
  • Schilt CR. 2007. Developing fish passage and protection at hydropower dams. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 104:295–325.
  • Schroepfer RL, Szedlmayer ST. 2006. Estimates of residence and site fidelity for red snapper Lutjanus campechanus on artificial reefs in the northeastern Gulf of Mexico. Bull Mar Sci 78:93–101.
  • Schupp DH. 1972. The walleye fishery of Leech Lake. Minnesota: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Division of Game and Fish, Section of Fisheries.
  • Schweizer PE, Cada GF, Bevelhimer MS. 2011. Estimation of the risks of collision or strike to freshwater aquatic organisms resulting from operation of instream hydrokinetic turbines. FY 2010 Annual Progress Report. Prepared for the Wind and Water Power Program. Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Energy; p. 39.
  • Scott WB, Crossman EJ. 1973. Freshwater fishes of Canada. Ottawa (ON): Fisheries Research Board of Canada; pp. 185.
  • Seitz AC, Moerlein K, Evans MD, Rosenberger AE. 2011. Ecology of fishes in a high-latitude, turbid river with implications for the impacts of hydrokinetic devices. Rev Fish Biol Fish. 21:481–496.
  • Skalski JR, Townsend R, Lady J, Giorgi AE, Stevenson JR, McDonald RD. 2002. Estimating route-specific passage and survival probabilities at a hydroelectric project from smolt radiotelemetry studies. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 59:1385–1393.
  • Smokorowski KE, Pratt TC. 2007. Effect of a change in physical structure and cover on fish and fish habitat in freshwater ecosystems – a review and meta-analysis. Env Rev. 15:5–41.
  • Summerfelt RC, Smith LS. 1990. Anesthesia, surgery and related techniques. In Schreck CB, Moyle PB, editors. Methods for fish biology. Bethesda (MD): American Fisheries Society; p. 213–272.
  • Suzuki FM, Dunham JB, Silva LGM, Alves CBM, Pompeu PS. 2016. Factors influencing movements of two migratory fishes within the tailrace of a large neotropical dam and their implications for hydropower impacts. River Res Appl. DOI: 10.1002/rra.3105
  • Symonds MR, Moussalli A. 2011. A brief guide to model selection, multi-model inference and model averaging in behavioural ecology using akaike's information criterion. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 65:13–21.
  • Thorstad EB, Økland F, Rowsell D, McKinley RS. 2000. A system for automatic recording of fish tagged with coded acoustic transmitters. Fish Manage Ecol. 7:281–294.
  • Thorstad EB, Rikardsen AH, Alp A, Økland F. 2013. The use of electronic tags in fish research–an overview of fish telemetry methods. Turk J Fish Aqua Sci. 13:881–896.
  • USDOE (United States Department of Energy). 2009. Report to Congress on the potential environmental effects of marine and hydrokinetic energy technologies. Washington (DC): UDDOE; p. 633.
  • Vandergoot CS, Murchie KJ, Cooke SJ, Dettmers JM, Bergstedt RA, Fielder DG. 2011. Evaluation of two forms of electroanesthesia and carbon dioxide for short-term anesthesia in walleye. N Am J Fish Manage. 31:914–922.
  • VanZwieten J, McAnally W, Ahmad J, Davis T, Martin J, Bevelhimer M, Cribbs A, Lippert R, Hudon T, Trudeau M. 2014. In-stream hydrokinetic power: review and appraisal. J Energy Eng. 141:04014024.
  • Viehman HA, Zydlewski GB. 2015. Fish interactions with a commercial-scale tidal energy device in the natural environment. Estuaries Coasts. 38:241–252.
  • Webber D. 2009. VEMCO acoustic telemetry new user guide. Halifax: Vemco.
  • Wilson JA, McKinley RS. 2004. Distribution, habitat, and movements. In LeBreton GTO, Beamish FWH, McKinley RS, editors. Sturgeons and paddlefish of North America. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; p. 40–72.
  • Yuce MI, Muratoglu A. 2015. Hydrokinetic energy conversion systems: a technology status review. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 43:72–82.
  • Zorn TG. 2015. Contribution of hatchery-reared walleyes to populations in Northern Green Bay, Lake Michigan. N Am J Aquacult. 77:409–422.
  • Zuur A, Ieno EN, Walker N, Saveliev AA, Smith GM. 2009. Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. New York (NY): Springer Science & Business Media.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.