Abstract
This study assessed the score reliability of the Drinking Motives Questionnaire–Revised (DMQ-R) via generalizability theory. Participants (n = 367 college students) completed the DMQ-R at three time points. Across subscale scores, persons, persons × occasions, and persons × items interactions accounted for meaningful variance. Findings illustrate advantages of generalizability theory–based techniques.
Notes
Declaration of Conflicting Interests The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/orPUBLICation of this article.
Funding The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/orPUBLICation of this article: This research project was in part supported by National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Grant # U18AA015039.
Additional information
Notes on contributors
Brooke J. Arterberry
Brooke J. Arterberry is a graduate student in the Counseling Psychology program at the University of Missouri. Her primary research interests include addictive behaviors, interventions, and psychometrics.
Matthew P. Martens
Matthew P. Martens is an Associate Professor in the Counseling Psychology program at the University of Missouri. His primary research interests include addictive behaviors, health psychology, and assessment issues.
Jennifer M. Cadigan
Jennifer M. Cadigan is a graduate student in the Counseling Psychology program at the University of Missouri. Her primary research interests include addictive behaviors and interventions.
Ashley E. Smith
Ashley E. Smith is a graduate student in the Counseling Psychology program at the University of Missouri. Her primary research interests include health psychology and intervention-related issues.