123
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Assessing the Dependability of Drinking Motives via Generalizability Theory

, , &
Pages 292-302 | Published online: 10 Mar 2017

References

  • BrennanR. L. (2001). Generalizability theory. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
  • ChristT. J.Riley-TillmanT. C.ChafouleasS. M.BoiceC. H. (2010). Direct behavior rating (DBR): Generalizability and dependability across raters and observations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 825–843. doi:10.1177/0013164410366695
  • CicchettiD. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284–290. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284
  • CiminiM. D.MartensM. P.LarimerM. E.KilmerJ. R.NeighborsC.MonserratJ. M. (2009). Assessing the effectiveness of peer-facilitated interventions addressing high-risk drinking among judicially mandated college students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 70, 57–66.
  • CooperM. L. (1994). Motivations for alcohol use among adolescents: Development and validation of a four-factor model. Psychological Assessment, 6, 117–128. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.2.117
  • CooperM. L.FroneM. R.RussellM.MudarP. (1995). Drinking to regulate positive and negative emotions: A motivational model of alcohol use. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 990–1005. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.990
  • CooperM. L.KrullJ. L.AgochaV. B.FlanaganM. E.OrcuttH. K.GrabeS.. . . MaudetteJ. (2008). Motivational pathways to alcohol use and abuse among Black and White adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 485–501. doi:10.1037/a0012592
  • CooperM. L.RussellM.SkinnerJ. B.WindleM. (1992). Development and validation of a three-dimensional measure of drinking motives. Psychological Assessment, 4, 123–132. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.2.123
  • CoxW. M.KlingerE. (1988). A motivational model of alcohol use. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97, 168–180. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.97.2.168
  • GrantV. V.StewartS. H.O’ConnorR. M.BlackwellE.ConrodP. J. (2007). Psychometric evaluation of the Five-Factor Modified Drinking Motives Questionnaire–Revised in undergraduates. Addictive Behaviors, 32, 2611–2632. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.07.004
  • HelmsJ. E.HenzeK. T.SassT. L.MifsudV. A. (2006). Treating Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficients as data in counseling research. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 630–660. doi:10.1177/0011000006288308
  • HingsonR. W.ZhaW.WeitzmanE. R. (2009). Magnitude of and trends in alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among U.S. college students ages 18–24, 1998–2005. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, Supplement, 16, 12–20.
  • HoytW. T.MelbyJ. N. (1999). Dependability of measurement in counseling psychology: An introduction to generalizability theory. The Counseling Psychologist, 27, 325–352. doi:10.1177/0011000099273003
  • JohnstonL. D.O’MalleyP. M.BachmanJ. G.SchulenbergJ. E. (2008). Monitoring the Future National Survey results on drug use, 1975–2007: Vol. I, Secondary school students. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
  • KuntscheE.KnibbeR.GmelG.EngelsR. (2005). Why do young people drink? A review of drinking motives. Clinical Psychology Review, 25, 841–861. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2005.06.002
  • KuntscheE.KnibbeR.GmelG.EngelsR. (2006). Who drinks and why? A review of socio-demographic, personality, and contextual issues behind the drinking motives in young people. Addictive Behaviors, 31, 1844–1857. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.12.028
  • MacLeanM. G.LecciL. (2000). A comparison of models of drinking motives in a university sample. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 14, 83–87. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.14.1.83
  • MartensM. P.CoxR. H.BeckN. C.HeppnerP. (2003). Measuring motivations for intercollegiate athlete alcohol use: A confirmatory factor analysis of the Drinking Motives Measure. Psychological Assessment, 15, 235–239. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.15.2.235
  • MartensM. P.RochaT. L.MartinJ. L.SerraoH. F. (2008). Drinking motives and college students: Further examination of a four-factor model. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 55, 289–295. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.55.2.289
  • MushquashC.O’ConnorB. P. (2006). SPSS and SAS programs for generalizability theory analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 542–547. doi:10.3758/BF03192810
  • NewcombM. D.ChouC.BentlerP. M.HubaG. J. (1988). Cognitive motivations for drug use among adolescents: Longitudinal tests of gender differences and predictors of change in drug use. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 35, 426–438. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.35.4.426
  • ShroutP. E.FleissJ. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420–428. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420
  • SimonsJ. S.CorreiaC. J.CareyK. B.BorsariB. E. (1998). Validating a five-factor marijuana motives measure: Relations with use, problems, and alcohol motives. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 265–273. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.45.3.265
  • StewartS. H.ZeitlinS. B.SamolukS. B. (1996). Examination of a three-dimensional drinking motives questionnaire in a young adult university student sample. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 61–71. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(95)00036-W
  • ThompsonR. (2003). Score reliability: Contemporary thinking on reliability issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • VolpeR. J.BrieschA. M.GadowK. D. (2011). The efficiency of behavior rating scales to assess inattentive-overactive and oppositional-defiant behaviors: Applying generalizability theory to streamline assessment. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 131–155. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2010.09.005
  • WebbN. M.ShavelsonR. J.HaertelE. H. (2007). Reliability coefficients and generalizability theory. In RaoC. R.SinharayS. (Eds.), Handbook of statistics: Vol. 26. Psychometrics (pp. 81–124). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
  • WechslerH.LeeJ. E.KuoM.SeibringM.NelsonT. F.LeeH. (2002). Trends in college binge drinking during a period of increased prevention efforts. Journal of American College Health, 50, 203–217.
  • WintersteinB. P.WillseJ. T.KwapilT. R.SilviaP. J. (2010). Assessment of score dependability of the Wisconsin Schizotypy Scales using generalizability analysis. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 32, 575–585. doi:10.1007/s10862-010-9181-x

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.